247 resultados para media relations
Resumo:
The mass media are assigned an important role in political campaigns on popular votes. This article asks how the press communicates political issues to citizens during referendum campaigns, and whether some minimal criteria for successful public deliberation are met. The press coverage of all 24 ballot votes on welfare state issues from 1995 to 2004 in Switzerland is examined, distinguishing seven criteria to judge how news coverage compares to idealized notions of the media's role in the democratic process: coverage intensity, time for public deliberation, balance in media coverage, source independence and inclusiveness, substantive coverage, and spatial homogeneity. The results of our quantitative analysis suggest that the press does fulfil these normative requirements to a reasonable extent and that fears about biased or deceitful media treatment of ballot issues are not well-founded. However, some potential for optimizing the coverage of referendum campaigns by the Swiss press does exist
Resumo:
Defense mechanisms as a central notion of psychoanalysis have inspired various levels of interest in research in psychotherapy and psychopathology. Defense specificities have only recently been investigated systematically with regard to several clinical diagnoses, such as affective and personality disorders. For the present study, 30 inpatients diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder I (BD) were interviewed. An observer-rater method, the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales (DMRS), applied to session-transcripts, of assessment of defenses was used. A matched, nonclinical control group was introduced. Defense specificities in BD encompass a set of 5 immature defenses, of which omnipotence is linked with symptom level. The level of the therapeutic alliance is predicted by mature defenses. These results are discussed with regard to the psychological vulnerability of BD, and treatment implications for psychodynamic psychotherapy with such challenging patients are evoked.
Resumo:
Ce travail de doctorat analyse les dynamiques qui se développent lorsque des personnes discutent en groupe et doivent prendre position sur des enjeux socio-politiques. Notre modèle prédit que les dynamiques positionnelles, relatives aux opinions exprimées, et les dynamiques relationnelles, relatives aux relations affectives et à l'organisation du groupe, sont constamment en interaction et s'imbriquent différemment selon le moment de vie du groupe. Les hypothèses issues de notre modèle ont été testées au moyen de cinq études conduites sur la base d'un paradigme expérimental en plusieurs phases. Les données relatives aux variables dépendantes (attraction interpersonnelle, identification au groupe, perception de cohésion du groupe, choix d'un représentant du groupe, évolution des positions suite aux interactions) ont été récoltées par questionnaire. Les résultats de ces études appuient l'importance d'analyser conjointement les dynamiques relationnelles et positionnelles, dans une perspective temporelle.