Chronic NSAID use and long-term decline of renal function in a prospective rheumatoid arthritis cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may cause kidney damage. This study assessed the impact of prolonged NSAID exposure on renal function in a large rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient cohort. METHODS: Renal function was prospectively followed between 1996 and 2007 in 4101 RA patients with multilevel mixed models for longitudinal data over a mean period of 3.2 years. Among the 2739 'NSAID users' were 1290 patients treated with cyclooxygenase type 2 selective NSAIDs, while 1362 subjects were 'NSAID naive'. Primary outcome was the estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Cockroft-Gault formula (eGFRCG), and secondary the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula equations and serum creatinine concentrations. In sensitivity analyses, NSAID dosing effects were compared for patients with NSAID registration in ≤/>50%, ≤/>80% or ≤/>90% of assessments. FINDINGS: In patients with baseline eGFRCG >30 mL/min, eGFRCG evolved without significant differences over time between 'NSAID users' (mean change in eGFRCG -0.87 mL/min/year, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.59) and 'NSAID naive' (-0.67 mL/min/year, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.09, p=0.63). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for significant confounders age, sex, body mass index, arterial hypertension, heart disease and for other insignificant factors, NSAIDs were an independent predictor for accelerated renal function decline only in patients with advanced baseline renal impairment (eGFRCG <30 mL/min). Analyses with secondary outcomes and sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs had no negative impact on renal function estimates but in patients with advanced renal impairment.

A prospective observational study comparing a non-operator dependent automatic PWV analyser to pulse pressure, in assessing arterial stiffness in hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) accelerates vascular stiffening related to age. Arterial stiffness may be evaluated measuring the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) or more simply, as recommended by KDOQI, monitoring pulse pressure (PP). Both correlate to survival and incidence of cardiovascular disease. PWV can also be estimated on the brachial artery using a Mobil-O-Graph; a non-operator dependent automatic device. The aim was to analyse whether, in a dialysis population, PWV obtained by Mobil-O-Graph (MogPWV) is more sensitive for vascular aging than PP. METHODS: A cohort of 143 patients from 4 dialysis units has been followed measuring MogPWV and PP every 3 to 6 months and compared to a control group with the same risk factors but an eGFR > 30 ml/min. RESULTS: MogPWV contrarily to PP did discriminate the dialysis population from the control group. The mean difference translated in age between the two populations was 8.4 years. The increase in MogPWV, as a function of age, was more rapid in the dialysis group. 13.3% of the dialysis patients but only 3.0% of the control group were outliers for MogPWV. The mortality rate (16 out of 143) was similar in outliers and inliers (7.4 and 8.0%/year). Stratifying patients according to MogPWV, a significant difference in survival was seen. A high parathormone (PTH) and to be dialysed for a hypertensive nephropathy were associated to a higher baseline MogPWV. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing PWV on the brachial artery using a Mobil-O-Graph is a valid and simple alternative, which, in the dialysis population, is more sensitive for vascular aging than PP. As demonstrated in previous studies PWV correlates to mortality. Among specific CKD risk factors only PTH is associated with a higher baseline PWV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02327962.

Pregnancy outcome following maternal exposure to mirtazapine: a multicenter, prospective study.

This multicenter, observational prospective cohort study addresses the risk associated with exposure to mirtazapine during pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes after exposure to mirtazapine were compared with 2 matched control groups: (1) exposure to any selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI, control subjects with a psychiatric condition) and (2) no exposure to medication known to be teratogenic or any antidepressant (general control subjects). Data were collected by members of the European Network of Teratology Information Services between 1995 and 2011. Observations from 357 exposed pregnancies were compared with 357 pregnancies from each control group. The rate of major birth defects between the mirtazapine and the SSRI group did not differ significantly (4.5% vs 4.2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.5-2.3; P = 0.9). A trend toward a higher rate of birth defects in the mirtazapine group compared with general control subjects (4.5% vs 1.9%; OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.9-6.3; P = 0.08) reached statistical significance after exclusion of chromosomal or genetic anomalies (4.1% vs 1.3%; OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.04-10.3; P = 0.03), but this difference became again nonsignificant if cases of exposure not comprising the first trimester were excluded from the analysis (3.4% vs 1.9%; OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.6-5.0; P = 0.26). The crude miscarriage rate did not differ significantly between the mirtazapine, the SSRI, and the general control groups (12.1% vs 12.0% vs 9.3%; P = 0.44). However, a higher rate of elective pregnancy termination was observed in the mirtazapine group compared with SSRI and general control subjects (7.8% vs 3.4% vs 5.6%; P = 0.03). This study did not observe a statistically significant difference in the rate of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure between mirtazapine, SSRI-exposed, and nonexposed pregnancies. A marginally higher rate of birth defects was, however, observed in the mirtazapine and SSRI groups compared with the low rate of birth defects in our general control subjects. Overall pregnancy outcome after mirtazapine exposure was similar to that of the SSRI-exposed control group.

Etude prospective sur l'utilité et valeur diagnostique du PET/CT au 18F-FDG pour le diagnostic d'infection sur cathéters veineux centraux permanents

Contexte Lié au vieillissement et à la sédentarisation de la population, ainsi qu'à la chronicisation du cancer, l'emploi de cathéters veineux centraux permanents (CVCP) n'a cessé d'augmenter. La complication majeure de ces dispositifs, induisant de forts taux de morbi-mortalité, est l'infection. Actuellement, le diagnostic de ces infections reste surtout basé sur la clinique et les hémocultures. Lorsque le doute persiste, une ablation chirurgicale suivie de la mise en culture des prélèvements chirurgicaux et du cathéter permettent de poser le diagnostic. En clinique, après ces examens, nous constatons que seule la moitié des cathéters retirés étaient réellement infectés. Alors que la tomographie par émission de positons fusionnée à la tomographie (PET/CT) a montré de bons résultats dans la détection des infections chroniques, la valeur diagnostique du PET/CT au fluorodeoxyglucose marqué au 18F (18F-FDG) pour les infections de CVCP n'a encore jamais été déterminée dans une étude prospective. Objectifs Au travers de cette étude prospective, ouverte et monocentrique, nous chercherons à connaître la valeur diagnostique du PET/CT au 18F-FDG dans la détection d'infections de CVCP et ainsi d'en déterminer son utilité. Nous essaierons aussi de déterminer la différence de valeur diagnostique du PET/CT au 18F-FDG par rapport aux méthodes conventionnelles (paramètres cliniques et culture du liquide d'aspiration), afin de se déterminer sur l'éventuelle utilité diagnostique de celui-ci. Méthodes Cadre : Etude prospective d'au moins 20 patients, avec 2 groupes contrôles d'au moins 10 patients ayant chacun respectivement une faible et une forte probabilité d'infection, soit au moins 40 patients au total. Population : patients adultes avec CVCP devant être retiré. Cette étude prévoit un examen PET/CT au 18F-FDG effectué auprès de patients nécessitant une ablation de CVCP sur suspicion d'infection, sans confirmation possible par les moyens diagnostiques non chirurgicaux. Deux acquisitions seront réalisées 45 et 70 minutes après l'injection de 5,5MBq/Kg de 18F-FDG. Le groupe contrôle à faible probabilité d'infection, sera formé de patients bénéficiant de l'ablation définitive d'un CVCP pour fin de traitement durant le laps de temps de l'étude, et ayant bénéficié au préalable d'un examen PET/CT pour raison X. Après avoir retiré chirurgicalement le CVCP, nous utiliserons la culture microbiologique des deux extrémités du CVCP comme étalon d'or (gold standard) de l'infection. Le groupe contrôle à forte probabilité d'infection sera formé de patients nécessitant une ablation de CVCP sur infection de CVCP confirmée par les moyens diagnostiques non chirurgicaux (culture positive du liquide de l'aspiration). Lors de l'examen PET/CT, ces patients auront aussi deux acquisitions réalisées 45 et 70 minutes après l'injection de 5,5MBq/Kg de 18F-FDG. Les résultats de ces examens seront évalués par deux spécialistes en médecine nucléaire qui détermineront le niveau de suspicion de l'infection sur une échelle de Likert allant de I à V, sur la base du nombre de foyers, de la localisation du foyer, de l'intensité de la captation de 18F-FDG au voisinage du cathéter et du rapport tissu/arrière-plan. Par la suite, nous retirerons chirurgicalement le CVCP. Nous utiliserons la culture microbiologique du pus (si présent), des deux extrémités du CVCP ainsi que l'histologie des tissus formant un tunnel autour du cathéter comme étalon d'or de l'infection. Les résultats seront analysés à l'aide de courbes ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) afin de déterminer la valeur diagnostique du PET/CT dans l'infection de CVCP. Les résultats des examens des patients avec suspicion clinique d'infection seront ensuite analysés séparément, afin de déterminer la différence de valeur diagnostique du PET/CT au 18F-FDG par rapport aux méthodes conventionnelles. Résultats escomptés Ce projet veut chercher à savoir si le PET/CT au 18F-FDG peut être un moyen diagnostique valide dans les infections de CVCP, s'avérer utile lorsque les autres moyens diagnostiques sont non conclusifs. Plus-value escomptée Actuellement, lors d'incertitude sur le diagnostic d'infection de CVCP, une opération chirurgicale est effectuée à titre préventif afin d'enlever le cathéter en cause, cependant seulement la moitié de ces cathéters sont réellement infectés en pratique. Le PET/CT au 18F-FDG, grâce à sa sensibilité élevée et probablement une bonne valeur prédictive négative, pourrait éviter à une partie des patients un retrait inutile du cathéter, diminuant ainsi les risques chirurgicaux et les coûts liés à de telles opérations, tout en préservant le capital d'accès vasculaire futur.

Pontages veineux in situ. Indications, technique et résultats. A propos d'une étude prospective de 26 cas consécutifs [In situ venous grafts. Indications, technique and results. Prospective study of 26 consecutive cases].

The in situ saphenous vein bypass has been introduced in our department since 1989. A total of 26 bypasses in 22 patients have been followed prospectively. Indications for revascularisation have been severe arterial insufficiency in 73% of the cases (stage III or IV). With the exception of one postoperative death (myocardial infarction), all the patients have recovered uneventfully, with a regression to stage I. No amputation has been necessary. Morbidity has been 30%, with mainly minor local complications. The primary patency rate is 83% at one year and 78% after 2 and 3 years, whereas the secondary patency rate is 91% at one year, and remains constant thereafter up to 3 years. Considering our results and those from the literature, we believe that the in situ technique is very valuable, especially for below-knee vascular reconstruction. Technical difficulties of the method are analysed.

Clinical Utility of the 2 New Scales of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA): A Naturalistic, Prospective Study in a Psychiatric Unit for Adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the clinical usefulness of the emotional symptoms (Emo) and externalizing problems (Ext) scales compared with the Total score on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). METHODS: The HoNOSCA was rated at admission and discharge for 260 adolescent inpatients. The primary outcomes assessed were (a) the sensitivity of the 3 HoNOSCA scores to clinical improvement; and (b) the between diagnoses discriminative value of these scores. RESULTS: Analyses of variances [2 (time: admission vs. discharge) ×5 (diagnostic groups)] revealed a main effect of time for the 3 scores, a main effect of the diagnostic group for the Total and Ext scores, and an interaction effect between time and diagnosis for the Emo score. A moderate correlation was observed between the change in Ext and Emo scores between admission and discharge. DISCUSSION: These 2 new scales of the HoNOSCA demonstrated good clinical utility and the ability to assess different aspects of clinical improvements. A significant discriminative value of both scores was observed. SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES: The clinical utility of the 2 new scales on the HoNOSCA was established. These 2 new scales provided a sensitive measure of clinical outcome for assessing improvement between admission and discharge on a psychiatric inpatient unit for adolescents, regardless of diagnostic group, and captured additional information about clinical improvements. Adolescents with psychosis and conduct disorders presented with higher externalizing symptoms than those with other disorders, as rated on the HoNOSCA, at admission and discharge. The Emo score differentiated between clinical improvement in patients with psychosis versus eating disorders. LIMITATIONS: The sample in this study represented a homogeneous population of adolescent inpatients, so that further research is needed before these findings can be generalized to outpatients. In addition, the small number of patients in some diagnostic groups did not allow for their inclusion in some of the statistical analyses.

Prospective motion correction of 3D echo-planar imaging data for functional MRI using optical tracking.

We evaluated the performance of an optical camera based prospective motion correction (PMC) system in improving the quality of 3D echo-planar imaging functional MRI data. An optical camera and external marker were used to dynamically track the head movement of subjects during fMRI scanning. PMC was performed by using the motion information to dynamically update the sequence's RF excitation and gradient waveforms such that the field-of-view was realigned to match the subject's head movement. Task-free fMRI experiments on five healthy volunteers followed a 2×2×3 factorial design with the following factors: PMC on or off; 3.0mm or 1.5mm isotropic resolution; and no, slow, or fast head movements. Visual and motor fMRI experiments were additionally performed on one of the volunteers at 1.5mm resolution comparing PMC on vs PMC off for no and slow head movements. Metrics were developed to quantify the amount of motion as it occurred relative to k-space data acquisition. The motion quantification metric collapsed the very rich camera tracking data into one scalar value for each image volume that was strongly predictive of motion-induced artifacts. The PMC system did not introduce extraneous artifacts for the no motion conditions and improved the time series temporal signal-to-noise by 30% to 40% for all combinations of low/high resolution and slow/fast head movement relative to the standard acquisition with no prospective correction. The numbers of activated voxels (p<0.001, uncorrected) in both task-based experiments were comparable for the no motion cases and increased by 78% and 330%, respectively, for PMC on versus PMC off in the slow motion cases. The PMC system is a robust solution to decrease the motion sensitivity of multi-shot 3D EPI sequences and thereby overcome one of the main roadblocks to their widespread use in fMRI studies.

Prospective pathways between heroin use and nonmedical use of prescription opioids: Trajectories among young Swiss men

BACKGROUND. So far few studies have focused on the last steps of drug-use trajectories. Heroin has been described as a final stage, but the non-medical use of prescription opioids (NMUPOs) is often associated with heroin use. There is, however, no consensus yet about which one precedes the other. AIMS. The objective of this study was to test which of these two substances was likely to be induced by the other using a prospective design. MATERIAL AND METHODS. We used data from the Swiss Longitudinal Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors (C-SURF) to assess exposure to heroin and NMUPO at two times points (N = 5,041). Cross-lagged panel models provided evidence regarding prospective pathways between heroin and NMUPOs. Power analyses provided evidence about significance and clinical relevance. RESULTS. Results showed that heroin use predicted later NMUPO use (? = 1.217, p < 0.001) and that the reverse pathway was non-significant (? = 0.240, p = .233). Heroin use seems to be an important determinant, causing a 150% risk increase for NMUPO use at follow-up, whereas NMUPO use at baseline increases the risk of heroin use at follow-up by a mere non-significant 20%. CONCLUSIONS. Thus, heroin users were more likely to move to NMUPOs than non-heroin users, whereas NMUPO users were not likely to move to heroin use. The pathway of substance use seemed to include first heroin use, then NMUPO use.