18 resultados para ARTHRODESIS
Resumo:
Introduction: Isolated avulsion fracture at the plantar lateral base of the first metatarsal (M1) is very rare. Case report: A 35 year old overweight woman sustained an eversion strain of her right foot. Despite pain along M1 she was able to continue walking for three days before presenting to her family doctor. Swelling on the plantar aspect of the foot was noticed, there was also pain at eversion of the foot and extension of the ankle. Plain X-ray showed no abnormalities. A MRI showed minimal bone bruise at the basis of M1 and a partial rupture of the peroneus longus tendon at its insertion. The patient was allowed to walk with partial weight bearing with a soft ankle brace. After 6 months she presented at our hospital because of persistent pain. There was still a painful insertion of the peroneus longus but active plantarflexion of M1 was possible. Plain X-rays were poorly contributive except for a discrete flattening of the longitunal arch. CT-scan showed a non displaced fracture at the M1-basis. A protocol with partial weight-bearing in a short-leg cast and partial weight-bearing orthosis each for 6 weeks was unsuccessfully attempted. Therefore, an excision of the non healed bone fragment at the basis of M1 and a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis were performed. Postoperatively the patient wore a partial weight-bearing short leg cast for 6 weeks followed by a weight-bearing short leg cast for 6 weeks with favourable outcome. Discussion: Initial internal fixation has been reported to lead to good results [1, 2]. In our case the conservative treatment failed and leaded to non union. At that time we considered as too risky (overweight) to excise the fragment and reattach the peroneus longus tendon. Therefore, we excised the fragment and fused the first tarsometatarsal joint. This procedure allowed, at least partially, to compensate for the function of the peroneus longus tendon. 1 Murakami T, et al. Avulsion fracture of the peroneus longus at the first metatarsal insertion: a case report. Br J Sports Med. 2004. 2 Kwak HY, and Bae SW. Isolated avulsion fracture at the plantar lateral base of the first metatarsal: a case report. Foot Ankle Int 2000.
Resumo:
Isolated avulsion fracture of the peroneus longus tendon insertion at the base of the first metatarsal is very rare. Similar to most avulsion fractures that result from excessive strain at a tendon or ligament insertion, this type of injury is caused by the strong tension exerted by the peroneus longus tendon. The mechanisms leading to this lesion and treatment options are not clearly defined. We present the case of an isolated minimally displaced intra-articular avulsion fracture at the plantar lateral base of the first metatarsal. Faced with a painful non-union following conservative treatment we considered excision of the bony fragment and first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis. This leads to a favourable functional outcome.
Resumo:
Introduction: Ankle arthrodesis (AD) and total ankle replacement (TAR) are typical treatments for ankle osteoarthritis (AO). Despite clinical interest, there is a lack of their outcome evaluation using objective criteria. Gait analysis and plantar pressure assessment are appropriate to detect pathologies in orthopaedics but they are mostly used in lab with few gait cycles. In this study, we propose an ambulatory device based on inertial and plantar pressure sensors to compare the gait during long-distance trials between healthy subjects (H) and patients with AO or treated by AD and TAR. Methods: Our study included four groups: 11 patients with AO, 9 treated by TAR, 7 treated by AD and 6 control subjects. An ambulatory system (Physilog®, CH) was used for gait analysis; plantar pressure measurements were done using a portable insole (Pedar®-X, DE). The subjects were asked to walk 50 meters in two trials. Mean value and coefficient of variation of spatio-temporal gait parameters were calculated for each trial. Pressure distribution was analyzed in ten subregions of foot. All parameters were compared among the four groups using multi-level model-based statistical analysis. Results: Significant difference (p <0.05) with control was noticed for AO patients in maximum force in medial hindfoot and forefoot and in central forefoot. These differences were no longer significant in TAR and AD groups. Cadence and speed of all pathologic groups showed significant difference with control. Both treatments showed a significant improvement in double support and stance. TAR decreased variability in speed, stride length and knee ROM. Conclusions: In spite of a small sample size, this study showed that ankle function after AO treatments can be evaluated objectively based on plantar pressure and spatio-temporal gait parameters measured during unconstrained walking outside the lab. The combination of these two ambulatory techniques provides a promising way to evaluate foot function in clinics.