Differences in low-grade chronic inflammation and insulin resistance in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus and women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are both characterized by an increase in insulin resistance. Our goal in the present study was to measure insulin resistance (as estimated by homeostasis model assessment, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and adiponectin concentrations) and parameters of low-grade inflammation in non-diabetic, non-hyperandrogenic ovulatory women with previous GDM (pGDM) and in non-diabetic women with classic PCOS, characterized by hyperandrogenism and oligo/anovulation. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: We evaluated 20 women with PCOS, 18 women with pGDM and 19 controls, all matched according to body mass index (BMI). Fasting blood samples were drawn in all women 3-6 days after spontaneous or dydrogesterone-induced withdrawal bleeding. Body fat distribution was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in all women. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and percent body fat, measures of insulin resistance such as SHBG and adiponectin concentrations were decreased and central obesity was increased in women with PCOS and pGDM compared with controls (all p < 0.05). Parameters of low-grade inflammation such as serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha and highly sensitive C-reactive protein concentrations, white blood cell and neutrophil count were increased only in women with PCOS compared with BMI-matched controls (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Certain markers of insulin resistance are increased in both women with PCOS and women with pGDM, while low-grade inflammation is increased only in PCOS. PCOS and GDM might represent specific phenotypes of one disease entity with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, whereby women with PCOS demonstrate an augmented cardiovascular risk profile.

Mico-cocktail validation for CYP3A and CYP2D6 assessment using a low dose of midazolam (0.075 mg) and dextromethorphan (2.5 mg)

Background/Aim: Cocktail approach is generally preferred to individual administration of probes in order to characterize the activity of multiple enzymes. However, cocktail strategy has several drawbacks such as drug-drug interactions, tolerability and toxicity. Hence, there is a need to develop cocktails using low doses of probes. Our aim was to investigate whether the simultaneous oral administration of microdoses of midazolam (MDZ) and dextromethorphan (DEM) can be used to assess the simultaneous activities of CYP3A and CYP2D6. Methods: As part of a 5 arm randomized cross-over control trial on the analgesic efficacy of oxycodone, ten healthy young non-smoking males received the following combinations of drugs: Quinidine (Q)+ ketoconazole (K) or Q+placebo (P) or K+P or P+P. In all cases MDZ (0.075 mg) and DEM (2.5 mg) were administrated 1 hour after Q, K or P. CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities were determined after urine collection during 8 hours (ratio DEM/DOR), and a blood sample (EDTA) after 30 min (ratio 1-OH-MDZ/MDZ). DEM and DOR analysis was performed using LC-fluorescence. MDZ and 1-OH-MDZ determination was performed using GC-MS. Allele's variants of CYP2D6 were detected using the AmpliChipTMCYP450 (Roche). Results: CYP2D6 genotype predicted 1 poor (PM), 1 intermediate (IM), 7 extensive (EM) and 2 ultra rapid (UM) metabolizers. A good correlation was obtained between the predicted and the measured phenotypes except for 1 EM phenotyped as UM. Two duplications for alleles *41/*41xN and *1/*2xN were detected and the two volunteers were phenotyped as UM. A potent inhibition of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 was obtained when Q or K were used. Mean metabolic ratio DEM/DOR in P and K groups were 0.015 (±0.028) and 0.015 (±0.019). It significantly increased in Q and QK groups (0.668 (±0.676) and 0.743 (±1.038)). Mean 1-OH-MDZ/MDZ in P, Q were 2.73 (±1.05) and 2.55 (±1.40) while it significantly decreased in K and QK groups (0.11 (±0.05), 0.10 (±0.05)). Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences between QK and K sessions for CYP3A and between QK and Q for CYP2D6 which indicate that there is no interaction between the two metabolic pathways. Conclusion: Simultaneous assessment of CYP3A and CYP2D6 activities can be obtained by low oral doses (micro-cocktail) of MDZ and DEM. Specific inhibitors such as Q or K modulates selectively CYP2D6 or CYP3A activities.