Forensic intelligence framework-Part I: induction of a transversal model by comparing illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring

Forensic intelligence is a distinct dimension of forensic science. Forensic intelligence processes have mostly been developed to address either a specific type of trace or a specific problem. Even though these empirical developments have led to successes, they are trace-specific in nature and contribute to the generation of silos which hamper the establishment of a more general and transversal model. Forensic intelligence has shown some important perspectives but more general developments are required to address persistent challenges. This will ensure the progress of the discipline as well as its widespread implementation in the future. This paper demonstrates that the description of forensic intelligence processes, their architectures, and the methods for building them can, at a certain level, be abstracted from the type of traces considered. A comparative analysis is made between two forensic intelligence approaches developed independently in Australia and in Europe regarding the monitoring of apparently very different kind of problems: illicit drugs and false identity documents. An inductive effort is pursued to identify similarities and to outline a general model. Besides breaking barriers between apparently separate fields of study in forensic science and intelligence, this transversal model would assist in defining forensic intelligence, its role and place in policing, and in identifying its contributions and limitations. The model will facilitate the paradigm shift from the current case-by-case reactive attitude towards a proactive approach by serving as a guideline for the use of forensic case data in an intelligence-led perspective. A follow-up article will specifically address issues related to comparison processes, decision points and organisational issues regarding forensic intelligence (part II).

A microarray-based system for the simultaneous analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in human genes involved in the metabolism of anti-malarial drugs

Background: In order to provide a cost-effective tool to analyse pharmacogenetic markers in malaria treatment, DNA microarray technology was compared with sequencing of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a larger number of samples. Methods: The microarray was developed to affordably generate SNP data of genes encoding the human cytochrome P450 enzyme family (CYP) and N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT2) involved in antimalarial drug metabolisms and with known polymorphisms, i.e. CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and NAT2. Results: For some SNPs, i.e. CYP2A6*2, CYP2B6*5, CYP2C8*3, CYP2C9*3/*5, CYP2C19*3, CYP2D6*4 and NAT2*6/*7/*14, agreement between both techniques ranged from substantial to almost perfect (kappa index between 0.61 and 1.00), whilst for other SNPs a large variability from slight to substantial agreement (kappa index between 0.39 and 1.00) was found, e. g. CYP2D6*17 (2850C>T), CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3. Conclusion: The major limit of the microarray technology for this purpose was lack of robustness and with a large number of missing data or with incorrect specificity.

Einsatz nicht-steroidaler Antirheumatika bei akuter Gicht [Use of non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs in acute gout]

Hintergrund : Ein akuter Gichtanfall entsteht durchdas Ausfällen von Mononatriumkristallenaus der Synovialflüssigkeit unddie dadurch bedingte Entzündung einesoder mehrerer Gelenke.Mitunter kommt es auch zur Bildung der Kristalle direkt im Gewebe. Das Erscheinungsbild der Gichterkrankung umfasst neben akuten Gichtanfällen die asymptomatische Hyperurikämie und chronische Gicht-Arthritis; extraartikulär kann sich eine Uratnephropathie bzw. Urolithiasis ausbilden. Bei akuten Gichtanfällen kommen die klassischen NSAR (z.B. Diclofenac) sowie die selektiven Cyclooxygenase-2-Hemmer (COX-2-Hemmer oder Coxibe) zum Einsatz. Beide Substanzgruppen scheinen das gleiche Risikoprofil und klinische Effektivität zu besitzen. Der Einsatz sollte kurzzeitig in maximal möglicher Dosierung erfolgen. Bei komorbiden Patienten z.B. mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, Niereninsuffizienz, Status nach gastrointestinalem Ulkus oder Blutung ist der Einsatz von NSAR eingeschränkt. Bisher wurde der Nutzen und die Sicherheit von klassischen NSAR und COX-2-Hemmer in der Behandlung von akuten Gichtanfällen nicht systematisch untersucht.