Governance von Universitätsbibliotheken : Optimierungsmöglichkeiten aus institutioneller Sicht

Ausgangspunkt der Arbeit bildet die Beobachtung, dass Universitäts­biblio­theken unterschiedliche Aufgaben zu Händen verschiedener Akteure erfüllen - so nehmen Universitätsbibliotheken in der Schweiz häufig Aufgaben einer Kantonsbibliothek wahr. Universitätsbibliotheken zeichnen sich durch unterschiedliche Rechts- und Organisationsformen aus, unterhalten Beziehungen zu Dritten und sind deshalb verschiedenen Instanzen zur Rechenschaft verpflichtet. Sie sind, schliesslich, in Zusammenschlüsse unterschiedlicher Natur eingebunden. Vor diesem Hintergrund wirft die vorliegende Arbeit die Frage nach der Steuerung des Unternehmens Universitätsbibliothek auf. Anhand ausgewählter Fallbeispiele wird aufgezeigt, wie sich unterschiedliche Governance-Modelle gestalten. Dabei wird insbesondere auf die Rechts- und Organisationsform, auf institutionelle Strukturen, auf Steuerungsinstrumente (Auftrag und finanzielle Rahmenbedingungen), auf institutionelle Beziehungen sowie auf die Autonomie der Bibliothek eingegangen. Darauf auf­bau­end werden Vor- und Nachteile der Modelle hinsichtlich der Erfüllung des Doppelauftrags (Universitäts- und Kantonsbibliothek) diskutiert. Es zeigt sich, dass Universitäts- und Kantonsauftrag komplementäre Funktionen darstellen, wobei allerdings vereinzelt Schwierigkeiten auftreten können. Die Rechts- und Organisationsform sowie, insbesondere, die Trägerschaft bilden ein zentrales Element im Hinblick auf die Auftragserfüllung. Gleichzeitig sind auch weitere Elemente zentral, beispielsweise Instrumente, welche nicht nur die Aufgaben, sondern die Zuständigkeiten der beteiligten Akteure festhalten. Parmi les nombreuses fonctions remplies par les bibliothèques universitaires en Suisse, celle de bibliothèque cantonale est la plus fréquente. Les formes juridiques et/ou d'organisation des bibliothèques universitaires suisses sont multiples ; les bibliothèques entretiennent des liens avec des tiers et elles sont, par conséquent, tenues de rendre des comptes à diverses instances. Comme toutes les bibliothèques, elles s'intègrent, finalement, à des réseaux de nature différente. Dans ce contexte, le présent travail soulève la question de la gouvernance de la bibliothèque universitaire. Il décrit, à partir d'exemples choisis, différents modèles de gouvernance en s'intéressant surtout à la forme juridique et/ou d'organisation, aux structures institutionnelles, aux instruments de gouvernance concernant la mission et les conditions cadres financières de la bibliothèque, aux relations institutionnelles et à l'autonomie de la bibliothèque. L'analyse permet ainsi une réflexion sur les avantages et les inconvénients des différents modèles de gouvernance au vu de la double mission universitaire et cantonale des bibliothèques. Le présent travail montre que les fonctions universitaires et cantonales sont à priori complémentaires et ne donnent lieu qu'à des difficultés mineures. La forme juridique et/ou d'organisation ainsi que l'autorité de tutelle constituent des éléments déterminants pour l'accomplissement de la (double) mission de la bibliothèque. Parallèlement, d'autres éléments jouent également un rôle important - par exemple, les instruments permettant non seulement de régler les tâches de la bibliothèque, mais aussi de déterminer les compétences de tous les acteurs intéressés.

ARCHITECTING USER-CENTRIC PRIVACY-AS-A-SET-OF-SERVICES: DIGITAL IDENTITY RELATED PRIVACY FRAMEWORK

AbstractDigitalization gives to the Internet the power by allowing several virtual representations of reality, including that of identity. We leave an increasingly digital footprint in cyberspace and this situation puts our identity at high risks. Privacy is a right and fundamental social value that could play a key role as a medium to secure digital identities. Identity functionality is increasingly delivered as sets of services, rather than monolithic applications. So, an identity layer in which identity and privacy management services are loosely coupled, publicly hosted and available to on-demand calls could be more realistic and an acceptable situation. Identity and privacy should be interoperable and distributed through the adoption of service-orientation and implementation based on open standards (technical interoperability). Ihe objective of this project is to provide a way to implement interoperable user-centric digital identity-related privacy to respond to the need of distributed nature of federated identity systems. It is recognized that technical initiatives, emerging standards and protocols are not enough to guarantee resolution for the concerns surrounding a multi-facets and complex issue of identity and privacy. For this reason they should be apprehended within a global perspective through an integrated and a multidisciplinary approach. The approach dictates that privacy law, policies, regulations and technologies are to be crafted together from the start, rather than attaching it to digital identity after the fact. Thus, we draw Digital Identity-Related Privacy (DigldeRP) requirements from global, domestic and business-specific privacy policies. The requirements take shape of business interoperability. We suggest a layered implementation framework (DigldeRP framework) in accordance to model-driven architecture (MDA) approach that would help organizations' security team to turn business interoperability into technical interoperability in the form of a set of services that could accommodate Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA): Privacy-as-a-set-of- services (PaaSS) system. DigldeRP Framework will serve as a basis for vital understanding between business management and technical managers on digital identity related privacy initiatives. The layered DigldeRP framework presents five practical layers as an ordered sequence as a basis of DigldeRP project roadmap, however, in practice, there is an iterative process to assure that each layer supports effectively and enforces requirements of the adjacent ones. Each layer is composed by a set of blocks, which determine a roadmap that security team could follow to successfully implement PaaSS. Several blocks' descriptions are based on OMG SoaML modeling language and BPMN processes description. We identified, designed and implemented seven services that form PaaSS and described their consumption. PaaSS Java QEE project), WSDL, and XSD codes are given and explained.

What Kind of Justice Today ? Expectations Of 'Good Justice', Convergences And Divergences Between Managerial And Judicial Actors And How They Fit Within Management-Oriented Values

This research aims toward a better understanding of the organizational culture(s) of the judiciary in Switzerland by analysing what 'good justice' means nowadays in this country. It seeks to clarify whether, and to what extent, expectations of 'good justice' of judicial actors (judges without managerial experience) and of managerial actors (court managers) are similar and to describe possible managerial implications that may result from this. As judges are at the heart of the judicial organization and exert a strong influence on other groups of actors (Sullivan, Warren et al. 1994), the congruence of their expectations with those of court managers will be at the centre of the analysis. Additionally, referring to the conceptual worlds of Boltanski and Thévenaut (1991), we analyze how closely these expectations are to management-oriented values. We found that almost half of expectations are common to the two groups examined and the main quoted ones are compatible to new public management (NPM) concepts. On the other hand, those expectations shared exclusively by judges relate to the human side of justice, whereas those specific to court managers focus on the way justice functions.

The Politics of Network Governance in Europe: The Case of Energy Regulation

Networks are considered increasingly important for policy-making. The literature on new modes of governance in Europe suggests that their horizontal coordination capacity and flexible and informal structures are particularly suitable for governing the multilevel architecture of the European polity. However, empirical evidence about the effects of networks on policy-making and public policies is still quite limited. This article uses the case of the European network of energy regulators to explore the determinants of the position of network members and, in turn, the domestic adoption of soft rules developed within this network. The empirical analysis, based on multivariate statistics and semi-directive interviews, supports the expectation that institutional complementarities increase actors' centrality in networks, while arguments based on organisational resources and age are disproved. Furthermore, results show that the overall level of adoption is considerable and that centrality might have a small positive effect on domestic adoption.

Struggles for meaning and struggles for control: the diffusion of bandwagon technology in two institutional environments

In this thesis, I examine the diffusion process for a complex medical technology, the PET scanner, in two different health care systems, one of which is more market-oriented (Switzerland) and the other more centrally managed by a public agency (Quebec). The research draws on institutional and socio-political theories of the diffusion of innovations to examine how institutional contexts affect processes of diffusion. I find that diffusion proceeds more rapidly in Switzerland than in Quebec, but that processes in both jurisdictions are characterized by intense struggles among providers and between providers and public agencies. I show that the institutional environment influences these processes by determining the patterns of material resources and authority available to actors in their struggles to strategically control the technology, and by constituting the discursive resources or institutional logics on which actors may legitimately draw in their struggles to give meaning to the technology in line with their interests and values. This thesis illustrates how institutional structures and meanings manifest themselves in the context of specific decisions within an organizational field, and reveals the ways in which governance structures may be contested and realigned when they conflict with interests that are legitimized by dominant institutional logics. It is argued that this form of contestation and readjustment at the margins constitutes one mechanism by which institutional frameworks are tested, stretched and reproduced or redefined.