Prévention des troubles du rythme cardiaque en hémodialyse: quels sont les facteurs modulables [Prevention of cardiac arrhythmias in hemodialysis: what are the modulating factors?].

La mort subite est la première cause de mortalité chez les patients souffrant d'une insuffisance rénale terminale traités par dialyse chronique. La technique de dialyse utilisée et la composition chimique du dialysat influencent l'incidence des arythmies. Des études pilotes démontrent que l'utilisation d'un dialysat sans acétate avec perfusion de bicarbonate de sodium en aval du filtre de dialyse, couplée à une modulation du profil de potassium pendant la séance de dialyse, ou acetate free biofiltration with potassium profiled dialysate, permet de réduire l'incidence des arythmies, l'intervalle QT et sa dispersion. La limitation du volume de soustraction liquidienne pendant la dialyse et l'augmentation de la concentration de calcium dans le dialysat constituent d'autres stratégies anti-arythmogènes possibles Sudden death is the first cause of mortality in patients with end stage renal disease undergoing chronic dialysis treatment. The technique of dialysis as well as the chemical composition of the dialysate can impact on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. Pilot studies reveal that the use of an acetate-free dialysate with a downstream filter infusion of sodium bicarbonate, coupled with a modulated potassium-profiled dialysate during hemodialysis, or acetate free biofiltration with potassium profiled dialysate, reduces the incidence of arrhythmias, the QT interval and QT dispersion. The limitation of the ultrafiltration volume during the dialysis session, and the increase in calcium concentration in the dialysate are other possible strategies to reduce cardiac arrhythmias.

Pro and con arguments in using alternative dialysis regimens in the frail and elderly patients.

In the last decade, an increasing number of patients over 75 years of age are starting renal replacement therapy. Frailty is highly prevalent in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the context of the increased prevalence of some ESRD-associated conditions: protein-energy wasting, inflammation, anaemia, acidosis or hormonal disturbances. There are currently no hard data to support guidance on the optimal duration of dialysis for frail/elderly ESRD patients. The current debate is not about starting dialysis or managing conservatory frail ESRD patients, but whether a more intensive regimen once dialysis is initiated (for whatever reasons and circumstances) would improve patients' outcome. The most important issue is that all studies performed with extended/alternative dialysis regimens do not specifically address this particular type of patients and therefore all the inferences are derived from the general ESRD population. Care planning should be responsive to end-of-life needs whatever the treatment modality. Care in this setting should focus on symptom control and quality of life rather than life extension. We conclude that, similar to the general dialysed population, extensive application of more intensive dialysis schedules is not based on solid evidence. However, after a thorough clinical evaluation, a limited period of a trial of intensive dialysis could be prescribed in more problematic patients.

Prevalence and Diagnostic Approach to Sleep Apnea in Hemodialysis Patients: A Population Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous observations found a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the hemodialysis population, but the best diagnostic approach remains undefined. We assessed OSA prevalence and performance of available screening tools to propose a specific diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: 104 patients from 6 Swiss hemodialysis centers underwent polygraphy and completed 3 OSA screening scores: STOP-BANG, Berlin's Questionnaire, and Adjusted Neck Circumference. The OSA predictors were identified on a derivation population and used to develop the diagnostic algorithm, which was validated on an independent population. RESULTS: We found 56% OSA prevalence (AHI ≥ 15/h), which was largely underdiagnosed. Screening scores showed poor performance for OSA screening (ROC areas 0.538 [SE 0.093] to 0.655 [SE 0.083]). Age, neck circumference, and time on renal replacement therapy were the best predictors of OSA and were used to develop a screening algorithm, with higher discriminatory performance than classical screening tools (ROC area 0.831 [0.066]). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the high OSA prevalence and highlights the low diagnosis rate of this treatable cardiovascular risk factor in the hemodialysis population. Considering the poor performance of OSA screening tools, we propose and validate a specific algorithm to identify hemodialysis patients at risk for OSA for whom further sleep investigations should be considered.