Les méthodes d'études de cas en psychothérapie: perspectives actuelles [Methods of psychotherapy case studies: current perspectives].

There is a renewal of interest among psychotherapy researchers and psychotherapists towards psychotherapy case studies. This article presents two paradigms that have greatly influenced this increasing interest in psychotherapy case studies : the pragmatic case study and the theory-building case study paradigm. The origins, developments and key-concepts of both paradigms are presented, as well as their methodological and ethical specificities. Examples of case studies, along with models developed, are cited. The differential influence of the post-modern schools on both paradigms are presented, as well as their contribution to the field of methods of psychotherapy case studies discussed and assessed in terms of relevance for the researcher and the psychotherapist.

Empirical antifungal therapy in neutropaenic cancer patients with persistent fever

Invasive fungal infections are frequent and severe complications in leukaemic patients with prolonged neutropaenia. Empirical antifungal therapy has become the standard of care in patients with persistent fever despite treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. For decades amphotericin B deoxycholate has been the sole option for empirical antifungal therapy. Recently, several new antifungal agents became available. The choice of the most appropriate drug should be guided by efficacy and safety criteria. The recommendations from the First European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-1) on empirical antifungal therapy in neutropaenic cancer patients with persistent fever have been developed by an expert panel after assessment of clinical practices in Europe and evidence-based review of the literature. Many antifungal regimens can now be recommended for empirical therapy in neutropaenic cancer patients. However, persistent fever lacks specificity for initiation of therapy. Development of empirical and pre-emptive strategies using new clinical parameters, laboratory markers and imaging techniques for early diagnosis of invasive mycoses are needed.

Représentations institutionnelles du cancer [Institutional representations of cancer]

Current institutional and official representations of cancer are: coordination, integration, team approaches, quality management, full informed consent, patient centered communication and empowerment. Web access, comprehensive care plan summaries patient centered healthcare interactions and evidence-based programs are different ways of delivering the comprehensive care and follow-up cancer survivors deserve. The question remains, how to best explore and respect, in the meantime, more subjective dimensions such as patient beliefs, values, the meaning of the illness, preferences and needs. These aspects are fundamental elements in the construction of a trusting relationship, so as to find common ground, to be open to discuss anxiety and doubts and to provide information tailored to suit the patient's level of understanding, in order to reduce vulnerability to the feeling of being "lost in transition".

Shared decision making development in Switzerland: room for improvement!

In Switzerland there is a strong movement at a national policy level towards strengthening patient rights and patient involvement in health care decisions. Yet, there is no national programme promoting shared decision making. First decision support tools (prenatal diagnosis and screening) for the counselling process have been developed and implemented. Although Swiss doctors acknowledge that shared decision making is important, hierarchical structures and asymmetric physician-patient relationships are still prevailing. The last years have seen some promising activities regarding the training of medical students and the development of patient support programmes. Swiss direct democracy and the habit of consensual decision making and citizen involvement in general may provide a fertile ground for SDM development in the primary care setting.

American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010.

In 2009, the American Cancer Society (ACS) Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee began the process of a complete update of recommendations for early prostate cancer detection. A series of systematic evidence reviews was conducted focusing on evidence related to the early detection of prostate cancer, test performance, harms of therapy for localized prostate cancer, and shared and informed decision making in prostate cancer screening. The results of the systematic reviews were evaluated by the ACS Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee, and deliberations about the evidence occurred at committee meetings and during conference calls. On the basis of the evidence and a consensus process, the Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee developed the guideline, and a writing committee drafted a guideline document that was circulated to the entire committee for review and revision. The document was then circulated to peer reviewers for feedback, and finally to the ACS Mission Outcomes Committee and the ACS Board of Directors for approval. The ACS recommends that asymptomatic men who have at least a 10-year life expectancy have an opportunity to make an informed decision with their health care provider about screening for prostate cancer after they receive information about the uncertainties, risks, and potential benefits associated with prostate cancer screening. Prostate cancer screening should not occur without an informed decision-making process. Men at average risk should receive this information beginning at age 50 years. Men in higher risk groups should receive this information before age 50 years. Men should either receive this information directly from their health care providers or be referred to reliable and culturally appropriate sources. Patient decision aids are helpful in preparing men to make a decision whether to be tested.