La Docencia Universitaria : su saber pedagógico desde distintas áreas del conocimiento : un estudio de casos con docentes de la Universidad de Barcelona

La formación investigadora en las distintas áreas del conocimiento es una desafío, una responsabilidad y una proyección para aquellas sociedades que busquen el desarrollo equilibrado y sostenible para el conjunto de sus ciudadanos. La investigación y la construcción del conociminento en los distintos campos del saber es el motor de cualquier región, o país. La memoria que aquí se expone refleja por un lado el proceso de formación de una investigadora novel en el área educativa, en el marco del programa de doctorado "“Diversidad y Cambio en Educació: Políticas y Prácticas" del Departamento de Didáctica y Organización Educativa, de la Universidad de Barcelona. Específicamente el área de investigación es la docencia universitaria y la consturcción de su conocimiento. A través de ella se revelan los distintos engranajes que van conformando el proceso formación. Además, por otro lado se presentan los puntos más relevantes del proyecto y del proceso de investigación, denominado "La Docencia Universitaria: su saber pedagógico desde distintas áreas del conocimiento. Un estudio de casos con docentes de la Universidad de Barcelona.

Histórias de Vida em Educação: A Construção do Conhecimento a partir de Histórias de Vida

[spa] Esta publicación recoge los trabajos presentados en las III Jornadas de Historias de Vida en Educación – La construcción del conocimiento a partir de las historias de vida, celebradas en la Facultad de Psicología y Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Porto en los días 8 y 9 de noviembre 2012, y organizadas por el Centro de Investigación e Intervención Educativas.En las diferentes contribuciones se profundiza la reflexión sobre el uso de las historias de vida en educación como proceso de investigación y de construcción de conocimiento insustituible, específico y pertinente para la formación y mejora de los docentes y los investigadores y para explorar relaciones y procedimientos particulares derivados de cada ejemplo presentadoEsta publicación ofrece un retrato del debate que tuvo lugar en la Universidad de Porto y da muestras de la vitalidad de esa comunidad que integra docentes e investigadores universitarios y estudiantes de master y doctorado de España, Portugal, México, Chile, Suiza, Argentina y Brasil.

Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education. How a dialogic space is created for thinking together

This paper explores how wikis may be used to support primary education students’ collaborative interaction and how such an interaction process can be characterised. The overall aim of this study is to analyse the collaborative processes of students working together in a wiki environment, in order to see how primary students can actively create a shared context for learning in the wiki. Educational literature has already reported that wikis may support collaborative knowledge-construction processes, but in our study we claim that a dialogic perspective is needed to accomplish this. Students must develop an intersubjective orientation towards each others’ perspectives, to co-construct knowledge about a topic. For this purpose, our project utilised a ‘Thinking Together’ approach to help students develop an intersubjective orientation towards one another and to support the creation of a ‘dialogic space’ to co-construct new understanding in a wiki science project. The students’ asynchronous interaction process in a primary classroom -- which led to the creation of a science text in the wiki -- was analysed and characterised, using a dialogic approach to the study of CSCL practices. Our results illustrate how the Thinking Together approach became embedded within the wiki environment and in the students’ collaborative processes. We argue that a dialogic approach for examining interaction can be used to help design more effective pedagogic approaches related to the use of wikis in education and to equip learners with the competences they need to participate in the global knowledge-construction era.

eKnowledge Project: Developing and piloting a forum tool to support the collaborative construction of knowledge on the UOC's Virtual Campus

Final report of the eKnowledge's project, an online forum tool that offers consultants and students the chance to create spaces for asynchronous communication and collaboration.

The construction process of pedagogical knowledge among nursing professors

Didactic knowledge about contents is constructed through an idiosyncratic synthesis between knowledge about the subject area, students' general pedagogical knowledge and the teacher's biography. This study aimed to understand the construction process and the sources of Pedagogical Content Knowledge, as well as to analyze its manifestations and variations in interactive teaching by teachers whom the students considered competent. Data collection involved teachers from an undergraduate nursing program in the South of Brazil, through non-participant observation and semistructured interviews. Data analysis was submitted to the constant comparison method. The results disclose the need for initial education to cover pedagogical aspects for nurses; to assume permanent education as fundamental in view of the complexity of contents and teaching; to use mentoring/monitoring and the value learning with experienced teachers with a view to the development of quality teaching.

Embodying feminist research: learning from action research, political practices, diffractions and collective knowledge.

In the past three decades, feminists and critical theorists have discussed and argued the importance of deconstructing and problematizing social science research methodology in order to question normalized hierarchies concerning the production of knowledge and the status of truth claims. Nevertheless, often, these ideas have basically remained theoretical propositions not embodied in research practices. In fact there is very little published discussion about the difficulties and limits of their practical application. In this paper we introduce some interconnected reflections starting from two different but related experiences of embodying 'feminist activist research'. Our aim is to emphasise the importance of attending to process, making mistakes and learning during fieldwork, as well as experimenting with personalized forms of analysis, such as the construction of narratives and the story-telling process.

Embodying feminist research: learning from action research, political practices, diffractions and collective knowledge.

In the past three decades, feminists and critical theorists have discussed and argued the importance of deconstructing and problematizing social science research methodology in order to question normalized hierarchies concerning the production of knowledge and the status of truth claims. Nevertheless, often, these ideas have basically remained theoretical propositions not embodied in research practices. In fact there is very little published discussion about the difficulties and limits of their practical application. In this paper we introduce some interconnected reflections starting from two different but related experiences of embodying 'feminist activist research'. Our aim is to emphasise the importance of attending to process, making mistakes and learning during fieldwork, as well as experimenting with personalized forms of analysis, such as the construction of narratives and the story-telling process.

Analysing knowledge building: usages, achievements and limits of forums at university

This paper aims to explore asynchronous communication in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Thirty virtual forums are analysed in both a quantitative and a qualitative way. Quantitatively, the number of messages written, message threads and original and answer messages are counted. Qualitatively, the content of the notes is analysed, cataloguing these into two different levels: on the one hand, as a set of knowledge building process categories, and on the other hand, following the scaffolds that Knowledge Forum offers. The results show that both an exchange of information and a collaborative work take place. Nevertheless, the construction of knowledge is superficial.