Comparison of the metabolic and endocrine effects of 3,5,3'-triiodothyroacetic acid and thyroxine.

To test the hypothesis that 3,5,3'-triiodothyroacetic acid (Triac) is more active as a TSH suppressor than on peripheral parameters of thyroid hormone action, the following parameters were studied: basal metabolic rate, sleeping energy expenditure (SEE), sex hormone-binding globulin, and cholesterol. In a double blind trial, 14 subjects received during 3 weeks (phase 1) 180 micrograms T4 or 1700 micrograms Triac daily, divided into 3 doses, to suppress thyroidal secretion. The dosage was doubled for the next 3 weeks (phase 2). Under T4 treatment, TSH reached 0.11 mU/L during phase 1 and less than 0.03 mU/L during phase 2. With Triac, a marked TSH inhibition occurred after 1 week (0.17 mU/L), followed by an escape during the following 2 weeks (0.63 mU/L). During phase 2, an almost complete TSH suppression was obtained (0.03 mU/L). Both Triac doses suppressed endogenous thyroid hormone secretion, as evidenced by T4 and rT3 levels. Both substances induced a 2-fold stimulation of sex hormone-binding globulin during phase 2. Serum cholesterol decreased similarly, without affecting the high/low density lipoprotein ratio. T4 increased SEE by 4.1% and 8.5% during phases 1 and 2. Triac failed to induce the expected peripheral metabolic responses of the thyroid hormones, as demonstrated by an unchanged SEE and basal metabolic rate. These results clearly show a preferential action of Triac on TSH suppression.

A role for the endocrine and pro-inflammatory mediator MIF in the control of insulin secretion during stress.

The systemic response to injury or infection is often accompanied by significant alterations in host metabolism and glucose homeostasis. Within the liver, these changes include a decrease in glycogenesis and an increase in gluconeogenesis, and in peripheral tissues, the development of insulin resistance and the increased utilization of glucose by non-insulin-dependent pathways. Depending on the severity and the duration of the response, both hyper- and hypoglycemia can ensue and each can become a clinically important manifestation of the systemic inflammatory response. The protein known as macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) has been identified recently to play a central role in host immunity and to regulate glucocorticoid effects on the immune and inflammatory systems. MIF is released in vivo from activated immune cells as well as by the anterior pituitary gland upon stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. MIF also has been found to be secreted together with insulin from the pancreatic beta-cells and to act as an autocrine factor to stimulate insulin release. Since circulating MIF levels are elevated during stress or systemic inflammatory processes, this protein may play a central role in the control of insulin secretion during various disease states.

p27 and Skp2 immunoreactivity and its clinical significance with endocrine and chemo-endocrine treatments in node-negative early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Low p27 and high Skp2 immunoreactivity are associated with a poor prognosis and other poor prognostic features including resistant phenotypes and antiestrogen drug resistance. We investigated these proteins in two International Breast Cancer Study Group trials studying node-negative early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Trial VIII compared chemotherapy followed by goserelin with either modality alone in premenopausal patients. Trial IX compared chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen with tamoxifen alone in postmenopausal patients. Central Pathology Office assessed p27 and Skp2 expression in the primary tumor by immunohistochemistry among 1631 (60%) trial patients. RESULTS: p27 and Skp2 were inversely related; 13% of tumors expressed low p27 and high Skp2. Low p27 and high Skp2 were associated with unfavorable prognostic factors including larger size and higher grade tumors, absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression and high Ki-67 (each P < 0.05). Low p27 and high Skp2 were not associated with disease-free survival (P = 0.42 and P = 0.48, respectively). The relative effects of chemo-endocrine versus endocrine therapy were similar regardless of p27 or Skp2. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the association of low p27 and high Skp2 with other poor prognostic features, but found no predictive or prognostic value, and therefore do not recommend routine determination of p27 and Skp2 for node-negative breast cancer.

Effects of fish oil on the neuro-endocrine responses to an endotoxin challenge in healthy volunteers

Résumé Introduction et hypothèse : Certains acides gras polyinsaturés de type n-3 PUFA, qui sont contenus dans l'huile de poisson, exercent des effets non-énergétiques (fluidité des membranes cellulaires, métabolisme énergétique et prostanoïdes, régulation génique de la réponse inflammatoire). Les mécanismes de la modulation de cette dernière sont encore mal connus. L'administration d'endotoxine (LPS) induit chez les volontaires sains une affection inflammatoire aiguë, comparable à un état grippal, associé à des modifications métaboliques et inflammatoires transitoires, similaires au sepsis. Ce modèle est utilisé de longue date pour l'investigation clinique expérimentale. Cette étude examine les effets d'une supplémentation orale d'huile de poisson sur la réponse inflammatoire (systémique et endocrinienne) de sujets sains soumis à une injection d'endotoxine. L'hypothèse était que la supplémentation d'huile de poisson réduirait les réponses physiologiques à l'endotoxine. Méthodes : Quinze volontaires masculins (âge 26.0±3.1 ans) ont participé à une étude randomisée, contrôlée. Les sujets sont désignés au hasard à recevoir ou non une supplémentation orale : 7.2 g d'huile de poisson par jour correspondant à un apport de 1.1 g/jour d'acides gras 20:5 (n-3, acide écosapentaénoïque) et 0.7 g/jour de 22:6 (n-3, acide docosahexaénoïque). Chaque sujet est investigué deux fois dans des conditions identiques : une fois il reçoit une injection de 2 ng par kg poids corporel de LPS intraveineuse, l'autre fois une injection de placebo. Les variables suivantes sont relevées avant l'intervention et durant les 360 min qui suivent l'injection :signes vitaux, dépense énergétique (EE) et utilisation nette des substrats (calorimétrie indirecte, cinétique du glucose (isotopes stables), taux plasmatique des triglycérides et FFA, du glucose, ainsi que des cytokines et hormones de stress (ACTH, cortisol, Adré, Nor-Adré). Analyses et statistiques :moyennes, déviations standards, analyse de variance (one way, test de Scheffé), différences significatives entre les groupes pour une valeur de p < 0.05. Résultats :L'injection de LPS provoque une augmentation de la température, de la fréquence cardiaque, de la dépense d'énergie et de l'oxydation nette des lipides. On observe une élévation des taux plasmatiques de TNF-a et IL-6, de la glycémie, ainsi qu'une élévation transitoire des concentrations plasmatiques des hormones de stress ACTH, cortisol, adrénaline et noradrénaline. L'huile de poisson atténue significativement la fièvre, la réponse neuro-endocrinienne (ACTH et cortisol) et sympathique (baisse de la noradrénaline plasmatique). Par contre, les taux des cytokines ne sont pas influencés par la supplémentation d'huile de poisson. Conclusion : La supplémentation d'huile de poisson atténue la réponse physiologique à l'endotoxine chez le sujet sain, en particulier la fièvre et la réponse endocrinienne, sans influencer la production des cytokines. Ces résultats soutiennent l'hypothèse que les effets bénéfiques de l'huile de poisson sont principalement caractérisés au niveau du système nerveux central, par des mécanismes non-inflammatoires qui restent encore à élucider.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy of benefit for postmenopausal women who receive endocrine treatment for highly endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer? International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VII and 12-93.

To compare the efficacy of chemoendocrine treatment with that of endocrine treatment (ET) alone for postmenopausal women with highly endocrine responsive breast cancer. In the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trials VII and 12-93, postmenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive or ER-negative, operable breast cancer were randomized to receive either chemotherapy or endocrine therapy or combined chemoendocrine treatment. Results were analyzed overall in the cohort of 893 patients with endocrine-responsive disease, and according to prospectively defined categories of ER, age and nodal status. STEPP analyses assessed chemotherapy effect. The median follow-up was 13 years. Adding chemotherapy reduced the relative risk of a disease-free survival event by 19% (P = 0.02) compared with ET alone. STEPP analyses showed little effect of chemotherapy for tumors with high levels of ER expression (P = 0.07), or for the cohort with one positive node (P = 0.03). Chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free survival for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, but the magnitude of the effect is substantially attenuated if ER levels are high.

Immunolocalization of neuropeptide Y in human pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36 amino acid peptide known to inhibit glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. NPY has recently been shown to be synthetized within rat islets of Langerhans and to be secreted in a differentiated rat insulin-secreting cell line, and as to this date the localization of NPY in human endocrine pancreas has not been reported. As NPY shares high amino acid sequence homology with peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP), the polyclonal antibodies raised against these peptides often cross-react with each other. To demonstrate the presence of NPY in the human endocrine pancreas, we used a highly specific monoclonal antibody raised against NPY and another against its C-flanking peptide (CPON). We studied three cases of hyperplasia of Langerhans islets and 11 cases of endocrine tumors of the pancreas. NPY and CPON were detected in all three cases of hyperplasia. For the 11 pancreatic tumors, five and nine of the tumors were positive for the antibodies NPY and CPON, respectively. The two negative tumors for CPON immunoreactivity were differentiated insulinomas, which showed no evidence of other hormonal secretion. In normal Langerhans islet, NPY and CPON immunoreactivities were colocalized in glucagon-producing cells (alpha-cells) and in a few insulin-secreting cell (beta-cells).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Rôle endocrine de la neurotensine dans le contrôle de l'homéostasie glucidique. [Role of neurotensin in endocrine control of glucose homeostasis.]

Introduction : La sécrétion d'insuline est régulée par le glucose et également pardes hormones peptidiques libérées par le tractus digestif, comme la neurotensine(NT). La NT est un neuropeptide, sécrété notamment par les cellules N dela paroi de l'estomac, qui exerce des fonctions régulatrices complexes dans lesystème digestif. Notre laboratoire a récemment démontré que les cellulesendocrines du pancréas (les îlots de Langherans) expriment les trois récepteursconnus de la NT. Nous avons montré que la NT module la survie de la cellulebêta pancréatique (Coppola et al. 2008). Cette fonction met en jeu deux desrécepteurs de la NT, le NTSR2 et le NTSR3 qui forment, après stimulation parla NT, un complexe protéique régulateur de la survie des cellules (Béraud-Dufour et al. 2009) et également de la sécrétion d'insuline (Béraud-Dufour et al.2010).Matériels et méthodes : La caractérisation pharmacologique de l'effet NT sur lasécrétion d'insuline a été faite à l'aide de ligands spécifiques (agonistes ou antagonistes),dans des expériences d'imagerie calciques et d'exocytose. Nous avonsmesuré l'acivation des PKC par imagerie en temps réel. Afin de déterminer lerôle de la NT dans la physiologie générale nous avons utilisé des modèles in vitro(lignées de cellules INS-1E) et in vivo (souris invalidées NTSR1 et NTSR2).Résultats : Nous avons montré que les récepteurs NTSR2 et NTSR3 interviennentdans la modulation de la sécrétion d'insuline en fonction des conditionsphysiologiques : 1) la NT stimule la sécrétion dans des conditions basales deglucose. 2) elle inhibe la sécrétion dans des situations d'hyperglycémie. La NTmobilise plusieurs activités protéines kinases C (PKC) nécessaires à son rôlephysiologique (Béraud-Dufour et al. 2010).Par ailleurs, sur les modèles murins l'étude du métabolisme de souris transgéniquesinvalidées pour les gènes des NTSR1 et NTSR2 a permis de mettre en évidencel'implication de la NT dans la régulation de l'homéostasie du glucose. Invivo, nous avons observé que l'injection intra péritonéale de NT diminue la glycémieet que cet effet nécessite la présence du NTSR1. Nous avons observé quel'invalidation du gène du NTSR1 affecte la réponse des souris lors des tests detolérance au glucose et à l'insulineConclusion : Les résultats obtenus dans cette étude prouvent que le bon fonctionnementdu système neurotensinergique est nécessaire au maintien d'uneglycémie stable. La dérégulation de ce système pourrait être l'un des facteursimpliqué dans la survenue et/ou l'aggravation d'un diabète de type 2.

Chemoendocrine compared with endocrine adjuvant therapies for node-negative breast cancer: predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors--International Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To centrally assess estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) levels by immunohistochemistry and investigate their predictive value for benefit of chemo-endocrine compared with endocrine adjuvant therapy alone in two randomized clinical trials for node-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VIII compared cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy for 6 cycles followed by endocrine therapy with goserelin with either modality alone in pre- and perimenopausal patients. Trial IX compared three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen for 5 years versus tamoxifen alone in postmenopausal patients. Central Pathology Office reviewed 883 (83%) of 1,063 patients on Trial VIII and 1,365 (82%) of 1,669 on Trial IX and determined ER and PgR by immunohistochemistry. Disease-free survival (DFS) was compared across the spectrum of expression of each receptor using the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot methodology. RESULTS: Both receptors displayed a bimodal distribution, with substantial proportions showing no staining (receptor absent) and most of the remainder showing a high percentage of stained cells. Chemo-endocrine therapy yielded DFS superior to endocrine therapy alone for patients with receptor-absent tumors, and in some cases also for those with low levels of receptor expression. Among patients with ER-expressing tumors, additional prediction of benefit was suggested in absent or low PgR in Trial VIII but not in Trial IX. CONCLUSION: Low levels of ER and PgR are predictive of the benefit of adding chemotherapy to endocrine therapy. Low PgR may add further prediction among pre- and perimenopausal but not postmenopausal patients whose tumors express ER.

Bone fractures among postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer treated with 5 years of letrozole or tamoxifen in the BIG 1-98 trial.

BACKGROUND: To compare the incidence and timing of bone fractures in postmenopausal women treated with 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen or letrozole for endocrine-responsive early breast cancer in the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial. METHODS: We evaluated 4895 patients allocated to 5 years of letrozole or tamoxifen in the BIG 1-98 trial who received at least some study medication (median follow-up 60.3 months). Bone fracture information (grade, cause, site) was collected every 6 months during trial treatment. RESULTS: The incidence of bone fractures was higher among patients treated with letrozole [228 of 2448 women (9.3%)] versus tamoxifen [160 of 2447 women (6.5%)]. The wrist was the most common site of fracture in both treatment groups. Statistically significant risk factors for bone fractures during treatment included age, smoking history, osteoporosis at baseline, previous bone fracture, and previous hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with other trials comparing aromatase inhibitors to tamoxifen, letrozole was associated with an increase in bone fractures. Benefits of superior disease control associated with letrozole and lower incidence of fracture with tamoxifen should be considered with the risk profile for individual patients.

Design, conduct, and analyses of Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98: a randomized, double-blind, phase-III study comparing letrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with receptor-positive, early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors provide superior disease control when compared with tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. PURPOSE: To present the design, history, and analytic challenges of the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial: an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase-III study comparing the aromatase inhibitor letrozole with tamoxifen in this clinical setting. METHODS: From 1998-2003, BIG 1-98 enrolled 8028 women to receive monotherapy with either tamoxifen or letrozole for 5 years, or sequential therapy of 2 years of one agent followed by 3 years of the other. Randomization to one of four treatment groups permitted two complementary analyses to be conducted several years apart. The first, reported in 2005, provided a head-to-head comparison of letrozole versus tamoxifen. Statistical power was increased by an enriched design, which included patients who were assigned sequential treatments until the time of the treatment switch. The second, reported in late 2008, used a conditional landmark approach to test the hypothesis that switching endocrine agents at approximately 2 years from randomization for patients who are disease-free is superior to continuing with the original agent. RESULTS: The 2005 analysis showed the superiority of letrozole compared with tamoxifen. The patients who were assigned tamoxifen alone were unblinded and offered the opportunity to switch to letrozole. Results from other trials increased the clinical relevance about whether or not to start treatment with letrozole or tamoxifen, and analysis plans were expanded to evaluate sequential versus single-agent strategies from randomization. LIMITATIONS: Due to the unblinding of patients assigned tamoxifen alone, analysis of updated data will require ascertainment of the influence of selective crossover from tamoxifen to letrozole. CONCLUSIONS: BIG 1-98 is an example of an enriched design, involving complementary analyses addressing different questions several years apart, and subject to evolving analytic plans influenced by new data that emerge over time.

Hormonothérapie dans le cancer du sein: efficacité et effets adverses [Endocrine therapy in breast cancer: efficacy and adverse events].

Endocrine therapy remains a mainstay in the treatment of endocrine-sensitive breast cancer. In the adjuvant setting, 5 years of endocrine therapy significantly reduces recurrence rate and mortality. Tamoxifen is the molecule of choice for premenopausal women, whereas for postmenopausal women aromatase inhibitors are currently part of the standard treatment. Endocrine therapy can induce side effects, which can affect patient's quality of life and lead to premature treatment interruption. Identification and adequately addressing these side effects is fundamental to maintain good treatment compliance and therefore improve breast cancer specific outcome.

The effect of endocrine responsiveness on high-risk breast cancer treated with dose-intensive chemotherapy: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95 after prolonged follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant dose-intensive chemotherapy and its efficacy according to baseline features has not yet been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and forty-four patients were randomized to receive seven courses of standard-dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) or three cycles of dose-intensive epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (epirubicin 200 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 4 mg/m(2) with filgrastim and progenitor cell support). All patients were assigned tamoxifen at the completion of chemotherapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). This paper updates the results and explores patterns of recurrence according to predicting baseline features. RESULTS: At 8.3-years median follow-up, patients assigned DI-EC had a significantly better DFS compared with those assigned SD-CT [8-year DFS percent 47% and 37%, respectively, hazard ratio (HR) 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.00; P = 0.05]. Only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease benefited from the DI-EC (HR 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.39, 0.95; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: After prolonged follow-up, DI-EC significantly improved DFS, but the effect was observed only in patients with ER-positive disease, leading to the hypothesis that efficacy of DI-EC may relate to its endocrine effects. Further studies designed to confirm the importance of endocrine responsiveness in patients treated with dose-intensive chemotherapy are encouraged.

Is chemotherapy necessary for premenopausal women with lower-risk node-positive, endocrine responsive breast cancer? 10-year update of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 11-93.

INTRODUCTION: International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 11-93 is the largest trial evaluating the role of the addition of chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression/ablation (OFS) and tamoxifen in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. METHODS: IBCSG Trial 11-93 is a randomized trial comparing four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC: doxorubicin or epirubicin, plus cyclophosphamide) added to OFS and 5 years of tamoxifen versus OFS and tamoxifen without chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive, endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. There were 174 patients randomized from May 1993 to November 1998. The trial was closed before the target accrual was reached due to low accrual rate. RESULTS: Patients randomized tended to have lower risk node-positive disease and the median age was 45. After 10 years median follow up, there remains no difference between the two randomized treatment groups for disease-free (hazard ratio=1.02 (0.57-1.83); P=0.94) or overall survival (hazard ratio=0.97 (0.44-2.16); P=0.94). CONCLUSION: This trial, although small, offers no evidence that AC chemotherapy provides additional disease control for premenopausal patients with lower-risk node-positive endocrine-responsive breast cancer who receive adequate adjuvant endocrine therapy. A large trial is needed to determine whether chemotherapy adds benefit to endocrine therapy for this population.

The endocrine disruptor monoethyl-hexyl-phthalate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma modulator that promotes adipogenesis.

The ability of pollutants to affect human health is a major concern, justified by the wide demonstration that reproductive functions are altered by endocrine disrupting chemicals. The definition of endocrine disruption is today extended to broader endocrine regulations, and includes activation of metabolic sensors, such as the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Toxicology approaches have demonstrated that phthalate plasticizers can directly influence PPAR activity. What is now missing is a detailed molecular understanding of the fundamental basis of endocrine disrupting chemical interference with PPAR signaling. We thus performed structural and functional analyses that demonstrate how monoethyl-hexyl-phthalate (MEHP) directly activates PPARgamma and promotes adipogenesis, albeit to a lower extent than the full agonist rosiglitazone. Importantly, we demonstrate that MEHP induces a selective activation of different PPARgamma target genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and fluorescence microscopy in living cells reveal that this selective activity correlates with the recruitment of a specific subset of PPARgamma coregulators that includes Med1 and PGC-1alpha, but not p300 and SRC-1. These results highlight some key mechanisms in metabolic disruption but are also instrumental in the context of selective PPAR modulation, a promising field for new therapeutic development based on PPAR modulation.