La forma del crédito al consumo y las sanciones para el caso de contravención

En este artículo se analizará la forma de los contratos de crédito al consumo, con especial atención a la manera en que debe exteriorizarse la declaración de voluntad (por escrito, en otro soporte duradero) y al contenido del contrato (menciones que forman parte de la información contractual). Lo primero es la forma "externa" y lo segundo es la forma "interna" del contrato. La diferenciación entre forma interna y forma externa también sirve para analizar el deber de información precontractual. Los efectos civiles previstos en la ley para el caso de contravención debe tener en cuenta esa distinción. El análisis se centra en la ley española de crédito al consumo, pero otros ordenamientos jurídicos se tomarán igualmente en consideración.

Recolecta : resultados y balance de su actividad 2009

Recolecta sorgeix sota els auspicis de la Fundación para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT) i la Red Bibliotecas Universitarias Española (REBIUN) amb l'objectiu d'impulsar i coordinar la creació d'una infraestructura a nivell nacional de dipòsits digitals interoperables segons estàndards internacionals i actuar com a agència nacional respecte a la infraestructura global de dipòsits digitals científics com a part integrant de l'Espai Europeu de Recerca.Es presentaran els resultats i balanç de la seva activitat 2009 en el marc del Conveni Rebiun / Fecyt 2008-2009.

Interbank liquidity crunch and the firm credit crunch: Evidence from the 2007-2009 crisis

We study the credit supply effects of the unexpected freeze of the Europeaninterbank market, using exhaustive Portuguese loan-level data. We find thatbanks that rely more on interbank borrowing before the crisis decrease theircredit supply more during the crisis. The credit supply reduction is stronger forfirms that are smaller, with weaker banking relationships. Small firms cannotcompensate the credit crunch with other sources of debt. Furthermore, theimpact of illiquidity on the credit crunch is stronger for less solvent banks.Finally, there are no overall positive effects of central bank liquidity, but higherhoarding of liquidity.

Reparar y sustituir cosas en la compraventa : evolución y últimas tendencias

International texts recognise the buyer's right to the repair or replacement if the goods do not conform with the contract, and at the same time, establish exceptions to their application and certain rules of protection for the seller (Art. 46 CISG, Art. 7.2.3 UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Art.9:102 PECL and Arts. 4:202 y 4:204 (1) PEL S). This approach is a result of a compromise between civil law systems and the common law and it has been widely extended to the regulation of consumer sales over the last decade (Art. 3.3 of the Directive 1999/44/CE, Art. III.-3:302 DCFR, Art. 26 of the proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights). These norms regulate the different ways of requiring the fulfilment of a contractual obligation from a new paradigm which has little to do with a need to protect the weak consumer which governed the origins of consumer policy in the European Community. Now the idea of the consumer who shall behave economically efficiently prevails in Art. 3.3 of the Directive 1999/44/CE, a norm which is clearly influenced by the international texts and whose transposing into the national legislation of Member States has created important problems for traditional dogmas. In this sense there are still some unclear issues, such as the possibility of replacing in sales of goods of specific nature or second-hand goods, some aspects on the exercise of repair and replacement, and, even, their use as primary remedies rather than a reduction in price or a rescission of the contract. With regard to this, in England the possibility of offering the consumer free choice between these measures if the goods do not conform with the contract has been raised. This is far from the principle of pacta sunt servanda and is clearly contrary to the economic approach of the proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights. Up to now Spain has limited itself to implementing Art. 3.3 Directive 1999/44/CE into its legal system in almost literal terms and the case law on the issue has completely turned out to be insufficient. By contrast with Germany, the Spanish legislator has not extended the application of the rules of repair and replacement of Directive 1999/44/CE to nonconsumer sales, even though two draft bill proposals along these lines presented by the General Commission for Codifying (“Comisión General de Codificación”), the last one being in January, 2009