Analyse des modifications de la chromatine impliquées dans l'effet barrière de CTF1 aux télomères humains

Eukaryotic genomes are compartmentalized in different structural domains that can affect positively or negatively gene expression. These regions of euchromatin and heterochromatin are characterized by distinct histones marks which can facilitate or repress gene transcription. The chromatin environment represents thus one of the main problems to control gene expression in biotechnological applications or gene therapy, since its expression is affected by the chromatin neighboring its locus of insertion. Some chromatin regions like telomeres are composed of constitutive heterochromatin which leads to the telomeric position effect (TPE) that silences genes adjacent to the telomere. TPE is known to spread by the selfrecruitment of the SIR histone deacetylase complex from the telomere in S.cerevisiae, but the histone marks that are associated to telomeric chromatin in mammalian cells remain mostly unknown. The transcription factor CTF1 has shown antisilencing properties in mammalian cells and also a boundary activity against TPE in yeast cells when fused to the yeast Gal4 DNA binding domain. In the work presented here, we describe a dual-reporter system to assess the boundary activity of proteins such as CTF1 at human telomeres. When located between the two reporter genes, CTF1 shields the telomere distal gene from TPE, while the telomereproximal gene remains silenced by telomeric heterochromatin. The boundary activity of CTF1 is shown to act regardless its function of transcriptional activator, by opposition to the transcriptional activator VP16 which activates indifferently both transgenes. Moreover, this study shows that CTF1 boundary activity is linked to its H3 binding function, as expected from a chromatin remodeler. ChIP experiments showed that histone deacetylation is the main histone modification involved in gene silencing at mammalian cell telomeres. Distinctly to yeast cells, the histone deacetylation signal in human cells extented over a short range along the chromosome. CTF1 may help to block this propagation and therefore to restore histones acetylation level on telomere protected locus. Surprisingly, other histone marks such as trimethyl-H3K9 or trimethyl-H4K20 were found on telomere protected locus, while in another clone, unsilencing of telomere distal transgene was associated with recruitment of the histone variant H2A.Z. Thus, I conclude that CTF1 displays a chromatin boundary function which is independent of its transcriptional activity and therefore exhibit features required for use as chromatin insulator in biotechnological applications. RESUME Les génomes eucaryotes sont compartementalisés en domaines structurels qui peuvent affecter positivement ou négativement l'expression des gènes avoisinants. Ces régions dites d'euchromatine ou d'hétérochromatine sont caractérisées par des modifications posttraductionnelles des histones qui peuvent faciliter ou au contraire inhiber la transcription des gènes qui s'y trouvent. Ainsi, isoler un gène de son environnement chromatinien est problème fréquent lorsqu'il s'agit de contrôler son expression dans le cadre d'applications en biotechnologie ou encore en thérapie génique. Certaines régions de chromatine telles que les télomères sont composées d'hétérochromatine constitutive qui mène au silençage des gènes avoisinants. Cet effet de position télomérique (TPE) est connu dans la levure S.cerevisiae comme se propageant par auto-recrutement du complexe de déacétylation d'histone SIR, alors que peu de modifications de chromatine ont pu être associées à ce phénomène dans les cellules de mammifères. Le facteur de transcription CTF1 a montré des propriétés d'anti-silençage dans les cellules de mammifères, ainsi qu'une activité barrière contre le silençage télomérique dans les cellules de levures lorsqu'il est fusionné au domaine de liaison à l'ADN de la protéine de levure Gal4. Dans le travail présenté ci-après est décrit un système à deux gènes rapporteurs permettant de mesurer l'activité barrière de protéines telles que CTF1 aux télomères humains, et les modifications de chromatine qui y sont associées. Lorsque CTF1 est placé entre les deux gènes rapporteurs, le gène distant du télomère est protégé du silençage qui lui est associé, alors que le gène proche du télomère reste soumis à ce silençage induit par l'hétérochromatine télomérique. L'activité barrière de CTF1 est montrée ici comme agissant indépendamment de son activité transcriptionnelle, par opposition à l'activateur transcriptionnel VP16 qui active indifféremment les deux transgènes. En outre, cette étude appuie l'hypothèse stipulant que CTF1 agisse comme remodeleur chromatinien puisqu'elle démontre que son activité barrière est directement dépendante de son activité de liaison avec l'histone H3. De plus, des expériences d'immuno-précipitation de la chromatine démontrent que la déacétylation des histones est le majeur phénomène intervenant dans le silençage télomérique. Par opposition à la levure, ce signal de déacétylation ne se propage dans les cellules humaines que sur une courte distance le long du chromosome. CTF1 agit ainsi en bloquant cette propagation et en restaurant le niveau d'acétylation des histones sur le locus protégé du télomère. De manière surprenante et inattendue, d'autres modifications d'histones telles que 4 les H3K9 et H4K20 triméthylées sont aussi observées à ce locus, tandis le recrutement du variant H2A.Z peut aussi être suffisant à restaurer l'expression du gène distant du télomère. En terme de cette analyse, CTF1 exhibe ainsi une fonction de barrière chromatinienne qui exclue une activité transcriptionnelle non désirée - propriété qui est requise dans l'établissement des isolateurs visant à permettre le contrôle d'un transgène dans le cadre d'applications en biotechnologies.

Leishmania major: histone H1 gene expression from the sw3 locus.

Histone H1 in the parasitic protozoan Leishmania is a developmentally regulated protein encoded by the sw3 gene. Here we report that histone H1 variants exist in different Leishmania species and strains of L. major and that they are encoded by polymorphic genes. Amplification of the sw3 gene from the genome of three strains of L. major gave rise to different products in each strain, suggesting the presence of a multicopy gene family. In L. major, these genes were all restricted to a 50-kb Bg/II fragment found on a chromosomal band of 1.3 Mb (chromosome 27). The detection of RFLPs in this locus demonstrated its heterogeneity within several species and strains of Leishmania. Two different copies of sw3 (sw3.0 and sw3.1) were identified after screening a cosmid library containing L. major strain Friedlin genomic DNA. They were identical in their 5' UTRs and open reading frames, but differed in their 3' UTRs. With respect to the originally cloned copy of sw3 from L. major strain LV39, their open reading frames lacked a repeat unit of 9 amino acids. Immunoblots of L. guyanensis parasites transfected with these cosmids revealed that both copies could give rise to the histone H1 protein. The characterization of this locus will now make possible a detailed analysis of the function of histone H1 in Leishmania, as well as permit the dissection of the molecular mechanisms governing the developmental regulation of the sw3 gene.

Genome-wide RNA polymerase II profiles and RNA accumulation reveal kinetics of transcription and associated epigenetic changes during diurnal cycles.

Interactions of cell-autonomous circadian oscillators with diurnal cycles govern the temporal compartmentalization of cell physiology in mammals. To understand the transcriptional and epigenetic basis of diurnal rhythms in mouse liver genome-wide, we generated temporal DNA occupancy profiles by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) as well as profiles of the histone modifications H3K4me3 and H3K36me3. We used these data to quantify the relationships of phases and amplitudes between different marks. We found that rhythmic Pol II recruitment at promoters rather than rhythmic transition from paused to productive elongation underlies diurnal gene transcription, a conclusion further supported by modeling. Moreover, Pol II occupancy preceded mRNA accumulation by 3 hours, consistent with mRNA half-lives. Both methylation marks showed that the epigenetic landscape is highly dynamic and globally remodeled during the 24-hour cycle. While promoters of transcribed genes had tri-methylated H3K4 even at their trough activity times, tri-methylation levels reached their peak, on average, 1 hour after Pol II. Meanwhile, rhythms in tri-methylation of H3K36 lagged transcription by 3 hours. Finally, modeling profiles of Pol II occupancy and mRNA accumulation identified three classes of genes: one showing rhythmicity both in transcriptional and mRNA accumulation, a second class with rhythmic transcription but flat mRNA levels, and a third with constant transcription but rhythmic mRNAs. The latter class emphasizes widespread temporally gated posttranscriptional regulation in the mouse liver.

Probing Rad51-DNA interactions by changing DNA twist.

In eukaryotes, Rad51 protein is responsible for the recombinational repair of double-strand DNA breaks. Rad51 monomers cooperatively assemble on exonuclease-processed broken ends forming helical nucleo-protein filaments that can pair with homologous regions of sister chromatids. Homologous pairing allows the broken ends to be reunited in a complex but error-free repair process. Rad51 protein has ATPase activity but its role is poorly understood, as homologous pairing is independent of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis. Here we use magnetic tweezers and electron microscopy to investigate how changes of DNA twist affect the structure of Rad51-DNA complexes and how ATP hydrolysis participates in this process. We show that Rad51 protein can bind to double-stranded DNA in two different modes depending on the enforced DNA twist. The stretching mode is observed when DNA is unwound towards a helical repeat of 18.6 bp/turn, whereas a non-stretching mode is observed when DNA molecules are not permitted to change their native helical repeat. We also show that the two forms of complexes are interconvertible and that by enforcing changes of DNA twist one can induce transitions between the two forms. Our observations permit a better understanding of the role of ATP hydrolysis in Rad51-mediated homologous pairing and strand exchange.

Topological aspects of DNA function and protein folding.

The Topological Aspects of DNA Function and Protein Folding international meeting provided an interdisciplinary forum for biological scientists, physicists and mathematicians to discuss recent developments in the application of topology to the study of DNA and protein structure. It had 111 invited participants, 48 talks and 21 posters. The present article discusses the importance of topology and introduces the articles from the meeting's speakers.

Implication of DNA methylation, CTCF and BORIS factors in the transcriptional regulation of the human telomerase catalytic subunit hTERT

RESUME La télomérase confère une durée de vie illimitée et est réactivée dans la plupart des cellules tumorales. Sa sous-unité catalytique hTERT est définie comme le facteur limitant pour son activation. De l'identification de facteurs liant la région régulatrice d'hTERT, au rôle de la méthylation de l'ADN et de la modification des histones, de nombreux modèles de régulation ont été suggérés. Cependant, aucun de ces modèles n'a pu expliquer l'inactivation de la télomérase dans la plupart des cellules somatiques et sa réactivation dans la majorité des cellules tumorales. De plus, les observations contradictoires entre le faible niveau d'expression d'ARN messager d'hTERT dans les cellules télomérase-positives et la très forte activité transcriptionnelle du promoteur d'hTERT en transfection restent incomprises. Dans cette étude, nous avons montré que la région proximale du gène hTERT (exon 1 et 2) était impliquée dans la répression de l'activité de son promoteur. Nous avons identifié le facteur CTCF comme étant un inhibiteur du promoteur d'hTERT, en se liant au niveau de son premier exon. La méthylation de l'exon 1 du gène hTERT, couramment observée dans les tumeurs mais pas dans les cellules normales, empêcherait la liaison de CTCF. L'étude du profil de méthylation du promoteur d'hTERT indique qu'une partie du promoteur reste déméthylée et qu'elle semble suffisante pour permettre une faible activité transcriptionnelle du gène hTERT. Ainsi, la méthylation particulière des régions régulatrices d'hTERT inhibe la liaison de CTCF tout en permettant une faible transcription du gène. Cependant, dans certaines cellules tumorales, le promoteur et la région proximale du gène hTERT ne sont pas méthylés. Dans les lignées cellulaires tumorales de tesitcules et d'ovaires, l'inhibition de CTCF est contrée par son paralogue BORIS, qui se lie aussi au niveau de l'exon 1 d'hTERT, mais permet ainsi l'activation du promoteur. L'étude de l'expression du gène BORIS montre qu'il est exclusivement exprimé dans les tissus normaux de testicules et d'ovaires jeunes, ainsi qu'à différents niveaux dans la plupart des tumeurs. Sa transcription est sous le contrôle de deux promoteurs. Le promoteur proximal est régulé par méthylation et un transcrit alternatif majoritaire, délété de l'exon 6, est trouvé lorsque ce promoteur est actif. Tous ces résultats conduisent à un modèle de régulation du gène hTERT qui tient compte du profil épigénétique du gène et qui permet d'expliquer le faible taux de transcription observé in vivo. De plus, l'expression de BORIS dans les cancers et son implication dans l'activation du gène hTERT pourrait permettre de comprendre les phénomènes de dérégulation épigénétique et d'immortalisation qui ont lieu durant la tumorigenèse. SUMMARY Telomerase confers an unlimited lifespan, and is reactivated in most tumor cells. The catalytic subunit of telomerase, hTERT, is defined as the limiting factor for telomerase activity. Between activators and repressors that bind to the hTERT 5' regulatory region, and the role of CpG methylation and histone acetylation, an abundance of regulatory models have been suggested. None of these models can explain the silence of telomerase in most somatic cells and its reactivation in tumor cells. Moreover, the contradictory observations of the low level of hTERT mRNA in telomerase-positive cells and the high transcriptional activity of the hTERT promoter in transfection experiments remain unresolved. In this study, we demonstrated that the proximal exonic region of the hTERT gene (exon 1 and 2) is involved in the inhibition of its promoter. We identified the protein CTCF as the inhibitor of the hTERT promoter, through its binding to the first exon. The methylation of the first exon region, which is often observed in cancer cells but not in noimal cells, represses CTCF binding. Study of hTERT promoter methylation shows a partial demethylation sufficient to activate the transcription of the hTERT gene. Therefore, we demonstrated that the particular methylation profile of the hTERT regulatory sequences inhibits the binding of CTCF, while it allows a low transcription of the gene. Nevertheless, in some tumor cells, the promoter and the proximal exonic region of hTERT are unmethylated. In testicular and ovarian cancer cell lines, CTCF inhibition is counteracted by its BORIS paralogue that also binds the hTERT first exon but allows the promoter activation. The study of BORIS gene regulation showed that this factor is exclusively expressed in normal tissue of testis and ovary of young woman, as well as in almost all tumors with different levels. Two promoters were found to induce its transcription. The proximal promoter was regulated by methylation. Moreover, a major alternative transcript, deleted of the exon 6, is detected when this promoter is active. All these results lead to a model for hTERT regulation that takes into account the epigenetic profile of the gene and provides an explanation for the low transcriptional level observed in vivo. BORIS expression in cancers and its implication in hTERT activation might also permit the understanding of epigenetic deregulation and immortalization phenomena that occur during tumorigenesis.

Chromosome 7 gain and DNA hypermethylation at the HOXA10 locus are associated with expression of a stem cell related HOX-signature in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: HOX genes are a family of developmental genes that are expressed neither in the developing forebrain nor in the normal brain. Aberrant expression of a HOX-gene dominated stem-cell signature in glioblastoma has been linked with increased resistance to chemo-radiotherapy and sustained proliferation of glioma initiating cells. Here we describe the epigenetic and genetic alterations and their interactions associated with the expression of this signature in glioblastoma. RESULTS: We observe prominent hypermethylation of the HOXA locus 7p15.2 in glioblastoma in contrast to non-tumoral brain. Hypermethylation is associated with a gain of chromosome 7, a hallmark of glioblastoma, and may compensate for tumor-driven enhanced gene dosage as a rescue mechanism by preventing undue gene expression. We identify the CpG island of the HOXA10 alternative promoter that appears to escape hypermethylation in the HOX-high glioblastoma. An additive effect of gene copy gain at 7p15.2 and DNA methylation at key regulatory CpGs in HOXA10 is significantly associated with HOX-signature expression. Additionally, we show concordance between methylation status and presence of active or inactive chromatin marks in glioblastoma-derived spheres that are HOX-high or HOX-low, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, we propose co-evolution and interaction between gene copy gain, associated with a gain of chromosome 7, and additional epigenetic alterations as key mechanisms triggering a coordinated, but inappropriate, HOX transcriptional program in glioblastoma.

Regulation of recombination at yeast nuclear pores controls repair and triplet repeat stability.

Secondary structure-forming DNA sequences such as CAG repeats interfere with replication and repair, provoking fork stalling, chromosome fragility, and recombination. In budding yeast, we found that expanded CAG repeats are more likely than unexpanded repeats to localize to the nuclear periphery. This positioning is transient, occurs in late S phase, requires replication, and is associated with decreased subnuclear mobility of the locus. In contrast to persistent double-stranded breaks, expanded CAG repeats at the nuclear envelope associate with pores but not with the inner nuclear membrane protein Mps3. Relocation requires Nup84 and the Slx5/8 SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase but not Rad51, Mec1, or Tel1. Importantly, the presence of the Nup84 pore subcomplex and Slx5/8 suppresses CAG repeat fragility and instability. Repeat instability in nup84, slx5, or slx8 mutant cells arises through aberrant homologous recombination and is distinct from instability arising from the loss of ligase 4-dependent end-joining. Genetic and physical analysis of Rad52 sumoylation and binding at the CAG tract suggests that Slx5/8 targets sumoylated Rad52 for degradation at the pore to facilitate recovery from acute replication stress by promoting replication fork restart. We thereby confirmed that the relocation of damage to nuclear pores plays an important role in a naturally occurring repair process.

Population Variation and Genetic Control of Modular Chromatin Architecture in Humans.

Chromatin state variation at gene regulatory elements is abundant across individuals, yet we understand little about the genetic basis of this variability. Here, we profiled several histone modifications, the transcription factor (TF) PU.1, RNA polymerase II, and gene expression in lymphoblastoid cell lines from 47 whole-genome sequenced individuals. We observed that distinct cis-regulatory elements exhibit coordinated chromatin variation across individuals in the form of variable chromatin modules (VCMs) at sub-Mb scale. VCMs were associated with thousands of genes and preferentially cluster within chromosomal contact domains. We mapped strong proximal and weak, yet more ubiquitous, distal-acting chromatin quantitative trait loci (cQTL) that frequently explain this variation. cQTLs were associated with molecular activity at clusters of cis-regulatory elements and mapped preferentially within TF-bound regions. We propose that local, sequence-independent chromatin variation emerges as a result of genetic perturbations in cooperative interactions between cis-regulatory elements that are located within the same genomic domain.

Adjuvant Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin in Stage II to III Colon Cancer: Updated 10-Year Survival and Outcomes According to BRAF Mutation and Mismatch Repair Status of the MOSAIC Study.

PURPOSE: The MOSAIC (Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer) study has demonstrated 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS) benefit of adjuvant oxaliplatin in stage II to III resected colon cancer. This update presents 10-year OS and OS and DFS by mismatch repair (MMR) status and BRAF mutation. METHODS: Survival actualization after 10-year follow-up was performed in 2,246 patients with resected stage II to III colon cancer. We assessed MMR status and BRAF mutation in 1,008 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 9.5 years, 10-year OS rates in the bolus/infusional fluorouracil plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) arms were 67.1% versus 71.7% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P = .043) in the whole population, 79.5% versus 78.4% for stage II (HR, 1.00; P = .980), and 59.0% versus 67.1% for stage III (HR, 0.80; P = .016) disease. Ninety-five patients (9.4%) had MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors, and 94 (10.4%) had BRAF mutation. BRAF mutation was not prognostic for OS (P = .965), but dMMR was an independent prognostic factor (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.55; P = .014). HRs for DFS and OS benefit in the FOLFOX4 arm were 0.48 (95% CI, 0.20 to 1.12) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.16 to 1.07), respectively, in patients with stage II to III dMMR and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.25 to 1.00) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31 to 1.42), respectively, in those with BRAF mutation. CONCLUSION: The OS benefit of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, increasing over time and with the disease severity, was confirmed at 10 years in patients with stage II to III colon cancer. These updated results support the use of FOLFOX in patients with stage III disease, including those with dMMR or BRAF mutation.