Les anticoagulants oraux directs en 2015 chez le patient âgé: focus chez le sujet fragile

Depuis les études princeps de phase III de non-inf ériorité comparant les anticoagulants oraux directs (AOD) à la warfarine, de nombreuses études ont essayé de répondre à la question de l'efficacité et de la sécurité d'utilisation des AOD chez les patients âgés. Ces études sont des études de sous-groupes complémentaires issues des études princeps ou des études de pharmacovigilance en postmarketing utilisant des données médicoéconomiques à grande échelle. De nombreux biais, par définition, peuvent entraîner une distorsion des résultats dans de telles études, rendant leur interprétation prudente. Aucun essai randomisé contrôlé n'a à ce jour comparé les AOD à la warfarine chez des patients de 80 ans ou plus et a fortiori chez des sujets âgés fragiles. En pratique, chez le patient âgé fragile, il n'y a pas de consensus quant au choix des anticoagulants à prescrire en cas de fibrillation atriale (FA) et de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse (MTEV). Quant au choix de l'AOD à privilégier chez le sujet âgé, faute d'études de comparaison directe disponibles à ce jour, il apparaît difficile de se prononcer. Toutefois, les données disponibles, tant sur le plan pharmacologique que celles issues des études complémentaires, semblent montrer que le dabigatran offre un profil bénéfice/risque moins favorable que les autres AOD. Néanmoins, les résultats prometteurs de l'idarucizumab, antidote du dabigatran, pourraient contribuer à améliorer ce rapport à l'avenir.

Statines en prévention primaire: comment décider avec le patient [Statins in primary prevention: how to share the decision?].

Long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemia with statins diminishes the risk of cardiovascular events. Statins are recommended in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. In the absence of preexisting cardiovascular disease, the decision to start a statin or not is most often made by the general practitioner and his patient. An interactive decision aid, developed by the Mayo Clinic, has just been translated in French and adapted to the Swiss epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors, with the aim of promoting shared decision-making. This paper reviews the conditions and potential benefits of shared decision-making about statin therapy in primary prevention.

Ventricularisation of the left atrium: a rare cause of left ventricular dysfunction in a patient with mitral valve prolapse

Case: A 11 yo girl with Marfan syndrome was referred to cardiac MR (CMR) to measure the size of her thoracic aorta. She had a typical phenotype with arachnodactyly, abnormally long arms, and was tall and slim (156 cm, 28 kg, body mass index 11,5 kg/m2). She complained of no symptoms. Cardiac auscultation revealed a prominent mid-systolic click and an end-systolic murmur at the apex. A recent echocardiogram showed a moderately dilated left ventricle with normal function and a mitral valve prolapse with moderate mitral valve regurgitation. CMR showed a dilatation of the aortic root (38 mm, Z-score 8.9) and a severe prolapse of the mitral valve with regurgitation. The ventricular cavity was moderately dilated (116 ml/m2) and its contraction was hyperdynamic (stroke volume (SV): 97 ml; LVEF 72%, with the LV volumes measured by modified Simpson method from the apex to the mitral annulus). In this patient however, the mitral prolapse was characterized by a severe backward movement of the valve toward the left atrium (LA) in systole and the dyskinetic movement of the atrioventricular plane caused a ventricularisation of a part of the LA in systole (Figure). This resulted in a significant reduction of LVEF: more than ¼ of the apparent SV was displaced backwards into the ventricularized LA volume, reducing the effective LVEF to 51% (effective SV 69ml). Moreover, by flow measurement, the SV across the ascending aorta was 30 ml (cardiac index 2.0 l/min/m2) allowing the calculation of a regurgitant fraction across the mitral valve of 56%, which was diagnostic for a severe mitral valve insufficiency. Conclusion: This case illustrates the phenomenon of a ventricularisation of the LA where the severe prolapse gives the illusion of a higher attachement of the mitral leaflets within the atrial wall. Besides the severe mitral regurgitation, this paradoxical backwards movement of the valve causes an intraventricular unloading during systole reducing the apparent LVEF of 72% to an effective LVEF of only 51%. In addition, forward flow fraction is only 22% after accounting for the regurgitant volume, as well. This combined involvement of the mitral valve could explain the discrepancy between a low output state and an apparently hyperdynamic LV contraction. Due to its ability to precisely measure flows and volumes, CMR is particularly suited to detect this phenomenon and to quantify its impact on the LV pump function.