Bortezomib(Velcade (R))-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (VTD) Is Superior to Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (TD) In Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) Progressing or Relapsing After Autologous Transplantation.

Introduction: The Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (TD) regimen has provided encouraging results in relapsed MM. To improve results, bortezomib (Velcade) has been added to the combination in previous phase II studies, the so called VTD regimen. In January 2006, the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) initiated a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label phase III, multicenter study, comparing VTD (arm A) with TD (arm B) for MM patients progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation. Patients and Methods: Inclusion criteria: patients in first progression or relapse after at least one autologous transplantation, including those who had received bortezomib or thalidomide before transplant. Exclusion criteria: subjects with neuropathy above grade 1 or non secretory MM. Primary study end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included safety, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment was scheduled as follows: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 was given as an i.v bolus on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 followed by a 10-Day rest period (days 12 to 21) for 8 cycles (6 months) and then on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 followed by a 20-Day rest period (days 23 to 42) for 4 cycles (6 months). In both arms, thalidomide was scheduled at 200 mg/Day orally for one year and dexamethasone 40 mg/Day orally four days every three weeks for one year. Patients reaching remission could proceed to a new stem cell harvest. However, transplantation, either autologous or allogeneic, could only be performed in patients who completed the planned one year treatment period. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria, with additional category of near complete remission (nCR). Adverse events were graded by the NCI-CTCAE, Version 3.0.The trial was based on a group sequential design, with 4 planned interim analyses and one final analysis that allowed stopping for efficacy as well as futility. The overall alpha and power were set equal to 0.025 and 0.90 respectively. The test for decision making was based on the comparison in terms of the ratio of the cause-specific hazards of relapse/progression, estimated in a Cox model stratified on the number of previous autologous transplantations. Relapse/progression cumulative incidence was estimated using the proper nonparametric estimator, the comparison was done by the Gray test. PFS and OS probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curves, the comparison was performed by the Log-Rank test. An interim safety analysis was performed when the first hundred patients had been included. The safety committee recommended to continue the trial. Results: As of 1st July 2010, 269 patients had been enrolled in the study, 139 in France (IFM 2005-04 study), 21 in Italy, 38 in Germany, 19 in Switzerland (a SAKK study), 23 in Belgium, 8 in Austria, 8 in the Czech republic, 11 in Hungary, 1 in the UK and 1 in Israel. One hundred and sixty nine patients were males and 100 females; the median age was 61 yrs (range 29-76). One hundred and thirty six patients were randomized to receive VTD and 133 to receive TD. The current analysis is based on 246 patients (124 in arm A, 122 in arm B) included in the second interim analysis, carried out when 134 events were observed. Following this analysis, the trial was stopped because of significant superiority of VTD over TD. The remaining patients were too premature to contribute to the analysis. The number of previous autologous transplants was one in 63 vs 60 and two or more in 61 vs 62 patients in arm A vs B respectively. The median follow-up was 25 months. The median TTP was 20 months vs 15 months respectively in arm A and B, with cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 2 years equal to 52% (95% CI: 42%-64%) vs 70% (95% CI: 61%-81%) (p=0.0004, Gray test). The same superiority of arm A was also observed when stratifying on the number of previous autologous transplantations. At 2 years, PFS was 39% (95% CI: 30%-51%) vs 23% (95% CI: 16%-34%) (A vs B, p=0.0006, Log-Rank test). OS in the first two years was comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: VTD resulted in significantly longer TTP and PFS in patients relapsing after ASCT. Analysis of response and safety data are on going and results will be presented at the meeting. Protocol EU-DRACT number: 2005-001628-35.

Dramatic influence of V beta gene polymorphism on an antigen-specific CD8+ T cell response in vivo.

According to recent crystallographic studies, the TCR-alpha beta contacts MHC class I-bound antigenic peptides via the polymorphic V gene-encoded complementarity-determining region 1 beta (CDR1 beta) and the hypervariable (D)J-encoded CDR3 beta and CDR3 alpha domains. To evaluate directly the relative importance of CDR1 beta polymorphism on the fine specificity of T cell responses in vivo, we have taken advantage of congenic V beta a and V beta b mouse strains that differ by a CDR1 polymorphism in the V beta 10 gene segment. The V beta 10-restricted CD8+ T cell response to a defined immunodominant epitope was dramatically reduced in V beta a compared with V beta b mice, as measured either by the expansion of V beta 10+ cells or by the binding of MHC-peptide tetramers. These data indicate that V beta polymorphism has an important impact on TCR-ligand binding in vivo, presumably by modifying the affinity of CDR1 beta-peptide interactions.

"V.N. Volochinov en contexte: essai d'épistémologie historique"

Cette thèse de doctorat porte sur la pensée de Valentin Volochinov (1895-1936) et le contexte intellectuel russe du début du XXe siècle dans lequel elle a été élaborée. Le cadre spatial de l'étude est la Russie. Le cadre temporel correspond aux années 1890-1920. Fait dans le cadre des « études bakhtiniennes », ce travail propose une démarche inverse de celle utilisée jusqu'à présent dans ce domaine. Son objectif est d'explorer les conséquences pratiques de trois hypothèses : 1) Valentin Volochinov (et non pas Mikhaïl Bakhtine) est l'auteur des textes parus sous son nom dans les années 1920 ; 2) Valentin Volochinov est un chercheur indépendant de Mikhaïl Bakhtine et de Pavel Medvedev (et non pas seulement un des membres du « Cercle de Bakhtine » ou du « groupe B.M.V. » dont le projet scientifique serait incompréhensible sans le recours aux textes bakhtiniens et/ou de Medvedev) ; 3) la connaissance du contexte intellectuel général dans lequel a travaillé Valentin Volochinov (c'est-à-dire l'ensemble des textes et des discussions scientifiques qui se sont déroulées dans les revues et les institutions scientifiques autour des thèmes abordés dans les textes signés dans les années 1920 par Volochinov) joue un rôle de premier plan dans l'interprétation de sa conception. L'analyse de la terminologie utilisée dans les travaux de Volochinov (en particulier de la notion d'« idéologie » et de méthode « marxiste »), ainsi que l'examen des idées ayant trait à la philosophie du langage (la réception des idées de Saussure, la polémique avec Rozalija Chor sur des principes de la science du langage « marxiste », la critique de la conception du «mot» de Gustav Chpet), psychologiques (la critique de la théorie psychanalytique de Sigmund Freud, l'élaboration de la notion de conscience, la recherche des bases de la psychologie « marxiste ») et sociologiques (l'analyse de l'interaction socio-verbale et l'élaboration de la théorie de l'énoncé) amènent à la conclusion que les hypothèses avancées sont justes et le mode de lecture adopté dans le travail est rentable : il suscite des interprétations différentes de celles proposées jusqu'à présent. Il permet, par exemple, de mettre en évidence les particularités du marxisme russe des années 1920 considéré par les intellectuels de l'époque, d'une part, comme une méthode des recherches dont les principes fondamentaux sont le matérialisme, le monisme, le déterminisme (y compris social), la dialectique et, d'autre part, comme une doctrine sociologique. Compris en ce sens, le marxisme fait partie de l'histoire de la sociologie russe qui comprend également des conceptions dites « bourgeoises » ou « positivistes » comme, par exemple, celle d'Eugène de Roberty, qui insiste dans ses travaux sur le primat du social sur l'individuel, autrement dit qui met en avant le principe du déterminisme social souvent associé uniquement au «sociologisme marxisant». L'oeuvre de Volochinov ne contient pas, par conséquent, d'éléments de «sociologisme vulgaire», elle s'inscrit dans l'histoire des idées sociologiques russes où il n'y a pas de rupture nette entre les conceptions dites «bourgeoises» et marxistes. Le marxisme de Volochinov n'est pas révolutionnaire. Il ne peut pas non plus être associé aux idées psychanalytiques. La preuve est le refus radical de l'existence de l'inconscient (ou plutôt d'une force inconsciente) qui déterminerait le comportement des individus sans qu'ils s'en rendent compte. Le projet scientifique de Volochinov consiste à analyser la conscience (les faits psychiques), ainsi que le langage, l'énoncé et les structures syntaxiques dans lesquelles l'énoncé se réalise en tant qu'éléments constitutifs de l'échange social et/ou verbal, qui se trouve au centre de vives discussions menées à la charnière des XIXe-XXe siècles par les chercheurs russes d'orientation marxiste et non marxiste. Pour comprendre ce projet il n'est pas nécessaire de faire appel aux idées de Bakhtine et de Medvedev : la lecture en contexte des textes signés dans les années 1920 par Volochinov met ainsi en doute l'idée qui domine actuellement dans le monde francophone que Bakhtine serait leur véritable auteur.

Clonal deletion of V beta 14-bearing T cells in mice transgenic for mammary tumour virus.

Autoreactive T lymphocytes are clonally deleted during maturation in the thymus. Deletion of T cells expressing particular receptor V beta elements is controlled by poorly defined autosomal dominant genes. A gene has now been identified by expression of transgenes in mice which causes deletion of V beta 14+ T cells. The gene lies in the open reading frame of the long terminal repeat of the mouse mammary tumour virus.

EEG alpha activity reflects motor preparation rather than the mode of action selection

Alpha-band activity (8-13 Hz) is not only suppressed by sensory stimulation and movements, but also modulated by attention, working memory and mental tasks, and could be sensitive to higher motor control functions. The aim of the present study was to examine alpha oscillatory activity during the preparation of simple left or right finger movements, contrasting the external and internal mode of action selection. Three preparation conditions were examined using a precueing paradigm with S1 as the preparatory and S2 as the imperative cue: Full, laterality instructed by S1; Free, laterality freely selected and None, laterality instructed by S2. Time-frequency (TF) analysis was performed in the alpha frequency range during the S1-S2 interval, and alpha motor-related amplitude asymmetries (MRAA) were also calculated. The significant MRAA during the Full and Free conditions indicated effective external and internal motor response preparation. In the absence of specific motor preparation (None), a posterior alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD) dominated, reflecting the main engagement of attentional resources. In Full and Free motor preparation, posterior alpha ERD was accompanied by a midparietal alpha event-related synchronization (ERS), suggesting a concomitant inhibition of task-irrelevant visual activity. In both Full and Free motor preparation, analysis of alpha power according to MRAA amplitude revealed two types of functional activation patterns: (1) a motor alpha pattern, with predominantly midparietal alpha ERS and large MRAA corresponding to lateralized motor activation/visual inhibition and (2) an attentional alpha pattern, with dominating right posterior alpha ERD and small MRAA reflecting visuospatial attention. The present results suggest that alpha oscillatory patterns do not resolve the selection mode of action, but rather distinguish separate functional strategies of motor preparation.

Immunotherapy with Bet v 1 derived contiguous overlapping peptides leads to long-term immunoregulatory responses

Background: Allergen-specific immunotherapy with whole pollen extract may induce anaphylaxis, is poorly standardized and of long duration.We thus designed a randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II clinical trial in volunteers with birch pollen allergic rhinitis and asthma to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a novel immunotherapy based on contiguous overlapping peptides (COPs) derived from Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen. Methods: A mixture of three COPs (AllerT™, Anergis SA, Switzerland) spanning the whole Bet v 1 molecule was selected for its inability to bind IgE. Prior to the pollen season, AllerT (in Alum) was injected subcutaneously to 15 adult volunteers at D0 (57 g), D7, D14, D21 and D51 (95 g each). Control volunteers (n = 5) only received the adjuvant. Results: Overall AllerT was safe. No serious adverse events and no immediate allergic reactions were reported. AllerT induced a vigorous early Bet v 1 specific immune response marked by vaccine associated INF- and IL- 10 secretion. This contributed to a strong anti-Bet v 1-specific IgG4 enhancement. Moreover, 2 months after the second season post treatment (July 2010), serum Bet v 1 specific IgG4 response was still markedly increased as compared to pre-treatment values and to placebo whereas post seasonal Bet v 1 specific IgE titers were similar to baseline values. Conclusion: Our data indicate that immunotherapy with a mixture of three COPs derived from Bet v 1 (AllerT) was safe and immunogenic, and led to long-term immunological memory.

NSAIDs inhibit alpha V beta 3 integrin-mediated and Cdc42/Rac-dependent endothelial-cell spreading, migration and angiogenesis.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), a key enzyme in arachidonic acid metabolism, is overexpressed in many cancers. Inhibition of COX-2 by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduces the risk of cancer development in humans and suppresses tumor growth in animal models. The anti-cancer effect of NSAIDs seems to involve suppression of tumor angiogenesis, but the underlying mechanism is not completely understood. Integrin alpha V beta 3 is an adhesion receptor critically involved in mediating tumor angiogenesis. Here we show that inhibition of endothelial-cell COX-2 by NSAIDs suppresses alpha V beta 3-dependent activation of the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac, resulting in inhibition of endothelial-cell spreading and migration in vitro and suppression of fibroblast growth factor-2-induced angiogenesis in vivo. These results establish a novel functional link between COX-2, integrin alpha V beta 3 and Cdc42-/Rac-dependent endothelial-cell migration. Moreover, they provide a rationale to the understanding of the anti-angiogenic activity of NSAIDs.

T cell receptor beta chain gene rearrangements and V beta gene usage in horse cytochrome c-specific T cell hybridomas.

Comparison of T cell receptor alpha and beta-chain genes in murine major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II-restricted T cell clones and hybridomas recognizing different antigens indicates that no simple correlation exists between the observed antigen/MHC specificity and the expression of certain alpha and beta-chain heterodimers. We have attempted to establish a possible correlation by analyzing T cell receptor beta chain gene rearrangements and V beta gene usage in five T cell hybridomas with identical antigen/MHC specificity and another hybridoma recognizing a different antigenic determinant in association with the same restriction molecule. We report here that in each of the five clones a uniquely rearranged beta chain gene is expressed in combination with at least two different V beta gene segments. The presence of the differently rearranged T cell receptor beta chain genes correlated with the finding of distinct fine specificity pattern of antigen recognition in each of the hybridomas. Interestingly, two hybridomas specific for different epitopes showed identical beta chain D-J rearrangements indicating that the differences might be encoded by the alpha chain gene or/and the V beta gene element.