12 resultados para Meri, Lennart
em Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain
Resumo:
Resum: Se trata de una aproximación a la obra del filósofo norteamericano Stanley Cavell, desde dos puntos de vista diferentes:el de la filosofía de cotidiana y el de la teoría estética, para sugerir su obra como germen de una posible teoría de la argumentación política y una aportación al proyecto de reconstrucción de una racionalidad crítica ampliada. Resum: Es tracta d'una aproximació inicial a l'obra del filòsof nord-americà Stanley Cavell, des de dos punts de vista diferents: la filosofia del llenguatge quotidià i la teoria estètica, per a suggerir la seva obra com à germen d'una possible teoria de l'argumentació política i una aportació al projecte de reconstrucció d'una racionalitat crítica ampliada
Resumo:
Tres personajes, tres cuerpos liminales, periféricos, nómades cuya lucha es comprender su corporeidad y poder narrarse conforme a sus deseos. Sin discurso propio, sin nombre, sin memoria, son cuerpos hechos de reflejos, de construcciones realizadas por el otro; cuerpos resistentes que se des-construyen en cada página para poder encontrar un punto, aunque sea uno solo, que las mantenga a flote. Tres cuerpos, tres mujeres que escarban en la llaga de un mapa creado por discursos ajenos, por miradas panópticas que las excluyen de la posibilidad de ser legítimamente cuerpos narrados y leídos por ellas mismas. Tres cuerpos fronterizos, nómades; tres cuerpos cyborg.
Resumo:
El trabajo Espejo, cuerpo e identidad en Ifigenia (Teresa de la Parra, Caracas, 1924) plantea el tema del espejo como afianzador de la identidad del personaje principal de la novela Ifigenia, María Eugenia Alonso. A través del espejo la autora configura a su personaje principal y todo el entramado de acontecimientos en la novela. El espejo permite a la heroína darse un cuerpo y construirse a su antojo a través del ritual del arreglo. Cada mirada al espejo se convierte en el despliegue de una puerta o umbral que atrae y que a su entrada le permitirá al personaje conectar con una nueva identidad.
Resumo:
S’hi tracten els vincles entre l’obra de Maria Aurèlia Capmany i les tesis formulades per l’existencialisme, sobretot l’existencialisme francès, perquè és el que més la influeix; per adonar-nos que tot al llarg de la producció capmaniana, d’una manera o altra, aquests vincles es manifesten. El compromís i la responsabilitat existencialistes, planaran per les obres capmanianes, com a fórmula per fugir del caos propi del moment en què viu l’autora: la postguerra, el franquisme… Capmany hi trobarà la fórmula per mantenir l’esperança i pensar en un futur millor, tant individualment com en el cas del feminisme i de la causa nacional.
Resumo:
El videoclip, al unir imagen y música, se presenta como un producto audiovisual de éxito, capaz de movilizar cuerpos, miradas, gestos en una gozosa y prolífica fruición. El encuentro del videoclip y del cuerpo en esta investigación, además de marcar las influencias mutuas de ambos “cuerpos”, se interesa por la potencia del medio “clíptico” en la producción de nuevas corporeidades y de nuevas narrativas
Resumo:
Esta investigación pretende hacer un pequeño recorrido por el espacio simbólico de la femina virilis. Se intenta destacar cuáles son sus orígenes, qué tipos de femina virilis hubo, sus exigencias y consecuencias, por ocupar este espacio de tránsito en hombre-mujer. A continuación, se intenta mostrar cómo utilizaron el cuerpo para escribir experiencia y, de qué manera algunas de ellas, se sirvieron del travestismo como recurso para subvertir su situación, en un cuerpo sexuado de mujer.
Resumo:
El proyecto, desarrollado bajo los auspicios del grupo Cos i Textualitat, aborda las relaciones entre las categorías de sujeto poético y sujeto epistolar, en la literatura romántica escrita por mujeres, que abarca corpus textuales del siglo XIX y principios del siglo XX. Haciendo uso de las herramientas del comparatismo, de la teoría de la literatura y de los estudios de género y sexualidad, el proyecto en una primera instancia se detuvo a estudiar la obra de aquellas escritoras (en el ámbito de la literatura norteamericana, española e hispanomericana) que desarrollaron e impulsaron el subgénero de la cartapoema, y cómo dicho subgénero les permitía velar su espacio íntimo, enmascarar su identidad literaria y social, al tiempo que obtenían legitimación social en esta estrategia de escritura. De este modo, el proyecto insiste en las estrategias de lectura de este tipo de textos, marginados por la crítica literaria, y de un tratamiento clasificatorio ciertamente ambiguo, y al mismo tiempo contaminado por la lectura autobiográfica de los textos. Cabe destacar que el punto de partida de este proceso de investigación fue la obra de la escritora norteamericana Emily Dickinson (1830-1886), pero se extendió con posterioridad desde autoras del romanticismo hispanoamericano, incluso hasta llegar a autoras españolas que escapan al movimiento romántico, bien entrado ya el siglo XX.
Resumo:
El projecte de recerca que s’ha dut a terme els darrers tres anys consisteix en una reflexió teòrica al voltant de l’autoria literària, fent especial èmfasi en les implicacions de gènere dels processos de legitimació literària i les posicions autorials que se’n deriven. Clarice Lispector en tant que nom d’autor sota el qual s’agrupa no només un corpus literari sinó tots aquells textos que construeixen un cos d’autora, constitueix l’objecte d’anàlisi a partir del qual es posa en joc la reflexió teòrica esmentada. Per a dur-lo a terme, es realitza un anàlisi de la producció autogràfica de l'autora i de tots aquells discursos que contribueixen a la construció del seu personatge: els discurso acadèmics, biogràfics i mediàtics; els materials fotogràfics i audiovisuals; les recreacions del personatge des de diversos llenguatges artístics (literari, teatral i cinematogràfic), etc.
Resumo:
Background: Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last twenty years however still considerable variation exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of cancer care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012 the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about colon and rectum was held looking for multidisciplinary consensus. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries. Methods: The expert panel had delegates of the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Pathology (ESP), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Radiology (ESR), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and the European Colorectal Cancer Patient Organisation (EuropaColon), as well as delegates from national registries or audits. Experts commented and voted on the two web-based online voting rounds before the meeting (between 4th and 25th October and between the 20th November and 3rd December 2012) as well as one online round after the meeting (4th20th March 2013) and were invited to lecture on the subjects during the meeting (13th15th December 2012). The sentences in the consensus document were available during the meeting and a televoting round during the conference by all participants was performed. All sentences that were voted on are available on the EURECCA website www.canceraudit.eu. The consensus document was divided in sections describing evidence based algorithms of diagnostics, pathology, surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy, and follow-up where applicable for treatment of colon cancer, rectal cancer and stage IV separately. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. Results: The total number of the voted sentences was 465. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the experts. Of the 465 sentences, 84% achieved large consensus, 6% achieved moderate consensus, and 7% resulted in minimum consensus. Only 3% was disagreed by more than 50% of the members. Conclusions: It is feasible to achieve European Consensus on key diagnostic and treatment issues using the Delphi method. This consensus embodies the expertise of professionals from all disciplines involved in the care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms were developed to implement the current evidence and to define core treatment guidance for multidisciplinary team management of colon and rectal cancer throughout Europe.
Resumo:
Background: Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last twenty years however still considerable variation exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of cancer care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012 the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about colon and rectum was held looking for multidisciplinary consensus. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries. Methods: The expert panel had delegates of the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Pathology (ESP), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Radiology (ESR), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and the European Colorectal Cancer Patient Organisation (EuropaColon), as well as delegates from national registries or audits. Experts commented and voted on the two web-based online voting rounds before the meeting (between 4th and 25th October and between the 20th November and 3rd December 2012) as well as one online round after the meeting (4th-20th March 2013) and were invited to lecture on the subjects during the meeting (13th-15th December 2012). The sentences in the consensus document were available during the meeting and a televoting round during the conference by all participants was performed. All sentences that were voted on are available on the EURECCA website www.canceraudit.eu. The consensus document was divided in sections describing evidence based algorithms of diagnostics, pathology, surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy, and follow-up where applicable for treatment of colon cancer, rectal cancer and stage IV separately. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. Results: The total number of the voted sentences was 465. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the experts. Of the 465 sentences, 84% achieved large consensus, 6% achieved moderate consensus, and 7% resulted in minimum consensus. Only 3% was disagreed by more than 50% of the members. Conclusions: It is feasible to achieve European Consensus on key diagnostic and treatment issues using the Delphi method. This consensus embodies the expertise of professionals from all disciplines involved in the care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms were developed to implement the current evidence and to define core treatment guidance for multidisciplinary team management of colon and rectal cancer throughout Europe.
Resumo:
Irrigated agriculture has come under close scrutiny in Europe recently because of its high share of total water consumption and its apparent inefficiency. Several water policies have been advocated, in particular the use of economic instruments such as water markets. This paper simulates the impact of a policy based upon water markets on agricultural production in the internal river basins of Catalonia (Spain). This zone presents certain particularities that make it very interesting to study: competition between sectors for the resource (agriculture-urban consumption-recreational uses), recent periods of resource insufficiency and conflicts between irrigators as a result of the measures taken by the hydraulic administration in drought situations. The results show that these markets would guarantee an optimal reassignment of the resource in situations of supply restrictions, and although compared to the situation without markets they would not mean higher economic profits for the irrigators, they could prevent conflicts between them. Nevertheless, doubts exist about their acceptance by irrigators