Traducción de documentos médicos pertenecientes al NorthShore University Health System

El presente trabajo consiste en la selección, análisis y traducción de 8 documentos con especialidad médica publicados por la institución sanitaria NorthShore University Health System. La elección de esta temática en la elaboración de este proyecto está vinculada al hecho de que en la actualidad trabajo como intérprete con especialidad en medicina para esta organización. Durante el año y medio que llevo en este organismo, he podido observar que existe un gran número de artículos, formularios, folletos informativos, consentimientos quirúrgicos y un largo etcétera que no están traducidos al castellano, cuestión que dificulta enormemente la comunicación, entendimiento y funcionamiento de las relaciones entre los pacientes, familiares y el equipo médico. El NorthShore University Health System tiene un Departamento de Interpretación con 12 intérpretes de castellano en plantilla, 3 intérpretes de ruso, 2 intérpretes de polaco, un intérprete de coreano y un intérprete de árabe. Lamentablemente, el NorthShore no posee un Departamento de Traducción para la traducción de los documentos destinados a los pacientes. El Departamento de Interpretación, bajo la dirección de la supervisora Erika Erdbeer, contrata a una agencia de traducción certificada por la American Translators Association para la traducción de estos documentos. Este proceso supone un alto costo para el Departamento de Interpretación en particular, y para la institución sanitaria en general. De igual modo, el volumen de documentos en necesidad de ser traducidos es sustancialmente más elevado que los recursos económicos disponibles para la traducción de los mismos, y esto supone que no haya presupuesto para traducir muchos de los textos esenciales. En términos generales, esta situación va en detrimento de los derechos e intereses de todos aquellos pacientes que tienen un conocimiento limitado del inglés.A su vez, la labor de los intérpretes se hace muy dificultosa debido al hecho de que en numerosas ocasiones tenemos que realizar traducciones a la vista (sight translate) de una variedad de permisos, formularios, documentos legales, hojas de consentimiento y un largo etcétera que deberían estar traducidos al castellano, y que dada la amplia carga de trabajo que tenemos, no podemos emplear el tiempo necesario para ofrecer al paciente una traducción oral de calidad. Por consiguiente, en un intento por mejorar esta situación, y con el propósito de ofrecer a la comunidad hispanoparlante que acude a esta institución unos servicios de calidad, hemos querido diseñar un proyecto basado en la selección y traducción de los documentos médicos más utilizados por los pacientes hispanoparlantes. Para el proceso de traducción hemos utilizado la herramienta de Traducción Asistida SDL Trados Studio 2009, con la intención de crear una memoria de traducción que pueda ser utilizada en futuros proyectos. Las traducciones realizadas en este trabajo serán publicadas y distribuidas en los pertinentes departamentos del NorthShore. Como paso previo a la publicación de estos documentos, Erika Erdbeer, supervisora del Departamento de Interpretación, enviará las traducciones a la agencia de traducción MetaPhrasis para ser corregidas y revisadas. Por motivos de responsabilidad legal, el NorthShore University Health System tiene la obligación de contratar traductores certificados por la American Translators Association. En la actualidad la autora de este proyecto se encuentra en el proceso de sacar dicha certificación, por lo que será necesario enviar las traducciones para que sean corregidas y revisadas a un traductor/a certificado. Tras la revisión y corrección de los documentos el NorthShore University Health System procederá a la publicación y distribución de los mismos tan pronto lo estime conveniente.

Public health expenditure and spatial interactions in a decentralized national health system

One of the limitations of cross-country health expenditure analysis refers to the fact that the financing, the internal organization and political restraints of health care decision-making are country-specific and heterogeneous. Yet, a potential solution is to examine the influence of such effects in those countries that have undertaken decentralization processes. In such a setting, it is possible to examine potential expenditure spillovers across the geography of a country as well as the influence of the political ideology of regional incumbents on public health expenditure. This paper examines the determinants of public health expenditure within Spanish region-states (Autonomous Communities, ACs), most of them subject to similar financing structures although exhibiting significant heterogeneity as a result of the increasing decentralization, region-specific political factors along with different use of health care inputs, economic dimension and spatial interactions

Public health expenditure and spatial interactions in a decentralized national health system

One of the limitations of cross-country health expenditure analysis refers to the fact that the financing, the internal organization and political restraints of health care decision-making are country-specific and heterogeneous. Yet, a potential solution is to examine the influence of such effects in those countries that have undertaken decentralization processes. In such a setting, it is possible to examine potential expenditure spillovers across the geography of a country as well as the influence of the political ideology of regional incumbents on public health expenditure. This paper examines the determinants of public health expenditure within Spanish region-states (Autonomous Communities, ACs), most of them subject to similar financing structures although exhibiting significant heterogeneity as a result of the increasing decentralization, region-specific political factors along with different use of health care inputs, economic dimension and spatial interactions

Public health expenditure and spatial interactions in a decentralized national health system

One of the limitations of cross-country health expenditure analysis refers to the fact that the financing, the internal organization and political restraints of health care decision-making are country-specific and heterogeneous. Yet, a potential solution is to examine the influence of such effects in those countries that have undertaken decentralization processes. In such a setting, it is possible to examine potential expenditure spillovers across the geography of a country as well as the influence of the political ideology of regional incumbents on public health expenditure. This paper examines the determinants of public health expenditure within Spanish region-states (Autonomous Communities, ACs), most of them subject to similar financing structures although exhibiting significant heterogeneity as a result of the increasing decentralization, region-specific political factors along with different use of health care inputs, economic dimension and spatial interactions

Traducción de documentos médicos pertenecientes al NorthShore University Health System

El presente trabajo consiste en la selección, análisis y traducción de 8 documentos con especialidad médica publicados por la institución sanitaria NorthShore University Health System. La elección de esta temática en la elaboración de este proyecto está vinculada al hecho de que en la actualidad trabajo como intérprete con especialidad en medicina para esta organización. Durante el año y medio que llevo en este organismo, he podido observar que existe un gran número de artículos, formularios, folletos informativos, consentimientos quirúrgicos y un largo etcétera que no están traducidos al castellano, cuestión que dificulta enormemente la comunicación, entendimiento y funcionamiento de las relaciones entre los pacientes, familiares y el equipo médico. El NorthShore University Health System tiene un Departamento de Interpretación con 12 intérpretes de castellano en plantilla, 3 intérpretes de ruso, 2 intérpretes de polaco, un intérprete de coreano y un intérprete de árabe. Lamentablemente, el NorthShore no posee un Departamento de Traducción para la traducción de los documentos destinados a los pacientes. El Departamento de Interpretación, bajo la dirección de la supervisora Erika Erdbeer, contrata a una agencia de traducción certificada por la American Translators Association para la traducción de estos documentos. Este proceso supone un alto costo para el Departamento de Interpretación en particular, y para la institución sanitaria en general. De igual modo, el volumen de documentos en necesidad de ser traducidos es sustancialmente más elevado que los recursos económicos disponibles para la traducción de los mismos, y esto supone que no haya presupuesto para traducir muchos de los textos esenciales. En términos generales, esta situación va en detrimento de los derechos e intereses de todos aquellos pacientes que tienen un conocimiento limitado del inglés.A su vez, la labor de los intérpretes se hace muy dificultosa debido al hecho de que en numerosas ocasiones tenemos que realizar traducciones a la vista (sight translate) de una variedad de permisos, formularios, documentos legales, hojas de consentimiento y un largo etcétera que deberían estar traducidos al castellano, y que dada la amplia carga de trabajo que tenemos, no podemos emplear el tiempo necesario para ofrecer al paciente una traducción oral de calidad. Por consiguiente, en un intento por mejorar esta situación, y con el propósito de ofrecer a la comunidad hispanoparlante que acude a esta institución unos servicios de calidad, hemos querido diseñar un proyecto basado en la selección y traducción de los documentos médicos más utilizados por los pacientes hispanoparlantes. Para el proceso de traducción hemos utilizado la herramienta de Traducción Asistida SDL Trados Studio 2009, con la intención de crear una memoria de traducción que pueda ser utilizada en futuros proyectos. Las traducciones realizadas en este trabajo serán publicadas y distribuidas en los pertinentes departamentos del NorthShore. Como paso previo a la publicación de estos documentos, Erika Erdbeer, supervisora del Departamento de Interpretación, enviará las traducciones a la agencia de traducción MetaPhrasis para ser corregidas y revisadas. Por motivos de responsabilidad legal, el NorthShore University Health System tiene la obligación de contratar traductores certificados por la American Translators Association. En la actualidad la autora de este proyecto se encuentra en el proceso de sacar dicha certificación, por lo que será necesario enviar las traducciones para que sean corregidas y revisadas a un traductor/a certificado. Tras la revisión y corrección de los documentos el NorthShore University Health System procederá a la publicación y distribución de los mismos tan pronto lo estime conveniente.

Diversity and regional inequalities: Assessing the outcomes of the Spanish 'System of Health Care Services'

The consolidation of a universal health system coupled with a process of regionaldevolution characterise the institutional reforms of the National Health System(NHS) in Spain in the last two decades. However, scarce empirical evidence hasbeen reported on the effects of both changes in health inputs, outputs andoutcomes, both at the country and at the regional level. This paper examinesthe empirical evidence on regional diversity, efficiency and inequality ofthese changes in the Spanish NHS using cross-correlation, panel data andexpenditure decomposition analysis. Results suggest that besides significantheterogeneity, once we take into account region-specific needs there is evidenceof efficiency improvements whilst inequalities in inputs and outcomes, althoughmore visible , do not appear to have increased in the last decade. Therefore,the devolution process in the Spanish Health System offers an interesting casefor the experimentation of health reforms related to regional diversity butcompatible with the nature of a public NHS, with no sizeable regionalinequalitiest.

Intermediary and structural determinants of early childhood health in Colombia: exploring the role of communities

This study examines how structural determinants influence intermediary factors of child health inequities and how they operate through the communities where children live. In particular, we explore individual, family and community level characteristics associated with a composite indicator that quantitatively measures intermediary determinants of early childhood health in Colombia. We use data from the 2010 Colombian Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Adopting the conceptual framework of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH), three dimensions related to child health are represented in the index: behavioural factors, psychosocial factors and health system. In order to generate the weight of the variables and take into account the discrete nature of the data, principal component analysis (PCA) using polychoric correlations are employed in the index construction. Weighted multilevel models are used to examine community effects. The results show that the effect of household’s SES is attenuated when community characteristics are included, indicating the importance that the level of community development may have in mediating individual and family characteristics. The findings indicate that there is a significant variance in intermediary determinants of child health between-community, especially for those determinants linked to the health system, even after controlling for individual, family and community characteristics. These results likely reflect that whilst the community context can exert a greater influence on intermediary factors linked directly to health, in the case of psychosocial factors and the parent’s behaviours, the family context can be more important. This underlines the importance of distinguishing between community and family intervention programmes.

Health care management autonomy: Evidence from the Catalonian hospital sector in a decentralised Spain

The organisation of inpatient care provision has undergone significant reform in many southern European countries. Overall across Europe, public management is moving towards the introduction of more flexibility and autonomy . In this setting, the promotion of the further decentralisation of health care provision stands out as a key salient policy option in all countries that have hitherto had a traditionally centralised structure. Yet, the success of the underlying incentives that decentralised structures create relies on the institutional design at the organisational level, especially in respect of achieving efficiency and promoting policy innovation without harming the essential principle of equal access for equal need that grounds National Health Systems (NHS). This paper explores some of the specific organisational developments of decentralisation structures drawing from the Spanish experience, and particularly those in the Catalonia. This experience provides some evidence of the extent to which organisation decentralisation structures that expand levels of autonomy and flexibility lead to organisational innovation while promoting activity and efficiency. In addition to this pure managerial decentralisation process, Spain is of particular interest as a result of the specific regional NHS decentralisation that started in the early 1980 s and was completed in 2002 when all seventeen autonomous communities that make up the country had responsibility for health care services.Already there is some evidence to suggest that this process of decentralisation has been accompanied by a degree of policy innovation and informal regional cooperation. Indeed, the Spanish experience is relevant because both institutional changes took place, namely managerial decentralisation leading to higher flexibility and autonomy- alongside an increasing political decentralisation at the regional level. The coincidence of both processes could potentially explain why some organisation and policy innovation resulting from policy experimentation at the regional level might be an additional featureto take into account when examining the benefits of decentralisation.

Organisational innovations and health care decentralisation: A perspective from Spain

Recent policy developments in public health care systems lead to a greater diversity in health care. Decentralisation, either geographically or at an institutional level, is the key force, because it encourages innovation and local initiatives in health care provision. The devolution of responsibilities allows for a sort of de-construction of the status quo by changing both organizational forms and service provision. The new organizations enjoy greater freedom in the way they pay their staff, and are judged according to their results. These organizations may retain financial surpluses, develop spin-off companies and commission a range of specialised services (such as Diagnostic and Treatment Centres in UK) from providers outside the institutional setting in order to have more access to capital markets. However this diversity may generate a feeling of lack of commitment to a national health service and ultimately a loss of social cohesion. By fiscal decentralisation to regional authorities or planned delegation of financial agreements to the providers, financial incentives are more explicit and may seem to place profit-making above a commitment to better health care. An evaluation of the myths and realities of the decentralization process is needed. Here, I offer an assessment pros and cons of the decentralization process of health care in Spain, drawing on the experience of regional reforms from the pioneering organisational innovations implemented in Catalonia in 1981, up to the observed dispersion of health care spending per capita among regions at present.

The evolution of inequity in the access to health care in Spain: 1987-2001

This paper reports an analysis of the evolution of equity in access to health care in Spain over the period 1987-2001, a time span covering the development of the modern Spanish National Health System. Our measures of access are the probabilities of visiting a doctor, using emergency services and being hospitalised. For these three measures we obtain indices of horizontal inequity from microeconometric models of utilization that exploit the individual information in the Spanish National Health Surveys of 1987 and 2001. We find that by 2001 the system has improved in the sense that differences in income no longer lead to different access given the same level of need. However, the tenure of private health insurance leads to differences in access given the same level of need, and its contribution to inequity has increased over time, both because insurance is more concentrated among the rich and because the elasticity of utilization for the three services has increased too.

Eliciting preferences for collectively financed health programmes : the "willingness to assign" approach

Improving public involvement in health system decision making stands as a primary goal in health systems reform. However, still limited evidence is found on how best to elicit preferences for health care programs. This paper examines a contingent choice technique to elicit preferences among health programs so called, willingness to assign (WTAS): Moreover, we elicited contingents rankings as well as the willingness to pay extra taxes for comparative purposes. We argue that WTAS reveals relative ( monetary-based) values of a set of competing public programmes under a hypothetical healthcare budget assessment. Experimental evidence is reported from a delibertive empirical study valuing ten health programmes in the context of the Catalan Health Services. Evidence from a our experimental study reveals that perferences are internally more consistent and slightly less affected by "preference reversals" as compared to values revealed from the willingness to pay (WTP) extra taxes approach. Consistent with prior studies, we find that the deliberative approach helped to avoid possible misunderstandings. Interestingly, although programmes promoting health received the higher relative valuation, those promoting other health benefits also ranked highly

Eliciting preferences for collectively financed health programmes : the "willingness to assign" approach

Improving public involvement in health system decision making stands as a primary goal in health systems reform. However, still limited evidence is found on how best to elicit preferences for health care programs. This paper examines a contingent choice technique to elicit preferences among health programs so called, willingness to assign (WTAS): Moreover, we elicited contingents rankings as well as the willingness to pay extra taxes for comparative purposes. We argue that WTAS reveals relative ( monetary-based) values of a set of competing public programmes under a hypothetical healthcare budget assessment. Experimental evidence is reported from a delibertive empirical study valuing ten health programmes in the context of the Catalan Health Services. Evidence from a our experimental study reveals that perferences are internally more consistent and slightly less affected by "preference reversals" as compared to values revealed from the willingness to pay (WTP) extra taxes approach. Consistent with prior studies, we find that the deliberative approach helped to avoid possible misunderstandings. Interestingly, although programmes promoting health received the higher relative valuation, those promoting other health benefits also ranked highly

E-Health and Society : An Empirical Study of Catalonia. Research report (synthesis document)

Aquest estudi va analitzar la interacció del canvi organitzatiu, els valors culturals i el canvi tecnològic en el sistema sanitari català. L'estudi se subdivideix en cinc parts diferents. La primera és una anàlisi de contingut de webs relacionats amb la salut a Catalunya. La segona és un estudi dels usos d'Internet en qüestions relacionades amb la salut entre la població en general, les associacions de pacients i els professionals de la salut, i es basa en un sondeig per Internet adaptat a cada un d'aquests grups. La tercera part és un estudi de treball de camp dels programes experimentals duts a terme pel Govern català en diverses àrees i hospitals locals per a integrar electrònicament la història clínica dels pacients. La quarta és un estudi de les implicacions organitzatives de la introducció de sistemes d'informació en la gestió d'hospitals i centres d'assistència primària a l'Institut Català de Salut, el principal proveïdor de salut pública a Catalunya, i es basa en un sondeig per Internet i entrevistes en profunditat. La cinquena part és un estudi de cas dels efectes organitzatius i socials de la introducció de les tecnologies de la informació i la comunicació en un dels principals hospitals de Catalunya, l'Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. L'estudi es va dur a terme entre el maig del 2005 i el juliol del 2007.

Economic evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding in Spain

To compare the cost and effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) versus combined oral contraception (COC) and progestogens (PROG) in first-line treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in Spain. STUDY DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of LNG-IUS, COC and PROG was carried out using a Markov model based on clinical data from the literature and expert opinion. The population studied were women with a previous diagnosis of idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding. The analysis was performed from the National Health System perspective, discounting both costs and future effects at 3%. In addition, a sensitivity analysis (univariate and probabilistic) was conducted. RESULTS: The results show that the greater efficacy of LNG-IUS translates into a gain of 1.92 and 3.89 symptom-free months (SFM) after six months of treatment versus COC and PROG, respectively (which represents an increase of 33% and 60% of symptom-free time). Regarding costs, LNG-IUS produces savings of 174.2-309.95 and 230.54-577.61 versus COC and PROG, respectively, after 6 months-5 years. Apart from cost savings and gains in SFM, quality-adjusted life months (QALM) are also favourable to LNG-IUS in all scenarios, with a range of gains between 1 and 2 QALM compared to COC and PROG. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that first-line use of the LNG-IUS is the dominant therapeutic option (less costly and more effective) in comparison with first-line use of COC or PROG for the treatment of DUB in Spain. LNG-IUS as first line is also the option that provides greatest health-related quality of life to patients.

Comparison of the consumption of antidepressants in the immigrant and native populations in a Spanish health region: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Health professionals and organizations in developed countries adapt slowly to the increase of ethnically diverse populations attending health care centres. Several studies report that attention to immigrant mental health comes up with barriers in access, diagnosis and therapeutics, threatening equity. This study analyzes differences in exposure to antidepressant drugs between the immigrant and the native population of a Spanish health region. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the dispensation of antidepressant drugs to the population aged 15 years or older attending the public primary health centres of a health region, 232,717 autochthonous and 33,361 immigrants, during 2008. Data were obtained from computerized medical records and pharmaceutical records of medications dispensed in pharmacies. Age, sex, country of origin, visits, date of entry in the regional health system, generic drugs and active ingredients were considered. Statistical analysis expressed the percentage of persons exposed to antidepressants stratified by age, gender, and country of origin and prevalence ratios of antidepressant exposition were calculated. RESULTS: Antidepressants were dispensed to 11% of native population and 2.6% of immigrants. Depending on age, native women were prescribed antidepressants between 1.9 and 2.7 times more than immigrant women, and native men 2.5 and 3.1 times more than their immigrant counterparts. Among immigrant females, the highest rate was found in the Latin Americans (6.6%) and the lowest in the sub-Saharans (1.4%). Among males, the highest use was also found in the Latin Americans (1.6%) and the lowest in the sub-Saharans (0.7%). The percentage of immigrants prescribed antidepressants increased significantly in relation to the number of years registered with the local health system. Significant differences were found for the new antidepressants, prescribed 8% more in the native population than in immigrants, both in men and in women. CONCLUSIONS: All the immigrants, regardless of the country of origin, had lower antidepressant consumption than the native population of the same age and sex. Latin American women presented the highest levels of consumption, and the sub-Saharan men the lowest. The prescription profiles also differed, since immigrants consumed more generics and fewer recently commercialized active ingredients.