3-T direct MR arthrography of the wrist: value of finger trap distraction to assess intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex tears.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of applying finger trap distraction during direct MR arthrography of the wrist to assess intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients were prospectively investigated by three-compartment wrist MR arthrography. Imaging was performed with 3-T scanners using a three-dimensional isotropic (0.4 mm) T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence, with and without finger trap distraction (4 kg). In a blind and independent fashion, two musculoskeletal radiologists measured the width of the scapholunate (SL), lunotriquetral (LT) and ulna-TFC (UTFC) joint spaces. They evaluated the amount of contrast medium within these spaces using a four-point scale, and assessed SL, LT and TFCC tears, as well as the disruption of Gilula's carpal arcs. RESULTS: With finger trap distraction, both readers found a significant increase in width of the SL space (mean Δ = +0.1mm, p ≤ 0.040), and noticed more contrast medium therein (p ≤ 0.035). In contrast, the differences in width of the LT (mean Δ = +0.1 mm, p ≥ 0.057) and UTFC (mean Δ = 0mm, p ≥ 0.728) spaces, as well as the amount of contrast material within these spaces were not statistically significant (p = 0.607 and ≥ 0.157, respectively). Both readers detected more SL (Δ = +1, p = 0.157) and LT (Δ = +2, p = 0.223) tears, although statistical significance was not reached, and Gilula's carpal arcs were more frequently disrupted during finger trap distraction (Δ = +5, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The application of finger trap distraction during direct wrist MR arthrography may enhance both detection and characterisation of SL and LT ligament tears by widening the SL space and increasing the amount of contrast within the SL and LT joint spaces.

Critical evaluation of outcome scales to assess outcome after lateral ankle ligament repair

Introduction: Several scores are commonly used to evaluate patients' postoperative satisfaction after lateral ankle ligament repair, including: AOFAS, FAAM, CAIT and CAIS. Comparing published studies in the literature is difficult, as the same patient can have markedly different results depending on which scoring system is used. The current study aims to address this gap in the literature by developing a system to compare these tests, to allow better analysis and comparison of published studies. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 47 patients following lateral ankle ligament repair using a modified Broström-Gould technique. All patients were operated between 2005 and 2010 by a single surgeon and followed the same post operative rehabilitation protocol. Six patients were excluded from the study because of concomitant surgery. Patients were assessed by an independent observer. We used the Pearson correlation coefficient to analyse the concordance of the scores, as well as scatter plots to assess the linear relationship between them. Results: A linear distribution between the scores was found when the results were analysed using scatter plots. We were thus able to use the Pearson correlation coefficient to evaluate the relationship between each of the different postoperative scores. The correlation was found to be above 0.5 in all cases except for the comparison between the CAIT and the FAAM for the activities of daily living (0.39). We were, therefore, able to compare the results obtained and assess the relative concordance of the scoring systems. The results showed that the more specific the scale is, the worst the score is and inversely. So the CAIT and the CAIS appeared to be more severe than the AOFAS and the FAAM measuring the activities of daily living. The sports subscale of the FAAM demonstrated intermediate results. Conclusion: This study outlines a system to compare different postoperative scores commonly used to evaluate outcome after ankle stabilization surgery. The impact of this study is that it makes comparison of published studies easier, even though they use a variety of different clinical scores, thus facilitating better outcome analysis of operative techniques.

Critical evaluation of outcome scales assessment of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction

Introduction: Les résultats d'une chirurgie du pied et de la cheville peuvent être évalués par des scores spécifiques à la région anatomique ainsi que par des scores spécifiques à la pathologie. Beaucoup de scores existent rendant la comparaison entre les études difficile. La présente étude se focalise sur une pathologie fréquente du pied et de la cheville et compare les résultats obtenu par deux scores spécifiques à la région et deux scores spécifiques à la pathologie. Méthode: Nous avons revu 41 patients ayant bénéficié d'une plastie ligamentaire externe de la cheville. Quatre scores ont été administrés simultanément: the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) et the Chronic Ankle Instability Scale (CAIS), spécifiques à la pathologie, the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale et the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure comprenant deux parties (FAAM1 et FAAM2), spécifiques à la région anatomique. Le degré de corrélation entre les scores a été évalué par le coefficient de corrélation de Pearson. L'analyse graphique des variances a été utilisée pour le choix de tests paramétriques versus non paramétriques. Des tests non paramétriques, le Kruskal-Wallis pour éliminer l'hypothèse nulle et le Mann-Whitney pour la comparaison entre les scores deux à deux, ont été utilisés. Résultats: Une différence significative (p<.005) a été démontrée entre le CAIS et l'AOFAS (p=.0002), entre le CAIS et le FAAM1 (p=.0001) et entre le CAIT et l'AOFAS (p=.0003) Conclusions: Cette étude compare les performances de quatre scores dont deux spécifiques à la région anatomique et deux spécifiques à la pathologie. Nous avons démontré une bonne corrélation entre les scores ainsi que des différences significatives entre les résultats obtenus par chacun d'eux. Les résultats obtenus par les scores spécifiques à la pathologie semblent être plus précis que ceux obtenus par les scores spécifiques à la région anatomique. De plus, nous avons mis en évidence une forte corrélation entre l'AOFAS et les autres scores. Le FAAM semble être un bon compromis car il offre la possibilité, du fait de ses deux parties, d'évaluer le résultat en fonction de la demande fonctionnelle du patient. Perspectives: Un algorithme est proposé qui permet d'évaluer la littérature spécifique de manière plus critique et peut s'adapter également à la recherche et à la clinique relative à d'autres pathologies du pied et de la cheville

Ossification du ligament commun cervical postérieur : coexistence de spondylarthrite et d'une hyperostose idiopathique diffuse du squelette

Introduction: L'ossification du ligament commun vertébral postérieur (LCVP) est une hyperostose prédominant au rachis cervical, associée à différentes pathologies constructrices comme l'arthrose, la maladie de Forestier (ou DISH : Diffuse Idiopathic Squeletal Hyperostosis) ou les spondylarthrites (1). Nous rapportons le cas d'une patiente avec ossification cervicale du LCVP, avec coexistence de DISH et de spondylarthrite.Observation: Patiente de 55 ans, d'origine Irakienne, qui présente depuis l'âge de 40 ans des lombalgies et des talalgies attribuées initialement à un métier physique. En 2008, apparait une cervicobrachialgie C6 gauche. L'IRM cervicale retrouve plusieurs hernies discales (C5-C6 et C6-C7 gauches) avec un canal cervical étroit constitutionnel et une ossification du LCVP cervical. Cette ossification est attribuée à un DISH (Figure1). L'échec du traitement conservateur de la névralgie et la menace neurologique de l'ossification du LCVP conduisent en 2010 à une laminectomie C3-C6 avec fixation postérieure (figure 2). En 2011, la patiente consulte en raison de la persistance de cette névralgie, ainsi que pour des lombalgies inflammatoires. La coexistence de ces symptômes inflammatoires et de l'ossification du LCVP nous incite à réaliser une IRM des sacroiliaques qui retrouve une sacroiliite bilatérale (figure 3). Le diagnostic de spondylarthrite HLA B27 négative est retenu devant l'association des signes cliniques et radiologiques. L'étiologie précise quant à l'origine de l'ossification du LCVP reste incertaine, néanmoins un traitement spécifique de la spondylarthopathie est proposé.Discussion: L'ossification du ligament vertébral commun postérieur est une hyperostose dont les principales causes sont le DISH et les spondylarthrites. On retrouve une ossification du ligament commun vertébral, qu'il soit lombaire, cervical ou dorsal, dans 10 à 50 % des DISH, et 3.5 à 30% des spondylarthrites. 4 types d'ossification du LCVP sont décrites : continue, segmentaire, mixte ou circonscrite. Selon Resnick, le DISH se différencie de la spondylarthrite par la présence d'ossifications antérolatérales d'au moins 4 vertèbres contigües sans érosion des sacroiliaques. Cependant on retrouve dans la littérature quelques cas décrivant la coexistence des 2 pathologies. Récemment, Kim et al. Ont rapporté un cas similaire à notre patiente, avec ossification du LCVP cervical et coexistence de DISH et de spondylarthrite (2).Conclusion: Devant la présence d'une ossification du ligament vertébral commun postérieur cervical, il convient de rechercher des signes de DISH et de spondylarthrite, car leur coexistence est possible. La prévalence exacte de cette association reste encore à déterminer.

Impact of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Timing on Brain Relapse Rates in Patients With Stage IIIB Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Treated With Two Different Chemoradiotherapy Regimens.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the influence of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) timing on brain relapse rates in patients treated with two different chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for Stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cohort of 134 patients, with Stage IIIB NSCLC in recursive partitioning analysis Group 1, was treated with PCI (30 Gy at 2 Gy/fr) following one of two CRT regimens. Regimen 1 (n = 58) consisted of three cycles of induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by concurrent CRT (C-CRT). Regimen 2 (n = 76) consisted of immediate C-CRT during thoracic radiotherapy. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 27.6 months (range, 7.2-40.4), 65 patients were alive. Median, progression-free, and brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) times for the whole study cohort were 23.4, 15.4, and 23.0 months, respectively. Median survival time and the 3-year survival rate for regimens 1 and 2 were 19.3 vs. 26.1 months (p = 0.001) and 14.4% vs. 34.4% (p < .001), respectively. Median time from the initiation of primary treatment to PCI was 123.2 (range, 97-161) and 63.4 (range, 55-74) days for regimens 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall, 11 (8.2%) patients developed brain metastasis (BM) during the follow-up period: 8 (13.8%) in regimen 1 and 3 (3.9%) in regimen 2 (p = 0.03). Only 3 (2.2%) patients developed BM at the site of first failure, and for 2 of them, it was also the sole site of recurrence. Median BMFS for regimens 1 and 2 were 17.4 (13.5-21.3) vs. 26.0 (22.9-29.1 months), respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that in Stage IIIB NSCLC patients treated with PCI, lower BM incidence and longer survival rates result from immediate C-CRT rather than ITC-first regimens. This indicates the benefit of earlier PCI use without delay because of induction protocols.

Dorsal fractures of the triquetrum: MRI findings with an emphasis on dorsal carpal ligament injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to report the MRI findings in dorsal fractures of the triquetrum, with an emphasis on dorsal carpal ligament injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients (16 men, five women; mean age, 41.9 years) with acute or subacute (≤ 6 weeks) dorsal triquetral fractures on radiography and MRI were included in this two-center retrospective study. MRI of the wrist was performed on 3-T units with transverse T1-weighted, coronal or transverse (or both) fat-suppressed T2weighted, transverse gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted turbo spin-echo, and 3D gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequences. Three musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated the ulnar styloid process index (USPI) on radiographs and the following MRI features: fracture pattern (types 1-6), bone fragment size and displacement, bone marrow edema distribution, and dorsal carpal ligament tears. RESULTS: Eight type 1, one type 2, six type 3, five type 4, and one type 5 fractures were identified. These fractures were associated with 14 (66.7%), 17 (81.0%), and 16 (76.2%) tears of the dorsal radiocarpal, ulnotriquetral, and intercarpal ligaments, respectively. There was no correlation between bone marrow edema distribution and dorsal carpal ligament injuries (all p > 0.05). The mean (± SD) bone fragment volume and displacement were 205 ± 157 mm(3) and 1.0 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. The mean USPI was 0.21 ± 0.10. CONCLUSION: Dorsal fractures of the triquetrum are frequently associated with dorsal carpal ligament injuries. Bone marrow edema distribution is not correlated with these ligament tears.

Absence of the fourth cranial nerve in congenital Brown syndrome.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the aetiology of congenital Brown syndrome. METHODS: Four consecutive patients diagnosed with unilateral congenital Brown syndrome had a comprehensive standardized ocular motility examination. Any compensatory head posture was measured. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with regard for the IV cranial nerve (CN) was performed in all patients. Orbital MRI was performed in 2/4 patients, with images acquired in eight directions of gaze and superior oblique (SO) muscle areas compared. RESULTS: CN IV could not be identified bilaterally in two patients, but was absent only on the side of the Brown syndrome in the two other patients. On the normal side, orbital MRI revealed a smaller SO muscle area in upgaze than in downgaze, demonstrating normal actions of this muscle. On the side of the Brown syndrome, the SO area remained the same in upgaze and in downgaze and approximately symmetric to the area of SO in downgaze on the normal side. CONCLUSIONS: These cases add further anatomical support to the theory of paradoxical innervation in congenital Brown syndrome. CN IV was absent in two patients on the side of the Brown syndrome, but without muscle hypoplasia. SO muscle size did not vary in up- and downgaze, which we interpreted as a sign of constant innervation through branches of CN III.

Loss of ATF2 function leads to cranial motoneuron degeneration during embryonic mouse development.

The AP-1 family transcription factor ATF2 is essential for development and tissue maintenance in mammals. In particular, ATF2 is highly expressed and activated in the brain and previous studies using mouse knockouts have confirmed its requirement in the cerebellum as well as in vestibular sense organs. Here we present the analysis of the requirement for ATF2 in CNS development in mouse embryos, specifically in the brainstem. We discovered that neuron-specific inactivation of ATF2 leads to significant loss of motoneurons of the hypoglossal, abducens and facial nuclei. While the generation of ATF2 mutant motoneurons appears normal during early development, they undergo caspase-dependent and independent cell death during later embryonic and foetal stages. The loss of these motoneurons correlates with increased levels of stress activated MAP kinases, JNK and p38, as well as aberrant accumulation of phosphorylated neurofilament proteins, NF-H and NF-M, known substrates for these kinases. This, together with other neuropathological phenotypes, including aberrant vacuolisation and lipid accumulation, indicates that deficiency in ATF2 leads to neurodegeneration of subsets of somatic and visceral motoneurons of the brainstem. It also confirms that ATF2 has a critical role in limiting the activities of stress kinases JNK and p38 which are potent inducers of cell death in the CNS.

Dorsal fractures of the Triquetrum : MRI findings with an emphasis on dorsal carpal ligament injuries

Contexte et but de l'étude: Les fractures du triquetrum sont les deuxièmes fractures des os du carpe en fréquence, après celles du scaphoïde. Elles représentent environ 3.5% de toutes les lésions traumatiques du poignet, et résultent le plus souvent d'une chute de sa hauteur avec réception sur le poignet en hyper-extension. Leur mécanisme physiopathologique reste débattu. La première théorie fut celle de l'avulsion ligamentaire d'un fragment osseux dorsal. Puis, Levy et coll. ainsi que Garcia-Elias ont successivement suggéré que ces fractures résultaient plutôt d'une impaction ulno-carpienne. De nombreux ligaments (intrinsèques et extrinsèques du carpe) s'insèrent sur les versants palmaires et dorsaux du triquetrum. Ces ligaments jouent un rôle essentiel dans le maintien de la stabilité du carpe. Bien que l'arthro-IRM du poignet soit l'examen de référence pour évaluer ces ligaments, Shahabpour et coll. ont récemment démontré leur visibilité en IRM tridimensionnelle (volumique) après injection iv. de produit de contraste (Gadolinium). L'atteinte ligamentaire associée aux fractures dorsales du triquetrum n'a jusqu'à présent jamais été évalué. Ces lésions pourraient avoir un impact sur l'évolution et la prise en charge de ces fractures. Les objectifs de l'étude étaient donc les suivants: premièrement, déterminer l'ensemble des caractéristiques des fractures dorsales du triquetrum en IRM, en mettant l'accent sur les lésions ligamentaires extrinsèques associées; secondairement, discuter les différents mécanismes physiopathologiques (i.e. avulsion ligamentaire ou impaction ulno-carpienne) de ces fractures d'après nos résultats en IRM. Patients et méthodes: Ceci est une étude rétrospective multicentrique (CHUV, Lausanne; Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris) d'examens IRM et radiographies conventionnelles du poignet. A partir de janvier 2008, nous avons recherché dans les bases de données institutionnelles les patients présentant une fracture du triquetrum et ayant bénéficié d'une IRM volumique du poignet dans un délai de six semaines entre le traumatisme et l'IRM. Les examens IRM ont été effectués sur deux machines à haut champ magnétique (3 Tesla) avec une antenne dédiée et un protocole d'acquisition incluant une séquence tridimensionnelle isotropique (« 3D VIBE ») après injection iv. de produit de contraste (Gadolinium). Ces examens ont été analysés par deux radiologues ostéo-articulaires expérimentés. Les mesures ont été effectuées par un troisième radiologue ostéo-articulaire. En ce qui concerne l'analyse qualitative, le type de fracture du triquetrum (selon la classification de Garcia-Elias), la distribution de l'oedème osseux post- traumatique, ainsi que le nombre et la distribution des lésions ligamentaires extrinsèques associées ont été évalués. Pour l'analyse quantitative, l'index du processus de la styloïde ulnaire (selon la formule de Garcia-Elias), le volume du fragment osseux détaché du triquetrum, et la distance séparant ce fragment osseux du triquetrum ont été mesurés.

Critical evaluation of outcome scales assessment of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Outcome following foot and ankle surgery can be assessed by disease- and region-specific scores. Many scoring systems exist, making comparison among studies difficult. The present study focused on outcome measures for a common foot and ankle abnormality and compared the results obtained by 2 disease-specific and 2 body region-specific scores. METHODS: We reviewed 41 patients who underwent lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. Four outcome scales were administered simultaneously: the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) and the Chronic Ankle Instability Scale (CAIS), which are disease specific, and the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), which are both body region-specific. The degree of correlation between scores was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Nonparametric tests, the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney test for pairwise comparison of the scores, were performed. RESULTS: A significant difference (P < .005) was observed between the CAIS and the AOFAS score (P = .0002), between the CAIS and the FAAM 1 (P = .0001), and between the CAIT and the AOFAS score (P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: This study compared the performances of 4 disease- and body region-specific scoring systems. We demonstrated a correlation between the 4 administered scoring systems and notable differences between the results given by each of them. Disease-specific scores appeared more accurate than body region-specific scores. A strong correlation between the AOFAS score and the other scales was observed. The FAAM seemed a good compromise because it offered the possibility to evaluate the patient according to his or her own functional demand. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study contributes to the development of more critical and accurate outcome assesment methods in foot and ankle surgery.