La protection de la personnalité du travailleur : sauvegarde de sa santé et sécurité au travail

Le scandale de l'amiante, l'épidémie de suicides au travail ou bien encore le "karôshi" sont autant de faits qui invitent à une réflexion renouvelée sur les conditions de travail. Cette thèse part d'une volonté de revisiter, dans un monde professionnel bouleversé par les progrès constants de la technique et les pressions économiques, les liens entre santé et sécurité, telles que visées aux art. 328 CO, 6 LTr et 82 LAA. Il s'agit d'examiner l'articulation entre ces dispositions, sur la base d'une analyse historique et de l'apport actuel du système légal, et la pertinence de repenser celui-ci. En effet, le pluralisme des sources en la matière, hétérogènes de par leur nature (de droit public ou privé) et/ou de par leur objet (la santé ou la sécurité), et le manque d'harmonie entre elles ne sont pas sans créer difficultés d'application et doubles emplois. La présente thèse commence par quelques repères chronologiques sur la mise en place progressive et pragmatique de la législation sociale suisse. Suit un survol des lois protectrices et autres normativités extra-juridiques, qui laisse conclure à un foisonnement et à une hétérogénéité des sources applicables. Puis, les trois dispositions générales topiques, à savoir les articles 328 CO, 6 LTr et 82 LAA, font successivement l'objet d'un examen détaillé, en vue d'évaluer leur bien-fondé respectif et la pertinence d'une approche compartimentée de la santé et sécurité au travail. Et donc de conclure par une réflexion sur l'intérêt d'un changement, notamment par la suppression du dualisme LTr / LAA.

Genetic polymorphism of CCR5 gene and HIV disease: the heterozygous (CCR5/delta ccr5) genotype is neither essential nor sufficient for protection against disease progression. Swiss HIV Cohort.

Homozygous (delta ccr5/delta ccr5) and heterozygous (CCR5/delta ccr5) deletions in the beta-chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) gene, which encodes for the major co-receptor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1 entry, have been implicated in resistance to HIV infection and in protection against disease progression, respectively. The CCR5/delta ccr5 genotype was found more frequently in long-term nonprogressors (LTNP) (31.0%) than in progressors (10.6%, p < 0.0001), in agreement with previous studies. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that a slower progression of disease, i.e. higher proportion of subjects with CD4+ T cell counts > 500/microl (p = 0.0006) and a trend toward a slower progression to AIDS (p = 0.077), was associated with the CCR5/delta ccr5 genotype. However, when LTNP were analyzed separately, no significant differences in CD4+ T cell counts (p = 0.12) and viremia levels (p = 0.65) were observed between the wild-type (69% of LTNP) and the heterozygous (31.0%) genotypes. Therefore, there are other factors which play a major role in determining the status of nonprogression in the majority of LTNP. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the CCR5/delta ccr5 genotype was associated with different rates of disease progression in the group of progressors. Taken together, these results indicate that the CCR5/delta ccr5 genotype is neither essential nor sufficient for protection against the progression of HIV disease.

Partial protection and intrathecal invasion of CD8(+) T cells in acute canine distemper virus infection.

Initial non-inflammatory demyelination in canine distemper virus infection (CDV) develops against a background of severe immunosuppression and is therefore, thought to be virus-induced. However, recently we found a marked invasion of T cells throughout the central nervous system (CNS) in dogs with acute distemper despite drastic damage to the immune system. In the present study, this apparent paradox was further investigated by immunophenotyping of lymphocytes, following experimental CDV challenge in vaccinated and non-vaccinated dogs. In contrast to CDV infected, unprotected dogs, vaccinated dogs did not become immunosuppressed and exhibited a strong antiviral immune response following challenge with virulent CDV. In unprotected dogs rapid and drastic lymphopenia was initially due to depletion of T cells. In peripheral blood, CD4(+) T cells were more sensitive and depleted earlier and for a longer time than CD8(+) cells which recovered soon. In the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) we could observe an increase in the T cell to B cell and CD8(+) to CD4(+) ratios. Thus, partial protection of the CD8(+) cell population could explain why part of the immune function in acute distemper is preserved. As found earlier, T cells invaded the CNS parenchyma in these dogs but also in the protected challenged dogs, which did not develop any CNS disease at all. Since markers of T cell activation were upregulated in both groups of animals, this phenomenon could in part be related to non-specific penetration of activated T cells through the blood brain barrier. However, in diseased animals much larger numbers of T cells were found in the CNS than in the protected dogs, suggesting that massive invasion of T cells in the brain requires CDV expression in the CNS.