Progresión tumoral y búsqueda de nuevas dianas terapéuticas en la familia de tumores del sarcoma de Ewing: función biológica de la caveolina-1

El sarcoma de Ewing es el segundo tumor óseo infantil más frecuente y presenta una alta incidencia de enfermedad metastática. Este tipo de tumores presentan una traslocación génica característica que da origen a una proteína de fusión, normalmente EWS/FLI1. Esta proteína de fusión actúa como factor de transcripción aberrante regulando la expresión de diferentes genes implicados en la iniciación, mantenimiento y progresión del tumor. Nuestro grupo describió como uno de estos genes diana a la caveolina 1 (CAV1) describiendo además su papel determinante en el fenotipo maligno del sarcoma de Ewing, en la tumorigénesis y en la resistencia a apoptosis inducida por quimioterapia. Para investigar el papel concreto de CAV1 en el proceso metastático de este sarcoma, creamos un modelo de baja expresión de CAV1 en líneas celulares de sarcoma de Ewing y determinamos cambios en su capacidad migratoria, invasiva y metastática. En los ensayos in vitro hallamos una menor capacidad migratoria de las células knockdown de CAV1 y una reducción en la expresión de MMP9 y en la actividad de MMP2. La regulación de la actividad de MMP2 parece estar relacionada con la posible regulación que ejerce CAV1 en la función de MT1-MMP, proteína fundamental para la activación de MMP2. Por otro lado, en este estudio proponemos que CAV1 promueve la expresión de MMP9 tanto transcripcionalmente, regulando la vía de señalización ERK1/2, como a nivel post-transcripcional regulando la vía RSK1/rpS6. Además, en los ensayos de metástasis experimental in vivo las células knockdown de CAV1 presentaron una menor incidencia de metástasis pulmonar, hecho que correlacionó con una disminución en la expresión de SPARC, una proteína de adhesión importante en procesos metastáticos. En resumen, nuestros resultados evidencian la importancia de CAV1 en el proceso metastático del sarcoma de Ewing.

Analysis of the antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed by Spanish oral surgeons

Aim: To identify prophylactic antibiotic prescription practices among Spanish dentists with preferential dedication to Oral Surgery in different types of tooth extraction surgeries. Method: Members of the Spanish Oral Surgery Society were surveyed on antibiotic prophylaxis use in 4 different tooth extraction modalities scaled according to their surgical invasiveness. Results: Sixty-nine of the 105 distributed questionnaires were returned completed. Thirteen percent of the surveyed surgeons would prescribe antibiotics to prevent postoperative wound infection when confronted with conventional tooth extraction lasting less than 5 minutes. In the case of surgery lasting more than 5 minutes, the percentage of participants that would prescribe antibiotics increased to 39%. When a mucoperiosteal flap was elevated or an ostectomy was performed, 87% and 100%, respectively, would prescribe antibiotic prophylaxis. Amoxicillin and its combination with clavulanic acid were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. All participants would prescribe the antibiotic orally, starting after surgery and with a duration that ranged from 2-8 days. Conclusions: The results obtained suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing local odontogenic infection is not being correctly implemented in Spain. This can generate new bacterial resistances, facilitate adverse drug reactions and favor opportunistic infections. Better designed studies are needed in order to clarify the role of antibiotics in the prevention of postsurgical wound infection

Analysis of the antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed by Spanish oral surgeons

Aim: To identify prophylactic antibiotic prescription practices among Spanish dentists with preferential dedication to Oral Surgery in different types of tooth extraction surgeries. Method: Members of the Spanish Oral Surgery Society were surveyed on antibiotic prophylaxis use in 4 different tooth extraction modalities scaled according to their surgical invasiveness. Results: Sixty-nine of the 105 distributed questionnaires were returned completed. Thirteen percent of the surveyed surgeons would prescribe antibiotics to prevent postoperative wound infection when confronted with conventional tooth extraction lasting less than 5 minutes. In the case of surgery lasting more than 5 minutes, the percentage of participants that would prescribe antibiotics increased to 39%. When a mucoperiosteal flap was elevated or an ostectomy was performed, 87% and 100%, respectively, would prescribe antibiotic prophylaxis. Amoxicillin and its combination with clavulanic acid were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. All participants would prescribe the antibiotic orally, starting after surgery and with a duration that ranged from 2-8 days. Conclusions: The results obtained suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing local odontogenic infection is not being correctly implemented in Spain. This can generate new bacterial resistances, facilitate adverse drug reactions and favor opportunistic infections. Better designed studies are needed in order to clarify the role of antibiotics in the prevention of postsurgical wound infection