Cercles de qualité médecins-pharmaciens, pour une responsabilité partagée de la liberté de prescription [Physicians-pharmacists quality circles: shared responsibility of the freedom of prescription].

Physicians-pharmacists quality circles (PPQCs) were introduced in 1997-98 by visionary healthcare practitioners of the French-speaking part of Switzerland with the aim to improve the quality of drug prescription. Indeed the challenge is to manage the 7917 brand names of the Swiss drug market (2010), including 19793 different dosages, galenic formulations and packaging. The impact of these PPQCs on the containment of drug costs and on drug prescribing profiles has been demonstrated and has led to their spread throughout Switzerland. PPQCs provide clear educational benefits and have thus been accredited by various continuous education bodies. In this article, participating physicians and pharmacists share their vision and illustrate how they work and influence the safety and efficiency of drug prescription, a routine process complex enough to warrant sharing of its burden in a constructive interdisciplinary collaboration.

Accès sans prescription aux statines: bénéfique ou délétère. [Over-the-counter statins: benefit or harmful?]

Making statin available over the counter is one of the measures proposed to correct its underuse. Since May 2004, simvastatin 10 mg is sold over the counter in Great Britain. But uncertainties persist concerning the efficacy of statin in primary prevention and at a 10 mg dose. Finally, there is a risk of side effects and drug interactions. Beyond the correction of statin underuse and the hope of coronary heart disease mortality reduction, the British decision highlighted the will to give individuals a sense of responsibility concerning their health and its financial cost. Anyway, the benefit of switching statin from prescription to over the counter should be experimentally evaluated before its introduction.

Association between non-medical prescription drug use and personality traits among young Swiss men.

AIM: To investigate the relationships between six classes of non-medical prescription drug use (NMPDU) and five personality traits. METHODS: Representative baseline data on 5777 Swiss men around 20 years old were taken from the Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors. NMPDU of opioid analgesics, sedatives/sleeping pills, anxiolytics, antidepressants, beta-blockers and stimulants over the previous 12 months was measured. Personality was assessed using the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale; attention deficit-hyperactivity (ADH) using the Adult Attention-Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Scale; and aggression/hostility, anxiety/neuroticism and sociability using the Zuckerman-Kuhlmann Personality Questionnaire. Logistic regression models for each personality trait were fitted, as were seven multiple logistic regression models predicting each NMPDU adjusting for all personality traits and covariates. RESULTS: Around 10.7% of participants reported NMPDU in the last 12 months, with opioid analgesics most prevalent (6.7%), then sedatives/sleeping pills (3.0%), anxiolytics (2.7%), and stimulants (1.9%). Sensation seeking (SS), ADH, aggression/hostility, and anxiety/neuroticism (but not sociability) were significantly positively associated with at least one drug class (OR varied between 1.24, 95%CI: 1.04-1.48 and 1.86, 95%CI: 1.47-2.35). Aggression/hostility, anxiety/neuroticism and ADH were significantly and positively related to almost all NMPDU. Sociability was inversely related to NMPDU of sedatives/sleeping pills and anxiolytics (OR, 0.70; 95%CI: 0.51-0.96 and OR, 0.64; 95%CI: 0.46-0.90, respectively). SS was related only to stimulant use (OR, 1.74; 95%CI: 1.14-2.65). CONCLUSION: People with higher scores for ADH, aggression/hostility and anxiety/neuroticism are at higher risk of NMPDU. Sociability appeared to protect from NMPDU of sedatives/sleeping pills and anxiolytics.

Prevalence of methylphenidate prescription among school-aged children in a Swiss population: increase in the number of prescriptions in the Swiss Canton of Vaud, from 2002 to 2005, and changes in patient demographics.

OBJECTIVE: Methylphenidate is prescribed for children and adolescents to treat ADHD. As in many Western countries, the increase in methylphenidate consumption is a public concern in Switzerland. The article discusses the authors' assessment of prescription prevalence in 2002 and 2005 for school-aged children in the canton of Vaud. METHOD: Pharmacy prescription information is available from the regional public health authority. Descriptive analyses are conducted on an anonymized database of the years 2002 and 2005. Data for each year are compared to assess trends in methylphenidate prescription prevalence. RESULTS: The findings show an increase from 0.74% to 1.02% in the number of prescriptions for 5- to 14-year-old children, particularly in prescriptions for girls. Data also show important geographical differences in prescription. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of methylphenidate prescription is lower in Switzerland than other Western countries, particularly the United States. However, some aspects of prevalence are similar, including the increase per year, demographics, and geographic characteristics.

Étude des biais sur la dose parentérale d'un nouveau médicament lors d'un essai clinique avec profil cinétique.

Introduction et objectif: Lors d'essais cliniques, le pharmacien est responsable de la préparation et de la dispensation des médicaments à évaluer. Un article récent a toutefois montré que les aspects pharmaceutiques liés au contrôle de la dose administrée in fine étaient souvent mal contrôlés. Il peut exister une différence entre la dose nominale fournie par le certificat d'analyse du fabricant et la dose réellement administrée au sujet, biais qui se reporte en cascade sur l'estimation des paramètres pharmaco¬cinétiques (PK), comme la clairance ou le volume de distribution. Ce travail visait à évaluer les biais entachant la quantité de médicament réellement injectée (iv/sc) aux volontaires d'un essai clinique étudiant la PK et la relation dose-réponse d'un nouveau produit biotechnologique. Méthode: La dose de médicament administrée lors de l'essai clinique (D) a été calculée de la manière suivante: D = C ? V - pertes. La concentration du produit (C; titre nominal du fabricant) a été vérifiée par immuno-essai. Le volume de médicament injecté (V) a été déterminé pour chaque injection par pesée (n=72), en utilisant la masse de la seringue avant et après injection et la densité du produit. Enfin, une analyse in vitro a permis d'évaluer les pertes liées à l'adsorption du produit dans les lignes de perfusion et de choisir le dispositif adéquat in vivo. Résultats: La concentration du médicament s'est révélée proche du titre nominal (96 ± 7%), et a été utilisée comme référence. Le volume injecté était quant à lui entaché d'un biais systématique par rapport à la valeur théorique correspondant à 0.03 mL pour la dose minimale (i.e. 75% du volume à injecter à cette dose). Une analyse complémentaire a montré que cela s'expliquait par une réaspiration partielle de la solution médica-menteuse avant le retrait de la seringue après injection sc, due à l'élasticité du piston. En iv, le biais était par contre provoqué par une réaspiration du soluté de perfusion co-administré. Enfin, la mesure des quantités de médicament récupérées après injection dans le dispositif de perfusion a démontré des pertes minimales par adsorption. Discussion-conclusion: Cette étude confirme l'existence de biais inversement corrélés au volume et à la concentration du médicament administré, pouvant provoquer des erreurs importantes sur les paramètres PK. Ce problème est négligé ou insuffisamment considéré dans les protocoles de Phase I et nécessiterait une planification rigoureuse. Les procédures opératoires devraient attirer l'attention sur ce point crucial.

Prescribing practices in German and Swiss psychiatric university and in non-university hospitals : national differences

RÉSUMÉ Il existe dans la pratique de prescription des médicaments de grandes variations entre les hôpitaux. Ces variations sont d'origines multifactorielles, comme par exemple des traditions de prescriptions locales, des considérations pharmato-économiques, la disponibilité d'un médicament, des différences de population, la prévalence d'une maladie, etc. Les études disponibles sur les pratiques de prescription sont souvent réduites à un centre unique, à une région ou à un pays. L'emploi de méthodes et de définitions particulières a jusqu'à pressent limité des comparaisons plus étendues entre les pays et régions. Le but de cette étude est de comparer la pratique de prescription de nouveaux médicaments psychotropes dans des cliniques suisses et allemandes. Cinq hôpitaux psychiatriques ont été sélectionnés, faisant tous partie du projet AMSP, et représentant des cliniques suisses, allemandes, de niveau universitaire ou non. Des données sur 572 patients et 1745 prescriptions ont été collectées durant un jour précis. Les comparaisons ont été ajustées pour l'âge et le sexe. Une différence significative (p <0.001) a été trouvée dans la prescription de nouveaux médicaments antidépresseurs, les cliniciens suisses en donnant en moyenne plus (65.2%) que les allemands (48.3%). Aucune différence significative n'a été démontrée dans la prescription des nouveaux médicaments antipsychotiques atypiques. Il semble en conséquence que les psychiatres suisses ont une propension plus élevée à prescrire des nouveaux médicaments antidépresseurs. Cela semble être dû à des différences de traditions de prescriptions nationales ou régionales. D'autres études sont nécessaires pour investiguer les influences économiques sur la pratique de prescription dans des cliniques suisses et allemandes. SUMMARY Obiective: There are great variations between hospitals in the way drugs are prescribed and these variations may be due to multiple factors such as local prescribing traditions, pharmacoeconomic considerations, drug availability; regional differences of population, disease prevalence etc. Available studies on prescribing habits have, besides studies performed in a unique centre, until now often been restricted to single countries or regions and the comparisons across countries or regions have often been limited by the use of diverse methodologies and definitions. The aim of the present study was to compare drug prescriptions between German and Swiss psychiatric services with regard to their preference of newer psychotropics. Material, method: Five psychiatric hospitals, associated to the AMSP-project, were chosen to represent Swiss and German clinics, university and non-university settings. Data were available from one index day on 572 patients and 1745 prescriptions. The comparisons were adjusted for age and gender. Results: There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) with regard to the prescription of newer antidepressants (NAD), Swiss clinicians giving proportionally more (65.2 %) than the German psychiatrists (48.3 %). No significant difference was, on the other hand, found as to the proportion of atypical antipsychotics, the lack of difference being due to the higher proportion of clozapine among the atypical antipsychotics in Germany. Conclusion: There seems therefore to be a higher propensity for Swiss hospital psychiatrists to prescribe newer antidepressants. This seems to be due to national or regional prescribing traditions. Further studies are needed to investigate the economical influences on antidepressant prescribing in Swiss and German clinics.)

Non-medical prescription drug and illicit street drug use among young Swiss men and associated mental health issues.

Non-medical use of prescription drugs (NMUPD) is increasing among the general population, particularly among teenagers and young adults. Although prescription drugs are considered safer than illicit street drugs, NMUPD can lead to detrimental consequences. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between drug use (NMUPD on the one side, illicit street drugs on the other side) with mental health issues and then compare these associations. A representative sample of 5719 young Swiss men aged around 20 years filled in a questionnaire as part of the ongoing baseline Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors (C-SURF). Drug use (16 illicit street drugs and 5 NMUPDs, including sleeping pills, sedatives, pain killers, antidepressants, stimulants) and mental health issues (depression, SF12) were assessed. Simple and multiple linear regressions were employed. In simple regressions, all illicit and prescription drugs were associated with poorer mental health. In multiple regressions, most of the NMUPDs, except for stimulants, were significantly associated with poorer mental health and with depression. On the contrary, the only associations that remained significant between illicit street drugs and mental health involved cannabis. NMUPD is of growing concern not only because of its increasing occurrence, but also because of its association with depression and mental health problems, which is stronger than the association observed between these problems and illicit street drug use, excepted for cannabis. Therefore, NMUPD must be considered in screening for substance use prevention purposes.

Respecte-t-on les bonnes pratiques de prescriptions des anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens en Suisse?

Introduction :¦Les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens (AINS) sont une classe de médicaments fréquemment utilisée. Bien qu'ils soient utiles pour leurs propriétés analgésiques, antipyrétiques et anti-inflammatoires, ils sont à l'origine d'effets indésirables nombreux et potentiellement graves. Neuf recommandations de bonne pratique ont été établies en France en 1994 dans le but de limiter les prescriptions inutiles ou dangereuses. Nous avons examiné ces recommandations, pour savoir si elles sont encore pertinentes, et avons évalué leur suivi en Suisse.¦Méthode :¦La population étudiée consiste en 53 891 patients de plus de 16 ans, suivis en 2005 et 2006, qui ont eu au moins une fois la délivrance d'un AINS (voie non locale).¦Résultats :¦60% des prescriptions d'AINS excèdent 14 jours de traitement standard et 25% des renouvellements de traitement surviennent avant le nombre de jours correspondant à une prescription journalière standard. 2,7% des prescriptions contiennent deux ou plus d'AINS. Un tiers des prescriptions d'AINS sont associées à un protecteur gastrique dans les 3 mois. Cette proportion augmente avec les facteurs de risque des complications gastro-intestinales : l'âge, la prescription d'autres médicaments gastro-toxiques et la dose d'AINS prescrite. Toutefois, moins d'un patient sur deux de plus de 70 ans bénéficie d'un protecteur gastrique. Une prescription d'AINS sur mille concerne une femme au 3ème trimestre de grossesse. La prescription concomitante d'un médicament susceptible d'augmenter la fréquence des événements indésirables des AINS est fréquente : 25% d'anticoagulant ou anti-thrombotique, 30,5% d'inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion, diurétique ou antagoniste des récepteurs à l'angiotensine II, et 5,3% de corticothérapie. Ces proportions augmentent avec l'âge. La plupart des taux définis ci-dessus varient en fonction du canton de résidence, après ajustement sur le sexe et l'âge.¦Conclusion:¦Nos résultats suggèrent qu'en Suisse, les AINS sont fréquemment prescrits à doses trop élevées ou pendant une trop longue durée et souvent associés à d'autres médicaments susceptibles d'augmenter le risque d'effets secondaires, et ce particulièrement chez les sujets les plus âgés. La fréquence de prescriptions chez les femmes au 3ème trimestre de grossesse est inférieure à celles publiées ailleurs. Il est probable que les protecteurs gastriques soient sous-utilisés chez les personnes âgées. Les variations inter-cantonales suggèrent que certaines pratiques pourraient être améliorées

Prescription des psychotropes au cabinet médical [Psychotropic drug prescription in general practice].

General practitioners treat patients with psychiatric disorders, for whom they have to evaluate the indication of a psychotropic medication. In addition to the patient's symptoms, the clinician has to take into account transferential and countertransferential elements linked to the prescription. Sociological factors also influence both the patient and the clinician, partly due to the western society's value of performance. Consistent with the bio-psycho-social model of disease, we recommend that the evaluation of the indication of a psychotropic medication includes the patient's symptoms, but also the psychological and sociological factors.

Ordonnance de sortie d'hôpital: un défi pour la continuité des soins et la collaboration interprofessionnelle [Hospital's discharge prescription: a challenge for continuity of care and the interprofessional collaboration].

The transition between hospital and community is an interface at high risk for medication. "The Association of Family Doctors" committee in the canton of Vaud (MFVaud), together with community pharmacists' and Homecare representatives, have begun to consider the following improvements: fast and co-ordinated care providers' information; arrangements for family doctors appointments as soon as possible; awareness and education for interprofessional collaboration; more secured preparation of pill boxes; development of interprofessional means such as medication use reviews and reconciliations. In the opinion of all the experts, there is an urgent public health need to act in an interprofessional manner, even if the solutions required (especially change in professional culture and technologies) are not immediate.

Efficacy of clinical guideline implementation to improve the appropriateness of chest physiotherapy prescription among inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Although there is no strong evidence of benefit, chest physiotherapy (CP) seems to be commonly used in simple pneumonia. CP requires equipment and frequently involves the assistance of a respiratory therapist, engendering a significant medical workload and cost. AIM: To measure and compare the efficacy of two modalities of chest physiotherapy (CP) guideline implementation on the appropriateness of CP prescription among patients hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured the CP prescription rate and duration in all consecutive CAP inpatients admitted in a division of general internal medicine at an urban teaching community hospital during three consecutive one-year time periods: (1) before any guideline implementation; (2) after a passive implementation by medical grand rounds and guideline diffusion through mailing; (3) after adding a one-page reminder in the CAP patient's medical chart highlighting our recommendations. Death and recurrent hospitalisation rates within one year after hospitalisation were recorded to assess whether CP prescription reduction, if any, impaired patient outcomes. RESULTS: During the three successive phases, 127, 157, and 147 patients with similar characteristics were included. Among all CAP inpatients, the CP prescription rate decreased from 68% (86/127) to 51% (80/157), and to 48% (71/147), respectively (P for trend <0.01 for trend). A significant reduction in CP duration was observed after the active guideline implementation (12.0, 11.0, 7.0days, respectively) and persisted after adjustment for length of stay. Reductions in CP prescription rate and duration were also observed among CAP patients with COPD CP prescription rate: 97% (30/31), 67% (24/36), 75% (35/47), respectively (P<0.01 for trend). The mean cost of CP per patient was reduced by 56%, from $709 to $481, and to $309, respectively. Neither the in-hospital deaths, the one-year overall recurrent hospitalisation nor the one-year CAP-specific recurrent hospitalisation significantly differed between the three phases. CONCLUSION: Both passive and active implementation of guidelines appear to improve the appropriateness of CP prescription among inpatients with CAP without impairing their outcomes. Restricting CP use to patients who benefit from this treatment might be an opportunity to decrease CAP medical cost and workload.

Tests pharmacogénétiques: bientôt avant chaque prescription [Pharmacogenetic testing: soon before every prescription?]

Genetic polymorphisms have currently been described in more than 200 systems affecting pharmacological responses (cytochromes P450, conjugation enzymes, transporters, receptors, effectors of response, protection mechanisms, determinants of immunity). Pharmacogenetic testing, i.e. the profiling of individual patients for such variations, is about to become largely available. Recent progress in the pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen, oral anticoagulants and anti-HIV agents is reviewed to discuss critically their potential impact on prescription and contribution/limits for improving rational and safe use of pharmaceuticals. Prospective controlled trials are required to evaluate large-scale pharmacogenetic testing in therapeutics. Ethical, social and psychological issues deserve particular attention.