Contribution à une étude normative de l'épreuve de Rorschach auprès d'un groupe d'enfants de 8 à 14 ans non-consultants

Cette étude normative de l'épreuve de Rorschach porte sur une population suisse de 102 enfants et adolescents non-consultants de 8 à 14 ans, répartis par tranches d'âge, sexe et niveau intellectuel. Elle présente un aperçu des différentes méthodes utilisées dans l'interprétation du Rorschach et des normes francophones existantes. Une réflexion est aussi proposée autour de la question de l'utilité de l'analyse des facteurs quantitatifs au Rorschach. Suite à une présentation détaillée de la méthodologie de recherche, les résultats sont exposés et comparés aux normes antérieures. Ils ne révèlent pas de différences importantes avec ces dernières, à l'exception de la hausse du F%, de la baisse du F+% et du nombre de Banalités. Les comparaisons Age, Sexe et QI révèlent quelques différences entre les groupes.

"We do have space in Lausanne. We have a large cemetery": The non-controversy of a non-existent Muslim burial ground

In the context of the administration of spaces assigned by municipalities for the burial of the dead, this article provides a critical analysis of the techniques for the governance of political collectives of citizens implemented by public authorities. More broadly, this article shows how funerary practices (i.e. the social practices surrounding death-the rituals, the legislation, etc.) can be used to develop a critical reading of the social relations that structure the social production of space. To this end, the authors use the conceptual tools provided by critical legal geography to explore the controversy surrounding the development of a 'carré confessionnel' (denominational area) within the Bois-de-Vaux Cemetery in Lausanne, Switzerland. Here, a focus on the techniques that allow 'nomosphere' technicians to convene a subset of the citizens within the public space reveals the administration of cemeteries as a means of governance, a method for mobilising bodies and a paradoxical means of managing flux.

Allergo-immunologie. 2 : Les réactions allergiques aux anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens [Allergic reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs]

Allergy to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is a very common affliction, especially among patients with asthma and chronic urticaria. These reactions are most often of a non-immunological nature but related to pharmacologic intolerance and linked to arachidonic acid metabolism and leukotriene release. Therefore, crossed reactions implying all non-selective and semi-selective NSAIDs constitute the rule, especially during respiratory reactions to NSAIDs and for patients with chronic urticaria. In isolated acute urticaria, crossed reactions are difficult to predict so caution is necessary. Tolerance induction is possible, especially when aspirin has to be administered in small doses as antiplatelet agent. Finally, acetaminophen and selective NSAIDs as celecoxib are well tolerated by most of these patients. L'allergie aux anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens (AINS) est très fréquente, en particulier chez les asthmatiques ou dans l'urticaire chronique. Il s'agit en général de réactions non immunologiques, mais dues à une intolérance pharmacologique liée au métabolisme de l'acide arachidonique et à la formation de leucotriènes. Ainsi, les réactions croisées impliquant tous les AINS non sélectifs et semi-sélectifs sont la règle, surtout lors de réactions respiratoires aux AINS et dans l'urticaire chronique. Lors d'urticaire aiguë isolée, les réactions croisées sont difficiles à prédire, ainsi la prudence s'impose. Une induction de tolérance est possible, en particulier lorsque l'aspirine est nécessaire à dose faible, comme antiagrégant plaquettaire. Enfin, le paracétamol et les AINS sélectifs sont supportés par la grande majorité de ces patients.

Bosentan and/or Sildenafil for non-operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Objectives: To evaluate outcome of patients treated "off-label" by bosentan and/or sildenafil for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Patients and methods: Since 2003, 18 patients (mean age 69 ± 11 years) have been treated with bosentan and/or sildenafil for CTEPH (mean pulmonary arterial resistance 8.1 ± 3.7 U Wood) in Lausanne University Hospital, with a follow-up of at least 12 months. Sixteen of them were inoperable because of distal disease and/or age or significant co-morbidities and 2 had persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension despite surgery. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated by comparison of New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA), six-minute walk test (6-MWT) and serum levels of N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) at baseline (T0) and at 12 months (T12). Wilcoxon rank test was used for statistics. Results: At T0, median NYHA class was III (range II-IV), 6-MWT was 348 meters (5 and 95 centiles:0, 539) and NT pro-BNP was 387 mmol/l (58, 3508). At T12, 11 patients were treated with bosentan, 5 with sildenafil, 1 with inhaled Iloprost (because of failure of the two other treatments) and 1 with a combination of sildenafil and Iloprost. NYHA had improved in 10 patients, remained stable in 7 and worsened in 1 (median decrease 0.5 (-2; 0.2) p = 0.013). Six-MWT improved by a median of 15 meters (-142, +270) (p = 0.047) and NT pro-BNP decreased by a median of 65 mmol/l (-2988, +187) (p = n.s.). Among the 10 patients with a follow-up of 2 years or longer, two thirds remained stable and one third had worsened at 24 month. Treatments were well tolerated and only one patient had significant side effects (cutaneous reaction to bosentan) necessitating a switch to another treatment. Conclusion: In agreement with published data, bosentan and sildenafil improved functional status (NYHA, 6-MWT) and haemodynamics (NT pro BNP) in our patients with inoperable CTEPH. However these medications should not be used as substitute for surgery when the latter is applicable.