Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial).

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is generally accepted as an alternative to SPECT to assess myocardial ischemia non-invasively. However its performance vs gated-SPECT and in sub-populations is not fully established. The goal was to compare in a multicenter setting the diagnostic performance of perfusion-CMR and gated-SPECT for the detection of CAD in various populations using conventional x-ray coronary angiography (CXA) as the standard of reference. METHODS: In 33 centers (in US and Europe) 533 patients, eligible for CXA or SPECT, were enrolled in this multivendor trial. SPECT and CXA were performed within 4 weeks before or after CMR in all patients. Prevalence of CAD in the sample was 49% and 515 patients received MR contrast medium. Drop-out rates for CMR and SPECT were 5.6% and 3.7%, respectively (ns). The study was powered for the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of CMR vs SPECT for both, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CAD (using a single-threshold reading), the results for the primary endpoint were reported elsewhere. In this article secondary endpoints are presented, i.e. the diagnostic performance of CMR versus SPECT in subpopulations such as multi-vessel disease (MVD), in men, in women, and in patients without prior myocardial infarction (MI). For diagnostic performance assessment the area under the receiver-operator-characteristics-curve (AUC) was calculated. Readers were blinded versus clinical data, CXA, and imaging results. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance (= area under ROC = AUC) of CMR was superior to SPECT (p = 0.0004, n = 425) and to gated-SPECT (p = 0.018, n = 253). CMR performed better than SPECT in MVD (p = 0.003 vs all SPECT, p = 0.04 vs gated-SPECT), in men (p = 0.004, n = 313) and in women (p = 0.03, n = 112) as well as in the non-infarct patients (p = 0.005, n = 186 in 1-3 vessel disease and p = 0.015, n = 140 in MVD). CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter, multivendor study the diagnostic performance of perfusion-CMR to detect CAD was superior to perfusion SPECT in the entire population and in sub-groups. Perfusion-CMR can be recommended as an alternative for SPECT imaging. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00977093.

The role of MIC-1/GDF15 cytokine in glioblastoma

AbstractDespite advances in diagnosis and treatment made over the past two decades, high-gradeprimary brain tumors remain incurable neoplasms. Glioblastoma (GBM) represents the mostmalignant stage of astrocytic brain tumors. Identification of diagnostic and prognostic markers ineasily accessible biological material, such as plasma or cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF), would greatlyfacilitate the management of GBM patients. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms that underlie thefunction of the factors implicated in GBM development would pave the way towards their potentialutility in cancer-targeting therapy.MIC-1/GDF15 (Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1/ Growth Differentiation Factor 15), asecreted protein of the TGF-β superfamily, emerged as a candidate marker exhibiting increasingmRNA expression during astrocytoma malignant progression. However, injection of MIC-1/GDF15over-expressing GBM cell lines into nude mice has been previously shown to completely abolish theinherent tumorigenicity.In this study, determination of MIC-1/GDF15 protein levels in the CSF of a cohort of 94patients with intracranial tumors including astrocytomas (grades II, III and IV), meningioma, andmetastasis revealed significantly increased concentrations in GBM patients as compared to controlcohort of patients treated for non-neoplastic diseases. However, MIC-1/GDF15 levels were notelevated in the matching plasma samples from these patients. Most interestingly, GBM patients withthe increased concentrations of MIC-1/GDF15 in the CSF had worse outcome.In GBM tissue, it was found that the expression of MIC-1/GDF15 gene is low. Promotermethylation of the gene may partially explain the overall low expression levels. Investigation of thecellular origin of MIC-1/GDF15 expression in GBM tissue led to the MIC-1/GDF15 protein detectionin a subpopulation of the tumor infiltrating macrophages. These findings substantiated the workinghypothesis of MIC-1/GDF15 as harboring tumor-suppressive properties in GBM. Analysis of thesignaling pathway mediated by MIC-1/GDF15 in GBM highlighted the potential role of TGF-β signaltransduction. However, the lack of the functional response to the presence of MIC-1/GDF15 in-vitrosuggested operation of a paracrine loop for suppression of tumor formation which is evident solely invivo.In conclusion, MIC-1/GDF15 protein measured in the CSF may have diagnostic andprognostic values in patients with intracranial tumors. Molecular studies collectively proposeimplication of the tumor-host interactions in mediating the MIC-1/GDF15 tumor-suppressing activityduring GBM development.RésuméMalgré les progrès durant ces deux dernières décennies dans le diagnostique et le traitementdes tumeurs du cerveau primaires, ces néoplasmes restent incurables. Le glioblastome représente laforme la plus maligne des tumeurs astrocytiques du cerveau (astrocytomes). Pour le diagnostic et lepronostic, l'identification de marqueurs présents dans des substances facilement accessibles comme leplasma où le liquide céphalorachidien (LCR) faciliterait beaucoup la prise en charge des patients. Lacompréhension des mécanismes moléculaires de facteurs impliqués dans le développement du GBMpourrait ouvrir la voie vers l'utilisation de ces mécanismes dans des thérapies ciblées.MIC-1/GDF15 (Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1/ Growth Differentiation Factor 15), uneprotéine secrétée qui appartient à la superfamille TGF-β, s'est révélé être un marqueur candidat, dontl'expression d'ARN messager augmente pendant la progression des astrocytomes malins. Cependant,une précedente étude montre que l'injection des lignées cellulaires de GBM fortement productrices deMIC-1/GDF15 dans des souris immunodéprimées abolit la tumorigénicité.Dans cette étude, les mesures dans une cohorte de 94 patients atteints de tumeursintracrâniennes comprenant des astrocytomes (grades II, III et IV), méningiomes et métastases,présentent des augmentations significatives des niveaux protéiques de MIC-1/GDF15 dans le LCRdes patients atteints de GBM par rapport aux patients traités pour des maladies non cancéreuses.Cependant, les niveaux de MIC-1/GDF15 n'étaient pas spécialement élevés dans le plasma. De plus,les patients atteints d'un GBM avec des niveaux élevés de MIC-1/GDF15 dans le LCR ont survécumoins longtemps. Dans les tissus de glioblastome, on observe que le gène MIC-1/GDF15 est peuexprimé. La méthylation du promoteur explique partiellement le faible niveau d'expression du gène.La recherche l'origine cellulaire de l'expression de MIC-1/GDF15, a permis de découvrir la présencede protéines MIC-1/GDF15 dans une sous-population de macrophages qui infiltrent les tumeurs. Cetteobservation supporte l'hypothèse que MIC-1/GDF15 présentait des propriétés de suppression destumeurs de type GBM. Des études sur les voies de signalisation régulées par MIC-1/GDF15 dans lesGBMs ont souligné l'importance de la voie de transduction du signal TGF-β. Cependant, l'absence deréponse fonctionnelle à MIC-1/GDF15 in vitro suggère fortement l'activité d'une boucle paracrinepour la répression de la formation de tumeur, qui n'est observé que in vivo.En conclusion, la protéine MIC-1/GDF15 mesurée dans le LCR pourrait avoir une valeur pourle diagnostic et le pronostic chez les patients atteints de GBM. Les études moléculaires suggèrent unepossible implication de l'interaction hôte-tumeur dans l'activité anti-tumorale de MIC-1/GDF15 sur leGBM.