Non-remboursement de la fécondation in vitro : il est temps de changer d'avis

La fécondation in vitro (FIV) n'est pas remboursée. Le Tribunal fédéral le répète inlassablement depuis bientôt 30 ans. Néanmoins, les assurées ne baissent pas les bras et périodiquement resoumettent la question, espérant que de nouvelles données scientifiques sauront infléchir la Haute Cour. En vain. Le tribunal l'a redit en octobre 2012:1 cette prestation n'est pas à charge des caisses.2 L'ordonnance sur les prestations de l'assurance-maladie (OPAS3) le prévoit explicitement, et il n'y a simplement pas lieu d'examiner une disposition d'une ordonnance du Département fédéral de l'intérieur (DFI). Le raisonnement est toutefois un peu court. Premièrement, le refus du Tribunal fédéral d'examiner si l'ordonnance respecte le cadre de la délégation législative ne convainc pas. Deuxièmement, la FIV remplit les critères imposés à la prise en charge tels que décidés par le législateur dans la loi sur l'assurance-maladie (LAMal4). Enfin, les assurés qui décident de recourir contre un refus de remboursement sont privés des garanties minimales de procédure que leur garantit pourtant la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme. La présente contribution commence par une brève description de la FIV. Elle expose ensuite la législation applicable (partie 2) et la jurisprudence fédérale qui en découle (partie 3). La partie suivante critique la position du Tribunal fédéral au regard des principes énoncés dans la législation. Une comparaison avec l'insémination intra-utérine (IIU), pour laquelle le Tribunal fédéral a admis le remboursement, met en lumière les incohérences de la jurisprudence. La compatibilité de la jurisprudence fédérale avec l'art. 6 de la Convention européenne sur les droits de l'homme est évaluée. La conclusion plaide pour une réforme partielle du système procédural gouvernant la prise en charge des prestations de soins, mais aussi des techniques médicales alternatives.

Retrospective research: What are the ethical and legal requirements?

Retrospective research is conducted on already available data and/or biologic material. Whether such research requires that patients specifically consent to the use of "their" data continues to stir controversy. From a legal and ethical point of view, it depends on several factors. The main criteria to be considered are whether the data or the sample is anonymous, whether the researcher is the one who collected it and whether the patient was told of the possible research use. In Switzerland, several laws delineate the procedure to be followed. The definition of "anonymous" is open to some interpretation. In addition, it is debatable whether consent waivers that are legally admissible for data extend to research involving human biological samples. In a few years, a new Swiss federal law on human research could clarify the regulatory landscape. Meanwhile, hospital-internal guidelines may impose stricter conditions than required by federal or cantonal law. Conversely, Swiss and European ethical texts may suggest greater flexibility and call for a looser interpretation of existing laws. The present article provides an overview of the issues for physicians, scientists, ethics committee members and policy makers involved in retrospective research in Switzerland. It aims at provoking more open discussions of the regulatory problems and possible future legal and ethical solutions.

Record keeping by Swiss physiotherapists--a national survey of knowledge regarding legal requirements.

A national survey conducted in Switzerland aimed to evaluate the knowledge of physiotherapists regarding the legal requirements for record keeping and to collect their feedback about record keeping in general. Three physiotherapists from various professional practice groups and a lawyer specialised in health law developed a questionnaire that was sent to the 7,753 members of two existing national associations of physiotherapists. The questionnaire evaluated the participants' knowledge by calculating a score of legal knowledge, which had a maximum of 30 points. We included 825 questionnaires in the analysis. The large majority (83.4%) of participants confessed an ignorance of the legal requirements concerning record keeping prior to the survey. The average score of legal compatibility was 8 points. The younger age of the physiotherapists was a significant predictor of having knowledge of the legal requirements for record keeping (p <0.001). The participants had an appreciation of the value of records, but they did not have the relevant knowledge regarding the legal requirements for keeping records. The participants blamed a lack of time and remuneration for their failure to keep records according to known requirements. All practising allied health professionals should keep up-to-date and accurate records that conform to active legal requirements and existing international guidelines. In addition to the existing legal requirements, the emergence of e-health and the electronic era will trigger major changes in patient record management by physiotherapists.

Translation to success of surgical innovation.

Contemporary thoracic and cardiovascular surgery uses extensive equipment and devices to enable its performance. As the specialties develop and new frontiers are crossed, the technology needs to advance in a parallel fashion. Strokes of genius or problem-solving brain-storming may generate great ideas, but the metamorphosis of an idea into a physical functioning tool requires a lot more than just a thinking process. A modern surgical device is the end-point of a sophisticated, complicated and potentially treacherous route, which incorporates new skills and knowledge acquisition. Processes including technology transfer, commercialisation, corporate and product development, intellectual property and regulatory routes all play pivotal roles in this voyage. Many good ideas may fall by the wayside for a multitude of reasons as they may not be marketable or may be badly marketed. In this article, we attempt to illuminate the components required in the process of surgical innovation, which we believe must remain in the remit of the modern-day thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

Why did Swiss citizens refuse a comprehensive second-hand smoke ban?

The ill effects of second-hand smoke are now well documented. To protect the population from exposure to tobacco smoke, comprehensive smoking bans are necessary as expressed in the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and its guidelines. Switzerland has only a partial smoking ban full of exceptions which has been in effect since 2010, which reproduces the so-called Spanish model. In September 2012, the Swiss citizens refused a proposal for a more comprehensive ban. This case study examines the reasons behind this rejection and draws some lessons that can be learnt from it.

Avastin-Lucentis: un médicament à tout prix ?

Début 2008, deux médicaments placent sous le feu des projecteurs médiatiques le système suisse de remboursement des médicaments. L'affaire du Lucentis et de l'Avastin retentit sur la télévision alémanique, rebondit dans les quotidiens, pour finalement atterrir devant le Parlement. Le prix très élevé du Lucentis (par rapport à son possible substitut, l'Avastin) suscite les critiques. Une année plus tard, les questions fondamentales que cette affaire soulève ne sont toujours pas résolues. Ce mini-scandale fournit l'occasion idéale pour présenter les dispositions légales et la jurisprudence sur le remboursement des médicaments par les caisses-maladie suisses. Les explications suivent la chronologie des événements pour conclure par diverses recommandations.