Imprinting of tumor-suppressor genes in human placenta.

Transcriptional deregulation in cancer has been shown to be associated with epigenetic alterations, in particular to tumor-suppressor- gene (TSG) promoters. In contrast, DNA methylation of TSGs is not considered to be present in normal differentiated cells. Nevertheless, we previously showed that the promoter of the tumor-suppressor gene APC is methylated, for one allele only, in normal gastric cells. Recently, RASSF1A has been shown to be imprinted in normal human placenta. To clarify putative TSG methylation in the placenta, 23 normal placental tissues from the first trimester, both decidua and villi, and four normal non-gestational endometrium were screened for DNA methylation by methylation-sensitive single-strand conformation analysis (MS-SSCA) and sequencing after bisulfite modification, on a panel of 12 genes known to be implicated in carcinogenesis. In all placental villi, four TSG promoters-APC, SFRP2, RASSF1A and WIF1-were hypermethylated, whereas all decidua and normal endometrium did not show any methylation. Allele-specific methylation analysis revealed that this methylation was monoallelic. Furthermore, comparison with maternal DNA indicated that APC and WIF1 were methylated on the maternal allele, whereas SFRP2 was methylated on the paternal allele. Sequence analysis of WIF1 mRNA revealed that only the unmethylated paternal allele was transcribed. The imprinting status of these TSGs is conserved during pregnancy. These results indicate that TSG imprinting is pre-existent in normal human placenta and should not be confused with carcinogenesis or pathology-induced methylation.

Integrating receptor interactions and dynamics and Interference with endocrine disruptors in the mechanisms of action of PPAR nuclear receptors

Abstract Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) form a family of three nuclear receptors regulating important cellular and metabolic functions. PPARs control gene expression by directly binding to target promoters as heterodimers with the Retinoid X Receptor (RXR), and their transcriptional activity is enhanced upon activation by natural or pharmacological ligands. The binding of PPAR/RXR heterodimers on target promoters allows the anchoring of a series of coactivators and corepressors involved in promoter remodeling and the recruitment of the transcription machinery. The transcriptional output finally depends on a complex interplay between (i) the respective expression levels of PPARs, RXRs and of other nuclear receptors competing for DNA binding and RXR recruitment, (ii) the availability and the nature of PPAR and RXR ligands, (iii) the expression levels and the nature of the different coactivators and corepressors and (iv) the sequence and the epigenetic status of the promoter. Understanding how all these factors and signals integrate and fine-tune transcription remains a challenge but is necessary to understand the specificity of the physiological functions regulated by PPARs. The work presented herein focuses on the molecular mechanisms of PPAR action and aims at understanding how the interactions and mobility of the receptor modulate transcription in the physiological context of a living cell: Such observations in vivo rely on the use of engineered fluorescent protein chimeras and require the development and the application of complementary imaging techniques such as Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP), Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS). Using such techniques, PPARs are shown to reside solely in the nucleus where they are constitutively associated with RXR but transcriptional activation by ligand binding -does not promote the formation of sub-nuclear structures as observed with other nuclear receptors. In addition, the engagement of unliganded PPARs in large complexes of cofactors in living cells provides a molecular basis for their ligand-independent activity. Ligand binding reduces receptor diffusion by promoting the recruitment of coactivators which further enlarge the size of PPAR complexes to acquire full transcriptional competence. Using these molecular approaches, we deciphered the molecular mechanisms through which phthalates, a class of pollutants from the plastic industry, interfere with PPARγ signaling. Mono-ethyl-hexyl-phthalate (MEHP) binding induces the recruitment of a specific subset of cofactors and translates into the expression of a specific subset of target genes, the transcriptional output being strongly conditioned by the differentiation status of the cell. This selective PPARγ modulation induces limited adipogenic effects in cellular models while exposure to phthalates in animal models leads to protective effects on glucose tolerance and diet-induced obesity. These results demonstrate that phthalates influence lipid and carbohydrate metabolism through complex mechanisms which most likely involve PPARγ but also probably PPARα and PPARß, Altogether, the molecular and physiological demonstration of the interference of pollutants with PPAR action outlines an important role of chemical exposure in metabolic regulations. Résumé Les PPARs (Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors) forment une famille de récepteurs nucléaires qui régulent des fonctions cellulaires et métaboliques importantes. Les PPARs contrôlent l'expression des gènes en se liant directement à leurs promoteurs sous forme d'hétérodimères avec les récepteurs RXR (Retinoid X Receptor), et leur activité transcriptionnelle est stimulée par la liaison de ligands naturels ou pharmacologiques. L'association des hétérodimères PPAR/RXR avec les promoteurs des gènes cibles permet le recrutement de coactivateurs et de corépresseurs qui vont permettre le remodelage de la chromatine et le recrutement de la machinerie transcriptionnelle. Les actions transcriptionnelles du récepteur dépendent toutefois d'interactions complexes qui sont régulées par (i) le niveau d'expression des PPARs, des RXRs et d'autres récepteurs nucléaires entrant en compétition pour la liaison à l'ADN et l'association avec RXR, (ii) la disponibilité et la nature de ligands de PPAR et de RXR, (iii) les niveaux d'expression et la nature des différents coactivateurs et corépresseurs et (iv) la séquence et le marquage épigénétique des promoteurs. La compréhension des mécanismes qui permettent d'intégrer ces aspects pour assurer une régulation fine de l'activité transcriptionnelle est un défi qu'il est nécessaire de relever pour comprendre la spécificité des fonctions physiologiques régulées par les PPARs. Ce travail concerne l'étude des mécanismes d'action moléculaire des PPARs et vise à mieux comprendre comment les interactions du récepteur avec d'autres protéines ainsi que la mobilité de ce dernier régulent son activité transcriptionnelle dans le contexte physiologique des cellules vivantes. De telles observations reposent sur l'emploi de protéines fusionnées à des protéines fluorescentes ainsi que sur le développement et l'utilisation de techniques d'imagerie complémentaires telles que le FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching), le FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) ou la FCS (Fluorescence Corrélation Spectroscopy). En appliquant ces méthodes, nous avons pu montrer que les PPARs résident toujours dans le noyau où ils sont associés de manière constitutive à RXR, mais que l'ajout de ligand n'induit pas la formation de structures sub-nucléaires comme cela a pu être décrit pour d'autres récepteurs nucléaires. De plus, les PPARs sont engagés dans de larges complexes protéiques de cofacteurs en absence de ligand, ce qui procure une explication moléculaire à leur activité ligand-indépendante. La liaison du ligand réduit la vitesse de diffusion du récepteur en induisant le recrutement de coactivateurs qui augmente encore plus la taille des complexes afin d'acquérir un potentiel d'activation maximal. En utilisant ces approches moléculaires, nous avons pu caractériser les mécanismes permettant aux phtalates, une classe de polluants provenant de l'industrie plastique, d'interférer avec PPARγ. La liaison du mono-ethyl-hexyl-phtalate (NERF) à PPARγ induit un recrutement sélectif de cofacteurs, se traduisant par l'induction spécifique d'un sous-ensemble de gènes qui varie en fonction du niveau de différentiation cellulaire. La modulation sélective de PPARγ par le MEHP provoque une adipogenèse modérée dans des modèles cellulaires alors que l'exposition de modèles animaux aux phtalates induit des effets bénéfiques sur la tolérance au glucose et sur le développement de l'obésité. Toutefois, les phtalates ont une action complexe sur le métabolisme glucido-lipidique en faisant intervenir PPARγ mais aussi probablement PPARα et PPARß. Cette démonstration moléculaire et physiologique de l'interférence des polluants avec les récepteurs nucléaires PPAR souligne un rôle important de l'exposition à de tels composés dans les régulations métaboliques.

Reactivation of transcription from a vaccinia virus early promoter late in infection.

We have studied the kinetics of RNA synthesis from the vaccinia virus 7,500-molecular-weight gene (7.5K gene) which is regulated by early and late promoters arranged in tandem. Unexpectedly, after a first burst of RNA synthesis early in infection, transcription was reactivated late in infection. Reactivation was not dependent on the location of the promoter in the genome or on the presence of the upstream late regulatory sequences. The mRNA synthesized from the reactivated promoter in the late phase had the same 5' and 3' ends as the molecules transcribed in the early phase. Interestingly, these molecules were efficiently translated despite the absence of the poly(A) leader characteristic of late mRNAs. Reactivation appears to be dependent on virus assembly since it is prevented by rifampin, a specific inhibitor of morphogenesis. Finally, analysis of various other early genes showed that reactivation is not unique to the 7.5K early promoter.

Protection from HIV-1 infection of primary CD4 T cells by CCR5 silencing is effective for the full spectrum of CCR5 expression.

Stable gene silencing by RNA interference (RNAi) can be achieved by expression of small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) from RNA polymerase III promoters. We have tested lentiviral vectors expressing shRNAs targetting CCR5 in primary CD4 T cells from donors representing various CCR5 and CCR2 genetic backgrounds covering the full spectrum of CCR5 expression levels and permissiveness for HIV-1 infection. A linear decrease in CCR5 expression resulted in a logarithmic decrease in cellular infection, giving up to three logs protection from HIV-1 infection in vitro. Protection was maintained at very high multiplicity of infection. This and other recent reports on RNAi should open a debate about the use of RNAi gene therapy for HIV infection.

Impact of genomic methylation on radiation sensitivity of colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of demethylation with 5-aza-cytidine (AZA) on radiation sensitivity and to define the intrinsic radiation sensitivity of methylation deficient colorectal carcinoma cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiation sensitizing effects of AZA were investigated in four colorectal carcinoma cell lines (HCT116, SW480, L174 T, Co115), defining influence of AZA on proliferation, clonogenic survival, and cell cycling with or without ionizing radiation. The methylation status for cancer or DNA damage response-related genes silenced by promoter methylation was determined. The effect of deletion of the potential target genes (DNMT1, DNMT3b, and double mutants) on radiation sensitivity was analyzed. RESULTS: AZA showed radiation sensitizing properties at >or=1 micromol/l, a concentration that does not interfere with the cell cycle by itself, in all four tested cell lines with a sensitivity-enhancing ratio (SER) of 1.6 to 2.1 (confidence interval [CI] 0.9-3.3). AZA successfully demethylated promoters of p16 and hMLH1, genes associated with ionizing radiation response. Prolonged exposure to low-dose AZA resulted in sustained radiosensitivity if associated with persistent genomic hypomethylation after recovery from AZA. Compared with maternal HCT116 cells, DNMT3b-defcient deficient cells were more sensitive to radiation with a SER of 2.0 (CI 0.9-2.1; p = 0.03), and DNMT3b/DNMT1-/- double-deficient cells showed a SER of 1.6 (CI 0.5-2.7; p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: AZA-induced genomic hypomethylation results in enhanced radiation sensitivity in colorectal carcinoma. The mediators leading to sensitization remain unknown. Defining the specific factors associated with radiation sensitization after genomic demethylation may open the way to better targeting for the purpose of radiation sensitization.

Choice of an adequate promoter for efficient complementation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a case study.

Conservation of the function of open reading frames recently identified in fungal genome projects can be assessed by complementation of deletion mutants of putative Saccharomyces cerevisiae orthologs. A parallel complementation assay expressing the homologous wild type S. cerevisiae gene is generally performed as a positive control. However, we and others have found that failure of complementation can occur in this case. We investigated the specific cases of S. cerevisiae TBF1 and TIM54 essential genes. Heterologous complementation with Candida glabrata TBF1 or TIM54 gene was successful using the constitutive promoters TDH3 and TEF. In contrast, homologous complementation with S. cerevisiae TBF1 or TIM54 genes failed using these promoters, and was successful only using the natural promoters of these genes. The reduced growth rate of S. cerevisiae complemented with C. glabrata TBF1 or TIM54 suggested a diminished functionality of the heterologous proteins compared to the homologous proteins. The requirement of the homologous gene for the natural promoter was alleviated for TBF1 when complementation was assayed in the absence of sporulation and germination, and for TIM54 when two regions of the protein presumably responsible for a unique translocation pathway of the TIM54 protein into the mitochondrial membrane were deleted. Our results demonstrate that the use of different promoters may prove necessary to obtain successful complementation, with use of the natural promoter being the best approach for homologous complementation.

Mitotic functions for SNAP45, a subunit of the small nuclear RNA-activating protein complex SNAPc.

The small nuclear RNA-activating protein complex SNAP(c) is required for transcription of small nuclear RNA genes and binds to a proximal sequence element in their promoters. SNAP(c) contains five types of subunits stably associated with each other. Here we show that one of these polypeptides, SNAP45, also known as PTF delta, localizes to centrosomes during parts of mitosis, as well as to the spindle midzone during anaphase and the mid-body during telophase. Consistent with localization to these mitotic structures, both down- and up-regulation of SNAP45 lead to a G(2)/M arrest with cells displaying abnormal mitotic structures. In contrast, down-regulation of SNAP190, another SNAP(c) subunit, leads to an accumulation of cells with a G(0)/G(1) DNA content. These results are consistent with the proposal that SNAP45 plays two roles in the cell, one as a subunit of the transcription factor SNAP(c) and another as a factor required for proper mitotic progression.

Tunable reporter signal production in feedback-uncoupled arsenic bioreporters.

Escherichia coli-based bioreporters for arsenic detection are typically based on the natural feedback loop that controls ars operon transcription. Feedback loops are known to show a wide range linear response to the detriment of the overall amplification of the incoming signal. While being a favourable feature in controlling arsenic detoxification for the cell, a feedback loop is not necessarily the most optimal for obtaining highest sensitivity and response in a designed cellular reporter for arsenic detection. Here we systematically explore the effects of uncoupling the topology of arsenic sensing circuitry on the developed reporter signal as a function of arsenite concentration input. A model was developed to describe relative ArsR and GFP levels in feedback and uncoupled circuitry, which was used to explore new ArsR-based synthetic circuits. The expression of arsR was then placed under the control of a series of constitutive promoters, which differed in promoter strength, and which could be further modulated by TetR repression. Expression of the reporter gene was maintained under the ArsR-controlled Pars promoter. ArsR expression in the systems was measured by using ArsR-mCherry fusion proteins. We find that stronger constitutive ArsR production decreases arsenite-dependent EGFP output from Pars and vice versa. This leads to a tunable series of arsenite-dependent EGFP outputs in a variety of systematically characterized circuitries. The higher expression levels and sensitivities of the response curves in the uncoupled circuits may be useful for improving field-test assays using arsenic bioreporters.

Repression of flagellar genes in exponential phase by CsgD and CpxR, two crucial modulators of Escherichia coli biofilm formation.

Escherichia coli adapts its lifestyle to the variations of environmental growth conditions, swapping between swimming motility or biofilm formation. The stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS is an important regulator of this switch, since it stimulates adhesion and represses flagellar biosynthesis. By measuring the dynamics of gene expression, we show that RpoS inhibits the transcription of the flagellar sigma factor, FliA, in exponential growth phase. RpoS also partially controls the expression of CsgD and CpxR, two transcription factors important for bacterial adhesion. We demonstrate that these two regulators repress the transcription of fliA, flgM, and tar and that this regulation is dependent on the growth medium. CsgD binds to the flgM and fliA promoters around their -10 promoter element, strongly suggesting direct repression. We show that CsgD and CpxR also affect the expression of other known modulators of cell motility. We propose an updated structure of the regulatory network controlling the choice between adhesion and motility.

Transcriptional regulation of MDR1, a gene involved in antifungal drug resistance in Candida albicans

ABSTRACT Upregulation of the Major Facilitator transporter gene MDR1 (Multi_drug Resistance 1) is one of the mechanisms observed in Candida albicans clinical isolates developing resistance to azole antifungal agents. To better understand this phenomenon, the cis-acting regulatory elements present in a modulatable reporter system under the control of the MDR1 promoter were characterized. In an azole-susceptible strain, transcription of this reporter is transiently upregulated in response to either benomyl or H2O2, whereas its expression is constitutively high in an azole-resistant strain (FR2). Two cis-acting regulatory elements, that are necessary and sufficient to convey the same transcriptional responses to a heterologous promoter (CDR2), were identified within the MDR1promoter. The first element, called BRE (for Benomyl Response Element, -296 to -260 with respect to the ATG start codon), is required for benomyl-dependent MDR1 upregulation and for constitutive high expression of MDR1 in FR2. The second element, termed HRE (for H2O2 Response Element, -561 to -520), is required for H2O2-dependent MDR1 upregulation, but is dispensable for constitutive high expression. Two potential binding sites (TTAG/CTAA) for the blip transcription factor Cap1p lie within the HRE. Moreover, inactivation of CAP1 abolished the transient response to H2O2 and diminished significantly the transient response to benomyl. Cap1p, which has been previously implicated in cellular responses to oxidative stress, may thus play a transacting and positive regulatory role in benomyl- and H2O2-dependent transcription of MDR1. However, it is not the only transcription factor involved in the response of MDR1 to benomyl. A minimal BRE element (-290 to -273) that is sufficient to detect in vitro sequence-specific binding of protein complexes in crude extracts prepared from C. albicans was also delimited. Genome-wide transcript profiling analyses undertaken with a matched pair of clinical isolates, one of which being azole-resistant and upregulating MDR1, and with an azole-susceptible strain exposed to benomyl, revealed that genes specifically upregulated by benomyl harbour in their promoters Cap1p binding site(s). This strengthened the idea that Cap1p plays a role in benomyl-dependent upregulation of MDR1. BRE-like sequences were also identified in several genes co-regulated with MDR1 in both conditions, which was consistent with the involvement of the BRE in both processes. A set of 147 mutants lacking a single transcription factor gene was next screened for loss of MDR1response to benomyl. Unfortunately, none of the tested mutants showed a loss of benomyl-dependent MDR1 upregulation. Nevertheless, a significant diminution of the response was observed in the mutants in which the MADS-box transcription factor Mcm1p and the C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor orf19.13374p were inactivated, suggesting that Mcm1p and orf19.13374p are involved in MDR1response to benomyl. Interestingly, the BRE contains a perfect match to the binding consensus of Mcm1p, raising the possibility that MDR1may be a direct target of this transcriptional activator. In conclusion, while the identity of the trans-acting factors that bind to the BRE and HRE remains to be confirmed, the tools we have developed during characterization of the cis-acting elements of the MDR1promoter should now serve to elucidate the nature of the components that modulate its activity. RESUME La surexpression du gène MDR1 (pour Résistance Multidrogue 1), qui code pour un transporteur de la famille des Major Facilitators, est l'un des mécanismes observés dans les isolats cliniques de la levure Candida albicans développant une résistance aux agents antifongiques appelés azoles. Pour mieux comprendre ce phénomène, les éléments de régulation agissant en cis dans un système rapporteur modulable sous le contrôle du promoteur MDR1 ont été caractérisés. Dans une souche sensible aux azoles, la transcription de ce rapporteur est transitoirement surélevée en réponse soit au bénomyl soit à l'agent oxydant H2O2, alors que son expression est constitutivement élevée dans une souche résistante aux azoles (souche FR2). Deux éléments de régulation agissant en cis, nécessaires et suffisants pour transmettre les mêmes réponses transcriptionnelles à un promoteur hétérologue (CDR2), ont été identifiés dans le promoteur MDR1. Le premier élément, appelé BRE (pour Elément de Réponse au Bénomyl, de -296 à -260 par rapport au codon d'initiation ATG) est requis pour la surexpression de MDR1dépendante du bénomyl et pour l'expression constitutive de MDR1 dans FR2. Le deuxième élément, appelé HRE (pour Elément de Réponse à l'H2O2, de -561 à -520), est requis pour la surexpression de MDR1 dépendante de l'H2O2, mais n'est pas impliqué dans l'expression constitutive du gène MDR1. Deux sites de fixation potentiels (TTAG/CTAA) pour le facteur de transcription Cap1p ont été identifiés dans l'élément HRE. De plus, l'inactivation de CAP1 abolit la réponse transitoire à l'H2O2 et diminua significativement la réponse transitoire au bénomyl. Cap1p, qui est impliqué dans les réponses de la cellule au stress oxydatif, doit donc jouer un rôle positif en trans dans la surexpression de MDR1 dépendante du bénomyl et de l'H2O2. Cependant, ce n'est pas le seul facteur de transcription impliqué dans la réponse au bénomyl. Un élément BRE d'une longueur minimale (de -290 à -273) a également été défini et est suffisant pour détecter une interaction spécifique in vitro avec des protéines provenant d'extraits bruts de C. albicans. L'analyse du profil de transcription d'une paire d'isolats cliniques comprenant une souche résistante aux azoles surexprimant MDR1, et d'une souche sensible aux azoles exposée au bénomyl, a révélé que les gènes spécifiquement surexprimés par le bénomyl contiennent dans leurs promoteurs un ou plusieurs sites de fixation pour Cap1p. Ceci renforce l'idée que Cap1p joue un rôle dans la surexpression de MDR1dépendante du bénomyl. Une ou deux séquences ressemblant à l'élément BRE ont également été identifiées dans la plupart des gènes corégulés avec MDR1 dans ces deux conditions, ce qui était attendu compte-tenu du rôle joué par cet élément dans les deux processus. Une collection de 147 mutants dans lesquels un seul facteur de transcription est inactivé a été testée pour la perte de réponse au bénomyl de MDR1. Malheureusement, la surexpression de MDR1 dépendante du bénomyl n'a été perdue dans aucun des mutants testés. Néanmoins, une diminution significative de la réponse a été observée chez des mutants dans lesquels le facteur de transcription à MADS-box Mcm1p et le facteur de transcription à doigts de zinc de type C2H2 orf19.13374p ont été inactivés, suggérant que Mcm1p et orf19.13374p sont impliqués dans la réponse de MDR1au bénomyl. Il est intéressant de noter que la BRE contient une séquence qui s'aligne parfaitement avec la séquence consensus du site de fixation de Mcm1p, ce qui soulève la possibilité que MDR1 pourrait être une cible directe de cet activateur transcriptionnel. En conclusion, alors que l'identité des facteurs agissant en trans en se fixant à la BRE et à la HRE reste à être confirmée, les outils que nous avons développés au cours de la caractérisation des éléments agissant en cis sur le promoteur MDR1 peut maintenant servir à élucider la nature des composants modulant son activité.

Effects of supercoiling on enhancer-promoter contacts.

Using Brownian dynamics simulations, we investigate here one of possible roles of supercoiling within topological domains constituting interphase chromosomes of higher eukaryotes. We analysed how supercoiling affects the interaction between enhancers and promoters that are located in the same or in neighbouring topological domains. We show here that enhancer-promoter affinity and supercoiling act synergistically in increasing the fraction of time during which enhancer and promoter stay in contact. This stabilizing effect of supercoiling only acts on enhancers and promoters located in the same topological domain. We propose that the primary role of recently observed supercoiling of topological domains in interphase chromosomes of higher eukaryotes is to assure that enhancers contact almost exclusively their cognate promoters located in the same topological domain and avoid contacts with very similar promoters but located in neighbouring topological domains.

Structure and expression profile of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene family indicates a broad role in inorganic phosphate homeostasis.

PHO1 has been recently identified as a protein involved in the loading of inorganic phosphate into the xylem of roots in Arabidopsis. The genome of Arabidopsis contains 11 members of the PHO1 gene family. The cDNAs of all PHO1 homologs have been cloned and sequenced. All proteins have the same topology and harbor a SPX tripartite domain in the N-terminal hydrophilic portion and an EXS domain in the C-terminal hydrophobic portion. The SPX and EXS domains have been identified in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) proteins involved in either phosphate transport or sensing or in sorting proteins to endomembranes. The Arabidopsis genome contains additional proteins of unknown function containing either a SPX or an EXS domain. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the PHO1 family is subdivided into at least three clusters. Reverse transcription-PCR revealed a broad pattern of expression in leaves, roots, stems, and flowers for most genes, although two genes are expressed exclusively in flowers. Analysis of the activity of the promoter of all PHO1 homologs using promoter-beta-glucuronidase fusions revealed a predominant expression in the vascular tissues of roots, leaves, stems, or flowers. beta-Glucuronidase expression is also detected for several promoters in nonvascular tissue, including hydathodes, trichomes, root tip, root cortical/epidermal cells, and pollen grains. The expression pattern of PHO1 homologs indicates a likely role of the PHO1 proteins not only in the transfer of phosphate to the vascular cylinder of various tissues but also in the acquisition of phosphate into cells, such as pollen or root epidermal/cortical cells.

Evolutionary origin and functions of retrogene introns.

Retroposed genes (retrogenes) originate via the reverse transcription of mature messenger RNAs from parental source genes and are therefore usually devoid of introns. Here, we characterize a particular set of mammalian retrogenes that acquired introns upon their emergence and thus represent rare cases of intron gain in mammals. We find that although a few retrogenes evolved introns in their coding or 3' untranslated regions (untranslated region, UTR), most introns originated together with untranslated exons in the 5' flanking regions of the retrogene insertion site. They emerged either de novo or through fusions with 5' UTR exons of host genes into which the retrogenes inserted. Generally, retrogenes with introns display high transcription levels and show broader spatial expression patterns than other retrogenes. Our experimental expression analyses of individual intron-containing retrogenes show that 5' UTR introns may indeed promote higher expression levels, at least in part through encoded regulatory elements. By contrast, 3' UTR introns may lead to downregulation of expression levels via nonsense-mediated decay mechanisms. Notably, the majority of retrogenes with introns in their 5' flanks depend on distant, sometimes bidirectional CpG dinucleotide-enriched promoters for their expression that may be recruited from other genes in the genomic vicinity. We thus propose a scenario where the acquisition of new 5' exon-intron structures was directly linked to the recruitment of distant promoters by these retrogenes, a process potentially facilitated by the presence of proto-splice sites in the genomic vicinity of retrogene insertion sites. Thus, the primary role and selective benefit of new 5' introns (and UTR exons) was probably initially to span the often substantial distances to potent CpG promoters driving retrogene transcription. Later in evolution, these introns then obtained additional regulatory roles in fine tuning retrogene expression levels. Our study provides novel insights regarding mechanisms underlying the origin of new introns, the evolutionary relevance of intron gain, and the origin of new gene promoters.

The challenge of modeling nuclear receptor regulatory networks in mammalian cells.

Nuclear receptors are a major component of signal transduction in animals. They mediate the regulatory activities of many hormones, nutrients and metabolites on the homeostasis and physiology of cells and tissues. It is of high interest to model the corresponding regulatory networks. While molecular and cell biology studies of individual promoters have provided important mechanistic insight, a more complex picture is emerging from genome-wide studies. The regulatory circuitry of nuclear receptor regulated gene expression networks, and their response to cellular signaling, appear highly dynamic, and involve long as well as short range chromatin interactions. We review how progress in understanding the kinetics and regulation of cofactor recruitment, and the development of new genomic methods, provide opportunities but also a major challenge for modeling nuclear receptor mediated regulatory networks.

Analysis of LEDGF/p75 expression regulation

Background To replicate, retroviruses must insert DNA copies of their RNA genomes into the host genome. This integration process is catalyzed by the viral integrase protein. The site of viral integration has been shown to be non-random and retrovirus-specific. LEDGF/p75, a splice variant encoded by PSIP1 gene and described as a general transcription coactivator, was identified as a tethering factor binding both to chromatin and to lentiviral integrases, thereby affecting integration efficiency as well as integration site selection. LEDGF/p75 is still a poorly characterized protein, and its cellular endogenous function has yet to be fully determined. In order to start unveiling the roles of LEDGF/p75 in the cell, we started to investigate the mechanisms involved in the regulation of LEDGF/p75. Materials and methods To identify PSIP1 minimal promoter and associated regulatory elements, we cloned a region starting 5 kb upstream the transcription start site (TSS, +1 reference position) to the ATG start codon (+816), as well as systematic truncations, in a plasmid containing the firefly luciferase reporter gene. These constructs were co-transfected into HEK293 cells with a plasmid encoding the Renilla luciferase under the pTK promoter as an internal control for transfection efficiency. Both luciferase activities were assessed by luminescence as an indicator of promoter activity. Results Luciferase assays identified regions -76 to +1 and +1 to +94 as two independent minimal promoters showing respectively a 3.7x and 2.3x increase in luciferase activity. These two independent minimal promoters worked synergistically increasing luciferase activity up to 16.3x as compared to background. Moreover, we identified five regulatory blocks which modulated luciferase activity depending on the DNA region tested, three enhancers (- 2007 to -1159, -284 to -171 and +94 to +644) and two silencers (-171 to -76 and +796 to +816). However, the silencing effect of the region -171 to -76 is dependent on the presence of the +94 to +644 region, ruling out the enhancer activity of the latter. Computational analysis of PSIP1 promoter revealed the absence of TATA box and initiator (INR) sequences, classifying this promoter as nonconventional. TATA-less and INR-less promoters are characterized by multiple Sp1 binding sites, involved in the recruitment of the RNA pol II complex. Consistent with this, PSIP1 promoter contains multiple putative Sp1 binding sequences in regions -76 to +1 and +1 to +94.