Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor versus calcium antagonist in the treatment of hypertension.

Sixteen patients with essential hypertension were treated for 2 consecutive 6-week periods with either the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril (20 mg once daily) or the calcium antagonist diltiazem (120 mg twice daily). The sequence of the treatment phases was randomly allocated. Blood pressure decreased from 154/102 +/- 5/2 mm Hg (mean +/- SEM) to 135/96 +/- 4/2 and 140/98 +/- 3/2 mm Hg during treatment with enalapril and diltiazem, respectively. It was impossible in the individual hypertensive patient to predict the long-term blood pressure response to one of the agents studied based on the long-term blood pressure response to the other agent.

Gender difference in the response to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a diurectic in hypertensive patients of African descent

Résumé de la thèse en français Titre : Différence entre hommes et femmes dans la réponse à un inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine et un diurétique chez des patients hypertendus d'origine Africaine. Introduction: L'efficacité des inhibiteurs de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine (ACEI) dans le traitement de l'hypertension artérielle chez les patients africains est controversée. Objectif: Nous avons examiné la baisse de la tension artérielle ambulatoire (ABP) en réponse à un diurétique et un ACEI chez des patients hypertendus d'origine africaine et nous avons évalué les différentes caractéristiques déterminant l'efficacité du traitement. Méthodes: Etude en simple-aveugle randomisée, en crossover AB/BA. Arrangement Familles hypertendues d'origine africaine de la population générale des Seychelles. Participants : 52 patients (29 hommes et 23 femmes) sur 62 patients hypertendus éligibles ont été inclus. Le principal résultat était la mesure de la réponse de l'ABP à 20 mg de lisinopril (LIS) ou 25 mg d'hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) quotidiennement pendant quatre semaines. Résultats: Le jour, la réponse systolique/diastolique de l'ABP sous HCT était de 4.9 (95% intervalle de confiance (IC) 1.2-8.6)/3.6 (1.0-6.2) mm Hg pour les hommes et 12.9 (9.216.6)/6.3 (3.7-8.8) mm Hg pour les femmes. Sous LIS, la réponse était de 18.8 (15.022.5)/14.6 (12.0-17.1) mm Hg pour les hommes et de 12.4 (8.7-16.2)/7.7 (5.1-10.2) mm Hg pour les femmes. La nuit, la réponse systolique/diastolique sous HCT était de 5.0 (0.6-9.4)/2.7 ((-0.4)-5.7) mm Hg pour les hommes et de 11.5 (7.1-16.0)/5.7 (2.6-8.8) mm Hg pour les femmes, et sous LIS était de 18.7 (14.2-22.1)/15.4 (12.4-18.5) mm Hg pour les hommes et de 3.5 ((-1.0)-7.9)/2.3 ((-0.8)-5.4) mm Hg pour les femmes. L'analyse de régression linéaire multiple a montré que le sexe est un prédicteur indépendant de la réponse tensionnelle à l'HCT et au LIS. Conclusions : Les patients hypertendus d'origine africaine ont présenté une baisse tensionnelle plus grande en réponse au LIS qu'à l'HCT. Les hommes ont mieux répondu au LIS qu'à l'HCT alors que les femmes ont répondu de manière similaire aux deux traitements.

Sustained 24-hour blockade of the renin-angiotensin system: a high dose of a long-acting blocker is as effective as a lower dose combined with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.

Whether a higher dose of a long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) can provide as much blockade of the renin-angiotensin system over a 24-hour period as the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a lower dose of ARB has not been formally demonstrated so far. In this randomized double-blind study we investigated renin-angiotensin system blockade obtained with 3 doses of olmesartan medoxomil (20, 40, and 80 mg every day) in 30 normal subjects and compared it with that obtained with lisinopril alone (20 mg every day) or combined with olmesartan medoxomil (20 or 40 mg). Each subject received 2 dose regimens for 1 week according to a crossover design with a 1-week washout period between doses. The primary endpoint was the degree of blockade of the systolic blood pressure response to angiotensin I 24 hours after the last dose after 1 week of administration. At trough, the systolic blood pressure response to exogenous angiotensin I was 58% +/- 19% with 20 mg lisinopril (mean +/- SD), 58% +/- 11% with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil, 62% +/- 16% with 40 mg olmesartan medoxomil, and 76% +/- 12% with the highest dose of olmesartan medoxomil (80 mg) (P = .016 versus 20 mg lisinopril and P = .0015 versus 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil). With the combinations, blockade was 80% +/- 22% with 20 mg lisinopril plus 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil and 83% +/- 9% with 20 mg lisinopril plus 40 mg olmesartan medoxomil (P = .3 versus 80 mg olmesartan medoxomil alone). These data demonstrate that a higher dose of the long-acting ARB olmesartan medoxomil can produce an almost complete 24-hour blockade of the blood pressure response to exogenous angiotensin in normal subjects. Hence, a higher dose of a long-acting ARB is as effective as a lower dose of the same compound combined with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in terms of blockade of the vascular effects of angiotensin.

Gender difference in the response to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a diuretic in hypertensive patients of African descent.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in decreasing blood pressure in African patients is controversial. OBJECTIVE: We examined the ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) response to a diuretic and an ACE inhibitor in hypertensive patients of East African descent and evaluated the individual characteristics that determined treatment efficacy. DESIGN: A single-blind randomized AB/BA crossover design. SETTING: Hypertensive families of East African descent from the general population in the Seychelles. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two (29 men and 23 women) out of 62 eligible hypertensive patients were included.Main outcome measures ABP response to 20 mg lisinopril (LIS) daily and 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) daily given for a 4-week period.Results The daytime systolic/diastolic ABP response to HCT was 4.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-8.6]/3.6 (1.0-6.2) mmHg for men and 12.9 (9.2-16.6)/6.3 (3.7-8.8) mmHg for women. With LIS the response was 18.8 (15.0-22.5)/14.6 (12.0-17.1) mmHg for men and 12.4 (8.7-16.2)/7.7 (5.1-10.2) mmHg for women. The night-time systolic/diastolic response to HCT was 5.0 (0.6-9.4)/2.7 [(-0.4)-5.7] mmHg for men and 11.5 (7.1-16.0)/5.7 (2.6-8.8) mmHg for women, and to LIS was 18.7 (14.2-22.1)/15.4 (12.4-18.5) mmHg for men and 3.5 [(-1.0)-7.9]/2.3 [(-0.8)-5.4] mmHg for women. Linear regression analyses showed that gender is an independent predictor of the ABP responses to HCT and to LIS. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive patients of African descent responded better to LIS than to HCT. Men responded better to LIS than to HCT and women responded similarly to both drugs.

Kalemia during combined therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a potassium-sparing diuretic.

Both angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and potassium-sparing diuretics tend to increase serum potassium levels. This retrospective study was undertaken to assess whether these two types of agents can nevertheless be combined safely. Twelve hypertensive patients were treated for 1-70 months (mean = 17) with an ACE inhibitor together with a potassium-sparing diuretic (spironolactone, n = 10; amiloride, n = 2). In addition, eight patients also took a thiazide or a loop diuretic. Nine patients had a normal and three a slightly impaired renal function. No clinically relevant hyperkalemia was observed during the course of the study. These data suggest that it is not impossible to combine an ACE inhibitor with a potassium-sparing diuretic, as long as renal function is normal and serum potassium concentration is monitored closely.

Effect on blood pressure and the renin-angiotensin system of repeated doses of the converting enzyme inhibitor CGS 14824A.

A new, orally active angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, CGS 14824A, was evaluated in 12 healthy male volunteers. Two groups each of 6 volunteers were given 5 or 10 mg once daily p.o. for 8 days. Four hours after the first and the last morning doses, plasma angiotensin II, aldosterone and plasma converting enzyme activity had fallen, while blood angiotensin I and plasma renin activity had risen. Throughout the study, more than 90% inhibition of ACE was found immediately before giving either the 5 or 10 mg dose and 50% blockade was still present 72 h following the last dose. Based on the determination of ACE, there was no evidence of drug accumulation. No significant change in blood pressure or heart rate was observed during the course of the study. CGS 14824A was an effective, orally active, long-lasting and well tolerated converting enzyme inhibitor.

Effects of prolonged administration of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor CGS 16617 in normotensive volunteers.

A new, orally active angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, CGS 16617, has been evaluated in normotensive subjects during acute and prolonged administration. Single ascending doses of CGS 16617 20 to 100 mg were given to 9 normotensive volunteers at one week intervals and the changes in blood pressure, plasma ACE and renin activity were examined up to 72 h after drug intake. Also, CGS 16617 50 mg/day or placebo were given for 30 days to 8 and 6 normotensive subjects, respectively, maintained on an unrestricted salt diet. Blood pressure was measured daily in the office and ambulatory blood pressure profiles were also obtained before, during and after therapy, using the Remler M 2000 blood pressure recording system. CGS 16617 was an effective and long lasting ACE inhibitor. It did not induce a consistent change in blood pressure, but, the individual responses were very variable and several subjects experienced a clear decrease in the average of the blood pressures recorded during the daytime.

Sustained 24-hour blockade of the renin-angiotensin system: a high dose of a long-acting blocker is as effective as a lower dose combined with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

Résumé en français Jusqu'alors, il n'avait jamais été formellement démontré qu'une forte dose d'un antagoniste de l'angiotensine II à longue durée d'action pouvait être aussi efficace sur le blocage du système rénine-angiotensine que l'association d'un inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion avec le même antagoniste de l'angiotensine II à des doses plus faibles. Dans cette étude randomisée en double aveugle, nous avons étudié le blocage du système rénine-angiotensine obtenu avec trois doses d'olmesartan medoxomil (20, 40 et 80 mg) chez 30 volontaires sains que nous avons comparé au blocage obtenu par du lisinopril (20 mg), seul ou associé à de l'olmesartan medoxomil (20 et 40 mg). L'étude s'est déroulée en deux phases selon un design par crossover. A deux reprises, chaque volontaire à reçu durant une semaine l'un des six traitements possibles. Un intervalle d'une semaine a été respecté entre les deux phases (période de washout). L'objectif principal était d'étudier, 24 heures après la dernière dose, le blocage de l'élévation de la pression systolique en réponse à l'administration d'angiotensine I. Ce blocage était de 58% ± 19% (moyenne ± déviation standard) avec 20 mg de lisinopril, de 58% ± 11% avec 20 mg d'olmesartan medoxomil, de 62% ± 16% avec 40 mg d'olmesartan medoxomil, et de 76% ± 12% avec la plus forte dose d'olmesartan medoxomil (80 mg) (P=.016 versus 20 mg de lisinopril et P=.0015 versus 20 mg d'olmesartan medoxomil). Le blocage était de 80% ± 22% avec 20 mg de lisinopril associé à 20 mg d'olmesartan medoxomil et de 83% ± 9% avec 20 mg de lisinopril associé à 40 mg d'olmesartan medoxomil (P= .3 versus 80 mg d'olmesartan medoxomil). Ces résultats montrent, que chez les volontaires sains, une dose suffisamment élevée d'olmesartan medoxomil peut induire un blocage à 24 heures quasi complet de l'élévation de la pression artérielle en réponse à l'administration d'angiotensine I. De même, en terme de blocage de l'effet vasculaire de l'angiotensine I, une dose suffisamment élevée d'un antagoniste de l'angiotensine II de longue durée d'action est tout aussi efficace que ce même antagoniste à des doses plus faibles associé avec à un inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion.

Long-term treatment of hypertension in man by an orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.

1. Captopril or SQ 14 225, administered orally twice a day, reduced the blood pressure of hypertensive patients whatever their clinical diagnosis and even when their plasma renin activity was 'normal' or low. 2. Long-term administration of captopril, either alone or together with diuretics, provides a powerful new tool with which to treat ambulatory hypertensive patients. 3. The renin system may play an important role in maintaining blood pressure in a majority of hypertensive patients.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angio-oedema: a review of the pathophysiology and risk factors.

Angio-oedema (AE) is a known adverse effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) therapy. Over the past several decades, evidence of failure to diagnose this important and potentially fatal reaction is commonly found in the literature. Because this reaction is often seen first in the primary care setting, a review was undertaken to analyse and document the keys to both diagnostic criteria as well as to investigate potential risk factors for ACE-I AE occurrence. A general review of published literature was conducted through Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database, targeting ACE-I-related AE pathomechanism, diagnosis, epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical decision making and treatment. The incidence and severity of AE appears to be on the rise and there is evidence of considerable delay in diagnosis contributing to significant morbidity and mortality for patients. The mechanism of AE due to ACE-I drugs is not fully understood, but some genomic and metabolomic information has been correlated. Additional epidemiologic data and clinical treatment outcome predictors have been evaluated, creating a basis for future work on the development of clinical prediction tools to aid in risk identification and diagnostic differentiation. Accurate recognition of AE by the primary care provider is essential to limit the rising morbidity associated with ACE-I treatment-related AE. Research findings on the phenotypic indicators relevant to this group of patients as well as basic research into the pathomechanism of AE are available, and should be used in the construction of better risk analysis and clinical diagnostic tools for ACE-I AE.

Acute antihypertensive effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and calcium entry blockade.

The acute blood pressure response to an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (enalaprilat) was compared in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension with that obtained under similar conditions with a calcium entry blocker (nifedipine). The patients were studied after a 3 week washout period. At a 48 h interval, each patient received in randomized order either enalaprilat (5 mg i.v.) or nifedipine (10 mg p.o.). Enalaprilat and nifedipine were equally effective in acutely lowering blood pressure. However, good responders to one agent were not necessarily good responders to the other.

Effects of a dual inhibitor of angiotensin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase, MDL 100,240, on endocrine and renal functions in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the endocrine and renal effects of the dual inhibitor of angiotensin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase, MDL 100,240. DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study was performed in 12 healthy volunteers. METHODS: MDL 100,240 was administered intravenously over 20 min at single doses of 6.25 and 25 mg in subjects with a sodium intake of 280 (n = 6) or 80 (n = 6) mmol/day. Measurements were taken of supine and standing blood pressure, plasma angiotensin converting enzyme activity, angiotensin II, atrial natriuretic peptide, urinary atrial natriuretic peptide and cyclic GMP excretion, effective renal plasma flow and the glomerular filtration rate as p-aminohippurate and inulin clearances, electrolytes and segmental tubular function by endogenous lithium clearance. RESULTS: Supine systolic blood pressure was consistently decreased by MDL 100,240, particularly after the high dose and during the low-salt intake. Diastolic blood pressure and heart rate did not change. Plasma angiotensin converting enzyme activity decreased rapidly and dose-dependently. In both the high- and the low-salt treatment groups, plasma angiotensin II levels fell and renin activity rose accordingly, while plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels remained unchanged. In contrast, urinary atrial natriuretic peptide excretion increased dose-dependently under both diets, as did urinary cyclic GMP excretion. Effective renal plasma flow and the glomerular filtration rate did not change. The urinary flow rate increased markedly during the first 2 h following administration of either dose of MDL 100,240 (P < 0.001) and, similarly, sodium excretion tended to increase from 0 to 4 h after the dose (P = 0.07). Potassium excretion remained stable. Proximal and distal fractional sodium reabsorption were not significantly altered by the treatment. Uric acid excretion was increased. The safety and clinical tolerance of MDL 100,240 were good. CONCLUSIONS: The increased fall in blood pressure in normal volunteers together with the preservation of renal hemodynamics and the increased urinary volume, atrial natriuretic peptide and cyclic GMP excretion distinguish MDL 100,240 as a double-enzyme inhibitor from inhibitors of the angiotensin converting enzyme alone. The differences appear to be due, at least in part, to increased renal exposure to atrial natriuretic peptide following neutral endopeptidase blockade.

Effects of MDL 100,240, a dual inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase on the vasopressor response to exogenous angiotensin I and angiotensin II challenges in healthy volunteers.

MDL 100,240, a dual inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP), was administered intravenously to two panels of four healthy males in a four-period, dose-increasing (0, 1.56, 6.25, and 25 mg, and 0, 3.13, 12.5, and 50 mg, respectively) double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Plasma ACE activity and blood-pressure response to exogenous angiotensin I and angiotensin II i.v. challenges and safety and tolerance were assessed over a 24-h period. MDL 100,240 induced a rapid, dose-related, and sustained inhibition of ACE (>70% over 24 h at doses > or =12.5 mg). The time integral of ACE inhibition was related to the dose but with near-maximal values already attained at doses > or =12.5 mg. Systolic and diastolic blood-pressure responses to exogenous angiotensin I challenges were inhibited in a dose-dependent fashion, whereas the effects of angiotensin II remained unaffected. Mean supine blood pressure decreased transiently (3 h) at doses > or =3.125 mg and < or =24 h with the 25- and 50-mg doses, but not significantly. MDL 100,240 was well tolerated. In healthy subjects, MDL 100,240 exerts a dose-dependent and long-lasting ACE-blocking activity, also expressed by the inhibition of the pressor responses to exogenous angiotensin I challenges. The baroreceptor reflex, assessed by the response to exogenous angiotensin II challenge, remains unaltered.