Kinder als Mitbetroffene von häuslicher Gewalt : die Vernetzung der betroffenen Kinder mit der Opferhilfe im Kanton Bern

Dans le présent travail, on se pose les questions de savoir si, dans le canton de Berne, il existe un besoin d'agir et d'intégrer les enfants touchés par la violence conjugale (on parle ici des actes de violence entre les parents) à l'aide aux victimes d'infractions. Le travail se concentre sur des enfants de moins de 12 ans, dont les parents, conscients de leur violence, se sont annoncés eux-mêmes à un centre de consultation. Les enfants n'ont aucune offre de soutien (par ex : protection de droit civil de l'enfant). Ces parents sont donc les personnes de contact de référence capables de défendre les intérêts des enfants, ce sont eux qui peuvent mettre les enfants en contact avec les systèmes de soutien appropriés. Généralement, à cet âge, les enfants ne peuvent pas encore chercher de l'aide eux-mêmes. Les centres de consultation sont donc les seules institutions d'état qui, dans de tels cas, offrent des aides de soutien, qui connaissent la situation des enfants, et qui par l'intermédiaire des parents, ont un contact indirect avec les enfants. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird den Fragen nachgegangen, ob im Kanton Bern ein Handlungsbedarf besteht, Kinder, die von häuslicher Gewalt (hier verstanden als Gewalthandlungen zwischen den Eltern) betroffen sind, mit der Opferhilfe zu vernetzen? Der Fokus der Arbeit liegt auf Kindern unter 12 Jahren, deren gewaltbetroffene Elternteile sich aufgrund des eigenen Gewalterlebens selbständig bei einer Opferhilfeberatungsstelle gemeldet haben. Ihre Kinder sind mit keinem Unterstützungsangebot vernetzt (z.B. zivilrechtlicher Kindesschutz). Diese Elternteile sind die zentralen Ansprechpersonen für die Belange der Kinder, sie können die Kinder mit geeigneten Unterstützungssystemen vernetzen. Die Kinder selbst können sich in diesem Alter in der Regel noch nicht selbständig Hilfe organisieren. Die Opferhilfeberatungsstellen sind damit die einzigen staatlichen Institutionen, die in solchen Fällen Unterstützungsleistungen bieten, von der Situation der Kinder Kenntnis haben und über die gewaltbetroffenen Eltern auch indirekten Kontakt zu den Kindern haben.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx with subglottic extension: is larynx preservation possible?. Plattenepithelkarzinom des Larynx mit subglottischer Ausdehnung: ist ein Larynxerhalt möglich ?

PURPOSE: Squamous cell carcinoma of larynx with subglottic extension (sSCC) is a rare location described to carry a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes and feasibility of larynx preservation in sSCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2012, 197 patients with sSCC were treated at our institution and included in the analysis. Stage III-IV tumors accounted for 76 %. Patients received surgery (62 %), radiotherapy (RT) (18 %), or induction chemotherapy (CT) (20 %) as front-line therapy. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant control rate were 59 % (95 % CI 51-68), 83 % (95 % CI 77-89), and 88 % (95 % CI 83-93), respectively, with a median follow-up of 54.4 months. There was no difference in OS and LRC according to front-line treatments or between primary subglottic cancer and glottosupraglottic cancers with subglottic extension. In the multivariate analysis, age > 60 years and positive N stage were the only predictors for OS (HR 2, 95 % CI 1.2-3.6; HR1.9, 95 % CI 1-3.5, respectively). A lower LRC was observed for T3 patients receiving a larynx preservation protocol as compared with those receiving a front-line surgery (HR 14.1, 95 % CI 2.5-136.7; p = 0.02); however, no difference of ultimate LRC was observed according to the first therapy when including T3 patients who underwent salvage laryngectomy (p = 0.6). In patients receiving a larynx preservation protocol, the 5-year larynx-preservation rate was 55 % (95 % CI 43-68), with 36 % in T3 patients. The 5-year larynx preservation rate was 81 % (95 % CI 65-96) and 35 % (95 % CI 20-51) for patients who received RT or induction CT as a front-line treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of sSCC are comparable with other laryngeal cancers when managed with modern therapeutic options. Larynx-preservation protocols could be a suitable option in T1-T2 (RT or chemo-RT) and selected T3 sSCC patients (induction CT).

Glasgow Coma Score für den Patienten mit Schädel-Hirn-Trauma [Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury].

Even 30 years after its first publication the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is still used worldwide to describe and assess coma. The GCS consists of three components, the ocular, motor and verbal response to standardized stimulation, and is used as a severity of illness indicator for coma of various origins. The GCS facilitates information transfer and monitoring changes in coma. In addition, it is used as a triage tool in patients with traumatic brain injury. Its prognostic value regarding the outcome after a traumatic brain injury still lacks evidence. One of the main problems is the evaluation of the GCS in sedated, paralysed and/or intubated patients. A multitude of pseudoscores exists but a universal definition has yet to be defined.

Schweizerisches Register für TNF-alpha-Blocker bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit rheumatologischen Erkrankungen [Swiss registry for TNF-alpha blockers in children and adolescents with rheumatological diseases].

We created a registry to evaluate long term outcome, efficacy and adverse events for children treated wit TNF-alpha inhibitors in Switzerland. 106 patients (68 female/38 male) were included. 61 patients were treated with Etanercept (Enbrel) and 45 with Infliximab (Remicade). Concomitant treatment at baseline included corticosteroids in 26% and Methotrexate in 75% of the patients. Subjective disease activity three months after initiation of TNF-alpha was better in 81%, worse in 4% and stable in 15% of the patients. In total 24 adverse events in 21 patients were reported. Treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors seems to be safe and effective for children and adolescents with rheumatologic diseases.

Concurrent use of cisplatin or cetuximab with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Strahlentherapie in Kombination mit platinbasierter Chemotherapie oder Cetuximab zur Behandlung von lokal fortgeschrittenen Plattenepithelkarzinomen im Kopf-Hals-Bereich.

AIM: The goal of the present work was to compare outcomes of definitive concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy (BRT) in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, 265 patients with locally advanced HNSCC were treated at our institution with CRT (n = 194; 73 %) with three cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks) or BRT (n = 71; 27 %) with weekly cetuximab. Patients receiving BRT had more pre-existing conditions (Charlson index ≥ 2) than the CRT group (p = 0.005). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months. In all, 56 % of patients treated with CRT received the planned three cycles (92 % at least two cycles) and 79 % patients treated with BRT received six cycles or more. The 2-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 72 % and 61 %, respectively. In the multivariate analysis (MVA), T4 stage, N2-3 stage, smoking status (current smoker as compared with never smoker), and non-oropharyngeal locations predicted for OS, whereas BRT association with OS was of borderline significance (p = 0.054). The 2-year actuarial locoregional control (LRC) and distant control (DC) rates were 73 and 79 %, respectively. CRT was independently associated with an improved LRC (2-year LRC: 76 % for CRT vs. 61 % for BRT) and DC (2-year LRC: 81 % for CRT vs. 68 % for BRT) in comparison with BRT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01 in the MVA). Subgroup analyses showed that T4 patients benefited significantly from CRT (vs. BRT) in LRC, while T1-3 did not. BRT patients had more G3-4 skin complications (p < 0.001) and CRT patients had higher rates of feeding tube placement (p = 0.006) and G3-4 gastrointestinal toxicities (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis showed a better LRC in locally advanced HNSCC treated by cisplatin-based CRT than cetuximab-based BRT, and a nonsignificant trend towards an improved OS.