Genetic analysis of sudden cardiac death victims: a survey of current forensic autopsy practices.

Autopsy-negative sudden cardiac deaths (SCD) seen in forensic practice are most often thought to be the result of sudden arrhythmic death syndrome. Postmortem genetic analysis is recommended in such cases, but is currently performed in only a few academic centers. In order to determine actual current practice, an on-line questionnaire was sent by e-mail to members of various forensic medical associations. The questions addressed routine procedures employed in cases of sudden cardiac death (autopsy ordering, macroscopic and microscopic cardiac examination, conduction tissue examination, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, biochemical markers, sampling and storage of material for genetic analyses, toxicological analyses, and molecular autopsy). Some questions concerned the legal and ethical aspects of genetic analyses in postmortem examinations, as well as any existing multidisciplinary collaborations in SCD cases. There were 97 respondents, mostly from European countries. Genetic testing in cases of sudden cardiac death is rarely practiced in routine forensic investigation. Approximately 60% of respondents reported not having the means to perform genetic postmortem testing and 40% do not collect adequate material to perform these investigations at a later date, despite working at university hospitals. The survey demonstrated that many of the problems involved in the adequate investigation of SCD cases are often financial in origin, due to the fact that activities in forensic medicine are often paid by and dependent on the judicial authorities. Problems also exist concerning the contact with family members and/or the family doctor, as well as the often-nonexistent collaboration with others clinicians with special expertise beneficial in the investigation of SCD cases, such as cardiologists and geneticists. This study highlights the importance in establishing guidelines for molecular autopsies in forensic medicine.

Circadian clock orchestration of signaling pathways influences mouse metabolism

Circadian clocks, present in organisms leaving in a rhythmic environment, constitute the mechanisms allowing anticipation and adaptation of behavior and physiology in response to these environmental variations. As a consequence, most aspects of metabolism and behavior are under the control of this circadian clock. At a molecular level, in all the studied species, the rhythmic expression of the genes involved are generated by interconnected transcriptional and translational feedback loops. In mammals, the heterodimer composed of BMAL1 and its partners CLOCK or NPAS2 constitutes a transcriptional activator regulating transcription of Per and Cry genes. These genes encode for repressors of the activity of BMAL1:CLOCK or BMAL1: NPAS2 heterodimers, thus closing a negative feedback loop that generates rhythms of approximately 24 hours. The aim of my doctoral work consisted in the investigation of the role of circadian clock in the regulation of different aspects of mouse metabolism through the rhythmic activation of signaling pathways. First, we showed that one way how the circadian clock exerts its function as an oscillator is through the regulation of mRNA translation. Indeed, we present evidence showing that circadian clock influences the temporal translation of a subset of mRNAs involved in ribosome biogenesis by controlling the transcription of translation initiation factors as well as the clock-dependent rhythmic activation of signaling pathways involved in their regulation. Moreover, the circadian oscillator regulates the transcription of ribosomal protein mRNAs and ribosomal RNAs. Thus the circadian clock exerts a major role in coordinating transcription and translation steps underlying ribosome biogenesis. In the second part, we showed the involvement of the circadian clock in lipid metabolism. Indeed, the three PAR bZip transcription factors DBP, TEF and HLF, are regulated by the molecular clock and play key roles in the control of lipid metabolism. Here we present evidence concerning the circadian expression and activity of PPARα via the circadian transcription of genes involved in the release of fatty acids, natural ligands of PPARα. It leads to the rhythmic activation of PPARα itself which could then play its role in the transcription of genes encoding proteins involved in lipid, cholesterol and glucose metabolism. In addition, we considered the possible role of lipid transporters, here SCP2, in the modulation of circadian activation of signaling pathways such as TORC1, PPARα and SREBP, linked to metabolism, and its feedback on the circadian clock. In the last part of this work, we studied the effects of these circadian clock-orchestrated pathways in physiology, as clock disruptions have been shown to be linked to metabolic disorders. We performed in vivo experiments on genetically and high-fat induced obese mice devoid of functional circadian clock. The results obtained showed that clock disruption leads to impaired triglycerides and glucose homeostasis in addition to insulin secretion and sensitivity. -- Les rythmes circadiens, présents chez tout organisme vivant dans un environnement rythmique, constituent l'ensemble de mécanismes permettant des réponses comportementales et physiologiques anticipées et adaptées aux variations environnementales. De ce fait, la plupart des aspects liés au métabolisme et au comportement de ces organismes apparaissent être sous le contrôle de l'horloge circadienne contrôlant ces rythmes. Au niveau moléculaire, dans toutes les espèces étudiées, l'expression rythmique de gènes impliqués sont générés par l'interconnexion de boucles de contrôle transcriptionnelles et traductionnelles. Chez les mammifères, l'hétérodimère composé de BMAL1 et de ses partenaires CLOCK ou NPAS2 constitue un activateur transcriptionnel régulant la transcription des gènes Per et Cry. Ces gènes codent pour des répresseurs de l'activité des hétérodimères BMAL1:CLOCK ou BMAL1:NPAS2. Cela a pour effet de fermer la boucle négative, générant ainsi des rythmes d'environ 24 heures. Le but de mon travail de thèse a consisté en l'investigation du rôle de l'horloge circadienne dans la régulation de certains aspects du métabolisme chez la souris via la régulation de l'activation rythmique des voies de signalisation. Nous avons tout d'abord montré que l'horloge circadienne exerce sa fonction d'oscillateur notamment au niveau de la régulation de la traduction des ARNm. En effet, nous présentons des preuves montrant que l'horloge circadienne influence la traduction temporelle d'un groupe d'ARNm impliqués dans la biogénèse des ribosomes en contrôlant la transcription de facteurs d'initiation de la traduction ainsi que l'activation rythmique des voies de signalisation qui sont impliquées dans leur régulation. De plus, l'oscillateur circadien régule la transcription d'ARNm codant pour les protéines ribosomales et d'ARN ribosomaux. De cette façon, l'horloge circadienne exerce un rôle majeur dans la coordination des étapes de transcription et traduction permettant la biogénèse des ribosomes. Dans la deuxième partie, nous montrons les implications de l'horloge circadienne dans le métabolisme des lipides. En effet, DBP, TEF et HLF, trois facteurs de transcription de la famille des PAR bZip qui sont régulés par l'horloge circadienne, jouent un rôle clé dans le contrôle du métabolisme des lipides par l'horloge circadienne. Nous apportons ici des preuves concernant l'expression et l'activité rythmiques de PPARα via la transcription circadienne de gènes impliqués dans le relargage d'acides gras, ligands naturels de PPARα, conduisant à l'activation circadienne de PPARα lui-même, pouvant ainsi jouer son rôle de facteur de transcription de gènes codant pour des protéines impliquées dans le métabolisme des lipides, du cholestérol et du glucose. De plus, nous nous sommes penchés sur le rôle possible de transporteurs de lipides, ici SCP2, dans la modulation de l'activation circadienne de voies de signalisation, telles que TORC1, PPARα et SREBP, qui sont liées au métabolisme, ainsi que son impact sur l'horloge elle-même. Dans la dernière partie de ce travail, nous avons étudié les effets de l'activation de ces voies de signalisation régulées par l'horloge circadienne dans le contexte physiologique puisqu'il a été montré que la perturbation de l'horloge pouvait être associée à des désordres métaboliques. Pour ce faire, nous avons fait des expériences in vivo sur des souris déficientes pour l'horloge moléculaire pour lesquelles l'obésité est induite génétiquement ou induite par la nourriture riche en lipides. Les résultats que nous obtenons montrent des dérèglements au niveau de l'homéostasie des triglycérides et du glucose ainsi que sur l'expression et la réponse à l'insuline.

Les neurosciences au Tribunal : de la responsabilité à la dangerosité, enjeux éthiques soulevés par la nouvelle loi française

AIM: In the past few years, spectacular progress in neuroscience has led to the emergence of a new interdisciplinary field, the so-called "neurolaw" whose goal is to explore the effects of neuroscientific discoveries on legal proceedings and legal rules and standards. In the United States, a number of neuroscientific researches are designed specifically to explore legally relevant topics and a case-law has already been developed. In Europe, neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being used in criminal courtrooms, as part of psychiatric testimony, nourishing the debate about the legal implications of brain research in psychiatric-legal settings. Though largely debated, up to now the use of neuroscience in legal contexts had not specifically been regulated by any legislation. In 2011, with the new bioethics law, France has become the first country to admit by law the use of brain imaging in judicial expertise. According to the new law, brain imaging techniques can be used only for medical purposes, or scientific research, or in the context of judicial expertise. This study aims to give an overview of the current state of the neurolaw in the US and Europe, and to investigate the ethical issues raised by this new law and its potential impact on the rights and civil liberties of the offenders. METHOD: An overview of the emergence and development of "neurolaw" in the United States and Europe is given. Then, the new French law is examined in the light of the relevant debates in the French parliament. Consequently, we outline the current tendencies in Neurolaw literature to focus on assessments of responsibility, rather than dangerousness. This tendency is analysed notably in relation to the legal context relevant to criminal policies in France, where recent changes in the legislation and practice of forensic psychiatry show that dangerousness assessments have become paramount in the process of judicial decision. Finally, the potential interpretations of neuroscientific data introduced into psychiatric testimonies by judges are explored. RESULTS: The examination of parliamentary debates showed that the new French law allowing neuroimaging techniques in judicial expertise was introduced in the aim to provide a legal framework that would protect the subject against potential misuses of neuroscience. The underlying fear above all, was that this technology be used as a lie detector, or as a means to predict the subject's behaviour. However, the possibility of such misuse remains open. Contrary to the legislator's wish, the defendant is not fully guaranteed against uses of neuroimaging techniques in criminal courts that would go against their interests and rights. In fact, the examination of the recently adopted legislation in France shows that assessments of dangerousness and of risk of recidivism have become central elements of the criminal policy, which makes it possible, if not likely that neuroimaging techniques be used for the evaluation of the dangerousness of the defendant. This could entail risks for the latter, as judges could perceive neuroscientific data as hard evidence, more scientific and reliable than the soft data of traditional psychiatry. If such neuroscientific data are interpreted as signs of potential dangerousness of a subject rather than as signs of criminal responsibility, defendants may become subjected to longer penalties or measures aiming to ensure public safety in the detriment of their freedom. CONCLUSION: In the current context of accentuated societal need for security, the judge and the expert-psychiatrist are increasingly asked to evaluate the dangerousness of a subject, regardless of their responsibility. Influenced by this policy model, the judge might tend to use neuroscientific data introduced by an expert as signs of dangerousness. Such uses, especially when they subjugate an individual's interest to those of society, might entail serious threats to an individual's freedom and civil liberties.

Les Neurosciences au Tribunal: de la responsabilité à la dangerosité

In recent years, an explosion of interest in neuroscience has led to the development of "Neuro-law," a new multidisciplinary field of knowledge whose aim is to examine the impact and role of neuroscientific findings in legal proceedings. Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being used in US and European courts in criminal trials, as part of psychiatric testimony, nourishing the debate about the legal implications of brain research in psychiatric-legal settings. During these proceedings, the role of forensic psychiatrists is crucial. In most criminal justice systems, their mission consists in accomplishing two basic tasks: assessing the degree of responsibility of the offender and evaluating their future dangerousness. In the first part of our research, we aim to examine the impact of Neuroscientific evidence in the assessment of criminal responsibility, a key concept of law. An initial jurisprudential research leads to conclude that there are significant difficulties and limitations in using neuroscience for the assessment of criminal responsibility. In the current socio-legal context, responsibility assessments are progressively being weakened, whereas dangerousness assessments gain increasing importance in the field of forensic psychiatry. In the second part of our research we concentrate on the impact of using neuroscience for the assessment of dangerousness. We argue that in the current policy era of zero tolerance, judges, confronted with the pressure to ensure public security, may tend to interpret neuroscientific knowledge and data as an objective and reliable way of evaluating one's dangerousness and risk of reoffending, rather than their responsibility. This tendency could be encouraged by a utilitarian approach to punishment, advanced by some recent neuroscientific research which puts into question the existence of free will and responsibility and argues for a rejection of the retributive theory of punishment. Although this shift away from punishment aimed at retribution in favor of a consequentialist approach to criminal law is advanced by some authors as a more progressive and humane approach, we believe that it could lead to the instrumentalisation of neuroscience in the interest of public safety, which can run against the proper exercise of justice and civil liberties of the offenders. By advancing a criminal law regime animated by the consequentialist aim of avoiding social harms through rehabilitation, neuroscience promotes a return to a therapeutical approach to crime which can have serious impact on the kind and the length of sentences imposed on the offenders; if neuroscientific data are interpreted as evidence of dangerousness, rather than responsibility, it is highly likely that judges impose heavier sentences, or/and security measures (in civil law systems), which can be indeterminate in length. Errors and epistemic traps of past criminological movements trying to explain the manifestation of a violent and deviant behavior on a biological and deterministic basis stress the need for caution concerning the use of modern neuroscientific methods in criminal proceedings.