Almost routine prophylactic cholecystectomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass is safe

RAPPORT DE SYNTHESE : Introduction : les patients obèses morbides présentent un risque majeur de développer des calculs biliaires en raison d'une sécrétion accrue de cholestérol dans la bile. Ce risque, davantage élevé dans la phase de perte pondérale rapide consécutive à la chirurgie bariatrique ou lors de régimes amaigrissants, est souvent la cause de nombreux symptômes, voire de complications biliaires. Aussi l'association d'une cholécystectomie à la chirurgie bariatrique, notamment le bypass gastrique laparoscopique a-t-elle été proposée afin d'éviter ces complications parfois redoutables dans cette population fragile. Ce concept a cependant fait l'objet de démentis dans de récentes études où ce risque apparaîtrait moins élevé, et la cholécystectomie durant le by- pris gastrique laparoscopique pourrait être grevée de difficultés et présenter des risques opératoires non négligeables pour le patient. Patients et méthodes : notre série comporte 772 patients opérés entre 2000 et 2007 par by-pass gastrique laparoscopique, avec montage d'une anse en Y selon Roux. Ces patients obèses morbides avaient été sélectionnés sur la base d'une anamnèse concluante, d'un examen anthropométrique, d'un bilan sanguin et d'un ultrason abdominal. Une analyse rétrospective des résultats d'ultrason abdominal préopératoire et des rapports histopathologiques des vésicules biliaires en postopératoire a été réalisée chez les patients opérés avant 2004. Résultats : 58 patients (7,5 %) avaient déjà eu une cholécystectomie. L'US abdominal a révélé des calculs ou de la boue biliaire chez 81 patients (11,3 %), un polype chez un patient et une vésicule biliaire normale chez les patients restants. La cholécystectomie a été réalisée concomitamment au by-pass gastrique chez 66S patients (91,7 %) et des calculs biliaires retrouvés à l'examen per-opératoire des vésicules biliaires chez 25 patients (3,9 %), rapportant alors la prévalence de la cholélithiase à 21,2 % dans cette population. L'âge des patients porteurs de calculs biliaires était significativement plus élevé que celui des patients sans calculs biliares (43,5 contre 38,7 ans, P < 0,0001). A l'examen histopathologique, des anomalies ont été décrites dans 81,8 % des vésicules biliaires, consistant pour la plupart en cholécystite chronique et cholestérolose. Aucune complication post-opératoire n'a été associée à la cholécystectomie et le prolongement du temps opératoire était en moyenne de 19 minutes (4 - 45 minutes) sans aucun impact sur le séjour hospitalier. La cholécystectomie n'a pas été réalisée chez 59 patients (8,3 %) en raison de conditions opératoires défavorables, notamment une exposition insuffisante. Un traitement d'acide ursodésoxycholique a été prescrit sur une période de 6 mois et aucun de ces patients n'a manifesté de symptômes biliaires. Conclusion : la cholécystectomie peut être réalisée à titre prophylactique et en toute sécurité au cours du by-pass gastrique laparoscopique. Cet acte opératoire supplémentaire sans conséquence sur le séjour hospitalier, constitue selon la présente étude une forme de prophylaxie recommandable dans la prévention de la formation des calculs biliaires dans la phase de perte pondérale post-opératoire. Sa supériorité ou non par rapport à la prophylaxie médicamenteuse à l'acide ursodésoxycholique n'a pas encore été établie. Des études prospectives randomisées seraient nécessaires afin de confirmer l'avantage de l'une ou l'autre de ces deux alternatives.

The different types of internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric by-bass for morbid obesity : MDCT features : P5

Purpose: 1. To provide an overview of the different types of internal hernia (IH) occurring after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) performed for morbid obesity. 2. To describe the correspondent MDCT features in relation with the underlying anatomical landmarks in order to differentiate their localisation and to direct the surgeon during following laparoscopic closure of mesenteric defects. Methods and materials: LRYGBP performed for morbid obesity is associated with less perioperative complications, shorter hospital stay and a more rapid recovery compared with the open surgical procedure. However, a relatively high incidence of IH is seen that may be due to the laparoscopic approach, but also caused by rapid weight loss with consecutive loosening of the mesenteric sutures. Results: After briefly reviewing the surgical procedure of LRYGBP (ante- versus retrocolic) we describe the exact anatomical landmarks of the different types of IH occurring at any time after operation: They are caused by surgical defects either at the level of the transverse colon mesentery, at the Petersen's space, which represents an opening between the mesocolon and jejunal mesentery, or at the enteroenterostomy site. Typical MDCT features of each IH type in axial and coronal plane as well as targeted vascular reconstructions are demonstrated. Conclusion: Exact knowledge about underlying pathophysiology and anatomical landmarks is essential for distinguishing the different types of IH occurring after LRYGBP on MDCT, since radiological features are difficult to recognize and may even overlap. The radiologist should be aware of the potential anatomic sites to ensure subsequent straightforward laparoscopic exploration.

The different types of internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric by-pass for morbid obesity: MDCT features [C-419]

Learning Objectives: 1. To provide an overview of the different types of internal hernia (IH) occurring after laparoscopic Roux‑en‑Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) for morbid obesity. 2. To describe correspondent MDCT features in relation with the underlying anatomical landmarks in order to differentiate their localisation and to direct the surgeon during following laparoscopic closure of mesenteric defects. Background: LRYGBP for morbid obesity is associated with less perioperative complications, shorter hospital stay and a more rapid recovery compared with the open surgical procedure. However, a relatively high incidence of IH is seen that may be due to the laparoscopic approach, but also caused by rapid weight loss with consecutive loosening of the mesenteric sutures. Procedure Details: After briefly reviewing the surgical procedure of LRYGBP (ante‑ versus retrocolic), we describe the exact anatomical landmarks of the different types of IH occurring at any time after operation: They are caused by surgical defects at the level of the transverse colon mesentery, at the Petersen's space, which represents an opening between the mesocolon and jejunal mesentery, or at the entero‑enterostomy site. Typical MDCT features of each IH type in axial and coronal planes as well as targeted vascular reconstructions are demonstrated. Conclusion: Exact knowledge about underlying pathophysiology and anatomical landmarks is essential for distinguishing the different types of IH occurring after LRYGBP on MDCT, since radiological features are difficult to recognize and may even overlap. The radiologist should be aware of the potential anatomic sites to ensure subsequent straightforward laparoscopic exploration.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: initial 2-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP)-essentially a restrictive bariatric procedure-is currently considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Open surgery in obese patients is associated with a high risk of cardiopulmonary complications, wound infection, and late incisional hernia. Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to reduce perioperative morbidity and to improve postoperative recovery for various procedures. Herein we present our results with laparoscopic RYGBP after an initial 2-year experience. METHODS: A prospective database was created in our department beginning without the first laparoscopic bariatric procedure. To provide a complete follow-up of 6 months, the results of all patients operated on between June 1999 and August 2001 were reviewed. Early surgical results, weight loss, correction of comorbidities, and improvement of quality of life were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included. There were 82 women and 25 men, with a mean age of 39.7 years (range, 19-58). RYGBP was a primary procedure in 80 cases (49 morbidly obese and 31 superobese patients) and a reoperation after failure or complication of another bariatric operation in 27 cases. Mean duration of surgery was 168 min for morbidly obese patients, 196 min for surperobese patients, and 205 min for reoperated patients (p <0.01). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in two cases. A total of 22 patients (20.5%) developed complication. Nine of them (8.4%) required reoperation for leak (five cases, or 4.6%), bowel occlusion (three cases, or 2.8%), or subphrenic abscess (one case, or 0.9%). mortality was 0.9%. Major morbidity decreased over time (first two-thirds, 12.5%, last third, 2.7%). major morbidity decreased over time (first two-thirds, 12.5%; last third, 2.7%). Excess weight loss of -50% was achieved in >80% of the patients, corresponding to a loss of 15 body mass index (BMI) units in morbidly obese patients and 20 BMI units in superobese patients. In the vast majority of patients, comorbidities improved or disappeared over time and quality of life improved. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is feasible, but it is a very complex operation. Indeed, it is associated with a long and steep learning curve, as reflected in the high number of major complications among our first 70 patients. The learning curve probably includes between 100 and 150 patients. With increasing experience, the morbidity rate becomes more acceptable and comparable to that of open RYGBP. The results in terms of weight loss and correction of comorbidities are similar to those obtained after open surgery, at least in the short term. However, only surgeons with extensive experience in advanced laparoscopic as well as bariatric surgery should attempt this procedure.

Improved surgical technique for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reduces complications at the gastrojejunostomy.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures for morbidly obese patients. It is associated with effective long-term weight loss, but can lead to significant complications, especially at the gastrojejunostomy (GJS). All the patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP at one of our two institutions were included in this study. The prospectively collected data were reviewed retrospectively for the purpose of this study, in which we compared two different techniques for the construction of the GJS and their effects on the incidence of complications. In group A, anastomosis was performed on the posterior aspect of the gastric pouch. In group B, it was performed across the staple line used to form the gastric pouch. A 21-mm circular stapler was used in all patients. A total of 1,128 patients were included between June 1999 and September 2009-639 in group A and 488 in group B. Sixty patients developed a total of 65 complications at the GJS, with 14 (1.2%) leaks, 42 (3.7%) strictures, and 9 (0.8%) marginal ulcers. Leaks (0.2% versus 2%, p = 0.005) and strictures (0.8% versus 5.9%, p < 0.0001) were significantly fewer in group B than in group A. Improved surgical technique, as we propose, with the GJS across the staple line used to form the gastric pouch, significantly reduces the rate of anastomotic complications at the GJS. A circular 21-mm stapler can be used with a low complication rate, and especially a low stricture rate. Additional methods to limit complications at the GJS are probably not routinely warranted.

Reoperative Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Provides Similar Long-Term Results as Primary Surgery

Background: The increasing prevalence of obesity worldwide is associated with a massive increase in the number of yearly performed bariatric procedures, many of them purely restrictive. Consequently, a growing number of surgical revisions are necessary, and conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is a common option. So far, few series including mostly patients reoperated using open surgery,and limited follow-up, have been reported.Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients undergoing revisional RYGBP in our two departments.Results: Between June 1999 and February 2011, 186 patients were submitted to revisional RYGBP, 161 women and 25 men with a mean age of 43 years. Their mean initial BMI was 45,3 kg/m2, their mean nadir BMI between the index operation and revision was 34, and their mean pre-revision BMI was 38,5. The initial procedure was gastric banding in 134 (72 %) patients, VBG in 48 (25,8 %), RYGBP in 5 (2,7 %), and others in 3. The main indications for revision were complications from the primary procedure with or without weight regain. A laparoscopic approach was usedin 137 (73,7 %) cases. Overall early morbidity was 18,8 %, and major morbidity was 3,2 %. Comparing patients in the first, second and last third of our experience, the percentage of patients operated using a laparoscopic approach increased from 53,2 % to 71 % and finally 96,7 %, and overall morbidity decreased from 27,4 % to 24,2 % and then 4,8 %. There were more wound infections after laparotomy (22,4 versus 2,9 %, p<0,001). There was no mortality. The mean BMI remained between 30 and 32 up to nine years after revision. Up to this limit, a BMI of <35 was maintained in between 75 and 83 % of the patients.Conclusions: Revisional RYGBP proves to be an effective and safe procedure. It can be performed by laparoscopy in most cases, especially as experience increases., It is associated with an acceptable morbidity, though higher than with primary RYGBP. Long-term results are equivalent to those of primary RYGBP, and can be considered as very satisfactory considering the fact that, on average, patients requiring redo surgery represent a sub-selection of difficult bariatric patients.

The Four Different Types of Internal Hernia Occurring After Laparascopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Performed for Morbid Obesity: Are There Any Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Features Permitting Their Distinction?

BACKGROUND: Four different types of internal hernias (IH) are known to occur after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) performed for morbid obesity. We evaluate multidetector row helical computed tomography (MDCT) features for their differentiation. METHODS: From a prospectively collected database including 349 patients with LRYGBP, 34 acutely symptomatic patients (28 women, mean age 32.6), operated on for IH immediately after undergoing MDCT, were selected. Surgery confirmed 4 (11.6%) patients with transmesocolic, 10 (29.4%) with Petersen's, 15 (44.2%) with mesojejunal, and 5 (14.8%) with jejunojejunal IH. In consensus, 2 radiologists analyzed 13 MDCT features to distinguish the four types of IH. Statistical significance was calculated (p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test). RESULTS: MDCT features of small bowel obstruction (SBO) (n = 25, 73.5%), volvulus (n = 22, 64.7%), or a cluster of small bowel loops (SBL) (n = 27, 79.4%) were inconsistently present and overlapped between the four IH. The following features allowed for IH differentiation: left upper quadrant clustered small bowel loops (p < 0.0001) and a mesocolic hernial orifice (p = 0.0003) suggested transmesocolic IH. SBL abutting onto the left abdominal wall (p = 0.0021) and left abdominal shift of the superior mesenteric vessels (SMV) (p = 0.0045) suggested Petersen's hernia. The SMV predominantly shifted towards the right anterior abdominal wall in mesojejunal hernia (p = 0.0033). Location of the hernial orifice near the distal anastomosis (p = 0.0431) and jejunojejunal suture widening (p = 0.0005) indicated jejunojejunal hernia. CONCLUSIONS: None of the four IH seems associated with a higher risk of SBO. Certain MDCT features, such as the position of clustered SBL and hernial orifice, help distinguish between the four IH and may permit straightforward surgery.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs gastric banding for morbid obesity: a case-matched study of 442 patients.

HYPOTHESIS: Gastric banding (GB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) are used in the treatment of morbidly obese patients. We hypothesized that RYGBP provides superior results. DESIGN: Matched-pair study in patients with a body mass index (BMI) less than 50. SETTING: University hospital and regional community hospital with a common bariatric surgeon. PATIENTS: Four hundred forty-two patients were matched according to sex, age, and BMI. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic GB or RYGBP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative morbidity, weight loss, residual BMI, quality of life, food tolerance, lipid profile, and long-term morbidity. RESULTS: Follow-up was 92.3% at the end of the study period (6 years postoperatively). Early morbidity was higher after RYGBP than after GB (17.2% vs 5.4%; P<.001), but major morbidity was similar. Weight loss was quicker, maximal weight loss was greater, and weight loss remained significantly better after RYGBP until the sixth postoperative year. At 6 years, there were more failures (BMI>35 or reversal of the procedure/conversion) after GB (48.3% vs 12.3%; P<.001). There were more long-term complications (41.6% vs 19%; P.001) and more reoperations (26.7% vs 12.7%; P<.001) after GB. Comorbidities improved more after RYGBP. CONCLUSIONS: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is associated with better weight loss, resulting in a better correction of some comorbidities than GB, at the price of a higher early complication rate. This difference, however, is largely compensated by the much higher long-term complication and reoperation rates seen after GB.

A new type of internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is currently the most common bariatric procedure. One of its late complications is the development of internal hernia, which can lead to acute intestinal obstruction or recurrent colicky abdominal pain. The aim of this paper is to present a new, unusual, and so far not reported type of internal hernia. A common computerized database is maintained for all patients undergoing bariatric surgery in our departments. The charts of patients with the diagnosis of internal hernia were reviewed. Three patients were identified who developed acute intestinal obstruction due to an internal hernia located between the jejunojejunostomy and the end of the biliopancreatic limb, directly between two jejunal limbs with no mesentery involved. Another seven patients with intermittent colicky abdominal pain, re-explored for the suspicion of internal hernia, were found to also have an open window of the same location apart from a hernia at one of the typical hernia sites. Since this gap is systematically closed during RYGBP, no other patient has been observed with this problem. Even very small defects can lead to the development of internal hernias after RYGBP. Patients with suggestive symptoms must be explored. Closure of the jejunojejunal defect with nonabsorbable sutures prevents the development of an internal hernia between the jejunal loops at the jejunojejunostomy.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: a Multicenter Experience with 203 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) has long been the main restrictive procedure for morbid obesity but has many long-term complications for which conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is often considered the best option. METHODS: This series regroups patients operated on by three different surgeons in four different centers. All data were collected prospectively, then pooled and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Out of 2,522 RYGBP performed between 1998 and 2010, 538 were reoperations, including 203 laparoscopic RYGBP after VBG. There were 175 women and 28 men. The mean BMI before VBG was 43.2 ± 6.3, and the mean BMI before reoperation was 37.4 ± 8.3. Most patients had more than one indication for reoperation and/or had regained significant weight. There was no conversion to open surgery. A total of 24 patients (11.8 %) developed complications, including nine (4.5 %) who required reoperation and one death. With a follow-up of 88.9 % after 8 years, the mean BMI after 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years was 29.1, 28.8, 28.7, 29.9, and 28.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this experience, the largest with laparoscopic reoperative RYGBP after failed VBG, we conclude that this procedure can safely be performed in experienced hands, with weight loss results similar to those observed after primary RYGBP. In patients with too difficult an anatomy below the cardia, dividing the esophagus just above the esophago-gastric junction and performing an esophagojejunostomy may be a safe alternative to converting to a Scopinaro-type BPD, obviating the additional long-term risks associated with malabsorption.

Nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity often cannot be prevented by standard multivitamin supplementation

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) in the treatment of morbid obesity, data about postoperative nutritional deficiencies and their treatment remain scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a standard multivitamin preparation in the prevention and treatment of nutritional deficiencies in obese patients after RYGBP. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of 2 y of follow-up of obese patients after RYGBP surgery. Between the first and the sixth postoperative months, a standardized multivitamin preparation was prescribed for all patients. Specific requirements for additional substitutive treatments were systematically assessed by a biologic workup at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 mo. RESULTS: A total of 137 morbidly obese patients (110 women and 27 men) were included. The mean (+/-SD) age at the time of surgery was 39.9 +/- 10.0 y, and the body mass index (in kg/m(2)) was 46.7 +/- 6.5. Three months after RYGBP, 34% of these patients required at least one specific supplement in addition to the multivitamin preparation. At 6 and 24 mo, this proportion increased to 59% and 98%, respectively. Two years after RYGBP, a mean amount of 2.9 +/- 1.4 specific supplements had been prescribed for each patient, including vitamin B-12, iron, calcium + vitamin D, and folic acid. At that time, the mean monthly cost of the substitutive treatment was $34.83. CONCLUSION: Nutritional deficiencies are very common after RYGBP and occur despite supplementation with the standard multivitamin preparation. Therefore, careful postoperative follow-up is indicated to detect and treat those deficiencies.

Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass is Superior to Gastric Banding in Non-superobese Patients. a Matched-case Study with Five-year Follow-up

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and gastric banding (GB) are the two most popular bariatric procedures. Only few studies have compared their results and follow-up duration is usually limited to <3 years. Patients and Methods: Using our prospective bariatric database, we matched non-superobese GB to RYGBP patients for sex, age and BMI to RYGBP. Follow-up considered up to five years. Results: 442 patients were matched in 221 pairs. Mean age (38,6) and mean BMI (43) were identical. Overall operative morbidity was higher after RYGBP (17,2 versus 5,4 %, p<0,001), but major morbidity was similar (3,6 versus 2,2 %, p=0,57). More patients developed long-term complications after GB (43,9 % versus 19 %, p<0,001), and more required reoperations (24,4 % versus 12 %, p=0,001). After RYGBP, reoperations were mainly due to internal hernias (87 %), with no reversal, whereas 18,5 % of the GB patients required band removal. Even including only patients who retained their band, weight loss after RYGBP was better throughout the study period, with 5-year EBMIL of 77,6 % and 61,7 % (p<0,001) after RYGBP and GB respectively. RYGBP was associated with better food tolerance and greater improvement of the lipid profile. Conclusions: GB is associated with a smaller overall operative morbidity and similar major morbidity, but with more long-term complications, more reoperations, a significant number of reversal or conversion procedures, and reduced weight loss when compared with RYGBP. Five-year results of RYGBP are superior to GB and patients should be informed accordingly.

Improved Surgical Technique Reduces Complications at the Gastro-jejunostomy After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is one of the commonest procedure for morbid obesity. It is associated with effective long-term weight loss, but can lead to significant complications, especially at the gastrojejunostomy (GJS) Patients and Methods: All the patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP at one of our two institutions were included in this study, in which we compared two different techniques for the construction of the GJS and their effects on the incidence of complications. In group A, anatomosis was performed on the posterior aspect of the gastric pouch. In group B it was performed across the staple line used to form the gastric pouch. A 21-mm circular stapler was used in all patients. Results: A total of 1128 patients were included between June 1999 and September 2009, 639 in group A and 488 in group B. Sixty patients developed a total of 65 complications at the GJS, with 14 (1,2 %) leaks, 42 (3,7 %) stricture, and 9 (0,8 %) marginal ulcers. Leaks (0,2 versus 2 %, p=0,005) and strictures (0,8 versus 5,9%, p<0,0001) were significantly fewer in group B than in group A. Conclusions: Improved surgical technique, with the GJS across the staple line used to form the gastric pouch, significantly reduces the rate of anastomotic complications at the GJS. A circular 21-mm stapler can be used with a low complication rate, and especially a low stricture rate. Additional methods to limit complications at the GJS are probably not routinely warranted.