Rendimiento neuropsicológico y anomalías del cuerpo callosoen adolescentes con antecedentes de prematuridad

Existe una clara relación entre prematuridad y un bajo rendimiento cognitivo y escolar. Sin embargo, los efectos concretos del nacimiento prematuro sobre el funcionamiento cognitivo así como sobre el desarrollo cerebral a largo plazo son poco conocidos. Objetivos: Identificar las disfunciones cognitivas concretas en adolescentes que nacieron prematuros mediante una evaluación neuropsicológica exhaustiva, y relacionar los datos cognitivos con la posible afectación del cuerpo calloso. Metodología y Resultados: se comparó dos muestras de sujetos prematuros y sujetos nacidos a término. Se evaluó el rendimiento cognitivo general y específico, y se cuantificó la estructura cerebral del cuerpo calloso. Se realizaron varios análisis estadísticos y se redactaron diversos artículos presentando los resultados obtenidos. Resultados: adolescentes con antecedentes de prematuridad: a) presentan dificultades cognitivas y anormalidades estructurales, más relacionadas con la edad gestacional que con el peso al nacer; b) tienen déficits cognitivos específicos que pueden explicarse parcialmente por sus disfunciones en el rendimiento cognitivo general; c) la media de sus puntuaciones en el CI se sitúa en el rango normal; d) los subtests de las escalas Wechsler no presentan el mismo grado de sensibilidad; e) presentan una reducción de tamaño del cuerpo calloso, f) más acusada en el genu, posterior midbody y splenium; g) existe una asociación específica entre el genu y el menor rendimiento en funciones del lóbulo prefrontal; h) la edad gestacional presenta una clara relación con las anormalidades del cuerpo calloso y con el bajo rendimiento cognitivo general.

Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities

Background: Recent research based on comparisons between bilinguals and monolinguals postulates that bilingualism enhances cognitive control functions, because the parallel activation of languages necessitates control of interference. In a novel approach we investigated two groups of bilinguals, distinguished by their susceptibility to cross-language interference, asking whether bilinguals with strong language control abilities ('non-switchers") have an advantage in executive functions (inhibition of irrelevant information, problem solving, planning efficiency, generative fluency and self-monitoring) compared to those bilinguals showing weaker language control abilities ('switchers"). Methods: 29 late bilinguals (21 women) were evaluated using various cognitive control neuropsychological tests [e.g., Tower of Hanoi, Ruff Figural Fluency Task, Divided Attention, Go/noGo] tapping executive functions as well as four subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The analysis involved t-tests (two independent samples). Non-switchers (n = 16) were distinguished from switchers (n = 13) by their performance observed in a bilingual picture-naming task. Results: The non-switcher group demonstrated a better performance on the Tower of Hanoi and Ruff Figural Fluency task, faster reaction time in a Go/noGo and Divided Attention task, and produced significantly fewer errors in the Tower of Hanoi, Go/noGo, and Divided Attention tasks when compared to the switchers. Non-switchers performed significantly better on two verbal subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Information and Similarity), but not on the Performance subtests (Picture Completion, Block Design). Conclusions: The present results suggest that bilinguals with stronger language control have indeed a cognitive advantage in the administered tests involving executive functions, in particular inhibition, self-monitoring, problem solving, and generative fluency, and in two of the intelligence tests. What remains unclear is the direction of the relationship between executive functions and language control abilities.

Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities

Background: Recent research based on comparisons between bilinguals and monolinguals postulates that bilingualism enhances cognitive control functions, because the parallel activation of languages necessitates control of interference. In a novel approach we investigated two groups of bilinguals, distinguished by their susceptibility to cross-language interference, asking whether bilinguals with strong language control abilities ('non-switchers") have an advantage in executive functions (inhibition of irrelevant information, problem solving, planning efficiency, generative fluency and self-monitoring) compared to those bilinguals showing weaker language control abilities ('switchers"). Methods: 29 late bilinguals (21 women) were evaluated using various cognitive control neuropsychological tests [e.g., Tower of Hanoi, Ruff Figural Fluency Task, Divided Attention, Go/noGo] tapping executive functions as well as four subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The analysis involved t-tests (two independent samples). Non-switchers (n = 16) were distinguished from switchers (n = 13) by their performance observed in a bilingual picture-naming task. Results: The non-switcher group demonstrated a better performance on the Tower of Hanoi and Ruff Figural Fluency task, faster reaction time in a Go/noGo and Divided Attention task, and produced significantly fewer errors in the Tower of Hanoi, Go/noGo, and Divided Attention tasks when compared to the switchers. Non-switchers performed significantly better on two verbal subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Information and Similarity), but not on the Performance subtests (Picture Completion, Block Design). Conclusions: The present results suggest that bilinguals with stronger language control have indeed a cognitive advantage in the administered tests involving executive functions, in particular inhibition, self-monitoring, problem solving, and generative fluency, and in two of the intelligence tests. What remains unclear is the direction of the relationship between executive functions and language control abilities.