Metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Is insulin resistance the link?

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a disease composed of different risk factors such as obesity, type 2 diabetes or dyslipidemia. The prevalence of this syndrome is increasing worldwide in parallel with the rise in obesity. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the most frequent chronic liver disease in western countries, affecting more than 30% of the general population. NAFLD encompasses a spectrum of liver manifestations ranging from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis and cirrhosis, which may ultimately progress to hepatocellular carcinoma. There is accumulating evidence supporting an association between NAFLD and MetS. Indeed, NAFLD is recognized as the liver manifestation of MetS. Insulin resistance is increasingly recognized as a key factor linking MetS and NAFLD. Insulin resistance is associated with excessive fat accumulation in ectopic tissues, such as the liver, and increased circulating free fatty acids, which can further promote inflammation and endoplasmic reticulum stress. This in turn aggravates and maintains the insulin resistant state, constituting a vicious cycle. Importantly, evidence shows that most of the patients developing NAFLD present at least one of the MetS traits. This review will define MetS and NAFLD, provide an overview of the common pathophysiological mechanisms linking MetS and NAFLD, and give a perspective regarding treatment of these ever growing metabolic diseases.

Arterial Therapies of Non-Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: The unique situation of the liver with arterial and venous blood supply and the dependency of the tumor on the arterial blood flow make this organ an ideal target for intrahepatic catheter-based therapies. Main forms of treatment are classical bland embolization (TAE) cutting the blood flow to the tumors, chemoembolization (TACE) inducing high chemotherapy concentration in tumors, and radioembolization (TARE) without embolizing effect but very high local radiation. These different forms of therapies are used in different centers with different protocols. This overview summarizes the different forms of treatment, their indications and protocols, possible side effects, and available data in patients with non-colorectal liver tumors. METHODS: A research in PubMed was performed. Mainly clinical controlled trials were reviewed. The search terms were 'embolization liver', 'TAE', 'chemoembolization liver', 'TACE', 'radioembolization liver', and 'TARE' as well as 'chemosaturation' and 'TACP' in the indications 'breast cancer', 'neuroendocrine', and 'melanoma'. All reported studies were analyzed for impact and reported according to their clinical relevance. RESULTS: The main search criteria revealed the following results: 'embolization liver + breast cancer', 122 results, subgroup clinical trials 16; 'chemoembolization liver + breast cancer', 62 results, subgroup clinical trials 11; 'radioembolization liver + breast cancer', 37 results, subgroup clinical trials 3; 'embolization liver + neuroendocrine', 283 results, subgroup clinical trials 20; 'chemoembolization liver + neuroendocrine', 202 results, subgroup clinical trials 9; 'radioembolization liver + neuroendocrine', 64 results, subgroup clinical trials 9; 'embolization liver + melanoma', 79 results, subgroup clinical trials 15; 'chemoembolization liver + melanoma', 60 results, subgroup clinical trials 14; 'radioembolization liver + melanoma', 18 results, subgroup clinical trials 3. The term 'chemosaturation liver' was tested without indication since only few publications exist and provided us with five results and only one clinical trial. CONCLUSION: Despite many years of clinical use and documented efficacy on intra-arterial treatments of the liver, there are still only a few prospective multicenter trials with many different protocols. To guarantee the future use of these efficacious therapies, especially in the light of many systemic or surgical therapies in the treatment of non-colorectal liver metastases, further large randomized trials and transparent guidelines need to be established.

Analyzing the temporal regulation of translation efficiency in mouse liver.

Mammalian physiology and behavior follow daily rhythms that are orchestrated by endogenous timekeepers known as circadian clocks. Rhythms in transcription are considered the main mechanism to engender rhythmic gene expression, but important roles for posttranscriptional mechanisms have recently emerged as well (reviewed in Lim and Allada (2013) [1]). We have recently reported on the use of ribosome profiling (RPF-seq), a method based on the high-throughput sequencing of ribosome protected mRNA fragments, to explore the temporal regulation of translation efficiency (Janich et al., 2015 [2]). Through the comparison of around-the-clock RPF-seq and matching RNA-seq data we were able to identify 150 genes, involved in ribosome biogenesis, iron metabolism and other pathways, whose rhythmicity is generated entirely at the level of protein synthesis. The temporal transcriptome and translatome data sets from this study have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession number GSE67305. Here we provide additional information on the experimental setup and on important optimization steps pertaining to the ribosome profiling technique in mouse liver and to data analysis.