149 resultados para Amphetamine psychosis
Resumo:
La durée de psychose non traitée (Duration of Untreated Psychosis, DUP) est définie par le temps écoulé entre l'émergence d'un trouble psychotique et le début de son traitement. La réduction de la DUP est un des objectifs principaux des programmes spécialisés dans le traitement de la psychose émergente, de nombreux travaux de recherche suggérant qu'une DUP longue est associée à une évolution défavorable de la maladie. Ces résultats restent cependant controversés, certaines études ne démontrant pas une telle association. Cette contradiction dans les résultats pourrait être la conséquence d'un manque d'uniformité dans les définitions appliquées pour mesurer la DUP, plus particulièrement en ce qui concerne la définition de ce que l'on considère être « début » du traitement. En effet, si l'étude de la phase d'émergence de la pathologie psychotique a été le focus d'une attention considérable qui a conduit à un certain degré de consensus quant à sa définition, le concept de début du traitement n'est clairement pas défini de manière aussi homogène. Compte tenu de l'importance des enjeux relatifs à l'intervention précoce dans les troubles psychotiques, il nous a semblé utile d'explorer cette question de manière plus approfondie, considérant qu'un manque de consensus dans la définition de la DUP contribue certainement à troubler les résultats des études qui visent à évaluer son impact sur l'évolution de ces maladies. En conséquence, l'objectif premier de ce travail est d'explorer l'impact de l'application de diverses définitions de début de traitement sur l'estimation de la DUP. Dans un premier article, publié dans Acta Neuropsychiatrica en 2009 (Duration of untreated psychosis : What are we talking about ?), le focus a été placé sur une revue de littérature concernant les définitions utilisées pour caractériser la fin de la DUP ainsi que sur les conséquences possibles d'un manque de précision dans cette définition sur l'évaluation de l'impact d'un retard de traitement dans la psychose débutante. Ce travail nous a permis d'identifier trois groupes principaux de définition de fin de DUP (End of DUP ; E-DUP) parmi les multiples critères utilisés dans les études publiées. E-DUP-1 est définie par la mise en route d'un traitement antipsychotique, le plus souvent sans tenir compte ni du dosage prescrit, ni de l'adhérence au traitement. E-DUP-2 est définie par l'entrée dans un programme de traitement spécialisé, et E-DUP-3 enfin est définie par la conjonction de la prescription d'un traitement antipsychotique adapté, de l'adhérence à ce traitement, et de la mise en route d'une prise en charge dans un programme spécialisé. En conclusion, nous relevions que cette grande variété dans les définitions appliquées pour l'évaluation de la DUP avait probablement contribué à l'aspect contradictoire des résultats des études de son impact sur l'évolution des psychoses et qu'il était donc temps de proposer une définition de consensus. La deuxième étude a été conduite dans le cadre d'un suivi de cohorte mis en place dans le programme de Traitement et Intervention Précoce dans les troubles Psychotiques (TIPP) établi dans le Département de Psychiatrie du CHUV à Lausanne depuis 2004. Les objectifs de cette seconde étude étaient au nombre de trois: (1) Exploration des variations de la DUP en fonction de l'application de trois principales définitions de fin de DUP (E-DUP) identifiées dans la littérature ; (2) Evaluation de la proportion de patients remplissant au moins une fois au cours des 18 mois de traitement la définition de E-DUP la plus compatible avec les directives de traitement proposées par l'International Early Psychosis Association (patient est à la fois engagé dans le traitement et se montre compliant à la médication, E-DUP-3); (3) Enfin, identification desfacteurs qui caractérisent les patients qui ne remplissent jamais les critères de cette dernière définition. L'exploration de différentes durées de DUP en utilisant les trois définitions d'E-DUP a donné les résultats suivants : La DUP1 médiane (2.2 mois) était significativement plus courte que la DUP2 (7.4 mois), et la DUP3 (13.6 mois) était significativement la plus longue des trois. De plus, 19.7% des patients n'avaient jamais rempli les critères de E-DUP-3 ; on peut donc considérer que près de 20% des patients traités dans ce programme spécialisé ne recevaient pas un traitement adéquat selon les directives intrernationales actuellement reconnues. Sur la base de ces chiffres, il apparaît clairement que, dans les études de l'impact de la DUP sur l'évolution de la psychose débutante, bon nombre des patients pour lesquels on considère que la DUP est terminée ne sont en fait pas adéquatement traités. Il est en conséquence très probable que ceci ait faussé les résultats de ces études, et qu'une définition plus restrictive permettrait de répondre de manière plus précise à cette question. Les patients qui ne remplissaient pas les critères E-DUP3 au cours des 18 premiers mois de traitement étaient caractérisés par un moins bon niveau de fonctionnement au cours de leur vie (« lower lifetime SOFAS » ; p=0.017) et ils étaient plus susceptibles de consommer du cannabis à l'entrée du programme ???? (?2 (1, n=49)=4.241, p=0.039). Pour ceux qui avaient rempli les critères E-DUP-3 au cours des 18 mois, une longue DUP3 était associée avec un jeune âge au début des symptômes psychotiques (rs =-0.573, p<0.001), et avec un faible niveau de fonctionnement pré-morbide (score de PAS élevés (rs =0.373, p=0.001), niveau maximal au cours de la vie bas pour le GAF(rs =-0.367, p<0.001) et pour le SOFAS (rs =-0.314, p=0.003)). En conclusion, ce travail a permis de mettre en évidence une grande variabilité dans la définition de la fin de la DUP parmi les études publiées jusque à ce jour, et l'impact important que le choix d'une ou l'autre de ces définitions peut avoir sur l'estimation de la DUP. De plus, nous avons observé que malgré la mise en place d'un programme spécialisé, près de 20% des patients ne remplissent pas les critères d'exposition à un traitement adéquat au cours des 18 premiers mois de prise en charge. Il est donc probable que l'estimation de l'impact de la DUP ait été faussé par cette variabilité, et il semble important que la communauté scientifique s'accorde sur une définition plus rigoureuse de cette variable. Enfin, certaines caractéristiques permettent d'identifier les patients qui sont à risque de ne pas remplir les critères de traitement adéquat a cours des 18 premiers mois de prise en charge ; il est possible qu'une identification précoce de ceux-ci permette la mise en place de stratégies mieux adaptées pour les aider à s'engager dans les soins. Le futur développement de ce travail sera d'évaluer l'impact de la DUP sur l'évolution des patients au cours des 36 mois de traitement proposés dans le programme TIPP, en appliquant les divers critères E-DUP, afin de voir si notre hypothèse que la variation des définitions a effectivement faussé les résultats de telles études. Nous devons pour cela attendre qu'un nombre suffisant de patients ait complété les 36 mois de traitement, de manière à avoir une puissance statistique suffisante pour répondre clairement à cette question.
Resumo:
Background: Cannabis use has a negative impact on psychosis. Studies are needed to explore the efficacy of psychological interventions to reduce cannabis use in psychosis. Our aim is to study the efficacy of a specific motivational intervention on young cannabis users suffering from psychosis. Methods: Participants (aged less than 35 years) were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) alone, or treatment as usual plus motivational intervention (MI + TAU). TAU was comprehensive and included case management, early intervention and mobile team when needed. Assessments were completed at baseline and at 3, 6 and12 months follow-up. Results: Sixty-two participants (32 TAU and 30 MI + TAU) were included in the study. Cannabis use decreased in both groups at follow-up. Participants who received MI in addition to TAU displayed both a greater reduction in number of joints smoked per week and greater confidence to change cannabis use at 3 and 6 months follow-up, but differences between groups were nonsignificant at 12 months. Conclusions: MI is well accepted by patients suffering from psychosis and has a short-term impact on cannabis use when added to standard care. However, the differential effect was not maintained at 1-year follow-up. MI appears to be a useful active component to reduce cannabis use which should be integrated in routine clinical practice.
Resumo:
Background: Several patterns of grey and white matter changes have been separately described in young adults with first-episode psychosis. Concomitant investigation of grey and white matter densities in patients with first-episode psychosis without other psychiatric comorbidities that include all relevant imaging markers could provide clues to the neurodevelopmental hypothesis in schizophrenia. Methods: We recruited patients with first-episode psychosis diagnosed according to the DSM-IV-TR and matched controls. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis and mean diffusivity voxel-based analysis (VBA) were used for grey matter data. Fractional anisotropy and axial, radial and mean diffusivity were analyzed using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) for white matter data. Results: We included 15 patients and 16 controls. The mean diffusivity VBA showed significantly greater mean diffusivity in the first-episode psychosis than in the control group in the lingual gyrus bilaterally, the occipital fusiform gyrus bilaterally, the right lateral occipital gyrus and the right inferior temporal gyrus. Moreover, the TBSS analysis revealed a lower fractional anisotropy in the first-episode psychosis than in the control group in the genu of the corpus callosum, minor forceps, corticospinal tract, right superior longitudinal fasciculus, left middle cerebellar peduncle, left inferior longitudinal fasciculus and the posterior part of the fronto-occipital fasciculus. This analysis also revealed greater radial diffusivity in the first-episode psychosis than in the control group in the right corticospinal tract, right superior longitudinal fasciculus and left middle cerebellar peduncle. Limitations: The modest sample size and the absence of women in our series could limit the impact of our results. Conclusion: Our results highlight the structural vulnerability of grey matter in posterior areas of the brain among young adult male patients with first-episode psychosis. Moreover, the concomitant greater radial diffusivity within several regions already revealed by the fractional anisotropy analysis supports the idea of a late myelination in patients with first-episode psychosis.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE: Studies investigating medication adherence in psychosis are limited by the need of a certain degree of medication adherence and the inclusion of mostly multiple-episode patients. By contrast, noninformed consent, epidemiological studies in first-episode psychosis (FEP) allow the assessment of an important subgroup of patients who persistently refuse antipsychotic medication and thereby never receive an adequate antipsychotic trial. The present study aims to assess the prevalence and predictors of such a "medication refusal" subgroup and its association with illness outcome. METHODS: The present file audit study assessed medication adherence in an epidemiological cohort of 605 FEP patients who were treated within the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre for up to 18 months. Medication adherence was categorized into full adherence, nonadherence, and persistent medication refusal. Predictors were analyzed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: During the 18-month treatment period, 204 patients (33.7%) were fully adherent, 287 (47.4%) displayed at least 1 phase of nonadherence, and 114 patients (18.8%) were persistent medication refusers. Poor premorbid functioning, comorbid substance use, and poor insight predicted both medication refusal and nonadherence; a forensic history and no previous contact to psychiatric care were specifically predictive of medication refusal. With respect to illness outcome, nonadherent patients were worse off when compared with fully adherent patients, and medication refusers were even worse off compared with nonadherent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Within a nonselected epidemiological FEP cohort, almost 20% of patients are persistent medication refusers. The found predictors may help to identify the individual risk of persistent medication refusal and may enable an early (preventive) treatment adaptation.
Resumo:
While it has often been stated that prevalence of schizophrenia is the same around the world, many publications have shown this illness is twice more frequent in urban areas. Although many hypotheses have been proposed, the mechanisms explaining this phenomenon are still unknown. Besides potential biological explanations, a certain number of hypotheses emerging from social sciences have recently enriched the debate. This article reviews the literature related to this issue and describes the development of a research projects conducted in collaboration between the Institut of Geography at the University of Neuchâtel, the Department of Psychiatry at the Lausanne University and the Swiss branch of ISPS, a society promoting the psychological treatment of schizophrenia and other psychoses.
Resumo:
Because increasing evidence point to the convergence of environmental and genetic risk factors to drive redox dysregulation in schizophrenia, we aim to clarify whether the metabolic anomalies associated with early psychosis reflect an adaptation to oxidative stress. Metabolomic profiling was performed to characterize the response to oxidative stress in fibroblasts from control individuals (n = 20) and early psychosis patients (n = 30), and in all, 282 metabolites were identified. In addition to the expected redox/antioxidant response, oxidative stress induced a decrease of lysolipid levels in fibroblasts from healthy controls that were largely muted in fibroblasts from patients. Most notably, fibroblasts from patients showed disrupted extracellular matrix- and arginine-related metabolism after oxidative stress, indicating impairments beyond the redox system. Plasma membrane and extracellular matrix, 2 regulators of neuronal activity and plasticity, appeared as particularly susceptible to oxidative stress and thus provide novel mechanistic insights for pathophysiological understanding of early stages of psychosis. Statistically, antipsychotic medication at the time of biopsy was not accounting for these anomalies in the metabolism of patients' fibroblasts, indicating that they might be intrinsic to the disease. Although these results are preliminary and should be confirmed in a larger group of patients, they nevertheless indicate that the metabolic signature of reactivity to oxidative stress may provide reliable early markers of psychosis. Developing protective measures aimed at normalizing the disrupted pathways should prevent the pathological consequences of environmental stressors.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the impact of cannabis use disorders (CU) on outcome in psychosis were predominantly based on non representative samples, often have not controlled for confounders and rarely focused on adolescent patients. Thus, the aims of the present study were to assess: (i) prevalence of CU; (ii) baseline and pretreatment differences between CU and those without CU (NCU); (iii) the impact of baseline and course of CU on 18-month outcomes in a representative cohort of adolescents with early onset first episode psychosis (EOP). METHODS: The sample comprised 99 adolescents (age 14 to 18) with EOP (onset age 14 to 17), admitted to the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre in Australia. Data were collected from medical files using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Prevalence of lifetime CU was 65.7%, of current CU at baseline 53.5%, and of persistent CU throughout treatment 26.3%. Baseline CU compared to NCU had significantly higher illness-severity, lower psychosocial functioning, less insight, lower premorbid functioning and longer duration of untreated psychosis. Compared to all other groups, only persistent CU was linked to worse outcomes and more service disengagement. Effect sizes were medium controlling for relevant confounders. Medication non-adherence did not explain the association between persistent CU and worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CU was associated with worse baseline characteristics, but only persistent CU was linked with worse outcome. About half of those with baseline CU reduced cannabis during treatment. For these, effectively treating the psychotic disorder may already be beneficial. However, future research is necessary on the reasons for persistent CU in EOP and its treatment.
Resumo:
Background: Computer assisted cognitive remediation (CACR) was demonstrated to be efficient in improving cognitive deficits in adults with psychosis. However, scarce studies explored the outcome of CACR in adolescents with psychosis or at high risk. Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of a computer-assisted cognitive remediation (CACR) program in adolescents with psychosis or at high risk. Method: Intention to treat analyses included 32 adolescents who participated in a blinded 8-week randomized controlled trial of CACR treatment compared to computer games (CG). Cognitive abilities, symptoms and psychosocial functioning were assessed at baseline and posttreatment. Results: Improvement in visuospatial abilities was significantly greater in the CACR group than in CG. Other cognitive functions, psychotic symptoms and psychosocial functioning improved significantly, but at similar rates, in the two groups. Conclusion: CACR can be successfully administered in this population; it proved to be effective over and above CG for the most intensively trained cognitive ability.
Resumo:
Starting from the early descriptions of Kraepelin and Bleuler, the construct of schizotypy was developed from observations of aberrations in nonpsychotic family members of schizophrenia patients. In contemporary diagnostic manuals, the positive symptoms of schizotypal personality disorder were included in the ultra high-risk (UHR) criteria 20 years ago, and nowadays are broadly employed in clinical early detection of psychosis. The schizotypy construct, now dissociated from strict familial risk, also informed research on the liability to develop any psychotic disorder, and in particular schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, even outside clinical settings. Against the historical background of schizotypy it is surprising that evidence from longitudinal studies linking schizotypy, UHR, and conversion to psychosis has only recently emerged; and it still remains unclear how schizotypy may be positioned in high-risk research. Following a comprehensive literature search, we review 18 prospective studies on 15 samples examining the evidence for a link between trait schizotypy and conversion to psychosis in 4 different types of samples: general population, clinical risk samples according to UHR and/or basic symptom criteria, genetic (familial) risk, and clinical samples at-risk for a nonpsychotic schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis. These prospective studies underline the value of schizotypy in high-risk research, but also point to the lack of evidence needed to better define the position of the construct of schizotypy within a developmental psychopathology perspective of emerging psychosis and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.
Resumo:
There has been increasing attention to the subgroups of mood disorders and their boundaries with other mental disorders, particularly psychoses. The goals of the present paper were (1) to assess the familial aggregation and co-aggregation patterns of the full spectrum of mood disorders (that is, bipolar, schizoaffective (SAF), major depression) based on contemporary diagnostic criteria; and (2) to evaluate the familial specificity of the major subgroups of mood disorders, including psychotic, manic and major depressive episodes (MDEs). The sample included 293 patients with a lifetime diagnosis of SAF disorder, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder (MDD), 110 orthopedic controls, and 1734 adult first-degree relatives. The diagnostic assignment was based on all available information, including direct diagnostic interviews, family history reports and medical records. Our findings revealed specificity of the familial aggregation of psychosis (odds ratio (OR)=2.9, confidence interval (CI): 1.1-7.7), mania (OR=6.4, CI: 2.2-18.7) and MDEs (OR=2.0, CI: 1.5-2.7) but not hypomania (OR=1.3, CI: 0.5-3.6). There was no evidence for cross-transmission of mania and MDEs (OR=.7, CI:.5-1.1), psychosis and mania (OR=1.0, CI:.4-2.7) or psychosis and MDEs (OR=1.0, CI:.7-1.4). The strong familial specificity of psychotic, manic and MDEs in this largest controlled contemporary family study challenges the growing assertion that the major types of mood disorders are manifestations of a common underlying diathesis.