Aortic root morphology: a paradigm for successful reconstruction.

Aortic root (AoR) components provide synchronous and precise 3D deformation of the aortic root during the cardiac cycle in order to ensure closure and opening of the three leaflets over a lifetime. Any deviation from the natural 3D morphology, such as with AoR annulus dilatation, enlarged sinuses and/or dilatation of the sinotubular junction, as in the case of ascending aortic dilatation, may result in disruption of the natural AoR function. Surgical treatment of AoR pathology has two modalities: the replacement of the aortic valve by artificial prosthesis or by preservation of the three leaflets and reconstruction of the aortic root components. Currently, there are two basic aortic root reconstruction procedures: aortic root sparing and aortic valve reimplantation techniques. Regardless of the technique used, the restoration of adequate cusp coaptation, is from a technical point of view, the most important element to consider. To achieve this, there are two requirements that need to be met: (i) the valve coaptation should be superior to the level of the aortic root base by at least 8 mm and (ii) the coaptation height per se has to be ≥5 mm. Successful restoration of the aortic root requires adequate technical skills, detailed knowledge of aortic root anatomy and topography, and also knowledge of the spatial pattern of AoR elements. Recently, there has been growing interest in aortic root reconstructive procedures as well their modifications. As such, the aim of this review is to analyse aortic root topography and 3D anatomy from a surgical point of view. The review also focuses on potential risk regions that one should be aware of before the surgical journey into the 'deep waters area' of the AoR begins.

Resultate und ausser- gewöhnliche Komplikationen der Chirurgie der Gehörgangexostosen [Results and extraordinary complications of surgery for exostoses of the external auditory canal].

We present a retrospective study on 22 operations of exostosis of the external auditory canal in 20 patients. 8 patients were passionated by water sports. The most frequent indication for surgery (13 operations) was recurrent external otitis or ceruminal obstruction. In 7 cases the need for a wider access to the middle ear indicated surgery. Surgery was usually performed as an outpatient procedure, maximum hospitalization was 3 days. The mean healing period was 6 (3-10) weeks. Mean follow up was 43 (3-110) months. There were no severe intraoperative complications such as facial paresis, lesions of the ossicles or of the inner ear. As intraoperative complications we found 2 perforations of the tympanic membrane, 2 expositions of the capsule of the mandibular joint, one of which was followed by chronic pain. As postoperative complications we found an early soft tissue stenosis of the external auditory canal and one late soft tissue stenosis which recurred after revision surgery. No recurrence of exostosis was seen. We describe an up to now unknown complication: the appearance of bilateral petrositis caused by staphylococcus epidermidis after bilateral surgery in an otherwise healthy patient. This study confirms that severe complications are rare, minor ones however relatively common. And that also minor complications may have a troublesome follow. Therefore and because of the potential of severe complications indication for surgery must be made cautiously and risks of the operation must not be underestimated.