The Vitamin A Derivative All-Trans Retinoic Acid Repairs Amyloid-β-Induced Double-Strand Breaks in Neural Cells and in the Murine Neocortex.

The amyloid-β peptide or Aβ is the key player in the amyloid-cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease. Aβ appears to trigger cell death but also production of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in aging and Alzheimer's disease. All-trans retinoic acid (RA), a derivative of vitamin A, was already known for its neuroprotective effects against the amyloid cascade. It diminishes, for instance, the production of Aβ peptides and their oligomerisation. In the present work we investigated the possible implication of RA receptor (RAR) in repair of Aβ-induced DSBs. We demonstrated that RA, as well as RAR agonist Am80, but not AGN 193109 antagonist, repair Aβ-induced DSBs in SH-SY5Y cells and an astrocytic cell line as well as in the murine cortical tissue of young and aged mice. The nonhomologous end joining pathway and the Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated kinase were shown to be involved in RA-mediated DSBs repair in the SH-SY5Y cells. Our data suggest that RA, besides increasing cell viability in the cortex of young and even of aged mice, might also result in targeted DNA repair of genes important for cell or synaptic maintenance. This phenomenon would remain functional up to a point when Aβ increase and RA decrease probably lead to a pathological state.

Role of Munc18c in SNARE-mediated exocytosis

Background: The SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor Attachment protein Receptors) and SM (Sec1/Munc18) family of proteins form the core machinery that drives the fusion of vesicles in different membrane trafficking steps. They are highly conserved, implying a similar mode of binding and function. In vertebrates, Munc18a is essential for neuronal exocytosis. It binds to its partner syntaxin1a (Syx1a) at both its N-peptide and closed conformation, and thereby inhibits SNARE complex formation in vitro. By contrast, its close homolog Munc18c is thought to interact with only the N-peptide of its partner Syx4. Moreover, different effects of Munc18c on SNARE complex formation have been reported, suggesting that the two Munc18/Syx pairs act differently. Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the mechanism of action of Munc18c indeed deviates from that of Munc18a by using sensitive biochemical and biophysical methods. Results: I found that Munc18c does have a similar binding mode as Munc18a and interacts tightly with Syx4 at both the N-peptide and closed conformation. Moreover, I established, through a novel assay, that Munc18c inhibits SNARE complex assembly, with both the binding sites contributing to inhibition, similar to Munc18a. However, there were several subtle differences between the two Munc18/Syx pairs. Munc18a exerted stronger inhibition than Munc18c. Also their respective Syx partners were found to differ in the rate of binding to SNAP25, suggesting that the equilibrium of their open and closed conformations is different. Moreover, Munc18a was found to interact with Syx 1, 2, 3 but not 4, while Munc18c bound to Syx 2, 4 and 1 but not 3. By comparing the kinetics of interaction of Syx with either Munc18 or SNAP25, I found that the block of SNARE complex assembly by Munc18 is effective on a shorter time scale, but SNAP25 eventually binds to Syx resulting in SNARE complex formation. Nevertheless, these findings do not explain how Syx can escape the tight grip of Munc18, suggesting that other proteins or mechanisms are needed for this step. I also discovered that Munc18 is able to bind on the surface of the SNARE core complex; however, this observation needs to be tested more rigorously. Conclusion: Munc18c was found to be similar to Munc18a in its mode of binding to Syx and inhibition of SNARE complex assembly. However, differences in kinetics and interaction specificities were observed between the different Munc18/Syx pairs. -- Contexte : Les familles des protéines SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor At- tachment protein Receptors) et SM (Sec1/Munc18) forment le coeur de la machinerie chargée de la fusion vésiculaire au cours des différentes étapes du trafic intracellulaire. Elles sont très conservées, suggérant un mode d'interaction et des fonctions semblables. Chez les Verté- brés, Munc18a est essentielle à l'exocytose neuronale. Elle se lie à sa partenaire d'interaction syntaxin1a (Syx1a) à la fois via un peptide N-terminal et la conformation fermée de celle-ci, inhibant ainsi la formation du complexe SNARE in vitro. Son homologue proche Munc18c au contraire, est supposée interagir seulement avec le peptide N-terminal de sa partenaire Syx4. En outre, différents effets de Munc18c sur la formation du complexe SNARE ont été décrits, suggérant que les deux paires Munc18/Syx fonctionnent différemment. Objectif : Le but de cette étude est de tester si les mécanismes de fonctionnement de Munc18c diffèrent vraiment de ceux de Munc18a par le biais de méthodes biochimiques et biophysiques très précises. Résultats : J'ai pu démontrer que Munc18c se comporte en effet de façon semblable à Munc18a, et interagit étroitement avec Syx4 à ses deux sites de liaison. J'ai pu de surcroît montrer par une nouvelle méthode que Munc18c inhibe l'assemblage du complexe SNARE en impliquant ces deux sites de liaison, comme le fait Munc18a. il existe cependant de subtiles différences entre les deux paires Munc18/Syx : Munc18a exerce une inhibition plus forte que Munc18c ; leurs Syx partenaires diffèrent également dans leur degré de liaison à SNAP25, ce qui suggère un équilibre different de leurs conformations ouverte et fermée. De plus, Munc18a interagit avec Syx 1, 2 et 3 mais pas Syx 4, alors que Munc18c se lie à Syx 2, 4 et 1 mais pas Syx 3. En comparant les cinétiques d'interaction de Syx avec Munc18 ou SNAP25, j'ai découvert que le blocage par Munc18 de l'assemblage du complexe SNARE est effectif de façon brève, bien que SNAP25 finisse par se lier à Syx et aboutir ainsi à la formation du complexe SNARE. Ces découvertes n'expliquent cependant pas comment Syx parvient à échapper à la solide emprise de Munc18, et suggèrent ainsi l'intervention nécessaire d'autres protéines ou mécanismes à cette étape. J'ai également découvert que Munc18 peut se lier à la surface de la partie centrale du complexe SNARE - cette observation reste à être testée de façon plus stringente. Conclusion : Il a pu être établi que Munc18c est semblable à Munc18a quant à son mode de liaison à Syx et d'inhibition de l'assemblage du complexe SNARE. Des différences de cinétique et de spécificité d'interaction entre les diverses paires Munc18/Syx ont cependant été identifiées.

Distinct roles of NMDA receptors at different stages of granule cell development in the adult brain.

NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity are thought to underlie the assembly of developing neuronal circuits and to play a crucial role in learning and memory. It remains unclear how NMDAR might contribute to the wiring of adult-born granule cells (GCs). Here we demonstrate that nascent GCs lacking NMDARs but rescued from apoptosis by overexpressing the pro-survival protein Bcl2 were deficient in spine formation. Insufficient spinogenesis might be a general cause of cell death restricted within the NMDAR-dependent critical time window for GC survival. NMDAR loss also led to enhanced mushroom spine formation and synaptic AMPAR activity throughout the development of newborn GCs. Moreover, similar elevated synapse maturation in the absence of NMDARs was observed in neonate-generated GCs and CA1 pyramidal neurons. Together, these data suggest that NMDAR operates as a molecular monitor for controlling the activity-dependent establishment and maturation rate of synaptic connections between newborn neurons and others.