Banning Obsolete Weapons or Reshaping Perceptions of Military Utility: Discursive Dynamics in Weapons Prohibitions

The paper focuses on the argumentative process through which new international norms prohibiting the use of weapons causing severe civilian harm emerge. It examines the debate surrounding the use and usefulness of landmines and cluster munitions and traces the process through which NGOs change conceptions of military utility and effectiveness of certain weapons by highlighting their humanitarian problems and questioning their military value. By challenging military thinking on these issues, NGOs redefine the terms of the debate – from a commonplace practice, the use of such weapons becomes controversial and military decisions need to be justified. The argument-counterargument dynamic shifts the burden of proof of the necessity and safety of the weapons to the users. The process witnesses the ability of NGOs to influence debates on military issues despite their disadvantaged position in hard security issue areas. It also challenges realist assumptions that only weapons that are obsolete or low-cost force equalizers for weak actors can be banned. To the contrary, the paper shows that in the case of landmines and cluster munitions, defining the military (in)effectiveness of the weapons is part and parcel of the struggle for their prohibition.

The Quest for Regulating the Global Diamond Trade

Campaign efforts by NGOs initially put conflict diamonds on the global radar screen in the late 1990s. In response, the Kimberley Process (KP), a negotiation forum between states, NGOs, and industry, was formed to discuss possible solutions to curb the trade in conflict diamonds. Less than three years later, a voluntary, global certification named the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) was adopted. The KPCS regulates the trade of rough diamonds by certifying all legitimate diamonds. This paper outlines the problem of conflict diamonds, how a global campaign raised awareness about the issue, and how the process of solution building unfolded in the KP. My analysis focuses on the diverse set of actors (NGOs, states, and industry) and their changing interactions over the course of the campaign and global regulation efforts. I conclude with several key lessons that capture important elements observed in this case study.

Clínica jurídica ambiental

La “Clínica Jurídica Ambiental” constitueix una experiència d’innovació docent desenvolupada en el marc del Màster Oficial en Dret Ambiental i de la Llicenciatura en Dret de la Universitat Rovira i Virgili des del curs 2005-2006. El mètode clínic, que parteix dels principis de la contextualització de l’aprenentatge en escenaris reals, el model de learning by doing i la redefinició dels rols de l’alumne i del professor en el procés d’ensenyament-aprenentatge, és una estratègia que permet a l’alumne una formació integral orientada a la capacitació professional, d’acord amb el canvi de paradigma educatiu que suposa la creació de l’EEES. Es pretén així assolir una millor qualitat dels titulats a partir d’una formació en competències genèriques i específiques assolibles només amb estratègies d’aprenentatge actiu que facilitin l’autonomia i la responsabilització en la construcció del propi aprenentatge. Paral·lelament, la metodologia obliga a establir mecanismes de coordinació entre el professorat de diverses àrees de coneixement jurídiques. Els alumnes treballen en petits grups, durant el curs acadèmic, sobre un cas real subministrat per un client extern (administracions públiques, fiscalia, ONG,s). Els alumnes tenen un tutor intern, professor, i un tutor extern, que pertany a la institució que ha subministrat el cas. El tutor intern avalua de manera contínua i individual el procés d’aprenentatge de l’alumne (60% de la qualificació final); l'extern avalua el resultat final (40 % de la qualificació final), que s’ha de presentar com a treball de grup quan finalitza el curs acadèmic. El finançament atorgat per l’AGAUR, en el marc de la convocatòria MQD 2006, ha permès introduir millores significatives en aquest projecte: la introducció de la figura dels practitioners (advocats en exercici) en l’equip docent; l’organització d’un Seminari Internacional sobre Clinical Legal Education, i la realització de sessions plenàries formatives pels professors i els alumnes de la Clínica.

'Les relacions entre la Unió Europea i els països de la conca del Mediterrani' : Barcelona, 24-28 de novembre de 1995

An Alternative Mediterranean Conference under the auspices of several NGOs frorn several countries of the Mediterranean basin was held in Barcelona from 24th to 26th Novernber 1995. Its purpose was to discuss the relationships arnong the European Union and the eastern and southern shore countries in the Mediterranean basin from a non-official point of view, and to evaluate the project of a Euro-Mediterranean Association which was to be launched by the Intergovernmental Euro-Mediterranean Conference at its meeting in Barcelona on 27th and 28th November. This Serninar was the focus of most discussion at the Alternative Mediterranean Conference

El tiempo libre como dinamizador y/o activador de comunidad/es

El aumento del diálogo con las ONG y los interlocutores sociales y la mejora de la coordinación entre las tres Administraciones es vital para una positiva adecuación entre normativa e intervención real a la hora de atender unas necesidades que aumentan con el actual panorama de crisis económica. No obstante, debe seguir progresándose tanto en la evaluación mediante indicadores conjuntos de la repercusión de estas iniciativas como en el aumento de la participación ciudadana en ellas

Overcoming the ethical dilemmas of skilled migration? An analysis of international narratives on the “brain drain”

Migration-related issues have, since approximately 2000, been the object of increased attention at the international level. This has led, among other things, to the production of international narratives, which aim both at understanding migration and at proposing policy recommendations on how to address it, with the objective of improving the governance of migration at the global level. But this implies overcoming dilemmas stemming from the diverging interests of states and other actors (like NGOs and the private sector). This article examines the way in which international migration narratives address skilled migration, which is characterised by some of the clearest political trade-offs between stakeholders. It argues that these narratives attempt to speak to all parties and conciliate contradictory arguments about what should be done, in order to discursively overcome policy dilemmas and create a consensus. While this is line with the mandate of international organizations, it depoliticises migration issues.

Juventud, políticas públicas y crisis en España: ¿Triángulo mágico o triángulo de las Bermudas?

In times of crisis, the youth policies are experiencing enormous cutbacks and transformations to the point that we are wondering whether they really exist as public policies with their own entity. The situation in which many young people find themselves in Spain leads them to wonder where the traditional protection networks are: The family, the NGO’s or the Welfare State, when they are really needed. Our objective in this article is to show and discuss the situation of the youth policies in Spain in the present context of social austerity and drastic cutbacks. We carry out this analysis from the parameters of the magical triangle that unite policies, research and social work with young people