State-of-the-art treatment of hypertension: established and new drugs.

The treatment of essential hypertension is based essentially on the prescription of four major classes of antihypertensive drugs, i.e. blockers of the renin-angiotensin system, calcium channel blockers, diuretics and beta-blockers. In recent years, very few new drug therapies of hypertension have become available. Therefore, it is crucial for physicians to optimize their antihypertensive therapies with the drugs available on the market. In each of the classes of antihypertensive drugs, questions have recently been raised: are angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors superior to angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB)? Is it possible to reduce the incidence of peripheral oedema with calcium antagonists? Is hydrochlorothiazide really the good diuretic to use in combination therapies? The purpose of this review is to discuss these various questions in the light of the most recent clinical studies and meta-analyses. These latter suggest that ACE inhibitors and ARB are equivalent except for a better tolerability profile of ARB. Third generation calcium channel blockers enable to reduce the incidence of peripheral oedema and chlorthalidone is certainly more effective than hydrochlorothiazide in preventing cardiovascular events in hypertension. At last, studies suggest that drug adherence and long-term persistence under therapy is one of the major issues in the actual management of essential hypertension.

Trends in hospital discharges, management and in-hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction in Switzerland between 1998 and 2008.

BACKGROUND: Since the late nineties, no study has assessed the trends in management and in-hospital outcome of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Switzerland. Our objective was to fill this gap. METHODS: Swiss hospital discharge database for years 1998 to 2008. AMI was defined as a primary discharge diagnosis code I21 according to the ICD10 classification. Invasive treatments and overall in-hospital mortality were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 102,729 hospital discharges with a diagnosis of AMI were analyzed. The percentage of hospitalizations with a stay in an Intensive Care Unit decreased from 38.0% in 1998 to 36.2% in 2008 (p for trend < 0.001). Percutaneous revascularizations increased from 6.0% to 39.9% (p for trend < 0.001). Bare stents rose from 1.3% to 16.6% (p for trend < 0.001). Drug eluting stents appeared in 2004 and increased to 23.5% in 2008 (p for trend < 0.001). Coronary artery bypass graft increased from 1.0% to 3.0% (p for trend < 0.001). Circulatory assistance increased from 0.2% to 1.7% (p for trend < 0.001). Among patients managed in a single hospital (not transferred), seven-day and total in-hospital mortality decreased from 8.0% to 7.0% (p for trend < 0.01) and from 11.2% to 10.1%, respectively. These changes were no longer significant after multivariate adjustment for age, gender, region, revascularization procedures and transfer type. After multivariate adjustment, differing trends in revascularization procedures and in in-hospital mortality were found according to the geographical region considered. CONCLUSION: In Switzerland, a steep rise in hospital discharges and in revascularization procedures for AMI occurred between 1998 and 2008. The increase in revascularization procedures could explain the decrease in in-hospital mortality rates.

Delayed diagnosis of HIV infection and late initiation of antiretroviral therapy in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate delayed HIV diagnosis and late initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. METHODS: Two sub-populations were included: 1915 patients with HIV diagnosis from 1998 to 2007 and within 3 months of cohort registration (group A), and 1730 treatment-naïve patients with CD4>or=200 cells/microL before their second cohort visit (group B). In group A, predictors for low initial CD4 cell counts were examined with a median regression. In group B, we studied predictors for CD4<200 cells/microL without ART despite cohort follow-up. RESULTS: Median initial CD4 cell count in group A was 331 cells/microL; 31% and 10% were <200 and <50 cells/microL, respectively. Risk factors for low CD4 count were age and non-White race. Homosexual transmission, intravenous drug use and living alone were protective. In group B, 30% initiated ART with CD4>or=200 cells/microL; 18% and 2% dropped to CD4 <200 and <50 cells/microL without ART, respectively. Sub-Saharan origin was associated with lower probability of CD4 <200 cells/microL without ART during follow-up. Median CD4 count at ART initiation was 207 and 253 cells/microL in groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CD4<200 cells/microL and, particularly, CD4<50 cells/microL before starting ART are predominantly caused by late presentation. Earlier HIV diagnosis is paramount.

Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery

Rapport de synthèse : But: comparer les taux d'infections du site chirurgical (ISC) en fonction de la voie d'abord, ouverte ou laparoscopique, pour 3 procédures : l'appendicectomie, la cholécystectomie et la colectomie. Evaluer l'effet de la laparoscopie sur l'ISC pour ces trois interventions. Contexte : la laparoscopie est associée à de nombreux avantages par rapport à la chirurgie ouverte. Parmi ceux-ci, des taux inférieurs d'ISC ont été rapportés lors de laparoscopie. Ceci a été décrit en particulier lors de cholécystectomie. Mais des biais tels que le manque de suivi après la sortie de l'hôpital, et certains facteurs confondants, auraient pu contribuer à l'observation de différences entre ces deux techniques. Méthode : étude descriptive basée sur des données collectées entre mars 1998 et décembre 2004 de manière prospective dans le cadre d'un programme de surveillance des ISC dans 8 hôpitaux suisses. Ce programme comportait un suivi standardisé après le départ de l'hôpital. Les taux d'ISC ont été comparés après interventions faites par laparoscopie et chirurgie ouverte. Différents paramètres pouvant influencer la survenue d'une infection ont été identifiés en utilisant des modèles de régression logistiques. Résultats : les taux d'ISC après interventions par laparoscopie et par voie ouverte ont été respectivement de 59/1051 (5.6%) versus 117/1417 (8.3%) après appendicectomie (p = 0.01), 46/2606 (1.7%) versus 35/144 (7.9%) après cholécystectomie (p < 0.0001), et 35/311 (11.3%) versus 400/1781 (22.5%) après colectomie (p < 0,0001). Après ajustement, les interventions par laparoscopie étaient associées à un taux inférieur d'ISC : odds ratio = 0.61 (IC 95% : 0.43 - 0.87) pour l'appendicectomie, 0.27 (0.16 - 0.43) pour la cholécystectomie et 0.43 (0.29 - 0.63) pour la colectomie. Discussion et conclusion : bien que les patients aient quitté plus tôt l'hôpital après une intervention laparoscopique, leur suivi à un mois a été identique, ce qui a permis d'éviter une sous-estimation des ISC après chirurgie laparoscopique. De plus, l'analyse multivariée a inclus de nombreux facteurs potentiellement confondants, et l'utilisation de la laparoscopie était indépendamment et significativement liée à un effet protecteur à l'égard de l'ISC. La laparoscopie lors d'appendicectomie, cholécystectomie et colectomie semble diminuer le taux d'ISC en comparaison à la même chirurgie pratiquée par voie ouverte. Lorsqu'elle est faisable, cette voie d'abord minimalement invasive devrait être préférée à la chirurgie ouverte.