Future perspectives in melanoma research: meeting report from the "Melanoma Bridge": Napoli, December 3rd-6th 2014.

The fourth "Melanoma Bridge Meeting" took place in Naples, December 3-6th, 2014. The four topics discussed at this meeting were: Molecular and Immunological Advances, Combination Therapies, News in Immunotherapy, and Tumor Microenvironment and Biomarkers. Until recently systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma patients was ineffective, but recent advances in tumor biology and immunology have led to the development of new targeted and immunotherapeutic agents that prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). New therapies, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors as well as other signaling pathway inhibitors, are being tested in patients with metastatic melanoma either as monotherapy or in combination, and all have yielded promising results. These include inhibitors of receptor tyrosine kinases (BRAF, MEK, and VEGFR), the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway [PI3K, AKT, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)], activators of apoptotic pathway, and the cell cycle inhibitors (CDK4/6). Various locoregional interventions including radiotherapy and surgery are still valid approaches in treatment of advanced melanoma that can be integrated with novel therapies. Intrinsic, adaptive and acquired resistance occur with targeted therapy such as BRAF inhibitors, where most responses are short-lived. Given that the reactivation of the MAPK pathway through several distinct mechanisms is responsible for the majority of acquired resistance, it is logical to combine BRAF inhibitors with inhibitors of targets downstream in the MAPK pathway. For example, combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (e.g., dabrafenib/trametinib) have been demonstrated to improve survival compared to monotherapy. Application of novel technologies such sequencing have proven useful as a tool for identification of MAPK pathway-alternative resistance mechanism and designing other combinatorial therapies such as those between BRAF and AKT inhibitors. Improved survival rates have also been observed with immune-targeted therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma. Immune-modulating antibodies came to the forefront with anti-CTLA-4, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway blocking antibodies that result in durable responses in a subset of melanoma patients. Agents targeting other immune inhibitory (e.g., Tim-3) or immune stimulating (e.g., CD137) receptors and other approaches such as adoptive cell transfer demonstrate clinical benefit in patients with melanoma as well. These agents are being studied in combination with targeted therapies in attempt to produce longer-term responses than those more typically seen with targeted therapy. Other combinations with cytotoxic chemotherapy and inhibitors of angiogenesis are changing the evolving landscape of therapeutic options and are being evaluated to prevent or delay resistance and to further improve survival rates for this patient population. This meeting's specific focus was on advances in combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Both combination targeted therapy approaches and different immunotherapies were discussed. Similarly to the previous meetings, the importance of biomarkers for clinical application as markers for diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment response was an integral part of the meeting. The overall emphasis on biomarkers supports novel concepts toward integrating biomarkers into contemporary clinical management of patients with melanoma across the entire spectrum of disease stage. Translation of the knowledge gained from the biology of tumor microenvironment across different tumors represents a bridge to impact on prognosis and response to therapy in melanoma.

Randomised, multicentre, phase III, open-label study of alectinib vs crizotinib in treatment-naïve anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive advanced NSCLC (ALEX study).

Background: In ∼5% of advanced NSCLC tumours, ALK tyrosine kinase is constitutively activated after translocation of ALK. ALK+ NSCLC was shown to be highly sensitive to the first approved ALK inhibitor, crizotinib. However, all pts eventually relapse on crizotinib mainly due to secondary ALK mutations/amplification or CNS metastases. Alectinib is a highly selective, potent, oral next-generation ALK inhibitor. Clinical phase II alectinib data in 46 crizotinib-naïve pts with ALK+ NSCLC reported an objective response rate (ORR) of 93.5% and a 1-year progression-free rate of 83% (95% CI: 68-92) (Inoue et al. J Thorac Oncol 2013). CNS activity was seen: of 14 pts with baseline brain metastasis, 11 had prior CNS radiation, 9 of these experienced CNS and systemic PFS of >12 months; of the 3 pts without prior CNS radiation, 2 were >15 months progression free. Trial design: Randomised, multicentre, phase III, open-label study in pts with treatment-naïve ALK+ advanced, recurrent, or metastatic NSCLC. All pts must provide pretreatment tumour tissue to confirm ALK rearrangement (by IHC). Pts (∼286 from ∼180 centres, ∼30 countries worldwide) will be randomised to alectinib (600mg oral bid, with food) or crizotinib (250mg oral bid, with/without food) until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. Stratification factors are: ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2), race (Asian vs non-Asian), baseline CNS metastases (yes vs no). Primary endpoint: PFS by investigators (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints: PFS by Independent Review Committee (IRC); ORR; duration of response; OS; safety; pharmacokinetics; quality of life. Additionally, time to CNS progression will be evaluated (MRI) for the first time in a prospective randomised NSCLC trial as a secondary endpoint. Pts with isolated asymptomatic CNS progression will be allowed to continue treatment beyond documented progression until systemic PD and/or symptomatic CNS progression, according to investigator opinion. Time to CNS progression will be retrospectively assessed by the IRC using two separate criteria, RECIST and RANO. Further details: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02075840). Disclosure: T.S.K. Mok: Advisory boards: AZ, Roche, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, Eisai, BMS, AVEO, Pfizer, Taiho, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, GSK Biologicals, Clovis Oncology, Amgen, Janssen, BioMarin; board of directors: IASLC; corporate sponsored research: AZ; M. Perol: Advisory boards: Roche; S.I. Ou: Consulting: Pfizer, Chugai, Genentech Speaker Bureau: Pfizer, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim; I. Bara: Employee: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; V. Henschel: Employee and stock: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; D.R. Camidge: Honoraria: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Impact of T cell receptor affinity on the molecular mechanisms modulating CD8 T cell signalling and function against NY-ESO-1 tumour antigen

It is well established that cytotoxic T lymphocytes play a pivotal role in the protection against intracellular pathogens and tumour cells. Such protective immune responses rely on the specific T cell receptor (TCR)-mediated recognition by CD8 T cells of small antigenic peptides presented in the context of class-I Major Histocompatibility Complex molecules (pMHCs) on the surface of infected or malignant cells. The strength (affinity/avidity) of this interaction is a major correlate of protection. Although tumour-reactive CD8 T cells can be observed in cancer patients, anti-tumour immune responses are often ineffective in controlling or eradicating the disease due to the relative low TCR affinity of these cells. To overcome this limitation, tumour-specific CD8 T cells can be genetically modified to express TCRs of improved binding strength against a defined tumour antigen before adoptive cell transfer into cancer patients. We previously generated a panel of TCRs specific for the cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-l,57.165 with progressively increased affinities for the pMHC complex, thus providing us with a unique tool to investigate the causal link between the surface expression of such TCRs and T cell activation and function. We recently demonstrated that anti-tumour CD8 T cell reactivity could only be improved within physiological affinity limits, beyond which drastic functional declines were observed, suggesting the presence of multiple regulatory mechanisms limiting T cell activation and function in a TCR affinity-dependent manner. The overarching goal of this thesis was (i) to assess the precise impact of TCR affinity on T cell activation and signalling at the molecular level and (ii) to gain further insights on the mechanisms that regulate and delimitate maximal/optimized CD8 T cell activation and signalling. Specifically, by combining several technical approaches we characterized the activation status of proximal (i.e. CD3Ç, Lek, and ZAP-70) and distal (i.e. ERK1/2) signalling molecules along the TCR affinity gradient. Moreover, we assessed the extent of TCR downmodulation, a critical step for initial T cell activation. CD8 T cells engineered with the optimal TCR affinity variants showed increased activation levels of both proximal and distal signalling molecules when compared to the wild-type T cells. Our analyses also highlighted the "paradoxical" status of tumour-reactive CD8 T cells bearing very high TCR affinities, which retained strong proximal signalling capacity and TCR downmodulation, but were unable to propagate signalling distally (i.e. pERKl/2), resulting in impaired cell-mediated functions. Importantly, these very high affinity T cells displayed maximal levels of SHP-1 and SHP-2 phosphatases, two negative regulatory molecules, and this correlated with a partial pERKl/2 signalling recovery upon pharmacological SHP-l/SHP-2 inhibition. These findings revealed the putative presence of inhibitory regulators of the TCR signalling cascade acting very rapidly following tumour-specific stimulation. Moreover, the very high affinity T cells were only able to transiently express enhanced proximal signalling molecules, suggesting the presence of an additional level of regulation that operates through the activation of negative feedback loops over time, limiting the duration of the TCR-mediated signalling. Overall, the determination of TCR-pMHC binding parameters eliciting optimal CD8 T cell activation, signalling, and effector function while guaranteeing high antigen specificity, together with the identification of critical regulatory mechanisms acting proximally in the TCR signalling cascade, will directly contribute to optimize and support the development of future TCR-based adoptive T cell strategies for the treatment of malignant diseases. -- Les lymphocytes T CD8 cytotoxiques jouent un rôle prédominant dans la protection contre les pathogènes intracellulaires et les cellules tumorales. Ces réponses immunitaires dépendent de la spécificité avec laquelle les récepteurs T (TCR) des lymphocytes CD8 reconnaissent les peptides antigéniques présentés par les molécules du complexe Majeur de Histocompatibilité de classe I (pCMH) à la surface des cellules infectées ou malignes. La force (ou affinité/avidité) de l'interaction du TCR-pCMH est un corrélat majeur de protection. Les réponses immunitaires sont cependant souvent inefficaces et ne permettent pas de contrôler ou d'éliminer les cellules tumorales chez les patients atteint du cancer, et ce à cause de la relative faible reconnaissance des TCRs exprimés par les lymphocytes T CD8 envers les antigènes tumoraux. Afin de surmonter cette limitation, les cellules T anti-tumorales peuvent être génétiquement modifiées en les dotant de TCRs préalablement optimisés afin d'augmenter leur reconnaissance ou affinité contre les antigènes tumoraux, avant leur ré¬infusion dans le patient. Nous avons récemment généré des cellules T CD8 exprimant un panel de TCRs spécifiques pour l'antigène tumoral NY-ESO-l157.16J avec des affinités croissantes, permettant ainsi d'investiguer la causalité directe entre l'affinité du TCR-pCMH et la fonction des cellules T CD8. Nous avons démontré que la réactivité anti-tumorale pouvait être améliorée en augmentant l'affinité du TCR dans une intervalle physiologique, mais au delà duquel nous observons un important déclin fonctionnel. Ces résultats suggèrent la présence de mécanismes de régulation limitant l'activation des cellules T de manière dépendante de l'affinité du TCR. Le but de cette thèse a été (i) de définir l'impact précis de l'affinité du TCR sur l'activation et la signalisation des cellules T CD8 au niveau moléculaire et (ii) d'acquérir de nouvelles connaissances sur les mécanismes qui régulent et délimitent l'activation et la signalisation maximale des cellules T CD8 optimisées. Spécifiquement, en combinant plusieurs approches technologiques, nous avons caractérisé l'état d'activation de différentes protéines de la voie de signalisation proximale (CD3Ç, Lek et ZAP-70) et distale (ERK1/2) le long du gradient d'affinité du TCR, ainsi que l'internalisation du TCR, une étape clef dans l'activation initiale des cellules T. Les lymphocytes T CD8 exprimant des TCRs d'affinité optimale ont montré des niveaux d'activation augmentés des molécules proximales et distales par rapport aux cellules de type sauvage (wild-type). Nos analyses ont également mis en évidence un paradoxe chez les cellules T CD8 équipées avec des TCRs de très haute affinité. En effet, ces cellules anti-tumorales sont capables d'activer leurs circuits biochimiques au niveau proximal et d'internaliser efficacement leur TCR, mais ne parviennent pas à propager les signaux biochimiques dépendants du TCR jusqu'au niveau distal (via phospho-ERKl/2), avec pour conséquence une limitation de leur capacité fonctionnelle. Finalement, nous avons démontré que SHP-1 et SHP-2, deux phosphatases avec des propriétés régulatrices négatives, étaient majoritairement exprimées dans les cellules T CD8 de très hautes affinités. Une récupération partielle des niveaux d'activation de ERK1/2 a pu être observée après l'inhibition pharmacologique de ces phosphatases. Ces découvertes révèlent la présence de régulateurs moléculaires qui inhibent le complexe de signalisation du TCR très rapidement après la stimulation anti-tumorale. De plus, les cellules T de très hautes affinités ne sont capables d'activer les molécules de la cascade de signalisation proximale que de manière transitoire, suggérant ainsi un second niveau de régulation via l'activation de mécanismes de rétroaction prenant place progressivement au cours du temps et limitant la durée de la signalisation dépendante du TCR. En résumé, la détermination des paramètres impliqués dans l'interaction du TCR-pCMH permettant l'activation de voies de signalisation et des fonctions effectrices optimales ainsi que l'identification des mécanismes de régulation au niveau proximal de la cascade de signalisation du TCR contribuent directement à l'optimisation et au développement de stratégies anti-tumorales basées sur l'ingénierie des TCRs pour le traitement des maladies malignes.

Quantitative performance of a quadrupole-orbitrap-MS in targeted LC-MS determinations of small molecules.

High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) has been associated with qualitative and research analysis and QQQ-MS with quantitative and routine analysis. This view is now challenged and for this reason, we have evaluated the quantitative LC-MS performance of a new high-resolution mass spectrometer (HRMS), a Q-orbitrap-MS, and compared the results obtained with a recent triple-quadrupole MS (QQQ-MS). High-resolution full-scan (HR-FS) and MS/MS acquisitions have been tested with real plasma extracts or pure standards. Limits of detection, dynamic range, mass accuracy and false positive or false negative detections have been determined or investigated with protease inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, steroids and metanephrines. Our quantitative results show that today's available HRMS are reliable and sensitive quantitative instruments and comparable to QQQ-MS quantitative performance. Taking into account their versatility, user-friendliness and robustness, we believe that HRMS should be seen more and more as key instruments in quantitative LC-MS analyses. In this scenario, most targeted LC-HRMS analyses should be performed by HR-FS recording virtually "all" ions. In addition to absolute quantifications, HR-FS will allow the relative quantifications of hundreds of metabolites in plasma revealing individual's metabolome and exposome. This phenotyping of known metabolites should promote HRMS in clinical environment. A few other LC-HRMS analyses should be performed in single-ion-monitoring or MS/MS mode when increased sensitivity and/or detection selectivity will be necessary.

Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: For the past decade (18)F-fluoro-ethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) and (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) have been used for the assessment of patients with brain tumor. However, direct comparison studies reported only limited numbers of patients. Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of FET and FDG-PET. METHODS: We examined studies published between January 1995 and January 2015 in the PubMed database. To be included the study should: (i) use FET and FDG-PET for the assessment of patients with isolated brain lesion and (ii) use histology as the gold standard. Analysis was performed on a per patient basis. Study quality was assessed with STARD and QUADAS criteria. RESULTS: Five studies (119 patients) were included. For the diagnosis of brain tumor, FET-PET demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.79-0.98) and pooled specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.37-0.99), with an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97), a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 8.1 (95% CI: 0.8-80.6), and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02-0.30), while FDG-PET demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27-0.50) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.31-0.99), with an area under the curve of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.36-0.44), an LR+ of 2.7 (95% CI: 0.3-27.8), and an LR- of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.47-1.11). Target-to-background ratios of either FDG or FET, however, allow distinction between low- and high-grade gliomas (P > .11). CONCLUSIONS: For brain tumor diagnosis, FET-PET performed much better than FDG and should be preferred when assessing a new isolated brain tumor. For glioma grading, however, both tracers showed similar performances.