Changes in antihypertensive drug treatment in the general population: the Colaus Study

Background and aims: there is little information regar ding changes in antihypertensive drug treatment in Switzerland. We aimed at assessing those changes in a population-based, prospective study. Methods: 768 hypertensive subjects (372 women, 397 men) followed for 5 years. Subjects were defined as continuers (no change), switchers (one antihypertensive class replace by another), combiners (one antihypertensive class added) and discontinuers (stopped treatment). Results: Analysis of all patients (mono or combination therapy) showed that 54.6% were continuers, 27.2% combiners, 12.9% switchers and 5.3 % discontinuers. Similar findings were obtained for participants on monotherapy only: 42.2% continuers, 36.7% combiners, 13.4% switchers and 7.7% discontinuers. Combiners had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure values at baseline than the other groups (p<0.001), while no difference were found for personal and family history and other clinical and biological variables. Compared to continuers, combiners and switchers improved their blood pressure status at follow-up: 26.7% of combiners and 26.3% of switchers improved, versus 17.7% of continuers and 7.3% of discontinuers (p<0.001). Among participants on monotherapy at baseline, continuation was greatest for angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agents (ARBs, 53.1%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (44.4%) and β-blockers (41.8%). Only one quarter of participants treated with diuretic or calcium channel blockers at baseline remained so at follow-up. Conclusion: Antihypertensivedrug treatment is very stable in Switzerland. There are no big differences in persistence between antihypertensive classes, even if ARBs had the most favorable utilization pattern. Changes are only due to blood pressure level and improve blood pressure status.

Success of referral for alcohol dependent patients from a general hospital: predictive value of patient and process characteristics.

To assess the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary evaluation and referral process in a prospective cohort of general hospital patients with alcohol dependence. Alcohol-dependent patients were identified in the wards of the general hospital and its primary care center. They were evaluated and then referred to treatment by a multidisciplinary team; those patients who accepted to participate in this cohort study were consecutively included and followed for 6 months. Not included patients were lost for follow-up, whereas all included patients were assessed at time of inclusion, 2 and 6 months later by a research psychologist in order to collect standardized baseline patients' characteristics, process salient features and patients outcomes (defined as treatment adherence and abstinence). Multidisciplinary evaluation and therapeutic referral was feasible and effective, with a success rate of 43%for treatment adherence and 28%for abstinence at 6 months. Among patients' characteristics, predictors of success were an age over 45, not living alone, being employed and being motivated to treatment (RAATE-A score &lt; 18), whereas successful process characteristics included detoxification of the patient at time of referral and a full multidisciplinary referral meeting. This multidisciplinary model of evaluation and referral of alcohol dependent patients of a general hospital had a satisfactory level of effectiveness. Predictors of success and failure allow to identify subsets of patients for whom new strategies of motivation and treatment referral should be designed.

Patients presenting with somatic complaints in general practice: depression, anxiety and somatoform disorders are frequent and associated with psychosocial stressors.

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders in primary care patients are frequently associated with physical complaints that can mask the disorder. There is insufficient knowledge concerning the role of anxiety, depression, and somatoform disorders in patients presenting with physical symptoms. Our primary objective was to determine the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders among primary care patients with a physical complaint. We also investigated the relationship between cumulated psychosocial stressors and mental disorders. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional study in twenty-one private practices and in one academic primary care centre in Western Switzerland. Randomly selected patients presenting with a spontaneous physical complaint were asked to complete the self-administered Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) between November 2004 and July 2005. The validated French version of the PHQ allowed the diagnosis of mental disorders (DSM-IV criteria) and the analyses of exposure to psychosocial stressors. RESULTS: There were 917 patients exhibiting at least one physical symptom included. The rate of depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders was 20.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.4% to 22.7%), 15.5% (95% CI = 13.2% to 18.0%), and 15.1% (95% CI = 12.8% to 17.5%), respectively. Psychosocial stressors were significantly associated with mental disorders. Patients with an accumulation of psychosocial stressors were more likely to present anxiety, depression, or somatoform disorders, with an increase of 2.2 fold (95% CI = 2.0 to 2.5) for each additional stressor. CONCLUSIONS: The investigation of mental disorders and psychosocial stressors among patients with physical complaints is relevant in primary care. Psychosocial stressors should be explored as potential epidemiological causes of mental disorders.

Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of high blood pressure in a Swiss city general population: the CoLaus study.

BACKGROUND: This study is aimed to assess the prevalence of awareness, treatment and control of high blood pressure (HBP) and associated factors in a Swiss city. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study of 6182 participants (52.5% women) aged 35-75 years living in Lausanne, Switzerland. METHODS: HBP was defined as blood pressure >/=140/90 mmHg or current antihypertensive medication. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of HBP was 36% (95% confidence interval: 35-38%). Among participants with HBP, 63% were aware of it. Among participants aware of HBP, 78% were treated, and among those treated, 48% were controlled (BP <140/90 mmHg). In multivariate analysis, HBP prevalence was associated with older age, male sex, low educational level, high alcohol intake, awareness of diabetes or dyslipidaemia, obesity and parental history of myocardial infarction. HBP awareness was associated with older age, female sex, awareness of diabetes or dyslipidaemia, obesity and parental history of myocardial infarction. HBP control was associated with younger age, higher educational level and no alcohol intake. Alone or in combination, sartans were the most often prescribed antihypertensive medication category (41%), followed by diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers. Only 31% of participants treated for HBP were taking >/=2 antihypertensive medications. CONCLUSION: Although more than half of all participants with HBP were aware and more than three-quarters of them received a pharmacological treatment, less than half of those treated were adequately controlled.

Distinguishing general concepts from individuals: an automatic coarse-grained classifier

Named entity recognizers are unable to distinguish if a term is a general concept as "scientist" or an individual as "Einstein". In this paper we explore the possibility to reach this goal combining two basic approaches: (i) Super Sense Tagging (SST) and (ii) YAGO. Thanks to these two powerful tools we could automatically create a corpus set in order to train the SuperSense Tagger. The general F1 is over 76% and the model is publicly available.

Effect of a general school-based physical activity intervention on bone mineral content and density: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Background: Specific physical loading leads to enhanced bone development during childhood. A general physical activity program mimicking a real-life situation was successful at increasing general physical health in children. Yet, it is not clear whether it can equally increase bone mineral mass. We performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial in children of both gender and different pubertal stages to determine whether a school-based physical activity (PA) program during one school-year influences bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD), irrespective of gender.Methods: Twenty-eight 1st and 5th grade (6-7 and 11-12 year-old) classes were cluster randomized to an intervention (INT, 16 classes, n = 297) and control (CON; 12 classes, n = 205) group. The intervention consisted of a multi-component PA intervention including daily physical education with at least 10 min of jumping or strength training exercises of various intensities. Measurements included anthropometry, and BMC and BMD of total body, femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). PA was assessed by accelerometers and Tanner stages by questionnaires. Analyses were performed by a regression model adjusted for gender, baseline height and weight, baseline PA, post-intervention pubertal stage, baseline BMC, and cluster.Results: 275 (72%) of 380 children who initially agreed to have DXA measurements had also post-intervention DXA and PA data. Mean age of prepubertal and pubertal children at baseline was 8.7 +/- 2.1 and 11.1 +/- 0.6 years, respectively. Compared to CON, children in INT showed statistically significant increases in BMC of total body, femoral neck, and lumbar spine by 5.5%, 5.4% and 4.7% (all p < 0.05), respectively, and BMD of total body and lumbar spine by 8.4% and 7.3% (both p < 0.01), respectively. There was no gender*group, but a pubertal stage*group interaction consistently favoring prepubertal children.Conclusion: A general school-based PA intervention can increase bone health in elementary school children of both genders, particularly before puberty. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the HypnoLaus study.

BACKGROUND: Sleep-disordered breathing is associated with major morbidity and mortality. However, its prevalence has mainly been selectively studied in populations at risk for sleep-disordered breathing or cardiovascular diseases. Taking into account improvements in recording techniques and new criteria used to define respiratory events, we aimed to assess the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing and associated clinical features in a large population-based sample. METHODS: Between Sept 1, 2009, and June 30, 2013, we did a population-based study (HypnoLaus) in Lausanne, Switzerland. We invited a cohort of 3043 consecutive participants of the CoLaus/PsyCoLaus study to take part. Polysomnography data from 2121 people were included in the final analysis. 1024 (48%) participants were men, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 49-68, range 40-85) and mean body-mass index (BMI) of 25·6 kg/m(2) (SD 4·1). Participants underwent complete polysomnographic recordings at home and had extensive phenotyping for diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and depression. The primary outcome was prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing, assessed by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. FINDINGS: The median apnoea-hypopnoea index was 6·9 events per h (IQR 2·7-14·1) in women and 14·9 per h (7·2-27·1) in men. The prevalence of moderate-to-severe sleep-disordered breathing (≥15 events per h) was 23·4% (95% CI 20·9-26·0) in women and 49·7% (46·6-52·8) in men. After multivariable adjustment, the upper quartile for the apnoea-hypopnoea index (>20·6 events per h) was associated independently with the presence of hypertension (odds ratio 1·60, 95% CI 1·14-2·26; p=0·0292 for trend across severity quartiles), diabetes (2·00, 1·05-3·99; p=0·0467), metabolic syndrome (2·80, 1·86-4·29; p<0·0001), and depression (1·92, 1·01-3·64; p=0·0292). INTERPRETATION: The high prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing recorded in our population-based sample might be attributable to the increased sensitivity of current recording techniques and scoring criteria. These results suggest that sleep-disordered breathing is highly prevalent, with important public health outcomes, and that the definition of the disorder should be revised. FUNDING: Faculty of Biology and Medicine of Lausanne, Lausanne University Hospital, Swiss National Science Foundation, Leenaards Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline, Ligue Pulmonaire Vaudoise.

Patients presenting with somatic complaints in general practice : dépression, anxiety and somatoform disorders are frequent and associated with psychosocial stressors

RAPPORT DE SYNTHÈSE Introduction En médecine de premier recours, les plaintes physiques sont fréquemment associées à des troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes et peuvent les masquer. Il est fréquemment reporté que ces troubles mentaux ont tendance à être insuffisamment diagnostiqués. Par ailleurs, peu d'études ont été conduites en médecine de premier recours concernant la possible association entre facteurs de stress psychosociaux et troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes. Objectifs Les objectifs étaient de déterminer la prévalence des troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes chez des patients consultant avec une plainte physique en médecine de premier recours, ainsi que d'explorer la possible association entre ces troubles mentaux et des facteurs de stress psychosociaux. Méthodes Nous avons conduit une étude transversale, multicentrique parmi vingt et un cabinets médicaux en Suisse Romande et la Policlinique Médicale Universitaire de Lausanne. Les sujets étaient sélectionnés aléatoirement parmi des patients qui avaient présenté spontanément au moins une plainte physique et qui avaient consulté lors d'une demi- journée de consultation considérée pour l'étude. Les patients inclus ont rempli l'auto- questionnaire Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) entre novembre 2004 et juillet 2005. Nous avons utilisé la version française et validée du PHQ qui permet le diagnostic des principaux troubles mentaux selon les critères du DSM-IV et l'analyse de l'exposition aux facteurs de stress psychosociaux. Résultats Neuf cent dix-sept patients se présentant avec au moins une plainte physique ont été inclus. Le taux de troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes a été de 20,0% (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95% = 17,4%-22,7%), 15,5% (IC 95% = 13,2%- 18,0%) et 15,1% (IC 95% = 12,8%~17,5%), respectivement. Les facteurs de stress psychosociaux ont été significativement associés aux troubles mentaux. Les patients avec une accumulation de facteurs de stress psychosociaux ont été le plus souvent déprimés, anxieux ou ont manifesté des troubles somatoformes, avec une augmentation par un facteur 2,2 (IC 95% = 2,0-2,5) pour chaque facteur additionnel. Conclusions Bien que la relation entre facteurs de stress psychosociaux et trouble dépressif soit bien établie, cette étude montre qu'il existe un lien entre ces facteurs de stress et les troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes. L'investigation de ces troubles mentaux chez des patients consultant avec un symptôme physique en médecine de premier recours est pertinente. D'autres explorations sont nécessaires pour investiguer le bénéfice potentiel d'une prise en charge intégrée des facteurs de stress psychosociaux sur la diminution des plaintes physiques et des troubles mentaux chez les patients que suivent les médecins de premier recours.

Difficulties associated with out-patient management of drug abusers by general practitioners. A cross sectional survey of general practitioners with and without methadone patients in Switzerland

Résumé de l'article Contexte : En Suisse, les médecins de premier recours traitent la plupart des patients dépendants aux opiacés méthadone en tant que traitement de substitution. Méthode : Nous avons étudié les difficultés rencontrées dans la prise en charge des patients toxicodépendants en envoyant par poste un questionnaire d'enquête. Nous avons envoyé ce questionnaire à tous les médecins de premier recours de Suisse Romande prescrivant de la méthadone (556 médecins). Nous avons envoyé un autre questionnaire, plus court, à des médecins de premier recours du Canton de Vaud qui ne prescrivent pas de méthadone. Résultats : le taux de réponse global est de 63,3 %. La plus haute dose de méthadone donnée par les médecins de premier recours est de 120,4 mg/j (moyenne). Questionnés au sujet de l'aide qu'ils désireraient recevoir face à ces patients, les médecins de premier recours avec patients substitués par méthadone ont mentionné premièrement l'importance d'un meilleur remboursement des services prodigués. Les autres éléments demandés ont été une meilleure formation, de meilleures connaissances des pathologies psychiatriques et des groupes de discussion de cas cliniques. Les médecins sans patients sous méthadone refusent de traiter ces patients surtout pour des raisons émotionnelles et relationnelles. En conclusion : les médecins acceptant des patients sous méthadone rencontrent des difficultés relationnelles et émotionnelles. Ils désirent un meilleur remboursement pour les services prodigués.

Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients

Résumé: La formation des atélectasies durant l'induction de l'anesthésie générale est plus importante chez le patient obèse morbide. Nous avons démontré dans des travaux de recherche antérieurs que l'utilisation de la PEEP (Pression Positive en Fin d'Expiration) durant l'induction de l'anesthésie prévient la formation d'atélectasies chez des patients non obèses. Par conséquent, nous voulions étudier l'efficacité de la pression positive en fin d'expiration chez le patient obèse morbide dans la prévention de la formation d'atélectasies. Nous avons fait une étude de 23 patients obèses morbides (BMI > 35 kg / m2) dans 2 groupes. Dans le groupe utilisant la pression positive en fin d'expiration, les patients respiraient 100% d'oxygène pendant 5 minutes par l'intermédiaire d'un masque facial type CPAP avec une pression de 10 cm H20. Après l'induction de l'anesthésie, nous avons ventilé les patients au masque facial avec une PEEP de 10 cm H20. Dans le groupe de contrôle, nous avons procédé au même type d'induction sans utiliser la pression positive en fin d'expiration. La surface de poumon atélectatique a été évaluée par tomographie (CT scann). L'étude des échanges gazeux se faisait à 2 reprises, à partir de gazométries réalisées juste avant l'induction de l'anesthésie puis juste après l'intubation. Après l'induction de l'anesthésie et l'intubation, les patients du groupe de contrôle présentaient une quantité d'atélectasies plus importante que les patients du groupe où la PEEP avait été utilisée (10.4% + 4.8% dans le groupe de contrôle versus 1.3% dans le groupe utilisant la pression positive en fin d'expiration p < 0.001). Après l'intubation, en présence d'une fraction inspirée en oxygène à 100%, la Pa02 était significativement supérieure dans le groupe ayant utilisé la pression positive en fin d'expiration en comparaison avec le groupe de contrôle (respectivement 457 ± 130 mmHg versus 315 ± 100 mmHg). Nous avons conclu que chez le patient obèse morbide, le recours à la pression positive en fin d'expiration lors de l'induction de l'anesthésie permet de prévenir largement la formation d'atélectasies et s'accompagne d'une meilleure oxygénation. Abstract: Atelectasis caused by general anesthesia is increased in morbidly obese patients. We have shown that application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during the induction of anesthesia prevents atelectasis formation in nonobese patients. We therefore studied the efficacy of PEEP in morbidly obese patients to prevent atelectasis. Twenty-three adult morbidly obese patients (b ody mass index >35 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the PEEP group, patients breathed 100% oxygen (5 min) with a continuous positive airway pressure of 10 cm H20 and, after the induction, mechanical ventilation via a face mask with a PEEP of 10 cm H2O. In the control group, the same induction was applied but without continuous positive airway pressure or PEEP. Atelectasis, determined by computed tomography, and blood gas analysis were measured twice: before the induction and directly after intubation. After endotracheal intubation, patients of the control group showed an increase in the amount of atelectasis, which was much larger than in the PEEP group (10.4% -± 4.8% in control group versus 1.7% ± 1.3% in PEEP group; P <0.001). After in.tubation with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, Pao, was significantly higher in the PEEP group compared with the control group (457 ±- 130 mm Hg versus 315 ± 100 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.035) We conclude that in morbidly obese patients, atelectasis formation is largely prevented by PEEP applied during the anesthetic induction and is associated with a better oxygenation.

Advance directives and the impact of timing. A qualitative study with Swiss general practitioners.

PRINCIPLES: Advance directives are seen as an important tool for documenting the wishes of patients who are no longer competent to make decisions in regards to their medical care. Due to their nature, approaching the subject of advance directives with a patient can be difficult for both the medical care provider and the patient. This paper focuses on general practitioners' perspectives regarding the timing at which this discussion should take place, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the different moments. METHODS: In 2013, 23 semi-structured face-to-face interviews were performed with Swiss general practitioners. Interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: In our sample, 23 general practitioners provided different options that they felt were appropriate moments: either (a) when the patient is still healthy, (b) when illness becomes predominant, or (c) when a patient has been transferred to a long-term care facility. Furthermore, general practitioners reported uncertainty and discomfort regarding initiating the discussion. CONCLUSION: The distinct approaches, perspectives and rationales show that there is no well-defined or "right" moment. However, participants often associated advance directives with death. This link caused discomfort and uncertainty, which led to hesitation and delay on the part of general practitioners. Therefore we recommend further training on how to professionally initiate a conversation about advance directives. Furthermore, based on our results and experience, we recommend an early approach with healthy patients paired with later regular updates as it seems to be the most effective way to inform patients about their end-of-life care options.