Psychological distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer: the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the degree of psychological distress in adult childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland and to characterize survivors with significant distress. METHODS: Childhood cancer survivors who were age younger than 16 years when diagnosed between 1976 and 2003, had survived more than 5 years, and were currently age 20 years or older received a postal questionnaire. Psychological distress was assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Raw scores were transformed into T scores according to the German norm sample, and the proportion of participants being at increased risk for psychological distress was calculated (case rule: T > or = 63). t tests and univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: One thousand seventy-six survivors (63.% of eligible survivors, 71.9% of contacted survivors) returned the questionnaire, 987 with complete data on BSI. Comparison with the norm populations showed lower T scores (T < 50) in the Global Severity Index (GSI; T = 46.2), somatization (T = 47.6), obsessive-compulsive tendencies (T = 46.9), and anxiety (T = 48.4). However, more childhood cancer survivors (especially women) had increased distress for GSI (14.4%), interpersonal sensitivity (16.5%), depression (13.4%), aggression (16.9%), and psychotic tendencies (15.6%) than the expected 10% from the norm population. Caseness was associated with female sex, being a single child, older age at study, and self-reported late effects, especially psychological problems. CONCLUSION: Results show that childhood cancer survivors, on average, have less psychological distress than a norm population but that the proportion of survivors at risk for high psychological distress is disproportionally large. Monitoring psychological distress in childhood cancer survivors may be desirable during routine follow-up, and psychological support should be offered as needed.

Lire Michel de Certeau

Lire Certeau en théologien, c'est consonner avec une articulation à l'histoire, vue dans ses discontinuités et comme lieu de productions, imaginaires et autres, et ainsi scène d'un désir et d'une exposition maximale au monde. On renvoie alors à un excès, jamais dit directement, mais en travail au coeur du présent et de l'immanence. Lire Certeau en théologien, c'est assumer ainsi une modernité signant la fin du rapport à un cosmos différencié et signifiant, pour entrer dans une passion de l'Unique, absent. Au creux d'une perte, d'un exil, d'une épreuve, qu'attestent les mystiques, eux qui disent un corps à corps avec le monde, une altération originaire, un avènement singulier. Et qui les écrivent. Or, la théologie est justement articulée à de la mémoire, textuelle et fictive, et aux jeux institutionnels à laquelle cette mémoire émarge, fût-ce sur mode d'écart ou de dissidence ; et son travail passe par l'anthropologie d'un croire, de dimension radicalement humaine et irréductible en l'humain. S'y dit une subversion, non un dépassement, du monde.