Distribution of monocarboxylate transporters in the peripheral nervous system suggests putative roles in lactate shuttling and myelination.

Lactate, a product of glycolysis, has been shown to play a key role in the metabolic support of neurons/axons in the CNS by both astrocytes and oligodendrocytes through monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs). Despite such importance in the CNS, little is known about MCT expression and lactate function in the PNS. Here we show that mouse MCT1, MCT2, and MCT4 are expressed in the PNS. While DRG neurons express MCT1, myelinating Schwann cells (SCs) coexpress MCT1 and MCT4 in a domain-specific fashion, mainly in regions of noncompact myelin. Interestingly, SC-specific downregulation of MCT1 expression in rat neuron/SC cocultures led to increased myelination, while its downregulation in neurons resulted in a decreased amount of neurofilament. Finally, pure rat SCs grown in the presence of lactate exhibited an increase in the level of expression of the main myelin regulator gene Krox20/Egr2 and the myelin gene P0. These data indicate that lactate homeostasis participates in the regulation of the SC myelination program and reveal that similar to CNS, PNS axon-glial metabolic interactions are most likely mediated by MCTs.

Accuracy of cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy in hitting prostate cancer-positive regions of interest.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis relies on clinical suspicion leading to systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB). Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) allows for targeted biopsy of suspicious areas of the prostate instead of random 12-core biopsy. This method has been shown to be more accurate in detecting significant PCa. However, the precise spatial accuracy of cognitive targeting is unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing mpMRI-targeted TRUSGB with cognitive registration (MRTB-COG) followed by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were included in the present analysis. The regions of interest (ROIs) involved by the index lesion reported on mpMRI were subsequently targeted by two experienced urologists using the cognitive approach. The 27 ROIs were used as spatial reference. Mapping on radical prostatectomy specimen was used as reference to determine true-positive mpMRI findings. Per core correlation analysis was performed. RESULTS: Forty patients were included. Overall, 40 index lesions involving 137 ROIs (mean ROIs per index lesion 3.43) were identified on MRI. After correlating these findings with final pathology, 117 ROIs (85 %) were considered as true-positive lesions. A total of 102 biopsy cores directed toward such true-positive ROIs were available for final analysis. Cognitive targeted biopsy hit the target in 82 % of the cases (84/102). The only identified risk factor for missing the target was an anterior situated ROI (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, cognitive MRTB-COG allows for an accuracy of 82 % in hitting the correct target, given that it is a true-positive lesion. Anterior tumors are less likely to be successfully targeted.

A cast of shadow on adjuvant radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A critical review based on a methodological perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a critical review focusing on the applicability in clinical daily practice of data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs): SWOG 8794, EORTC 22911, and ARO/AUO 96-02. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analytical framework, based on the identified population, interventions, comparators, and outcomes (PICO) was used to refine the search of the evidence from the three large randomized trials regarding the use of radiation therapy after prostatectomy as adjuvant therapy (ART). RESULTS: With regard to the inclusion criteria: (1) POPULATION: in the time since they were designed, in two among three trial (SWOG 8794 and EORTC 22911) patients had a detectable PSA at the time of randomization, thus representing de facto a substantial proportion of patients who eventually received salvage RT (SRT) at non-normalised PSA levels rather than ART. (2) INTERVENTIONS: although all the trials showed the benefit of postoperative ART compared to a wait-and-see approach, the dose herein employed would be now considered inadequate; (3) COMPARATORS: the comparison arm in all the 3 RCTs was an uncontrolled observation arm, where patients who subsequently developed biochemical failure were treated in various ways, with up to half of them receiving SRT at PSA well above 1ng/mL, a level that would be now deemed inappropriate; (4) OUTCOMES: only in one trial (SWOG 8794) ART was found to significantly improve overall survival compared to observation, with a ten-year overall survival rate of 74% vs. 66%, although this might be partly the result of imbalanced risk factors due to competing event risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: ART has a high level of evidence due to three RCTs with at least 10-year follow-up recording a benefit in biochemical PFS, but its penetrance in present daily clinics should be reconsidered. While the benefit of ART or SRT is eagerly expected from ongoing randomized trials, a dynamic risk-stratified approach should drive the decisions making process.

"Hit the primary": A paradigm shift in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer?

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) represent a heterogeneous group with survival rates varying between 13 and 75 months. The current standard treatment in this setting is hormonal therapy, with or without docetaxel-based chemotherapy. In the era of individualized medicine, however, maximizing treatment options, especially in long-term surviving patients with limited disease burden, is of capital importance. Emerging data, mainly from retrospective surgical series, show survival benefits in men diagnosed with metastatic PC following definitive therapy for the prostate. Whether the irradiation of primary tumor in a metastatic disease might improve the therapeutic ratio in association with systemic treatments remains investigational. In this scenario, modern radiation therapy (RT) can play a significant role owing to its intrinsic capability to act as a more general immune response modifier, as well as to the potentially better toxicity profile compared to surgery. Preclinical data, clinical experience, and challenges in local treatment in de novo metastatic PC are reviewed and discussed.

Prostate cancer screening in Switzerland: 20-year trends and socioeconomic disparities.

BACKGROUND: Despite important controversy in its efficacy, prostate cancer (PCa) screening has become widespread. Important socioeconomic screening disparities have been reported. However, trends in PCa screening and social disparities have not been investigated in Switzerland, a high risk country for PCa. We used data from five waves (from 1992-2012) of the population-based Swiss Health Interview Survey to evaluate trends in PCa screening and its association with socioeconomic indicators. METHODS: We used multivariable Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) adjusting for demographics, health status, and use of healthcare. RESULTS: The study included 12,034 men aged ≥50 years (mean age: 63.9). Between 1992 and 2012, ever use of PCa screening increased from 55.3% to 70.0% and its use within the last two years from 32.6% to 42.4% (p-value <0.05). Income, education, and occupational class were independently associated with PCa screening. PCa screening within the last two years was greater in men with the highest (>$6,000/month) vs. lowest income (≤$2,000) (46.5% vs. 38.7% in 2012, PR for overall period =1.29, 95%CI: 1.13-1.48). These socioeconomic disparities did not significantly change over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that about half of Swiss men had performed at least one PCa screening. Men belonging to high socioeconomic status are clearly more frequently screened than those less favored. Given the uncertainty of the usefulness of PCa screening, men, including those with high socioeconomic status, should be clearly informed about benefits and harms of PCa screening, in particular, the adverse effect of over-diagnosis and of associated over-treatment.

TRIM24 Is an Oncogenic Transcriptional Activator in Prostate Cancer.

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is a key driver of prostate cancer (PC). While androgen-deprivation therapy is transiently effective in advanced disease, tumors often progress to a lethal castration-resistant state (CRPC). We show that recurrent PC-driver mutations in speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) stabilize the TRIM24 protein, which promotes proliferation under low androgen conditions. TRIM24 augments AR signaling, and AR and TRIM24 co-activated genes are significantly upregulated in CRPC. Expression of TRIM24 protein increases from primary PC to CRPC, and both TRIM24 protein levels and the AR/TRIM24 gene signature predict disease recurrence. Analyses in CRPC cells reveal that the TRIM24 bromodomain and the AR-interacting motif are essential to support proliferation. These data provide a rationale for therapeutic TRIM24 targeting in SPOP mutant and CRPC patients.

Surveillance active du cancer de la prostate [Active surveillance in prostate cancer].

Active surveillance in prostate cancer The spread of PSA in the screening of prostate cancer has almost doubled the incidence of this disease in the last twenty years. An improved understanding of the natural history of this cancer allows for risk stratification of the disease and to better predict insignificant prostate cancer. Active surveillance has recently been proposed as a new option to delay or avoid a radical treatment for patients with low-risk disease. The principle, results and future perspectives of this treatment modality are discussed in this review.

Dépistage du cancer de la prostate: actualité. [Prostate cancer screening: an update]

Prostate cancer screening using PSA is controversial because of a low specificity and detection of non clinically relevant cancer. Two important studies have been published recently. One of two studies suggests a 20% lowering in specific prostate cancer mortality due to PSA screening. This benefit is relevant but implies at a high risk of overtreatment and treatment-related complications. Currently PSA screening is only proposed as an individual screening for informed patients.

La surveillance active dans la prise en charge du cancer de la prostate précoce. [Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer]

Diagnostic and treatment management of prostate cancer at its initial stage continues to raise important debates within the involved medical community. To establish a protocol for active surveillance, a validated option in specific conditions of localised prostate cancer management for eight years, is a unique opportunity to gather different specialists in this field. This paper presents this concept.

Chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer

The development and use of chemotherapy for patients with prostate cancer was slow and modest in comparison with other solid tumor sites. While many cytotoxic agents and multiple drug combinations were tested during the 1980, the first recognized drug for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) was mitoxantrone combined with prednisone in 1996. Mitoxantrone showed an improvement in quality of life and pain compared to men treated with prednisone alone. In 2004, two randomized controlled trials found docetaxel superior to mitoxantrone in PSA response and survival. Despite the somewhat higher side effect rate, quality of life and pain were also improved with docetaxel. Unfortunately only about every second man benefits from this treatment and there are no approved criteria to select patients with better chances of response. It takes about 3 months of treatment to identify non-responders and all patients will ultimately progress and most of them will die of prostate cancer. Many men with mCRPC were treated with mitoxantrone after progression on docetaxel without a strong evidence for such a choice. More recently, the benefit of a second-line chemotherapy was addressed within a randomized controlled trial. A new taxane, cabazitaxel, was found superior to mitoxantrone in terms of overall survival despite the previous treatment with docetaxel and therefore recently approved in this indication. The most important challenges and opportunities for future studies will be the combination of chemotherapy with hormonal or non-hormonal targeted agents, the establishment of treatment algorithms to best sequence docetaxel and cabazitaxel and non-cytotoxic agents. Patient selection criteria as well as early biomarkers of response or resistance would also be important for patients and clinicians. Toxicity and quality of life are particular important aspects of drug development in current and future studies which aim to improve treatment options in this frequently elderly patient population.

Immunothérapie: une nouvelle arme contre le cancer de la prostate [Immunotherapy: a therapeutic revolution against prostate cancer?].

The interaction between the immune system and cancer was an area of research interest for several decades. The recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of sipuleucel-T and ipilimumab stimulated broader interest in manipulating immunity to fight cancer. In the context of prostate cancer, the immunotherapy strategies under development are therapeutic vaccination strategies, such as sipuleucel-T and PROSTVAC-VF, or immune checkpoint blockade of CTLA-4. Improved understanding of the immune responses generated by the development of predictive biomarkers for patient selection will guide rational combinations of these treatments and provide new treatment options in prostate cancer.

Quels nouveaux médicaments a l'horizon pour te traitement du cancer avancé de la prostate [New drugs at the horizon for men with prostate cancer]

Despite major progress in the understanding of biological mechanisms underlying metastatic prostate cancer, the treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer remains challenging. Several randomized controlled trials with promising or positive results are underway or just released. Here we discuss new treatments which might be used in clinic in the near future: hormonal treatments (Abiraterone and MDV3100), a new chemotherapy (Cabazitaxel), a cellular vaccine (Sipuleucel-T), anti-angiogenic drugs (Bevacizumab, Aflibercept), a new radioactive treatment (Alpharadin) and a new bone-protective agent (Deno-sumab).

Centre de la prostate: une approche multidisciplinaire pour une prise en charge globale du patient [Prostate cancer center: a multidisciplinary approach to accurately manage patients with prostate cancer]

The prostate cancer is a complex pathology involving oncological, functional and psychosocial items. The prostate's center of CHUV harmonize the know-how of urologists, oncologist, radiotherapists and clinical nurses to offer a global management to patients attempts by prostate cancer, from diagnosis to therapy and follow-up.

Tumor-host interactions Part 1: Stromal signatures of breast and prostate cancer Part 2: GLG1 and the control of the secretory pathway in tumor cells

Tumor-host interaction is a key determinant during cancer progression, from primary tumor growth to metastatic dissemination. At each step, tumor cells have to adapt to and subvert different types of microenvironment, leading to major phenotypic and genotypic alterations that affect both tumor and surrounding stromal compartments. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that govern tumor-host interplay may be essential for better comprehension of tumorigenesis in an effort to improve current anti-cancer therapies. The present work is composed of two projects that address tumor-host interactions from two different perspectives, the first focusing on the characterization of tumor-associated stroma and the second on membrane trafficking in tumor cells. Part 1. To selectively address stromal gene expression changes during cancer progression, oligonucleotide-based Affymetrix microarray technology was used to analyze the transcriptomes of laser-microdissected stromal cells derived from invasive human breast and prostate carcinoma. Comparison showed that invasive breast and prostate cancer elicit distinct, tumor-specific stromal responses, with a limited panel of shared induced and/or repressed genes. Both breast and prostate tumor-specific deregulated stromal gene sets displayed statistically significant survival-predictive ability for their respective tumor type. By contrast, a stromal gene signature common to both tumor types did not display prognostic value, although expression of two individual genes within this common signature was found to be associated with patient survival. Part 2. GLG1 is known as an E-selectin ligand and an intracellular FGF receptor, depending on cell type and context. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence analyses showed that GLG1 is primarily localized in the Golgi of human tumor cells, a central location in the biosynthetic/secretory pathways. GLG1 has been shown to interact with and to recruit the ARF GEF BIGI to the Golgi membrane. Depletion of GLG1 or BIGI markedly reduced ARF3 membrane localization and activation, and altered the Golgi structure. Interestingly, these perturbations did not impair constitutive secretion in general, but rather seemed to impair secretion of a specific subset of proteins that includes MMP-9. Thus, GLG1 coordinates ARF3 activation by recruiting BIGI to the Golgi membrane, thereby affecting secretion of specific molecules. - Les interactions tumeur-hôte constituent un élément essentiel à la progression tumorale, de la croissance de la tumeur primaire à la dissémination des métastases. A chaque étape, les cellules tumorales doivent s'adapter à différents types de microenvironnement et les détourner à leur propre avantage, donnant lieu à des altérations phénotypiques et génotypiques majeures qui affectent aussi bien la tumeur elle-même que le compartiment stromal environnant. L'étude des mécanismes moléculaires qui régissent les interactions tumeur-hôte constitue une étape essentielle pour une meilleure compréhension du processus de tumorigenèse dans le but d'améliorer les thérapies anti cancer existantes. Le travail présenté ici est composé de deux projets qui abordent la problématique des interactions tumeur-hôte selon différentes perspectives, le premier se concentrant sur la caractérisation du stroma tumoral et le second sur le trafic intracellulaire des cellules tumorales. Partie 1. Pour examiner les changements d'expression des gènes dans le stroma en réponse à la progression du cancer, des puces à ADN Affymetrix ont été utilisées afin d'analyser les transcriptomes des cellules stromales issues de carcinomes invasifs du sein et de la prostate et collectées par microdissection au laser. L'analyse comparative a montré que les cancers invasifs du sein et de la prostate provoquent des réponses stromales spécifiques à chaque type de tumeur, et présentent peu de gènes induits ou réprimés de façon similaire. L'ensemble des gènes dérégulés dans le stroma associé au cancer du sein, ou à celui de la prostate, présente une valeur pronostique pour les patients atteints d'un cancer du sein, respectivement de la prostate. En revanche, la signature stromale commune aux deux types de cancer n'a aucune valeur prédictive, malgré le fait que l'expression de deux gènes présents dans cette liste soit liée à la survie des patients. Partie 2. GLG1 est connu comme un ligand des sélectines E ainsi que comme récepteur intracellulaire pour des facteurs de croissances FGFs selon le type de cellule dans lequel il est exprimé. Des analyses immunohistochimiques et d'immunofluorescence ont montré que dans les cellules tumorales, GLG1 est principalement localisé au niveau de l'appareil de Golgi, une place centrale dans la voie biosynthétique et sécrétoire. Nous avons montré que GLG1 interagit avec la protéine BIGI et participe à son recrutement à la membrane du Golgi. L'absence de GLG1 ou de BIGI réduit drastiquement le pool d'ARF3 associé aux membranes ainsi que la quantité d'ARF3 activés, et modifie la structure de l'appareil de Golgi. Il est particulièrement intéressant de constater que ces perturbations n'ont pas d'effet sur la sécrétion constitutive en général, mais semblent plutôt affecter la sécrétion spécifique d'un sous-groupe défini de protéines comprenant MMP-9. GLG1 coordonne donc l'activation de ARF3 en recrutant BIGI à la membrane du Golgi, agissant par ce moyen sur la sécrétion de molécules spécifiques.