Speech and oromotor deficits of epileptic origin in benign partial epilepsy of childhood with rolandic spikes (BPERS). Relationship to the acquired aphasia-epilepsy syndrome.

The authors report three children who suffered temporary oromotor or speech disturbances as focal epileptic manifestations within the frame of benign partial epilepsy of childhood with rolandic spikes and review similar cases described in the literature. The deficit can occur as an initial symptom of the disorder without visible epileptic seizures and interferes in a variable way with simple voluntary oromotor functions or complex movements including speech production, depending on the exact location and spread of the discharging epileptic focus around the perisylvian region. The most severe deficit produces the anterior operculum syndrome. More subtle non-linguistic deficits such as intermittent drooling, oromotor apraxia or dysfluency, as well as linguistic ones involving phonologic production, can occur. The rapidity of onset, progression and recovery of the deficit is very variable as well as its duration and presumably reflects the degree of epileptic activity. In some cases, rapid improvement with antiepileptic medication occurs and coincidence between the paroxysmal EEG activity (which is usually bilateral) and the functional deficit is seen. The clinical and EEG profile of the seizures disorder and the dynamic of the deficit in these cases bear a strong resemblance to what is seen in the acquired epilepsy-aphasia syndrome (Landau and Kleffner). The variations in clinical symptoms appear more related to the main site, local extension and bilaterality of the epileptic foci rather than a basic difference in physiopathology.

Le devenir féminin transgenre : une étude qualitative et réflexive sur le genre, la corporéité et la subjectivité sexuelle

RésuméCette thèse en psychologie qualitative et critique de la santé propose un éclairage, sur la subjectivité transgenre, différent des modèles dominants en clinique. Les nosologies de type DSM et de la psychiatrie dominante focalisent sur la seule question de la transition transsexuelle, elles utilisent la sexualité comme outil dans les diagnostics différentiels permettant d'effectuer le gatekeeping de la transition médicalisée du genre. Elles sont décrites comme un dispositif de médicalisation du genre, induisant des pratiques maltraitantes. Une méthodologie qualitative inspirée de la théorie ancrée ainsi que de l'analyse réflexive est utilisée. Un échantillon de 15 personnes représentant la diversité des personnes transgenres FtM a été recruté. Les données provenant d'entrevues non directives sont analysées dans une perspective verticale et horizontale. Les résultats soulignent l'inadéquation des typologies cliniques, de la place qui est donnée à la sexualité dans les procédures diagnostiques et de l'opposition qu'elles construisent entre identité (de genre) et sexualité. Ils plaident pour une vision deleuzienne de type nomade, incarnée et sexuée de la subjectivité transgenre.AbstractThe broad of this study in critical health psychology is to build an understanding of transgender subjectivity which contrast with dominant clinical models. DSM nosology types and dominant psychiatry have traditionally focused only on transsexual transitioning. They use sexuality as a diagnostic tool to address the gatekeeping of the medical transition. These practices have been described as medicalization of gender, inducing mistreatment. A qualitative methodology mixing grounded theory and reflexivity has been used. A sample of 15 persons has been recruited to represent transgender FtM diversity. Data were collected through in-depth interview and analysed case by case and by themes. Results show that dominant clinical typologies of TG are inappropriate, as well as the way sexuality is used in this practices and the opposition between (gender) identity and sexuality. We propose a deleuzian concept of becoming and multiplicity to understand transgender subjectivity.