Patients' satisfaction with community treatment: a pilot cross-sectional survey adopting multiple perspectives.

ACCESSIBLE SUMMARY: Patients' satisfaction is scarcely studied within the context of community treatment for adolescents. Thus, this study adopts a multiple perspective on patients' satisfaction (including service users as well as staff members). The results highlighted that all informants (patients, foster carers in foster homes and professional caregivers from community treatment teams) perceived the patients to be satisfied, with foster carers reporting the highest patient satisfaction rate. Considering the patient satisfaction rate from multiple perspectives provides complementary understandings. Clinical outcomes and, specifically, a reduction in emotional difficulties were related to patient's satisfaction, but only from the patients' perspective. ABSTRACT: Community treatment (CT) teams in Switzerland provide care to patients who are unable to use regular child and adolescent mental health services (i.e. inpatient and outpatients facilities). No study has considered patients' self-rated satisfaction alongside with staff members' perspectives on patient satisfaction. Thus, adopting a cross-sectional survey design, we collected patients' satisfaction using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), rated by multiple informants (patients, foster carers in foster homes and professional caregivers from CT teams). Professional caregivers assessed clinical outcomes using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents. The results indicated that all informants were satisfied with the community treatment teams. The satisfaction scores were not correlated across informants; however, the alleviation of emotional symptoms was correlated with patients' satisfaction. This study indicated that the use of a combined approach including the views of service users and professionals gives important complementary information. Finally, in our sample, lower emotional symptoms were linked to enhanced patient satisfaction. This study demonstrated the importance of considering multiple perspectives to obtain the most accurate picture of patients' satisfaction. Second, focusing on the reduction of emotional symptoms might lead to a higher degree of patients' satisfaction.

Patients' satisfaction with community treatment: a pilot cross-sectional survey adopting multiple perspectives.

ACCESSIBLE SUMMARY: Patients' satisfaction is scarcely studied within the context of community treatment for adolescents. Thus, this study adopts a multiple perspective on patients' satisfaction (including service users as well as staff members). The results highlighted that all informants (patients, foster carers in foster homes and professional caregivers from community treatment teams) perceived the patients to be satisfied, with foster carers reporting the highest patient satisfaction rate. Considering the patient satisfaction rate from multiple perspectives provides complementary understandings. Clinical outcomes and, specifically, a reduction in emotional difficulties were related to patient's satisfaction, but only from the patients' perspective. ABSTRACT: Community treatment (CT) teams in Switzerland provide care to patients who are unable to use regular child and adolescent mental health services (i.e. inpatient and outpatients facilities). No study has considered patients' self-rated satisfaction alongside with staff members' perspectives on patient satisfaction. Thus, adopting a cross-sectional survey design, we collected patients' satisfaction using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), rated by multiple informants (patients, foster carers in foster homes and professional caregivers from CT teams). Professional caregivers assessed clinical outcomes using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents. The results indicated that all informants were satisfied with the community treatment teams. The satisfaction scores were not correlated across informants; however, the alleviation of emotional symptoms was correlated with patients' satisfaction. This study indicated that the use of a combined approach including the views of service users and professionals gives important complementary information. Finally, in our sample, lower emotional symptoms were linked to enhanced patient satisfaction. This study demonstrated the importance of considering multiple perspectives to obtain the most accurate picture of patients' satisfaction. Second, focusing on the reduction of emotional symptoms might lead to a higher degree of patients' satisfaction.

Delirium in the elderly: Current problems with increasing geriatric age.

Delirium is an acute disorder of attention and cognition seen relatively commonly in people aged 65 yr or older. The prevalence is estimated to be between 11 and 42 per cent for elderly patients on medical wards. The prevalence is also high in nursing homes and long term care (LTC) facilities. The consequences of delirium could be significant such as an increase in mortality in the hospital, long-term cognitive decline, loss of autonomy and increased risk to be institutionalized. Despite being a common condition, it remains under-recognised, poorly understood and not adequately managed. Advanced age and dementia are the most important risk factors. Pain, dehydration, infections, stroke and metabolic disturbances, and surgery are the most common triggering factors. Delirium is preventable in a large proportion of cases and therefore, it is also important from a public health perspective for interventions to reduce further complications and the substantial costs associated with these. Since the aetiology is, in most cases, multfactorial, it is important to consider a multi-component approach to management, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological. Detection and treatment of triggering causes must have high priority in case of delirium. The aim of this review is to highlight the importance of delirium in the elderly population, given the increasing numbers of ageing people as well as increasing geriatric age.

Drinking locations and alcohol-related harm: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in a sample of young Swiss men.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption--in particular drinking volume (DV) and risky single occasion drinking (RSOD)--has been related to a wide range of negative consequences and health problems. Previous studies also suggested that drinking in certain locations may be more strongly associated with the occurrence of alcohol-related harm than drinking in others. However, they were conducted in countries culturally and legally different from European countries and were limited to cross-sectional designs. This study investigates the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of alcohol-related harm with DVs in different locations in a sample of young Swiss men. METHODS: A representative sample of 4536 young Swiss male drinkers completed baseline and 15-month follow-up questionnaires. These assessed DVs in 11 locations, alcohol-related harm (i.e. number of alcohol-related consequences and alcohol use disorder criteria) and frequency of RSOD. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of alcohol-related harm with DVs in each location were tested using regression models, with and without adjustment for frequency of RSOD. RESULTS: Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses showed significant positive associations between alcohol-related harm and DVs at friends' homes, in discos/nightclubs and in outdoor public places, when controlling for frequency of RSOD. In contrast, the contribution of DVs at one's own home and in restaurants was consistently not significant when adjusted for frequency of RSOD. When controlling for RSOD, associations between alcohol-related harm and DVs in bars/pubs, when playing sports, during other leisure activities, at cinemas/theatres, during sporting events, and during special events were not consistent between cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that prevention interventions should not only target reducing the overall volume of alcohol consumed and the frequency of RSOD in general, but they should additionally focus on limiting alcohol consumption in outdoor public places, discos/nightclubs, and in friends' homes in particular, or at least on preventing harm occurring in these occasions.

Smoking cessation and the incidence of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes : a cohort study

Le tabagisme est associé à un risque augmenté de développer un diabète de type 2. Arrêter de fumer devrait donc diminuer le risqué de diabète. Seulement, les études concernant le risque métabolique à l'arrêt du tabac sont discordantes. Par ailleurs, les effets métaboliques du tabac et de l'arrêt du tabac diffèrent probablement selon le sexe, avec notamment un effet différent du tabac sur la santé des femmes, et une prise pondérale plus importante à l'arrêt que chez les hommes. Notre étude vise à évaluer le risque métabolique à l'arrêt du tabac, chez les femmes et les homes séparément. Nous avons utilisé les données de l'étude de cohorte prospective CoLaus, qui évalue différents facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire chez des sujets choisis de manière aléatoire, dans la population Lausannoise entre 35 et 75 ans, suivis sur 5.5 ans en moyenne. Parmi ceux avec une glycémie à jeun normale au départ, nous avons divisé les participants en quatre groupes selon leur statut tabagique : non fumeurs, personnes ayant arrêté de fumer depuis plus de 5 ans, celles ayant arrêté depuis moins de 5 ans, et fumeurs actifs. Nous avons mesuré les incidences de glycémie à jeun altérée (5.6-6.99 mmol/l) et de diabète (glycémie à jeun ≥ 7 mmol/l et/ou traitement pour le diabète) durant le période de suivi, stratifiées par sexe. Puis le risque d'incidence de glycémie altérée et de diabète a été calculé avec trois niveaux d'ajustement pour les facteurs confondants pour un risque métabolique. Nous avons inclus 3166 participants, dont 63% de femmes. Au total, 26.3% étaient fumeurs, 6.5% ex-fumeurs depuis moins de 5 ans et 23.5% ex-fumeurs depuis plus de 5 ans. Durant le suivi, 1311 (41.4%) personnes ont développé une glycémie à jeun altérée (33.6% des femmes, 54.7% des homes), et 47 (1.5%) ont développé un diabète (1.1% des femmes, 2.1% des hommes). Les personnes ayant arrêté de fumer n'avait pas de risque significativement plus élevé de développer une glycémie à jeun altérée ou un diabète que les fumeurs, après ajustement pour l'âge, l'éducation, l'hypercholestérolémie, la prise d'alcool, l'activité physique, la prise de poids, le BMI initial et le BMI d'arrivée dans les différents modèles d'ajustement. L'analyse de l'interaction du sexe avec ces résultats est également négative. Les analyses de sensibilité ont montré que l'exclusion des personnes ayant changé de statut tabagique durant le suivi ne changeait pas ces résultats. Nous avons refait les analyses en incluant les participants ayant une glycémie altérée au début du suivi, mais le risque d'incidence de diabète n'est pas plus élevé chez les ex-fumeurs que chez les fumeurs non plus dans cette population. Sur demande d'un reviewer, nous avons également refait les analyses avec la glycémie en continue (valeurs de base et valeurs à 5.5 ans), et la glycémie moyenne n'était pas différente par groupe de tabagisme. En conclusion, dans cette population européenne d'âge moyen, avec une prévalence basse d'obésité et une prise de poids modérée durant le suivi, nous n'avons pas trouvé de risque significativement plus élevé de développer un diabète en arrêtant de fumer, et ce pour les deux sexes. L'arrêt du tabac doit donc être encouragé chez toutes les fumeuses et tous les fumeurs.