Does change talk during brief motivational interventions with young men predict change in alcohol use?

Client change talk (CT) during motivational interviewing and brief motivational interventions (BMIs) have been described as predictors of behavior change, but these links have not been clearly evaluated in research on young people. Within 127 BMIs with 20-year-old men with at-risk alcohol consumption, each CT utterance was categorized and given a strength rating using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code 2.1. Several ways of categorizing and measuring CT were tested using stepwise regression procedures. Overall CT measures were not significantly related to changes in drinking at 6-month follow-up. Regarding CT sub-dimensions, the frequency of ability/desire/need to change and of ability/desire/need not to change, as well as the average strength of ability/desire/need, predicted significant change in the expected direction. CT length was not significantly linked to outcome. The frequency and strength with which some CT sub-dimensions are expressed during BMI seemed to be important predictors of change in drinking among young men and might thus be especially important for clinicians to notice.

Brief alcohol intervention and alcohol assessment do not influence alcohol use in injured patients treated in the emergency department: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of brief alcohol intervention (BAI) in reducing alcohol use among hazardous drinkers treated in the emergency department (ED) after an injury; in addition it tests whether assessment of alcohol use without BAI is sufficient to reduce hazardous drinking. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial with 12-month follow-up conducted between January 2003 and June 2005. SETTING: Urban academic emergency department (ED) of the Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5136 consecutive patients attending ED after an injury completed a seven-item general and a three-item alcohol screen and 1472 (28.7%) were positive for hazardous drinking according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Addiction definition; of these 987 (67.1%) were randomized into a BAI group (n = 310) or a control group with screening and assessment (n = 342) or a control group with screening only (n = 335) and then a total of 770 patients (78.0%) completed the 12-month follow-up procedures. INTERVENTION: A single 10-15-minute session of standardized BAI conducted by a trained research assistant. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of participants who have changed to low-risk drinking at follow-up. FINDINGS: Data obtained at 12 months indicated that similar proportions were low-risk drinkers in BAI versus control groups with and without assessment (35.6%, 34.0%, 37.0%, respectively, P = 0.71). Data also indicated similar reductions in drinking frequency, quantity, binge drinking frequency and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores across groups. All groups reported similar numbers of days hospitalized and numbers of medical consults in the last 12 months. A model including age groups, gender, AUDIT and injury severity scores indicated that BAI had no influence on the main alcohol use outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the evidence that a 10-15-minute BAI does not decrease alcohol use and health resource utilization in hazardous drinkers treated in the ED, and demonstrates that commonly found decreases in hazardous alcohol use in control groups cannot be attributed to the baseline alcohol assessment.

Brief intervention on tobacco use among young adults - do they benefit from booster sessions?

Introduction Le tabac représente un risque majeur pour la santé de chacun, avec un lien direct établi entre le risque de développer des pathologies et la durée de sa consommation. Les jeunes sont donc des cibles primordiales pour la prévention du tabac ; les quelques recherches effectuées dans ce groupe d'âge ne sont pas encore parvenues à identifier des moyens efficaces afin d'éviter le début de la cigarette ou d'arrêter une consommation préexistante. Les buts de cette étude sont d'identifier les effets de l'intervention motivationnelle brève et de définir la nécessité d'un booster dans cette catégorie particulière de la population que sont les jeunes hommes de 19 ans. Méthodes Cette étude a été menée d'octobre 2008 à septembre 2009 au centre de recrutement de Lausanne, Vaud. Les individus étaient invités à participer à une intervention motivationnelle brève ciblant simultanément le tabac, l'alcool et le cannabis, sans screening préalable. Les 823 volontaires ont été assignés de manière randomisée entre les groupes cas et témoin, avec dans le groupe intervention une nouvelle randomisation attribuant un booster téléphonique trois mois plus tard à certains cas. Ce travail se fixe uniquement sur les résultats concernant le tabac, six mois après l'intervention. Les effets (statut de fumeur et de fumeur quotidien, nombre de cigarettes fumées en moyenne, dépendance à la cigarette selon les critères de Fagerström) étaient analysés sur la base d'un questionnaire écrit au baseline, puis d'un contact téléphonique au follow-up à six mois ; ils ont été analysés séparément pour différents groupes : l'entier des participants, les fumeurs et les fumeurs quotidiens. Résultats Les interventions motivationnelles brèves n'ont aucun effet significatif sur la consommation de tabac. Elles ont cependant une tendance bénéfique sur le fait d'être de fumeur et fumeur quotidien, sur le nombre de cigarettes consommées en moyenne et la dépendance selon Fagerström chez tous les participants, ainsi que dans les sous-groupes de fumeurs et fumeurs quotidiens. Les résultats des boosters ne sont pas significatifs et entraînent des effets mitigés selon les analyses effectuées et les groupes observés. Discussion Les interventions motivationnelles brèves n'ont pas d'effet significatif mais semblent avoir une tendance favorable à une diminution de la consommation de tabac. Les boosters ne paraissent pas avoir d'impact bénéfique mais ces conclusions sont à pondérer avec le fait qu'aucun des résultats obtenus n'est significatif. Des recherches plus systématiques sont nécessaires pour mieux comprendre ces résultats décevants : en ce qui concernent les interventions, les causes à envisager sont le fait d'utiliser des volontaires sans screening préalable, de cibler l'intervention sur de multiples substances pendant un temps relativement court ou encore la difficulté de cibler les jeunes vis-à-vis des risques liés à la cigarette ; quant aux boosters, une augmentation de fréquence ou de durée pourrait représenter une alternative, afin de rendre cette session complémentaire efficace.

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (version 4.0) factorial structure and its sensitivity in the treatment of outpatients with unipolar depression.

The 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS, version 4.0) enables the rater to measure psychopathology severity. Still, little is known about the BPRS's reliability and validity outside of the psychosis spectrum. The aim of this study was to examine the factorial structure and sensitivity to change of the BPRS in patients with unipolar depression. Two hundred and forty outpatients with unipolar depression were administered the 24-item BPRS. Assessments were conducted at intake and at post-treatment in a Crisis Intervention Centre. An exploratory factor analysis of the 24-item BPRS produced a six-factor solution labelled "Mood disturbance", "Reality distortion", "Activation", "Apathy", "Disorganization", and "Somatization". The reduction of the total BPRS score and dimensional scores, except for "Activation", indicates that the 24-item BPRS is sensitive to change as shown in patients that appeared to have benefited from crisis treatment. The findings suggest that the 24-item BPRS could be a useful instrument to measure symptom severity and change in symptom status in outpatients presenting with unipolar depression.

PPAR beta/delta Agonists Modulate Platelet Function via a Mechanism Involving PPAR Receptors and Specific Association/Repression of PKC alpha-Brief Report

Objectives-Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta (PPAR beta/delta) is a nuclear receptor found in platelets. PPAR beta/delta agonists acutely inhibit platelet function within a few minutes of addition. As platelets are anucleated, the effects of PPAR beta/delta agonists on platelets must be nongenomic. Currently, the particular role of PPAR beta/delta receptors and their intracellular signaling pathways in platelets are not known. Methods and Results-We have used mice lacking PPAR beta/delta (PPAR beta/delta(-/-)) to show the effects of the PPAR beta/delta agonist GW501516 on platelet adhesion and cAMP levels are mediated specifically by PPAR beta/delta, however GW501516 had no PPAR beta/delta-specific effect on platelet aggregation. Studies in human platelets showed that PKC alpha, which can mediate platelet activation, was bound and repressed by PPAR beta/delta after platelets were treated with GW501516. Conclusions-These data provide evidence of a novel mechanism by which PPAR receptors influence platelet activity and thereby thrombotic risk. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 1871-1873.)

Brief alcohol intervention as pragmatic intervention: Who is voluntarily taking an offered intervention?

Brief alcohol interventions (BAI) have shown the potential to decrease problematic alcohol use among adolescents and young adults. Most of the BAI studies have been efficacy trials designed to achieve high internal validity but have raised questions regarding the feasibility of large-scale implementation. Providing interventions for those voluntarily wanting them might offer an alternative, and studies using this design would be more similar to effectiveness studies. The present research compares randomly selected 20-year-old men who took part in a scientific trial (efficacy) with those who voluntarily sought an intervention (effectiveness). Sampling took place during army recruitment procedures that are mandatory for all males in Switzerland. At-risk drinking (20+ drinks per week, or more than one risky drinking occasion of 6+ drinks per month) was determined a posteriori; there was no screening. There were a higher percentage of at-risk drinkers in the volunteer arm at baseline, but at-risk drinkers did not differ from those in the trial arm on any of the assessed alcohol measures. This suggests that offering BAI on a large-scale, voluntary basis may reach at-risk drinkers as effectively as do more scientifically oriented trials, without needing to adhere to screening and stringent research procedures. Nevertheless, BAI was more effective for at-risk drinkers who were invited for trial participation versus those who volunteered. This could be due to behavior that is already consolidated and is difficult to change. Lacking further modifications, real-world implementations of BAI for young men may be less effective than randomized controlled trials designed to test the efficacy of BAI.

Motivational brief intervention for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections in travelers: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are among the frequent risks encountered by travelers. Efficient interventions are needed to improve the understanding of the risks of STIs. We investigated the potential benefits of a motivational brief intervention (BI) and the provision of condoms on the engagement in unprotected casual sex.Methods: 3-arm randomized controlled trial performed among single travelers aged 18-44 years visiting a travel clinic in Switzerland. The main outcomes were the prevalence of casual unprotected sexual intercourse and their predictors.Results: 5148 eligible travelers were seen from 2006 to 2008. 1681 agreed to participate and 1115 subjects (66%) completed the study. 184/1115 (17%) had a casual sexual relationship abroad and overall 46/1115 (4.1%) had inconsistently protected sexual relations. Women (adjusted OR 2.7 [95% CI 1.4-5.6]) and travelers with a history of past STI (adjusted OR 2.8 [95% CI 1.1-7.4]) had more frequent casual sexual relationships without consistent protection. Regarding the effect of our intervention, the prevalence of subjects using condoms inconsistently was 28% (95% CI 16-40) in the motivational BI group, 24% (95% CI 10-37) in the condoms group and 24% (95% CI 14-33) in the control group (p = 0.7).Conclusion: This study showed that a motivational brief intervention and/or the provision of free condoms did not modify risky sexual behavior of young travelers. The rate of inconsistently protected sexual relationships during travel was however lower than expected