PPARs as drug targets to modulate inflammatory responses?

The three peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) isotypes (PPAR alpha, beta/delta and gamma) belong to the nuclear hormone receptor family. During the last decade, they have been identified as anti-inflammatory transcription factors. Part of this regulation antiinflammatory is mediated through negative interference between PPARs and other nuclear factors such as NFkB, AP-1 and C/EBP, which regulate innate as well as adaptative immunity. In addition, the PPARs control the functions of macrophages, B cells and T cells. In this review, we summarise the pathways through which the PPARs control inflammatory responses. We also discuss the potential utilisation of PPAR specific ligands in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, atherosclerosis, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases.

Constitutively active G protein-coupled receptor mutants: implications on receptor function and drug action.

Mutations of GPCRs can increase their constitutive (agonist-independent) activity. Some of these mutations have been artificially introduced by site-directed mutagenesis; others occur spontaneously in human diseases. The analysis of constitutively active GPCR mutants has attracted a large interest in the past decade, providing an important contribution to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying receptor function and drug action.

Party drug use in techno nights: a field survey among French-speaking Swiss attendees.

This study was designed to investigate the lifestyle and substance use habits of dance music event attendees together with their attitudes toward prevention of substance misuse, harm reduction measures and health-care resources. A total of 302 attendees aged 16-46 years (mean=22.70, S.D.=4.65) were randomly recruited as they entered dance music events. Rates for lifetime and current use (last 30 days) were particularly high for alcohol (95.3% and 86.6%, respectively), cannabis (68.8% and 53.8%, respectively), ecstasy (40.4% and 22.7%, respectively) and cocaine (35.9% and 20.7%, respectively). Several patterns of substance use could be identified: 52% were alcohol and/or cannabis only users, 42% were occasional poly-drug users and 6% were daily poly-drug users. No significant difference was observed between substance use patterns according to gender. Pure techno and open-air events attracted heavier drug users. Psychological problems (such as depressed mood, sleeping problems and anxiety attacks), social problems, dental disorders, accidents and emergency treatment episodes were strongly related to party drug use. Party drug users appeared to be particularly receptive to harm reduction measures, such as on-site emergency staff, pill testing and the availability of cool water, and to prevention of drug use provided via counseling. The greater the involvement in party drug use, the greater the need for prevention personnel to be available for counseling. General practitioners appeared to be key professionals for accessing health-care resources.

Changes in antihypertensive drug treatment in the general population: the Colaus Study

Background and aims: there is little information regar ding changes in antihypertensive drug treatment in Switzerland. We aimed at assessing those changes in a population-based, prospective study. Methods: 768 hypertensive subjects (372 women, 397 men) followed for 5 years. Subjects were defined as continuers (no change), switchers (one antihypertensive class replace by another), combiners (one antihypertensive class added) and discontinuers (stopped treatment). Results: Analysis of all patients (mono or combination therapy) showed that 54.6% were continuers, 27.2% combiners, 12.9% switchers and 5.3 % discontinuers. Similar findings were obtained for participants on monotherapy only: 42.2% continuers, 36.7% combiners, 13.4% switchers and 7.7% discontinuers. Combiners had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure values at baseline than the other groups (p<0.001), while no difference were found for personal and family history and other clinical and biological variables. Compared to continuers, combiners and switchers improved their blood pressure status at follow-up: 26.7% of combiners and 26.3% of switchers improved, versus 17.7% of continuers and 7.3% of discontinuers (p<0.001). Among participants on monotherapy at baseline, continuation was greatest for angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agents (ARBs, 53.1%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (44.4%) and β-blockers (41.8%). Only one quarter of participants treated with diuretic or calcium channel blockers at baseline remained so at follow-up. Conclusion: Antihypertensivedrug treatment is very stable in Switzerland. There are no big differences in persistence between antihypertensive classes, even if ARBs had the most favorable utilization pattern. Changes are only due to blood pressure level and improve blood pressure status.