Political market and regulatory uncertainty: Insights and implications for integrated strategy

Managers can craft effective integrated strategy by properly assessing regulatory uncertainty. Leveraging the existing political markets literature, we predict regulatory uncertainty from the novel interaction of demand and supply side rivalries across a range of political markets. We argue for two primary drivers of regulatory uncertainty: ideology-motivated interests opposed to the firm and a lack of competition for power among political actors supplying public policy. We align three, previously disparate dimensions of nonmarket strategy - profile level, coalition breadth, and pivotal target - to levels of regulatory uncertainty. Through this framework, we demonstrate how and when firms employ different nonmarket strategies. To illustrate variation in nonmarket strategy across levels of regulatory uncertainty, we analyze several market entry decisions of foreign firms operating in the global telecommunications sector.

L'interdiction de discrimination en raison de la nationalité au sens de l'Accord sur la libre circulation des personnes

Au coeur même du premier paquet de sept accords bilatéraux conclu entre la Suisse et la Communauté européenne le 21 juin 1999, l'Accord sur la libre circulation des personnes (ALCP) vise à garantir la libre circulation et à faciliter la prestation de services sur le territoire des parties contractantes. Or la réalisation de ces objectifs dépend avant tout de la mise en oeuvre effective de l'interdiction de discrimination en raison de la nationalité consacrée par l'ALCP, véritable clé de voûte de l'Accord. Le présent ouvrage s'attache, dans un premier temps, à l'analyse du principe de libre circulation et à l'examen du fonctionnement de l'ALCP - examen portant notamment sur le rôle joué par la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes dans le cadre de l'interprétation de cet Accord (Partie I). Dans un second temps, cet ouvrage se penche sur la question centrale de l'interdiction de discrimination en raison de la nationalité (Partie II). Pour ce faire, il propose tout d'abord une définition de la notion de discrimination elle-même et détermine ensuite le champ d'application matériel et personnel des principales dispositions de l'ALCP interdisant les discriminations. Dans ce cadre, une attention toute particulière est accordée à la question de la potentielle portée horizontale de ces dispositions. Ensuite, l'ouvrage procède à une analyse complète des principes et dispositions susceptibles de limiter la portée de cette interdiction,avant de conclure par un examen détaillé des conséquences administratives et civiles induites par la présence d'un cas de discrimination effectif.

From bird to sparrow: Learning-induced modulations in fine-grained semantic discrimination.

Recognition of environmental sounds is believed to proceed through discrimination steps from broad to more narrow categories. Very little is known about the neural processes that underlie fine-grained discrimination within narrow categories or about their plasticity in relation to newly acquired expertise. We investigated how the cortical representation of birdsongs is modulated by brief training to recognize individual species. During a 60-minute session, participants learned to recognize a set of birdsongs; they improved significantly their performance for trained (T) but not control species (C), which were counterbalanced across participants. Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded during pre- and post-training sessions. Pre vs. post changes in AEPs were significantly different between T and C i) at 206-232ms post stimulus onset within a cluster on the anterior part of the left superior temporal gyrus; ii) at 246-291ms in the left middle frontal gyrus; and iii) 512-545ms in the left middle temporal gyrus as well as bilaterally in the cingulate cortex. All effects were driven by weaker activity for T than C species. Thus, expertise in discriminating T species modulated early stages of semantic processing, during and immediately after the time window that sustains the discrimination between human vs. animal vocalizations. Moreover, the training-induced plasticity is reflected by the sharpening of a left lateralized semantic network, including the anterior part of the temporal convexity and the frontal cortex. Training to identify birdsongs influenced, however, also the processing of C species, but at a much later stage. Correct discrimination of untrained sounds seems to require an additional step which results from lower-level features analysis such as apperception. We therefore suggest that the access to objects within an auditory semantic category is different and depends on subject's level of expertise. More specifically, correct intra-categorical auditory discrimination for untrained items follows the temporal hierarchy and transpires in a late stage of semantic processing. On the other hand, correct categorization of individually trained stimuli occurs earlier, during a period contemporaneous with human vs. animal vocalization discrimination, and involves a parallel semantic pathway requiring expertise.

The political ecology of weeds : a scalar approach to landscape transformations

How do plants that move and spread across landscapes become branded as weeds and thereby objects of contention and control? We outline a political ecology approach that builds on a Lefebvrian understanding of the production of space, identifying three scalar moments that make plants into 'weeds' in different spatial contexts and landscapes. The three moments are: the operational scale, which relates to empirical phenomena in nature and society; the observational scale, which defines formal concepts of these phenomena and their implicit or explicit 'biopower' across institutional and spatial categories; and the interpretive scale, which is communicated through stories and actions expressing human feelings or concerns regarding the phenomena and processes of socio-spatial change. Together, these three scalar moments interact to produce a political ecology of landscape transformation, where biophysical and socio-cultural processes of daily life encounter formal categories and modes of control as well as emotive and normative expectations in shaping landscapes. Using three exemplar 'weeds' - acacia, lantana and ambrosia - our political ecology approach to landscape transformations shows that weeds do not act alone and that invasives are not inherently bad organisms. Humans and weeds go together; plants take advantage of spaces and opportunities that we create. Human desires for preserving certain social values in landscapes in contradiction to actual transformations is often at the heart of definitions of and conflicts over weeds or invasives.

The Political Communication of Independent Regulatory Agencies

Since independent regulatory agencies (IRAs) became key actors in European regulatory governance in the 1990s, a significant share of policy-making has been carried out by organizations that are neither democratically elected nor directly accountable to elected politicians. In this context, public communication plays an important role. On the one hand, regulatory agencies might try to use communication to raise their accountability and thereby to mitigate their democratic deficit. On the other hand, communication may be used with the intent to steer the behavior of the regulated industry when more coercive regulatory means are unfeasible or undesirable. However, empirical research focusing directly on how regulators communicate is virtually non-existent. To fill this gap, this paper examines the public communication of IRAs in four countries (the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland, and Switzerland) and three sectors (financial services, telecommunications, and broadcasting). The empirical analysis, based on qualitative interviews and a quantitative content analysis, indicates that the organization of the communication function follows a national pattern approach while a policy sector approach is helpful for understanding the use of communication as a soft tool of regulation.

Literature report : a review of policy learning in five strands of political science research

This paper reviews the policy learning literature in political science. In recent years, the number of publications on learning in the political realm increased dramatically. Researchers have focused on how policymakers and administrators adapt policies based on learning processes or experiences. Thereby, learning has been discussed in very different ways. Authors have referred to learning in the context of ideas, understood as deeply held beliefs, and, as change and adaptation of policy instruments. Two other strands of literature have taken into consideration learning, namely the diffusion literature and research on transfer, which put forward learning to understand who learns from whom and what. Opposed to these views, political learning emphasizes the adaptation of new strategies by policymakers over the transfer of knowledge or broad ideas. In this approach, learning occurs due to the failure of existing policies, increasing problem pressure, scientific innovations, or a combination of these elements.

Un déguisement pour la discrimination?

Malgré une société de plus en plus tolérante, la discrimination reste un problème d'actualité. Pour expliquer la formation des comportements discriminatoires, la recherche en psychologie sociale a traditionnellement étudié la discrimination comme un phénomène intergroupe, notamment à travers la théorie de l'identité sociale (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Toutefois, cette approche ne permet pas de comprendre comment des individus peuvent de nos jours s'engager dans des comportements discriminatoires tout en sachant que ces actes sont répréhensibles socialement et pénalement. C'est à cette problématique que nous nous sommes attelés dans la présente recherche. De nombreuses études ont mis en évidence le fait que des individus étaient prêts à commettre des actes discriminatoires pour autant qu'ils puissent les justifier (Crandall & Eshleman, 2003). Nous proposons de contribuer à la compréhension de ce phénomène grâce au concept de désengagement moral définit comme le processus par lequel des individus justifient leurs comportements immoraux pour les rendre acceptable. Ce concept a initialement été développé de manière conceptuelle par Bandura (1990) pour comprendre les processus cognitifs amenant des individus à se comporter de manière immorale. Dans le cadre de notre recherche, nous proposons de développer le concept de désengagement moral pour des actes discriminatoires (DMD) ainsi que sa mesure. Plus particulièrement, nous proposons de conceptualiser le DMD comme une différence individuelle permettant aux individus de s'engager dans des comportements discriminatoires en toute impunité à travers un processus anticipatoire de justification. Ces justifications visent à prouver le bien-fondé des actes de discrimination envisagés, ainsi perçus comme bénins, acceptables, voire désirables. Deux des trois étapes envisagées pour le développement de la mesure ont déjà été réalisées. Les résultats obtenus sont prometteurs quant à la structure et la validité de la mesure.