Hexaclorobenzè a Sidney : estudi de bioremediació i percepció social

El magatzem de residus de l'empresa Orica de Sidney, Austràlia, és el magatzem d'hexaclorobenzè (HCB) més gran del món. El HCB és un dels compostos més tòxics i persistents que es coneixen, i està inclòs a la llista de la Convenció d'Estocolm sobre contaminants orgànics persistents (POPs). Durant molts anys, Orica ha intentat exportar els seus residus a diversos països d'Europa. Però un tractament alternatiu com la bioremediació podria ser una solució més segura, econòmica i ambientalment responsable.

Mecanismos de control de la aplicación y el cumplimiento de los tratados internacionales en materia ambiental

Investigación elaborada a partir de una estancia en el Center of International Environmental Law (CIEL) de Washington, Estados Unidos, entre los meses de julio y septiembre del 2006. CIEL es una organización no gubernamental sin ánimo de lucro que trabaja utilizando el Derecho Internacional y las instituciones internacionales para proteger el medio ambiente, la salud humana y asegurar una sociedad justa y sostenible. El ámbito de trabajo del CIEL abarca a más de 16 países en 6 continentes. CIEL también pertenece al programa de investigación y formación del American University Washington College of Law. Este programa incluye cursos de Derecho Internacional del Medio Ambiente y Derecho Comparado del medio ambiente. La actividad científica realizada ha consistido en: primer lugar en una investigación, capacitación y apoyo jurídico realizado en el ámbito de la aplicación de la Convención de Estocolmo sobre contaminantes orgánicos persistentes en los países latinoamericanos; y en segundo lugar, en la participación en los varios seminarios relativos a diferentes ámbitos del Derecho Internacional del medio ambiente. Todo ello ha contribuido a dar un impulso definitivo a la tesis doctoral de la becaria.

The CFSP/ESDP, Parliamentary Accountability, and the ´Future of Europe´ Convention debate

This paper examines the importance that the current Convention on the Future of Europe is giving (or not) to the question of democratic accountability in European foreign and defence policy. As all European Union (EU) member states are parliamentary democracies1, and as there is a European Parliament (EP) which also covers CFSP (Common Foreign and Security Policy) and ESDP (European Security and Defence Policy2) matters, I will concentrate on parliamentary accountability rather than democratic accountability more widely defined. Where appropriate, I will also refer to the work of other transnational parliamentary bodies such as the North Atlantic Assembly or NAA (NATO´s Parliamentary Assembly) or the Western European Union (WEU) Parliamentary Assembly3. The article will consist of three sections. First, I will briefly put the question under study within its wider context (section 1). Then, I will examine the current level of parliamentary accountability in CFSP and defence matters (section 2). Finally, I will consider the current Convention debate and assess how much attention is being given to the question of accountability in foreign and defence policies (section 3). This study basically argues that, once again, there is very little interest in an issue that should be considered as vital for the future democratic development of a European foreign and defence policy. It is important to note however that this paper does not cover the wider debate about how to democratise and make the EU more transparent and closer to its citizens. It concentrates on its Second Pillar because its claim is that very little if any attention is being given to this question

Trafficking in Human Beings.THB unit in Stockholm

Our police work against human trafficking started in 2004 on behalf of the government. (Police Department received 300 000 euros which was divided between the three largest cities in Sweden, Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö. Then, each police district had to find out how .THB looked like in their district and how it best could be combated.