AGNP Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psychiatry: Update 2011.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), i. e., the quantification of serum or plasma concentrations of medications for dose optimization, has proven a valuable tool for the patient-matched psychopharmacotherapy. Uncertain drug adherence, suboptimal tolerability, non-response at therapeutic doses, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical situations when measurement of medication concentrations is helpful. Patient populations that may predominantly benefit from TDM in psychiatry are children, pregnant women, elderly patients, individuals with intelligence disabilities, forensic patients, patients with known or suspected genetically determined pharmacokinetic abnormalities or individuals with pharmacokinetically relevant comorbidities. However, the potential benefits of TDM for optimization of pharmacotherapy can only be obtained if the method is adequately integrated into the clinical treatment process. To promote an appropriate use of TDM, the TDM expert group of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) issued guidelines for TDM in psychiatry in 2004. Since then, knowledge has advanced significantly, and new psychopharmacologic agents have been introduced that are also candidates for TDM. Therefore the TDM consensus guidelines were updated and extended to 128 neuropsychiatric drugs. 4 levels of recommendation for using TDM were defined ranging from "strongly recommended" to "potentially useful". Evidence-based "therapeutic reference ranges" and "dose related reference ranges" were elaborated after an extensive literature search and a structured internal review process. A "laboratory alert level" was introduced, i. e., a plasma level at or above which the laboratory should immediately inform the treating physician. Supportive information such as cytochrome P450 substrate- and inhibitor properties of medications, normal ranges of ratios of concentrations of drug metabolite to parent drug and recommendations for the interpretative services are given. Recommendations when to combine TDM with pharmacogenetic tests are also provided. Following the guidelines will help to improve the outcomes of psychopharmacotherapy of many patients especially in case of pharmacokinetic problems. Thereby, one should never forget that TDM is an interdisciplinary task that sometimes requires the respectful discussion of apparently discrepant data so that, ultimately, the patient can profit from such a joint effort.

The French adaptation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents Self-Rated Form (F-HoNOSCA-SR): Validation and clinical routine use.

The current study aimed to explore the validity of an adaptation into French of the self-rated form of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (F-HoNOSCA-SR) and to test its usefulness in a clinical routine use. One hundred and twenty nine patients, admitted into two inpatient units, were asked to participate in the study. One hundred and seven patients filled out the F-HoNOSCA-SR (for a subsample (N=17): at two occasions, one week apart) and the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). In addition, the clinician rated the clinician-rated form of the HoNOSCA (HoNOSCA-CR, N=82). The reliability (assessed with split-half coefficient, item response theory (IRT) models and intraclass correlations (ICC) between the two occasions) revealed that the F-HoNSOCA-SR provides reliable measures. The concurrent validity assessed by correlating the F-HoNOSCA-SR and the SDQ revealed a good convergent validity of the instrument. The relationship analyses between the F-HoNOSCA-SR and the HoNOSCA-CR revealed weak but significant correlations. The comparison between the F-HoNOSCA-SR and the HoNOSCA-CR with paired sample t-tests revealed a higher score for the self-rated version. The F-HoNSOCA-SR was reported to provide reliable measures. In addition, it allows us to measure complementary information when used together with the HoNOSCA-CR.

Traitement pharmacologique de la schizophrénie : évaluation comparative de la qualité des recommandations de pratique clinique = Comparative evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia

De nombreuses recommandations de pratique clinique (RPC) ont été publiées, en réponse au développement du concept de la médecine fondée sur les preuves et comme solution à la difficulté de synthétiser et trier l'abondante littérature médicale. Pour faire un choix parmi le foisonnement de nouvelles RPC, il est primordial d'évaluer leur qualité. Récemment, le premier instrument d'évaluation standardisée de la qualité des RPC, appelé " AGREE " pour appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation, a été validé. Nous avons comparé - avec l'aide de la grille " AGREE " - les six principales RPC publiées depuis une dizaine d'années sur le traitement de la schizophrénie : (1) les Recommandations de l'Agence nationale pour le développement de l'évaluation médicale (ANDEM) ; (2) The American Psychiatric Association (APA) practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia ; (3) The quick reference guide of APA practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia [APA - guide rapide de référence] ; (4) The schizophrenia patient outcomes research team (PORT) treatment recommandations ; (5) The Texas medication algorithm project " T-MAP " ; (6) The expert consensus guideline for the treatment of schizophrenia. Les résultats de notre étude ont ensuite été comparés avec ceux d'une étude similaire publiée en 2005 par Gæbel et al. portant sur 24 RPC abordant le traitement de la schizophrénie, réalisée également avec l'aide de la grille " AGREE " et deux évaluateurs [Br J Psychiatry 187 (2005) 248-255]. De manière générale, les scores des deux études ne sont pas trop éloignés et les deux évaluations globales des RPC convergent : chacune des six RPC est perfectible et présente différemment des points faibles et des points forts. La rigueur d'élaboration des six RPC est dans l'ensemble très moyenne, la prise en compte de l'opinion des utilisateurs potentiels est lacunaire et un effort sur la présentation des recommandations faciliterait leur utilisation clinique. L'applicabilité des recommandations est également peu considérée par les auteurs. Globalement, deux RPC se distinguent et peuvent être fortement recommandées selon les critères de la grille " AGREE " : " l'APA - guide rapide de référence " et le " T-MAP ".

Discrepancies between clinical needs and helpseeking behaviors in co-occurring posttraumatic stress and alcohol use disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare subjects dually diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) to those with only one or none of these conditions regarding helpseeking needs and behaviors. METHOD: Data from a large community sample (N=3694) were used to assess the associations among lifetime PTSD and AUD, other psychiatric disorders, clinical characteristics and lifetime helpseeking behaviors derived from a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: Comorbid individuals had more severe clinical profiles and were more impaired than individuals with either PTSD or AUD alone or those with no/other psychiatric conditions. However, they did not differ in overall helpseeking behavior from any other group. Those with comorbid PTSD/AUD were even less likely than the other groups to seek help for depression and anxiety disorders through specific treatment facilities or the use of prescribed psychotropic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a greater need for treatment the comorbid group did not seek more help than the others. Their lower use of prescribed drugs supports the self-medication hypothesis, suggesting that those individuals relieve their symptoms through higher alcohol use instead. Our findings underline the need for health care facilities to encourage helpseeking behavior in the aftermath of stressful life events.