Bosentan and/or Sildenafil for non-operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Objectives: To evaluate outcome of patients treated "off-label" by bosentan and/or sildenafil for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Patients and methods: Since 2003, 18 patients (mean age 69 ± 11 years) have been treated with bosentan and/or sildenafil for CTEPH (mean pulmonary arterial resistance 8.1 ± 3.7 U Wood) in Lausanne University Hospital, with a follow-up of at least 12 months. Sixteen of them were inoperable because of distal disease and/or age or significant co-morbidities and 2 had persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension despite surgery. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated by comparison of New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA), six-minute walk test (6-MWT) and serum levels of N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) at baseline (T0) and at 12 months (T12). Wilcoxon rank test was used for statistics. Results: At T0, median NYHA class was III (range II-IV), 6-MWT was 348 meters (5 and 95 centiles:0, 539) and NT pro-BNP was 387 mmol/l (58, 3508). At T12, 11 patients were treated with bosentan, 5 with sildenafil, 1 with inhaled Iloprost (because of failure of the two other treatments) and 1 with a combination of sildenafil and Iloprost. NYHA had improved in 10 patients, remained stable in 7 and worsened in 1 (median decrease 0.5 (-2; 0.2) p = 0.013). Six-MWT improved by a median of 15 meters (-142, +270) (p = 0.047) and NT pro-BNP decreased by a median of 65 mmol/l (-2988, +187) (p = n.s.). Among the 10 patients with a follow-up of 2 years or longer, two thirds remained stable and one third had worsened at 24 month. Treatments were well tolerated and only one patient had significant side effects (cutaneous reaction to bosentan) necessitating a switch to another treatment. Conclusion: In agreement with published data, bosentan and sildenafil improved functional status (NYHA, 6-MWT) and haemodynamics (NT pro BNP) in our patients with inoperable CTEPH. However these medications should not be used as substitute for surgery when the latter is applicable.

Functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation versus outpatient physiotherapy for non specific low back pain: randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: In recent decades the treatment of non-specific low back pain has turned to active modalities, some of which were based on cognitive-behavioural principles. Non-randomised studies clearly favour functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation over outpatient physiotherapy. However, systematic reviews and meta-analysis provide contradictory evidence regarding the effects on return to work and functional status. The aim of the present randomised study was to compare long-term functional and work status after 3-week functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation or 18 supervised outpatient physiotherapy sessions. METHODS: 109 patients with non-specific low back pain were randomised to either a 3-week functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme, including physical and ergonomic training, psychological pain management, back school and information, or 18 sessions of active outpatient physiotherapy over 9 weeks. Primary outcomes were functional disability (Oswestry) and work status. Secondary outcomes were lifting capacity (Spinal Function Sort and PILE test), lumbar range-of-motion (modified-modified Schöber and fingertip-to-floor tests), trunk muscle endurance (Shirado and Biering-Sörensen tests) and aerobic capacity (modified Bruce test). RESULTS: Oswestry disability index was improved to a significantly greater extent after functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation compared to outpatient physiotherapy at follow-up of 9 weeks (P = 0.012), 9 months (P = 0.023) and 12 months (P = 0.011). Work status was significantly improved after functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation only (P = 0.012), resulting in a significant difference compared to outpatient physiotherapy at 12 months' follow-up (P = 0.012). Secondary outcome results were more contrasted. CONCLUSIONS: Functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation was better than outpatient physiotherapy in improving functional and work status. From an economic point of view, these results should be backed up by a cost-effectiveness study.

Imagerie cardiaque non invasive: apport spécifique en clinique des nouvelles modalités (I). Evaluation morphologique [Cardiac imaging: specific clinical role of newly developed non invasive techniques. Part 1: Morphological evaluation].

Echocardiography is the preferred initial test to assess cardiac morphology and ventricular function. Cardiac MRI enables an optimal visualisation of heart muscle without contrast injection, and precise measurement of the ventricular volumes and systolic function. It is therefore an ideal test for patients with poor echocardiographic windows or for the specific evaluation of right heart chambers. Heart CT also remarkably images heart muscle and precisely measures ventricular systolic function after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast. Coronary CT may also, in selected cases, avoid the need for diagnostic coronary angiography. Although very accurate, these imaging modalities are expensive and may be contra-indicated for a particular patient. Their use in clinical practice has to follow the accepted guidelines.