Simulated Patient as Co-facilitators: Benefits and Challenges of the Interprofessional Team OSCE (Submission #9350).

Hypothesis: The quality of care for chronic patients depends on the collaborative skills of the healthcare providers.1,2 The literature lacks reports of the use of simulation to teach collaborative skills in non-acute care settings. We posit that simulation offers benefits for supporting the development of collaborative practice in non-acute settings. We explored the benefits and challenges of using an Interprofessional Team - Objective Structured Clinical Examination (IT-OSCE) as a formative assessment tool. IT-OSCE is an intervention which involves an interprofessional team of trainees interacting with a simulated patient (SP) enabling them to practice collaborative skills in non-acute care settings.5 A simulated patient are people trained to portray patients in a simulated scenario for educational purposes.6,7 Since interprofessional education (IPE) ultimately aims to provide collaborative patient-centered care.8,9 We sought to promote patient-centeredness in the learning process. Methods: The IT-OSCE was conducted with four trios of students from different professions. The debriefing was co-facilitated by the SP with a faculty. The participants were final-year students in nursing, physiotherapy and medicine. Our research question focused on the introduction of co-facilitated (SP and faculty) debriefing after an IT-OSCE: 1) What are the benefits and challenges of involving the SP during the debriefing? and 2) To evaluate the IT-OSCE, an exploratory case study was used to provide fine grained data 10, 11. Three focus groups were conducted - two with students (n=6; n=5), one with SPs (n=3) and one with faculty (n=4). Audiotapes were transcribed for thematic analysis performed by three researchers, who found a consensus on the final set of themes. Results: The thematic analysis showed little differentiation between SPs, student and faculty perspectives. The analysis of transcripts revealed more particularly, that the SP's co-facilitation during the debriefing of an IT-OSCE proved to be feasible. It was appreciated by all the participants and appeared to value and to promote patient-centeredness in the learning process. The main challenge consisted in SPs feedback, more particularly in how they could report accurate observations to a students' group rather than individual students. Conclusion: In conclusion, SP methodology using an IT-OSCE seems to be a useful and promising way to train collaborative skills, aligning IPE, simulation-based team training in a non-acute care setting and patient-centeredness. We acknowledge the limitations of the study, especially the small sample and consider the exploration of SP-based IPE in non-acute care settings as strength. Future studies could consider the preparation of SPs and faculty as co-facilitators. References: 1. Borrill CS, Carletta J, Carter AJ, et al. The effectiveness of health care teams in the National Health Service. Aston centre for Health Service Organisational Research. 2001. 2. Reeves S, Lewin S, Espin S, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. 3. Issenberg S, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning - a BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher. 2005;27(1):10-28. 4. McGaghie W, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Medical Education. 2010;44(1):50-63. 5. Simmons B, Egan-Lee E, Wagner SJ, Esdaile M, Baker L, Reeves S. Assessment of interprofessional learning: the design of an interprofessional objective structured clinical examination (iOSCE) approach. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2011;25(1):73-74. 6. Nestel D, Layat Burn C, Pritchard SA, Glastonbury R, Tabak D. The use of simulated patients in medical education: Guide Supplement 42.1 - Viewpoint. Medical teacher. 2011;33(12):1027-1029. Disclosures: None (C) 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Les besoins en soins de support chez les patients en phase d'un traitement ambulatoire, suivant l'annonce d'un diagnostic de cancer : étude descriptive transversale

Problématique L'incidence du cancer ne cesse d'augmenter dans les pays occidentaux et en Suisse, en constituant la deuxième cause de mortalité après les maladies cardiovasculaires. Si d'une part, les différents traitements oncologiques ont le potentiel de guérir certains cancers et d'augmenter l'espérance de vie des personnes concernées, ils sont associés à de multiples problèmes physiques et psychosociaux. De même, l'annonce de la maladie provoque une fragilité émotionnelle et sociale et la phase de traitement qui suit le diagnostic de cancer est souvent associé à des besoins psychologiques et d'information élevés. But Cette étude vise à décrire les besoins en soins de support insatisfaits chez les patients nouvellement diagnostiqués d'un cancer, au cours d'un traitement ambulatoire dans un Hôpital Cantonal de la Suisse. Elle vise également à identifier les associations entre les besoins en soins de support insatisfaits et les caractéristiques sociodémographiques et médicales. Méthode Cette étude corrélationnelle descriptive a été conduite auprès de 67 patients nouvellement atteints d'un cancer primaire ou d'une récidive, recrutés selon un échantillonnage non probabiliste par convenance consécutive. Le questionnaire auto-administré comprenait le Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34 et un questionnaire sur des données sociodémographiques. Les données médicales ont été collectées par les chercheurs à travers les dossiers médicaux. Résultats Les trois besoins exprimés comme les plus insatisfaits étaient « la peur que le cancer se propage » (48,5%), « l'incertitude face à l'avenir » (45,4%) et « vos préoccupations face à l'incertitude de vos proches » (43,9%). Nous constatons une insatisfaction plus élevée des besoins psychologiques (M: 32,6 ; ET: 20,4) et des besoins d'information (M: 29,3 ; ET: 17,5) par rapport aux autres dimensions de besoins. À propos des caractéristiques associées a un plus haut niveau de besoins insatisfaits, nous trouvons qu'être plus jeune (29-56 ans) ou âgés de > 72 ans est positivement associé aux besoins insatisfaits du domaine psychologique (F = 3,50 ; p = 0,02) et de l'information/système de santé (F = 3,48 ; p = 0,02). Le jeune âge est aussi associé à plus de besoins dans le domaine sexuel (F = 2,85 ; p = 0,04). Il semble exister une association négative entre le niveau d'instruction et le degré d'insatisfaction des besoins psychologiques (F = 2,92, p = 0,06). Être retraité coïncide avec un plus grand degré d'insatisfaction dans les besoins physiques et des activités de la vie quotidienne (F = 4,64 ; p = 0,013). Finalement, avoir un moins bon état général est relié à plus de besoins physiques et de besoins issus du domaine des activités de la vie quotidienne (t = -2,85 ; p = 0,005). Conclusions Les présents résultats concordent avec les études antérieures. Cette étude a la particularité d'avoir identifié les besoins insatisfaits durant la phase de traitement qui suit l'annonce du diagnostic, sans se restreindre à une maladie cancéreuse spécifique, ce qui a été peu effectué auparavant. Les chercheurs infirmiers devraient poursuivre, en collaboration avec d'autres professionnels de la santé, les recherches visant le développement d'approches efficaces pour réduire les besoins insatisfaits chez des personnes atteintes de maladies cancéreuses.

Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants.

One of the global targets for non-communicable diseases is to halt, by 2025, the rise in the age-standardised adult prevalence of diabetes at its 2010 levels. We aimed to estimate worldwide trends in diabetes, how likely it is for countries to achieve the global target, and how changes in prevalence, together with population growth and ageing, are affecting the number of adults with diabetes. We pooled data from population-based studies that had collected data on diabetes through measurement of its biomarkers. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate trends in diabetes prevalence-defined as fasting plasma glucose of 7.0 mmol/L or higher, or history of diagnosis with diabetes, or use of insulin or oral hypoglycaemic drugs-in 200 countries and territories in 21 regions, by sex and from 1980 to 2014. We also calculated the posterior probability of meeting the global diabetes target if post-2000 trends continue. We used data from 751 studies including 4,372,000 adults from 146 of the 200 countries we make estimates for. Global age-standardised diabetes prevalence increased from 4.3% (95% credible interval 2.4-7.0) in 1980 to 9.0% (7.2-11.1) in 2014 in men, and from 5.0% (2.9-7.9) to 7.9% (6.4-9.7) in women. The number of adults with diabetes in the world increased from 108 million in 1980 to 422 million in 2014 (28.5% due to the rise in prevalence, 39.7% due to population growth and ageing, and 31.8% due to interaction of these two factors). Age-standardised adult diabetes prevalence in 2014 was lowest in northwestern Europe, and highest in Polynesia and Micronesia, at nearly 25%, followed by Melanesia and the Middle East and north Africa. Between 1980 and 2014 there was little change in age-standardised diabetes prevalence in adult women in continental western Europe, although crude prevalence rose because of ageing of the population. By contrast, age-standardised adult prevalence rose by 15 percentage points in men and women in Polynesia and Micronesia. In 2014, American Samoa had the highest national prevalence of diabetes (>30% in both sexes), with age-standardised adult prevalence also higher than 25% in some other islands in Polynesia and Micronesia. If post-2000 trends continue, the probability of meeting the global target of halting the rise in the prevalence of diabetes by 2025 at the 2010 level worldwide is lower than 1% for men and is 1% for women. Only nine countries for men and 29 countries for women, mostly in western Europe, have a 50% or higher probability of meeting the global target. Since 1980, age-standardised diabetes prevalence in adults has increased, or at best remained unchanged, in every country. Together with population growth and ageing, this rise has led to a near quadrupling of the number of adults with diabetes worldwide. The burden of diabetes, both in terms of prevalence and number of adults affected, has increased faster in low-income and middle-income countries than in high-income countries. Wellcome Trust.