Les représentations d'attachement du jeune enfant. Développement d'un système de codage pour les histoires à compléter

Les histoires d'attachement à compléter de Bretherton et Ridgeway (1990) constituent un moyen d'évaluer les narratifs d'enfants dès l'âge de 3 ans. Dans le présent article, nous présentons un Q-sort permettant de coder ces productions enfantines. Des scores à 4 dimensions d'attachement (sécurité, désactivation, hyperactivation, désorganisation) peuvent être obtenus grâce à une comparaison des réponses du sujet à celles de prototypes. Par ailleurs, une analyse en composantes principales a permis de définir 6 échelles, correspondant chacune à un aspect spécifique du jeu. Certains aspects des narratifs semblent influencés par le sexe et l'âge de l'enfant, mais non par son QI. Des exemples d'application du Q-sort sont présentés, notamment pour l'étude de la transmission intergénérationnelle des stratégies d'attachement ou pour l'étude de l'implication des représentations et des capacités narratives en matière de psychopathologie. Bretherton and Ridgeway's (1990) attachment story completion task allows for the assessment of child narratives as early as 3 years of age. In the present article, we present a Q-sort for the coding of these child productions. Scores on 4 attachment dimensions (security, deactivation, hyperactivation, disorganization) can be computed by comparing participants' responses to those of each prototype. Following a principal components analysis, 6 scales have been defined, each one corresponding to some specific aspects of child play. Certain aspects of child narratives seem to be influenced by gender and age, but not by IQ. Examples of possible applications of the Q-sort are presented, such as its use in the study of intergenerational transmission of attachment strategies or the study of the role of representations and narrative competence in psychopathology.

2

In 1959, Swerdlow reported a case of a 27-year-old woman with a pelvic tumour that seemed to arise from the peritoneum, in the presence of normal ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus, and that was histologically similar to papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary [52]. Since then several authors have described this disease using different names, such as extraovarian primary peritoneal carcinoma (EOPPC), peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma, peritoneal adenocarcinoma of Müllerian type, serous surface papillary carcinoma, normal sized ovary carcinoma syndrome, peritoneal mesothelioma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma. This illustrates the confusion about definition, histogenesis and clinicopathologic features of this entity. In 1993, in an attempt to sort out these confounding variables, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) developed criteria to define EOPPC: - Both ovaries must be either physiologically normal in size or enlarged by a benign process. - The involvement in extraovarian sites must be greater than the involvement on the surface of either ovary. - Microscopically, the ovarian component must be one of the following: non existent; confined to ovarian surface epithelium with no evidence of cortical invasion; involving ovarian surface epithelium and underlying cortical stroma but with tumour size less than 5x5mm within ovarian substance with or without surface disease. The histological and cytological characteristics of the tumour must be predominantly of the serous type that is similar or identical to ovarian serous adenocarcinoma of any grade [8, 55].