Testis size, sperm characteristics and testosterone concentrations in four species of shrews (Mammalia, Soricidae).

The aim of this study was to establish and compare the sperm characteristics in four shrew species in the context of the sperm competition hypothesis. As expected, the large relative testis size in promiscuous species was associated with a high number of cauda epididymal spermatozoa and a high concentration of circulating testosterone. In addition, in Sorex and Neomys, species with high intensity of sperm competition, the spermatozoa stored in cauda epididymis were characterized by high percentage of progressive motility whereas in Crocidura and Suncus, the cauda epididymal spermatozoa were motile but with very low percentage of progressive motility. This capability is achieved only following the passage through the vas gland, a specialized region for sperm storage located along the vas deferens in these shrew species. The hypothesis that sperm competition is positively correlated with spermatozoa length could not be confirmed. In Crocidura and Suncus, the total sperm length is increased by the large sperm head due to a big acrosome. This trait, specific to the subfamily Crocidurinae, may results from a selective pressure independent of the context of sperm competition, related to a specific, but as yet unclear role, for the acrosome during the fertilization.

The difference of disease perception by juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients and their parents : analysis of the JAMAR questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The JAMAR (Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report) has been developed to evaluate the perception of the patient and his parents on different items: well-being, pain, functional status, quality of life, disease activity, disease course, side effects of medication, therapeutic compliance and satisfaction with illness outcome. Our aim was to compare disease's perception by JIA patients and their parents. METHODS: We included into the study 100 consecutive patients over 7 years of age. We asked both parent and child to complete the JAMAR questionnaire. For each patient we recorded demographic and disease related data. We examined the level of disagreement between children and parents for the quantitative items of the JAMAR: VAS Pain, VAS Disease Activity, VAS Well Being, Juvenile Arthritis Functional Score, HRQoL. Then we looked for a relation between discordance-rate and demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Children and parents' median scores for all five items were similar. Individual dyads agreement was low, with a large amount of pairs (80) discordant for at least one item. We found higher MD VAS and JADAS in more discordant dyads, suggesting that when the disease is more active discordance between child and parent increase. CONCLUSION: The JAMAR questionnaire is an important tool that helps clinicians to detect divergent child and parent's disease perceptions. It is essential that both patients and parents fill the JAMAR questionnaire for a complete clinical and psychosocial evaluation.

Relation entre l'alliance thérapeutique infirmière/patient, et les contrôles perçus par le patient en traitement de dépendances

Le but de cette étude était d'investiguer l'association entre l'alliance thérapeutique et le contrôle de substances, comme il est vécu par le patient. La théorie de King et le concept de l'alliance thérapeutique figuraient comme cadres théoriques. L'investigation se faisait à l'aide d'un questionnaire auto-administré, incluant l'instrument working alliance inventory (WAI) dans sa forme abréviée, traduit et validé en français, visant un échantillon de convenance (n=28). L'alliance thérapeutique était évaluée sur une échelle Likert à 12 questions, et les alliances thérapeutiques se sont révélées comme bonnes (x=61.68, max=84). Mais il y a une relation linéaire négative significative entre le degré à quel point les contrôles sont perçus comme pesants, évalués par une question supplémentaire sur une visual analog scale (VAS), et l'établissement d'une alliance thérapeutique (r =-0.67, p-value>0.001). De plus, la forme d'admission joue un rôle significatif, car dans cette étude, les patients admis sous pression de l'extérieur (n=7) ont de moins bonnes alliances (t, p-value=0.018) et vivent les contrôles comme plus pesants (Z, p-value=0.004) que les patients admis de leur propre gré (n=21). Malgré que ces résultats ne sont, vu le petit échantillon (n=28), pas généralisables, ils pourraient impliquer pour la pratique de repenser la prise d'urine et d'être sensibilisés aux conséquences possibles. Des options, comme l'introduction d'une supervision par caméra ou le retrait complet de l'infirmière de référence de toute sorte de contrôles, seraient imaginables. Au moins pour les personnes hospitalisées sous pression de l'extérieur et qui sont probablement, pour cette raison, plus susceptibles à tout dérangement de la relation.